Comparison of safety and outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy between elderly and non-elderly patients

Predictive markers for infections after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with kidney stone based on a large prospective cohort

OBJECTIVE

Infections in patients with kidney stones after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is a common clinical issue. However, the associated factors are unclear. Therefore, we aim to develop and validate a predictive model for infections after SWL in patients with kidney stone.

METHODS

Between June 2020 and May 2022, consecutive kidney stone patients were enrolled. Of them, 553 patients comprised the development cohort. One hundred sixty-five patients comprised the validation cohort. The data were prospectively collected. The stepwise selection was applied using the likelihood ratio test with Akaike's information criterion as the stopping rule; A predictive model was constructed through multivariate logistic regression. The performance was evaluated regarding discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness.

RESULTS

Predictors of infections after SWL in treating kidney stones included older age (OR = 1.026, p = 0.041), female (OR = 2.066, p = 0.039), higher BMI (OR = 1.072, p = 0.039), lower stone density (OR = 0.995, p < 0.001), and higher grade of hydronephrosis (OR = 5.148, p < 0.001). For the validation cohort, the model showed good discrimination with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.839 (95% CI 0.736, 0.941) and good calibration. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the model was also clinically useful.

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that age, gender, BMI, stone density, and hydronephrosis grade were significant predictors of infections after SWL in treating kidney stones. It provided evidence in optimizing prevention and perioperative treatment strategies to reduce the risk of infection after SWL.

International Alliance of Urolithiasis Guideline on Shockwave Lithotripsy

Different international associations have proposed their own guidelines on urolithiasis. However, the focus is primarily on an overview of the principles of urolithiasis management rather than step-by-step technical details for the procedure. The International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) is releasing a series of guidelines on the management of urolithiasis. The current guideline on shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is the third in the IAU guidelines series and provides a clinical framework for urologists and technicians performing SWL. A total of 49 recommendations are summarized and graded, covering the following aspects: indications and contraindications; preoperative patient evaluation; preoperative medication; prestenting; intraoperative analgesia or anesthesia; intraoperative position; stone localization and monitoring; machine and energy settings; intraoperative lithotripsy strategies; auxiliary therapy following SWL; evaluation of stone clearance; complications; and quality of life. The recommendations, tips, and tricks regarding SWL procedures summarized here provide important and necessary guidance for urologists along with technicians performing SWL. PATIENT SUMMARY: For kidney and urinary stones of less than 20 mm in size, shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is an approach in which the stone is treated with shockwaves applied to the skin, without the need for surgery. Our recommendations on technical aspects of the procedure provide guidance for urologists and technicians performing SWL.

Clinical results of shock wave lithotripsy treatment in elderly patients with kidney stones: Results of 1433 patients

OBJECTIVE

In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SWL treatment in elderly patients with kidney stones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from a total of 3024 patients who underwent SWL treatment for urinary tract stone disease in three centers of our university were evaluated retrospectively. A total of 1433 patients in the adult age group treated for single kidney stones were included in the study. The patients were divided into 3 groups (18-40, 41-64 and ≥ 65) years depending on their age. Demographic data, stone parameters, stone-free rate (SFR) and clinically insignificant residual fragment (CIRF) rate, number of SWL sessions and complication rate were analyzed according to the age groups.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 47.38 ± 13.24 years. Stone size was significantly lower in the 18-40 years age group compared to other groups (p = 0.000) and the stones were mostly located on the right side in this age group (p = 0.007). There was no significant relationship between age groups and gender, stone localization, and number of SWL sessions. The overall SFR was 66.4%. Although the SFR was lower (61.4%) and the rate of multiple sessions (27.2%) was higher in ≥ 65 years group, there was no statistically significant difference between age groups regarding SFR, CIRF, need for additional sessions, and complication rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to its similar clinical results, treatment of SWL should not be ignored as a treatment option in the geriatric patient group with kidney stones.

The role of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the future of stone management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The most relevant recent findings on the use of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in adult population to provide an insight of its role in the current and future of stone treatment. Comparing ESWL with other modalities is not in the scope of this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

We conducted a PubMed/Embase search and reviewed recent publications that include relevant information on the development of ESWL. Low-rate shock waves improve stone breakage, ramping energy modalities improve stone fragmentation and have lower incidence of hematoma and kidney injury. Transgluteal approach is suggested to improve stone-free rates for distal ureteral stones in a single session. Proper coupling is the most important technical aspect of the treatment and coupling improvement can be achieved by optical monitorization. Triple D score is a promising tool in proper patient selection, but external validation is needed. Predictive information arising from computed tomography scans has been refined by the variant coefficient of stone density and 3D texture analysis that might improve outcomes in the future.

SUMMARY

Recent evidence suggests that modifying techniques and protocols, and better patient selection are the current trends for improving ESWL outcomes. EWSL will keep its role as the single noninvasive treatment in stone management with room for outcome improvement in the future.

Surgical management of urolithiasis in octogenarians

Objective:

The objective of this study was to report the outcomes of octogenarians undergoing surgical treatment for urolithiasis.

Materials and methods:

We performed a retrospective review of patients aged over 80 years who underwent surgical management for urolithiasis over 8.5 years. Data was collected for patient demographics, procedure, stone size, position, composition and clearance, urine cultures, complications and length of stay.

Results:

Sixty patients had 111 surgical procedures: 89 elective procedures (80.2%) and 22 emergency procedures (19.8%). Median age was 83 years (81–85), ASA grade 3 and stone size 8 mm (6–10). Clinical presentation was varied, with only 17 patients (28.3%) presenting with ureteric colic/flank pain. Ureterorenoscopy was performed in 74 procedures (66.7%). A ureteric stent was left in 91 procedures (82.0%). The median length of stay for the emergency patients was 6 nights (3–9.5 nights) and for the elective patients was 1 night (1–3 nights). The complication rate varied depending on the primary procedure performed. The overall complication rate was 19.8%: three (2.7%) Clavien I (urinary retention); 11 (9.9%) Clavien II (blood transfusion/urinary tract infection/urosepsis); two (1.8%) Clavien IIIb (stent insertion/bleeding); three (2.7%) Clavien IV (urosepsis) and three (2.7%) Clavien V (two patients urosepsis and one patient pneumonia). The stone-free rate was 68.3%.

Conclusion:

Octogenarian patients with urolithiasis have a variable presentation, and in patients with sepsis of unknown origin urolithiasis should be considered. We demonstrate that surgical treatment, in particular ureterorenoscopy, can be safely and effectively performed in octogenarians with appropriate surgical planning. Level of evidence: 4 Case series

Local Anesthetic Flexible Ureterorenoscopy in the Management of Urolithiasis

Introduction: Patients unfit for general anesthesia who present with renal tract pathology currently have limited options. Many of these patients present in the emergency setting with imperative reasons for intervention, including sepsis, renal failure, and pain. Conservative management and temporizing measures, such as percutaneous nephrostomy, are associated with significant morbidity. Ureterorenoscopy (URS) is a central component of the management of upper tract disease and is routinely performed under general anesthesia. We describe our institution's experience of URS using only local anesthetic (LA) lubricating gel per urethra. Methods: A single centre, retrospective analysis of 78 patients was performed for an 11 year period. Demographic data and Charlson comorbidity index scoring were collected for all patients. Outcomes, including stone-free rates, tolerability, and complications, were analyzed. Results: In total 58% of patients were men. Mean age was 68 and Charlson comorbidity index was 5.2. Indications for URS included pain (68%) and renal failure (15%). Totally 10% of patients previously had retrograde stenting because of sepsis. Median stone size was 8 mm. All patients were able to tolerate the procedure and none were abandoned because of pain. The overall stone-free rate was 82% after one procedure. The stone-free rate for mid and distal ureteral stones was 97%. Nineteen percent of patients were left with a ureteral stent after the procedure, with the remaining patients left totally tubeless. Median length of stay was 1 day. There were no complications above Clavien Grade 2. Conclusion: Urologists are increasingly faced with unfit patients presenting with urolithiasis. In the appropriately selected patient, LA flexible ureterorenoscopy is a feasible option with good outcomes. This approach is a useful addition to the armamentarium available to patients deemed unsuitable for general or regional anesthesia.

Flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy with PolyScope for senile patients with renal calculi

The present study reported the clinical experience of using a PolyScope with holmium laser lithotripter in managing renal calculi in senile patients. Between December 2013 and December 2016, 157 senile patients (69.1±6.1 years old) were treated with PolyScope holmium laser lithotripsy for renal calculi at Xin Hua Hospital (Shanghai, China). The mean stone digitized surface area was 154.2±57.7 mm² (range, 55.8–478.3 mm²). A thorough medical history investigation, and laboratory and radiological examination were followed by proper preoperative management. The PolyScope was then passed into the renal cavities following the position of the ureteral access sheath, with laser energy maintained at 1.0–2.0 J, frequency 10–15 Hz. The demographical and operative information of senile patients were compared with that of the 332 non-senile patients operated at the same period time. The average operative time was 54.6±13.2 min (range, 37–124 min). No major complications, including ureteral perforation or sepsis were encountered. The single session stone-free rate (SFR) was 81.5% and the overall SFR was 89.2%, similar to that of the non-senile group. PolyScope combined with holmium laser lithotripter is safe and effective in managing renal calculi in senile patients compared with non-senile patients, with considerately high SFRs and low complication rates.