Cost-effectiveness of bazedoxifene versus raloxifene in the treatment of postmenopausal women in Spain

Systematic evidence of health economic evaluation of drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis: A quality appraisal

This paper systematically and critically reviewed all published economic evaluations of drugs for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. A systematic search was conducted using relevant databases for economic evaluations to include all relevant English articles published between January 2008 to January 2020. After extracting the key study characteristics, methods and outcomes, we evaluated each article using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) instruments. A total of 49 studies met the inclusion criteria. Majority of studies were funded by the industry and reported favorable cost-effectiveness. Based on the QHES total scores, studies (n = 35) were found to be industry-funded with higher QHES mean 82.44 ± 8.69 as compared with nonindustry funding studies (n = 11) with mean 72.22 ± 17.67. The overall mean QHES scores were found to be higher 79.06 ± 11.84, representing high quality (75–100) compared to CHEERS scores (%) 75.03 ± 11.21. The statistical pairwise comparison between CHEERS mean (75.03 ± 11.21) and QHES mean (79.06 ± 11.84) were not statistically significant (P = 0.10) whereas, QHES score showed higher means as compared to CHEERS. This study suggests the overall quality of the published literatures was relatively few high-quality health economic evaluation demonstrating the cost-effectiveness of drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis, and the majority of the literature highlights that methodological shortcoming.

Bazedoxifene for the treatment of osteoporosis

Introduction: Bazedoxifene (BZD) is a third-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator approved for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with additional favorable effects in lipids, uterine and breast tissue. Areas covered: In this review, the authors outline clinical data regarding the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of continuous BZD administration up to seven years in randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III clinical trials. Long-term treatment with BZD for postmenopausal osteoporosis is generally safe and well tolerated. BZD achieves small but significant increases in the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine but not the total hip. In addition, BZD reduces significantly the risk of vertebral fractures but not of non-vertebral and hip fractures, with the exception of high fracture risk postmenopausal women in whom BZD significantly reduces non-vertebral fractures. Expert opinion: BZD does not seem to offer significant advantages over the other available antiresorptive agents. However, considering the need for long-term management of osteoporosis, BZD may have a place in the long-term therapeutic planning of the disease.

A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Given the limited availability of healthcare resources and the recent introduction of new anti-osteoporosis drugs, the interest in the cost effectiveness of drugs in postmenopausal osteoporosis remains and even increases.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify all recent economic evaluations on drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis, to critically appraise the reporting quality, and to summarize the results.

METHODS

A literature search using Medline, the National Health Service Economic Evaluation database and the Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry was undertaken to identify original articles published between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2013. Studies that assessed cost effectiveness of drugs in postmenopausal osteoporosis were included. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement was used to assess the quality of reporting of these articles.

RESULTS

Of 1,794 articles identified, 39 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. They were conducted in 14 different countries and nine active interventions were assessed. When compared with no treatment, active osteoporotic drugs were generally cost effective in postmenopausal women aged over 60-65 years with low bone mass, especially those with prior vertebral fractures. Key drivers of cost effectiveness included individual fracture risk, medication adherence, selected comparators and country-specific analyses. Quality of reporting varied between studies with an average score of 17.9 out of 24 (range 7-21.5).

CONCLUSION

This review found a substantial number of published cost-effectiveness analyses of drugs in osteoporosis in the last 6 years. Results and critical appraisal of these articles can help decision makers when prioritizing health interventions and can inform the development of future economic evaluations.