1
|
Pacheco M, Sá P, Santos G, Boa-Sorte N, Domingues K, Assis L, Silva M, Oliveira A, Santos D, Ferreira J, Fernandes R, Fortes F, Rocha R, Santana G. Impact of an intervention program on drug adherence in patients with ulcerative colitis: Randomized clinical trial. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0295832. [PMID: 38150452 PMCID: PMC10752503 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Evaluate the impact of an intervention program in non-adherent patients with ulcerative colitis. METHODS Parallel controlled randomized clinical trial (1:1), approved by the ethics committee (No. 3.068.511/2018) and registered at The Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (No. RBR-79dn4k). Non-adherent ulcerative colitis patients according to the Morisky-Green-Levine-test were included. Recruitment began in August 2019 until August 2020, with 6-month follow-up. All participants received standard usual care, and additionally the intervention group received educational (video, educational leaflet, verbal guidance) and behavioral interventions (therapeutic scheme, motivational and reminder type short message services). Researchers were blinded for allocation prior to data collection at Visits 1 and 2 (0 and 6 months). Primary outcome: 180-day adherence rate, with relative risk 95%CI. Secondary outcome: 180-day quality of life according to SF-36 domains, using Student's t test. Variables with p<0.20 were selected for regression. Analysis included data from August/2019 to May/2021. RESULTS Forty-six and 49 participants were allocated in control and intervention groups, respectively. Two were excluded due to intervention refusal, and 4 and 6 were lost to follow-up in control and intervention groups. There was no post-intervention adherence rate difference, even after adjustment for type of non-adherence (unintentional/both/intentional) as confounder, or if considered as adherent the intervention group participants lost in follow-up. Interventions promoted better quality of life scores even after multivariate analysis for "Pain", when adjusted for ulcerative colitis severity, sex, and marital status (β = 18.352, p = 0.004), "Vitality", when adjusted for ulcerative colitis severity (β = 10.568, p = 0.015) and "Emotional Aspects", when adjusted for disease severity, income, and education (β = 24.907, p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS The intervention program was not able to produce a significant medication adherence rate difference between comparative groups, however, there was a significant improvement in quality of life. Study limitations may include: sample size calculated to identify differences of 30%, leading to a possible insufficient power; non blinded participants, exposing the results to the risk of performance bias; outcomes based on self-reported data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mila Pacheco
- Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Universidade do Estado da Bahia (UNEB), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Pedro Sá
- Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Universidade do Estado da Bahia (UNEB), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Gláucia Santos
- Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Universidade do Estado da Bahia (UNEB), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Ney Boa-Sorte
- Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Universidade do Estado da Bahia (UNEB), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Kilma Domingues
- Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Universidade do Estado da Bahia (UNEB), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Larissa Assis
- Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Universidade do Estado da Bahia (UNEB), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Marina Silva
- Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Universidade do Estado da Bahia (UNEB), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Ana Oliveira
- Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Universidade do Estado da Bahia (UNEB), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Daniel Santos
- Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Universidade do Estado da Bahia (UNEB), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Jamile Ferreira
- Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Universidade do Estado da Bahia (UNEB), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Rosemeire Fernandes
- Centro de Infusões e Medicamentos Especializados da Bahia (CIMEB), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Flora Fortes
- Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Universidade do Estado da Bahia (UNEB), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Raquel Rocha
- Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Canela, Salvador, BA–Brazil
| | - Genoile Santana
- Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Universidade do Estado da Bahia (UNEB), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martins CDA, de Azevedo MFC, Carlos AS, Damião AOMC, Sobrado Junior CW, Nahas SC, Queiroz NSF. Predictive factors of response to infliximab therapy in Brazilian inflammatory bowel disease patients. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2023; 16:17562848231210053. [PMID: 38026104 PMCID: PMC10652804 DOI: 10.1177/17562848231210053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Biological therapies have revolutionized the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Infliximab (IFX) has been shown to be effective in inducing and maintaining remission in patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. However, about one-third of the patients are primary non-responders, and up to half can lose response over time. Hence, it is important to assess which factors are related to treatment failure. Objectives We aimed to identify factors predicting clinical and endoscopic remission with IFX treatment during maintenance therapy in a Brazilian IBD referral center. Design We conducted a cross-sectional study to describe demographic, clinical, and IBD therapy-related characteristics of IBD patients treated with IFX for at least 6 months in a Brazilian referral center. Subsequently, we evaluated factors associated with clinical and endoscopic remission (primary and secondary outcomes, respectively). Methods We used descriptive statistics to summarize the essential demographic and clinical characteristics of the population. The association of sociodemographic and clinical variables with outcomes was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. Results A total of 131 IBD patients (the mean age 41.7 years) were enrolled in this study. Clinical and endoscopic remission were observed in 79.4% and 58.2% of the patients, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, IFX therapy duration and higher albumin levels increased the likelihood of clinical remission, while previous surgery decreased its chance. Prior use of adalimumab and higher C-reactive protein levels reduced the likelihood of endoscopic remission. Conclusion In summary, this study has enhanced our understanding of the predictive factors of treatment response to IFX in a well-characterized Brazilian IBD population. Trial registration 4.254.501 and 2.903.748.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla de Almeida Martins
- Department of Gastroenterology and Division of Colorectal Surgery, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Alexandre Sousa Carlos
- Department of Gastroenterology and Division of Colorectal Surgery, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Carlos Walter Sobrado Junior
- Department of Gastroenterology and Division of Colorectal Surgery, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Sergio Carlos Nahas
- Department of Gastroenterology and Division of Colorectal Surgery, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|