Cryolipolysis: patient selection and special considerations

Non-invasive Body Contouring Technologies: An Updated Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

Nowadays, a lot of body contouring devices and methods are introduced all over the world. The object of the present narrative review was to update and classify existing evidence on these methods and devices.

METHODS

We searched databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar for 11 essential keywords, including cryolipolysis, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), shock wave, low-level laser therapy (LLLT), radiofrequency (RF), capacitive resistive electrical transfer (TECAR), high-intensity focused electromagnetic (HIFEM), electromyostimulation (EMS), carboxytherapy, mesotherapy, and acupuncture and their abbreviations, in addition to obesity, overweight, cellulite, subcutaneous fat, and body contouring.

RESULTS

Totally 193 references were used in 11 main topics.

CONCLUSION

In order to help physicians with finding the best evidence in different methods, the data were summarised in 11 topics. Furthermore, FDA-approved devices, side effects and common protocols were described in each section.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

This journal requires that authors 39 assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full 40 description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, 41 please refer to the Table of Contents or the online 42 Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Assessment of the Efficacy of Cryolipolysis on Abdominal Fat Deposits: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Cryolipolysis is a non-invasive and efficacious procedure for body contouring. The effectiveness of cryolipolysis has been demonstrated on multiple areas of the body, but on a limited number of subjects. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the effectiveness and the safety of cryolipolysis in the lower abdomen adipose tissue thickness reduction.

METHODS

A prospective study on 60 healthy women was carried out using CryoSlim Hybrid device. Each patient underwent two cryolipolysis sessions centered on the abdominal area. The primary endpoint was to decrease the thickness of the abdominal fat deposits. The change in the abdominal circumference and the thickness of the subcutaneous fat layer were assessed. Patient satisfaction and tolerance of the procedure were also taken into account.

RESULTS

A significant reduction of the abdominal circumference and subcutaneous fat layer thickness was observed. The mean decrease in abdominal circumference was 2.10 cm (3.1%) 3 months after the procedure and 4.03 cm (5.8%) 6 months after the procedure. The mean decrease in fat layer thickness was 1.25 cm (43.81%) 3 months after the procedure and 1.61 cm (41.73%) 6 months after the procedure. No major adverse events were noted. All patients were very satisfied, and minimal pain was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Cryolipolysis is an effective technique to treat abdominal localized fat deposits. No major adverse events have been described for this procedure. Our promising results should encourage further studies aimed at optimizing the efficacy of the procedure without a considerable increase in the risks.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266 .

Cryolipolysis for fat reduction using Cooltech® Define technology: A large-sample retrospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

Cryolipolysis is a noninvasive technique for localized fat reduction, which induces selective apoptosis of the adipocytes using controlled exposure to intense cold. During the past 10 years, this technique has been shown to be safe and effective and its application has significantly increased. In this context, Cooltech® devices have been widely used around the world.

AIMS

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the removal of localized fatty tissue in different body areas using the new Cooltech® Define controlled cooling system.

METHODS

This single-center study was carried out on 287 patients, both female and male, treated with Cooltech® Define on different body areas for a total of 1118 procedures. Follow-up evaluations were conducted to estimate efficacy and safety. Efficacy was evaluated through plicometry and photographs. Side effects were also reported.

RESULTS

Fold thickness showed a significant reduction (-69.91 ± 12.55%) after cryolipolysis treatment (fold thickness before: 35.33 ± 8.41 mm; fold thickness after: 10.69 ± 5.27 mm). Few side effects were reported, they included posttreatment pain (1.70%) and one case of paradoxical adipose hyperplasia (0.09%).

CONCLUSION

The Cooltech® Define cryolipolysis device is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated nonsurgical procedure for reducing localized fat.

Cryolipolysis: The future of cryolipolysis

BACKGROUND

Cryolipolysis has revolutionized the field of cosmetic dermatology as a nonsurgical procedure, utilizing controlled cooling to selectively destroy fat cells.

AIMS AND METHODS

This review article will focus on the future prospects of cryolipolysis, considering advancements in current technology as well as innovations that hold promise for the future. We will explore emerging trends in cryolipolysis, considering novel applicator designs, combination therapies, an innovative injectable treatment approach, and the evolving role of this technology in the field of cosmetic dermatology.

CONCLUSION

The future holds promise for advances in cryolipolysis using both the noninvasive topical cooling approach and the novel injectable ice-slurry technology.

Structural design optimization and lipolytic effect prediction of vacuum suction cryolipolysis applicator: Simulation study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Cryolipolysis is a popular noninvasive lipolytic method that uses low temperature to induce apoptosis or necrosis of adipocytes to reduce local fat in the human body. Vacuum suction applicator is a commonly used cryolipolysis equipment, which suction human skin and fat into a chamber for cooling. The structure of vacuum suction applicator is usually irregular, its cooling characteristic is also complex, and unreasonable suction structure will cause human discomfort. Biological experiments and clinical studies are often used to study the structural design of applicators, whereas these methods are impossible to obtain the three-dimensional cooling characteristic of applicator comprehensively and require a lot of costs. This study aims to optimize the structure of applicator for lowering discomfort, evaluate the cooling characteristic and lipolytic effect of applicators, which could provide guidance for clinical application of applicators and reduce costs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cryolipolysis applicators models with four vacuum suction angles were established, and COMSOL was used to compare the cooling performance parameters, cooling kinetics, and lipolytic effects of the applicators. Specific evaluation indicators also include: cooling capacity analysis, temperature field analysis, lipolytic percentage, lipolytic volume, lipolytic weight, lipolytic thickness, lipolytic waistline, and lipolysis temperature threshold analysis.

RESULTS

The applicator with a small suction angle has a greater cooling capacity to cool deeper level of fat. When the cooling temperature is -10°C, the temperature of skin layer is about -10°C at 60 minutes, the temperature of fat layer is -7.36 to 3.01°C at 10 mm, -3.67 to 5.91°C at 20 mm and 2.01-10.81°C at 30 mm. The percentage of lipolytic declined with the increase of suction angle, the final lipolytic percentage (35.81%) of the 90° applicator is the highest, the percentage (28.72%) of 150° applicator (28.72%) is the lowest. The lipolytic volume, weight, and average thickness of applicator constantly increased with the increase of the suction angle, the final lipolytic volume range of the four suction angle applicators is 171.88-310.18 cm³ , the lipolytic weight range is 160.11-288.93 g, and the lipolytic average thickness range is 1.21-1.36 cm. Lower lipolysis temperature threshold will reduce the lipolysis effect, but it may also lead to another lipolysis mechanism-cell necrosis.

CONCLUSION

Different suction angles significantly affect the cooling characteristics and lipolytic effects of cryolipolysis applicator. A reasonable suction angle is one of the critical factors to improve the efficiency and comfort of cryolipolysis.

Global Expert Opinion on Cryolipolysis Treatment Recommendations and Considerations: A Modified Delphi Study

Background

Cryolipolysis is an increasingly popular nonsurgical fat-reduction procedure. Published treatment guidance and adverse event (AE) management protocols are limited.

Objective

A modified Delphi study aimed to establish global expert consensus on the use of CoolSculpting (Allergan Aesthetics, an AbbVie Company, Irvine, CA), a noninvasive cryolipolysis treatment system.

Methods

A literature search informed survey topics for an 11-expert Delphi panel. Panelists completed an online 39-question survey. An interim panel discussion, with open-ended questions and yes/no voting, informed a second survey containing 61 statements, for which panelists rated agreement using a 5-point Likert scale. Topics included treatment outcome and responder definitions, patient evaluation and selection, treatment protocols, patient satisfaction, and AEs.

Results

Panelists achieved consensus on 38 final guidelines and recommendations. They reached moderate to complete consensus on 4 statements on defining responders (ie, patients with a range of visible improvement) and 6 statements on patient factors contributing to treatment outcomes (eg, how well the applicator conforms to patient body region). Panelists defined minimum numbers of treatment cycles to achieve visible clinical outcomes for 12 body regions, with moderate to complete consensus on 31 statements. They achieved a strong to complete consensus on 7 statements about patient satisfaction (eg, importance of patient expectations, visible improvement, and before-and-after photographs). Panelists defined management strategies for AEs, with moderate to complete consensus on 15 statements.

Conclusions

A modified Delphi process yielded multiple guideline recommendations for cryolipolysis, providing a needed resource for the broad range of clinicians who perform this noninvasive fat-reduction procedure.

Level of Evidence 5

Cryolipolysis Does not Modify the Behavior and Recovery of Cardiac Autonomic Modulation

The desire to reduce and remodel undesirable fatty deposits has increased the popularity and use of aesthetic procedures, among them, cryolipolysis. However, repercussions on the autonomic nervous system must be considered, since the decrease in cutaneous body temperature can have repercussions on sympathetic and parasympathetic components. The aim was to evaluate the behavior of cardiac autonomic modulation during and after a single application of cryolipolysis. A single-arm, prospective interventional study evaluated data from 13 women with a mean age of 22.38 ± 2.95 years, who had an accumulation of abdominal fat of at least 1.5 mm, were using oral contraceptives, and were sedentary. A professional applied cryolipolysis in a single 40-min session. RR intervals were collected by means of a cardiofrequency meter, at rest prior to the technique for 10 min, during the performance of the technique, and immediately after the end of the technique for a period of 50 min. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis was performed using time, frequency, and Poincaré plot indices. For the mean RR, SDNN, rMSSD, SD1, SD2, and LF [ms²] indices, the values increased during the execution of cryolipolysis when compared to rest. In the recovery period, increases in the mean values of the RR, SDNN, rMSSD, SD1, SD2, HF [ms²], LF [nu], and HF [nu] indices were also observed when compared to the baseline moment. Both during the technique and in the recovery period, there were changes in the behavior of HRV characterized by an increase in global and vagal indices. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Effects of Ultracavitation and Radiofrequency on Abdominal Adiposity

BACKGROUND

The mechanism of fat reduction from radiofrequency occurs via the thermal stimulation of adipocyte metabolism, causing a lipase-mediated triglyceride enzyme degradation, apoptosis, and adipocyte rupture. Ultracavitation promotes fat reduction using adipose cell destruction through mechanical stimulus. The literature on the combination of these two physical agents, named ultrafrequency, is still scarce and requires consistent analysis of the effects of this therapy combination.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of radiofrequency associated with ultracavitation in the treatment of abdominal subcutaneous tissue of women.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized clinical trial in which 45 participants were divided into three distinct groups: the control group (no treatment); ultracavitation group; and ultracavitation and radiofrequency (UCV+RF) group, each with 15 volunteers. The following variables were evaluated: weight, perimetry, plicometry, ultrasonography, treatment reactions, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

The participants in the UCV+RF group presented a more significant decrease in adipose tissue, which was verified through all the evaluation methods.

CONCLUSION

Based on our results, the simultaneous application of ultracavitation and radiofrequency generated a reduction in localized adiposity superior to the isolated use of ultracavitation.

Significant improvement in body contour with multiple cycles of CoolSculpting: Results of a prospective study

Cryolipolysis is a nonsurgical body sculpting technique that uses controlled cooling for localized fat reduction. The aim of the present study was to assess whether an intensive regimen of CoolSculpting based on multiple cycles/sessions on the same body area(s) could yield greater (more clinically significant) improvements in body contour. This was a prospective analysis of consecutive, healthy, adult patients undergoing CoolSculpting in routine practice across a variety of treatment areas. Patients underwent ≤4 cycles of CoolSculpting per body area during an initial treatment session, and ≤4 further cycles 4 weeks later (if required). They were followed up for ≥12 weeks. Twenty‐eight patients were enrolled (n = 26 female; mean age: 51.6 ± 9.0 years; mean body weight: 69.4 ± 13.7 kg). They were treated across 58 body areas: 48 in a single session; 10 across two sessions. The mean number of cycles per area was 2.8 ± 1.5. Twenty‐seven patients (54 body areas) were considered as treatment “responders.” In these individuals, mean skinfold thickness decreased from 35.4 ± 9.9 mm pretreatment to 22.2 ± 7.6 mm at 12 weeks (mean change: −40%; P < .001). Mean change in skinfold thickness was greater with ≥3 vs 1 to 2 cycles of CoolSculpting (P = .01). Patient satisfaction was high (n = 51/58; 88%). No adverse events were recorded. The study shows that multiple cycles/sessions of CoolSculpting can safely improve overall treatment benefit in body contouring, with greater decreases in skinfold thickness than have typically been previously observed.

Cryolipolysis for local fat reduction in adults from Brazil: A single-arm intervention study

BACKGROUND

Localized fat is a matter of great concern among individuals from today's society. Cryolipolysis is a noninvasive technique that have shown great results in reducing localized fat.

AIMS

To analyze the efficacy of cryoplipolysis on visible local fat reduction in submental region, arms, or male breast (pseudogynecomastia) in Brazilian subjects, and to assess possible factors associated with treatment success.

METHODS

Single-arm, nonrandomized trial, with volunteers from both genders with visible excess fat in the arms or submental region or men presenting pseudogynecomastia. Eligible subjects were submitted to physical, photographic, and ultrasound analysis before and three months after intervention. A single cryolipolysis session was performed using specific methods for each region, followed by a local massage for two minutes. Data were described as measures of central tendency and dispersion and measures of frequency. Reduction in measurements and factors associated with treatment success was analyzed using appropriate statistical tests.

RESULTS

Thirty-six subjects underwent one session of cryolipolysis in each area (22 subjects treated the arms, 20 the submental region and 9 the breast). In general, a mean reduction of 19.1% was observed. Significant differences were observed for almost all body parts analyzed. Body mass index was the only variable showing a significant relationship with intervention results.

CONCLUSIONS

Cryolipolysis is a useful noninvasive tool in reduction of visible localized fat in arms and submental region and of pseudogynecomastia. Obese subjects are not benefited by the treatment.

Clinical application of cryolipolysis in Asian patients for subcutaneous fat reduction and body contouring

Background

Cryolipolysis, a preferred method for minimally invasive body contouring, involves the noninvasive cooling of adipocytes to induce lipolysis without damaging other tissues. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cryolipolysis for the treatment of excessive fat tissue.

Methods

Between May 2014 and December 2017, 231 patients with 448 areas of interest were enrolled and their records were retrospectively reviewed. We used five different vacuum applicators, and the best-fitting applicator was used for each area. One cycle of cryolipolysis was applied at a cooling intensity factor of 41.6. The efficacy was evaluated 12 weeks after treatment via review of clinical photographs, the pinch test, and ultrasonographic measurements of fat thickness. The occurrence of any complications was also assessed.

Results

The volume was reduced in all of the areas to which cryolipolysis was applied. The rate of reduction of the fat layer as measured via the pinch test was 19.2%, and the rate of the decrease in fat layer thickness as measured via ultrasonography was 22.8%. Fat reduction of the upper arm differed significantly from that of the abdomen and flank, but no significant difference was found between sexes. The side effects were limited to erythema, edema, bruising, and numbness at the treatment site and resolved without treatment.

Conclusions

Cryolipolysis, with new and better-fitting applicators, is safe, fast, and effective for the reduction of excessive fat tissue on the abdomen, back, flank, and extremities. It is a good option for treating excess adipose tissue in Asian patients.