Propofol or benzodiazepines for short- and long-term sedation in intensive care units? An economic evaluation based on meta-analytic results

Adult sedation and analgesia in a resource limited intensive care unit - A Systematic Review and evidence based guideline

Background

Sedation and analgesia are essential in the intensive care unit in order to promote control of pain, anxiety, prevent loss of materials, accidental extubation and improve the synchrony of patients with ventilator. However, excess of these medications leads to an increased morbidity and mortality, and thus demands protocol.

Methods

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and the Meta-Analysis Protocol have been used to undertake this review. Pub Med, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar search engines were used to find up-to-date evidence that helps to draw recommendations and conclusions.

Results

In this Guideline and Systematic Review, we have used 16 Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis, 3 Evidence-Based Guidelines and 10 RCT Meta-Analysis, 6 Systemic Reviews of Non-randomized Studies, 8 Randomized Clinical Trials, 11 Cohort Studies, 5 Cross-Sectional Studies and 1 Case Report with their respective study descriptions.

Discussion

Analgesia, which as a sedation basement can reduce sedative use, is key aspect of treatment in ICU patients, and we can also conclude that an analgesic sedation regimen can reduce the occurrence of delirium by reducing sedatives. The aim of this guideline and the systematic review is to write up and formulate analgesia-based sedation for limited resource settings.

Conclusions

Analgesia and sedation are effective in critically ill patients; however, too much sedation is associated with longer periods of mechanical ventilation and longer duration of ICU stay. Poorly managed ICU patients have a delirium rate of up to 80%, increased mortality, longer hospital stays, higher hospital costs and bad long-term outcomes.

•

Critically ill patients shall be awake, alert without pain, anxiety and delirium.

•

Analgesia and sedation in the ICU shall be given as per needed after determined they are in need of.

•

Sedation breaks are paramount important as equal as spontaneous breathing trials.

•

Unnecessary deep sedations will increase hospital and personnel costs by increasing length of ICU stay.

Propofol specifically reduces PMA-induced neutrophil extracellular trap formation through inhibition of p-ERK and HOCl

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are net-like chromatin fibers that can trap and kill microorganisms. Although several anti-inflammatory effects of intravenous anesthetics have been reported, it has not been investigated whether intravenous anesthetics influence NET formation.

AIMS

To compare the effects of four intravenous anesthetics (propofol, thiamylal sodium, midazolam, and ketamine) on phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)-induced NET formation and analyze the associated signaling pathways.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PMA-stimulated NETs formed in the absence or presence of intravenous anesthetics were stained with SYTOX Green and then quantified. Inhibitors were applied to investigate the related mechanism, which was confirmed by western blotting, and ROS were detected.

KEY FINDINGS

The neutrophils incubated with propofol showed the lowest degree of NET formation compared with those incubated with the other intravenous anesthetics. Propofol significantly reduced the level of myeloperoxidase (MPO)-derived HOCl but not that of superoxide. Aminopyrine, an MPO inhibitor, markedly decreased the number of PMA-induced NETs, indicating the involvement of HOCl in the inhibitory effect of propofol on NET formation. According to western blotting results, the level of p-ERK was reduced by propofol during PMA-induced NET formation. The ERK inhibitor PD98059 decreased NET formation but did not inhibit PMA-induced HOCl generation, and aminopyrine did not reduce ERK phosphorylation.

SIGNIFICANCE

Through this study, we define a new anti-inflammatory effect of intravenous anesthetics. Of the four intravenous anesthetics tested, propofol was the most potent inhibitor of NET formation. Moreover, propofol resulted in a decrease in PMA-induced NET formation by two independent mechanisms: inhibition of HOCl and p-ERK.