Changing from bevacizumab to ranibizumab in age-related macular degeneration. Is it safe?

Impact of Anti-VEGF Treatment and Patient Characteristics on Vision Outcomes in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration: Up to 6-Year Analysis of the AAO IRIS® Registry

Purpose

To evaluate anti-VEGF treatment patterns and the influence of patient demographic and clinical characteristics on up to 6-year vision outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Design

Retrospective, multicenter, noninterventional registry study with up to 6 years of follow-up.

Participants

A cohort of 254 655 eyes (226 767 patients) with first anti-VEGF injection and at least 2 years of follow-up; 160 423 eyes had visual acuity (VA) data.

Methods

Anonymized patient data were collected in the United States through the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight).

Main Outcome Measures

Changes in VA from baseline; frequency of and gaps between intravitreal anti-VEGF injections; treatment discontinuations; switching anti-VEGF agents; and influence of baseline clinical and demographic characteristics on VA.

Results

After a mean VA increase of 3.0 ETDRS letters at year 1, annual decreases led to a net loss from baseline of 4.6 letters after 6 years. Patients with longer follow-ups had better baseline and follow-up VA. From a mean of 7.2 in year 1 and 5.6 in year 2, mean injections plateaued between 4.2 to 4.6 in years 3 through 6. Treatment was discontinued in 38.8% of eyes and switched in 32.3%. When adjusting for differences at baseline, every additional injection resulted in a 0.68 letter improvement from baseline to year 1; thus, multiple injections in a year have the potential to be clinically meaningful. Older age, male gender, Medicaid insurance, and not being treated by a retina specialist were associated with a higher likelihood of vision loss at year 1. Of the patients, 58.5% lost ≥ 10 letters VA at least once during follow-up, with 14.5% of patients experiencing sustained poor vision after a median of 3.4 years.

Conclusions

After modest mean VA improvement with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections at year 1, patients netted a loss of VA by year 6. Injection frequency decreased over time, and this was paired with a relatively high rate of discontinuation. Modeling suggested that more frequent injections were associated with better VA. Difficulty with continuous adherence to frequent intravitreal injections may have contributed to undertreatment resulting in less-than-optimal vision outcomes.

Financial Disclosures

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Clinical Outcomes of Retinal Arterial Macroaneurysms With Vitreous Hemorrhage Treated With Observation, Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Intravitreal Injections, or Pars Plana Vitrectomy

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of different types of treatment of retinal arterial macroaneurysm with vitreous hemorrhage. Methods: This retrospective cohort study comprised patients with retinal arterial macroaneurysm and vitreous hemorrhage who were examined at a single retina clinic between 2013 and 2021. Results: Treatment arms included observation (n = 33), intravitreal injections (IVIs) of antivascular endothelial growth factor agents (n = 5), and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV; n = 12). Baseline characteristics and final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were similar in a combined analysis of all treatment groups (P > .05). The BCVA improved in all eyes, but the IVI and PPV arms had worse presenting BCVA. The mean number of injections was 3.6 ± 2.8. The incidence of subretinal hemorrhage was 18.2% in the observation arm, 25.0% in the PPV group (8.3% had subretinal tissue plasminogen activator), and 60.0% in the IVI group. The mean time to intervention was 13 ± 15.3 days for PPV and 38 ± 69.9 days for IVI. There was no correlation between the number of injections and the final BCVA (r = 0.13, P = .830). The IVI and PPV arms were more frequently on anticoagulants (P = .011). There was no difference in final BCVA between those using anticoagulants (0.52 ± 0.53) vs not using anticoagulants (0.55 ± 0.65) (P = .870). Conclusions: Most patients, regardless of treatment modality, demonstrated significantly improved BCVA and similar final visual outcomes. Patients with worse presenting BCVA were more likely to undergo PPV or IVI whereas those with better presenting BCVA had excellent outcomes with observation alone. Improved BCVA was not associated with the number of IVIs or anticoagulant use.

Long-term outcomes of switching to aflibercept for treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

To report 4-year outcomes following the switch to aflibercept in treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

METHODS

In this prospective, open-label, non-controlled, clinical trial, 49 patients with treatment-resistant nAMD received 2 mg intravitreal aflibercept as three loading doses every 4 weeks, followed by injections every 8 weeks for the first 48 weeks, then an individualized regimen for a further 36 months, following previous treatment with ranibizumab and/or bevacizumab. Outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height and geographic atrophy (GA) surface area.

RESULTS

Of the 49 patients who were initially recruited, data from 39 eyes of 39 patients were available at 48-month follow-up. Mean age was 76.7 ± 7.2 years. Over the 48 months, these eyes received a mean of 32.1 ± 5.6 injections. The mean BCVA improved significantly following 12 months of treatment (4.9 ± 9.0 ETDRS letters, p < 0.001); however, this was not maintained and was similar to baseline after 48 months (mean difference -0.4 ± 13.3 letters between baseline and 48 months, p < 0.001). The reduction in CRT from baseline was 170.3 ± 143.3 μm (p < 0.001) with absence of macular fluid in 56% of the 39 eyes at the end of month 48. PED height reduced by a mean 77.5 ± 20.0 μm, and geographic atrophy increased by a mean of 4.1 ± 3.4 mm² (p < 0.01) over the 48 months.

CONCLUSION

Aflibercept is an effective alternative therapy for treatment-resistant nAMD. Good anatomical and stable functional responses are achievable with continued therapy. The lack of continued visual improvement may be representative of GA progression, reflecting the progression of late-stage nAMD in these patients.

WRINKLED VASCULARIZED RETINAL PIGMENT EPITHELIUM DETACHMENT PROGNOSIS AFTER INTRAVITREAL ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR THERAPY

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is frequently associated with vascularized pigment epithelial detachment (v-PED). We observed a peculiar characteristic of v-PED characterized by small lacy folds of the retinal pigment epithelium, appearing as a wrinkled PED (w-PED) on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Our purpose was to describe the visual prognosis and number of intravitreal injections in w-PED compared with non-w-PED.

METHODS

In this retrospective, case-control series, we reviewed retrospectively medical records of 52 eyes of 51 patients who were consecutively included between November 1 and 30, 2015 with a previous minimum 3-year follow-up. Inclusion criteria were: neovascular age-related macular degeneration, affected with w-PED. Baseline characteristics, best-corrected visual acuity (BVCA), number of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections (anti-VEGF IVT) and maximal recurrence-free interval, that is, without intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection, were analyzed. A w-PED was defined as a v-PED ≥200 μm in height on SD-OCT imaging, presenting with at least 4 small lacy folds on the surface of the retinal pigment epithelium. Patients were compared with a control group, that is, patients harboring PED without wrinkle shape (non-w-PED). All patients had been treated by intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection of either ranibizumab (IVR) or aflibercept (IVA) using a pro re nata (PRN) protocol after three initial monthly treatments, with a minimum of follow-up of 3 years.

RESULTS

Two groups of patients were compared, w-PED (29 eyes, from 29 patients), and non-w-PED (23 eyes from 22 patients). In the w-PED group, mean BCVA evolved from 0.28 (±0.18) log MAR (20/40, range 20/25-20/63) at baseline, to 0.29 (±0.21) log MAR (20/40, range 20/25-20/63) at 1 year (P = 0.41), 0.34 (±0.26) log MAR (20/40, range 20/25-20/80) at 2 years (P = 0.49), 0.35 (±0.28) log MAR (20/40, range 20/25-20/80) at 3 years (P = 0.54). In the non-w-PED group, mean BCVA was 0.40 (±0.28) log MAR (20/50, range 20/25-20/100) at baseline and decreased to 0.48 (±0.46) log MAR (20/63, range 20/20-20/160) at 1 year (P = 0.19), 0.48 (±0.35) log MAR (20/63, range 20/25-20/125) at 2 years (P = 0.02), 0.60 (±0.38) log MAR (20/80, range 20/32-20/200) at 3 years (P = 0.002). In the w-PED group, the mean maximal documented recurrence-free interval was 7.87 (±2.94) months at Year 1, 13.5 (±7.52) at Year 2 and 14.78 (±10.70) at Year 3, versus 4.59 (±2.95) months at Year 1, 7.83 (±6.62) at Year 2, 8.57 (±11.18) at Year 3 in the non-w-PED group (P = 0.0004; 0.0101; 0.0168 respectively at Years 1, 2 and 3).

DISCUSSION

The evolution of v-PED after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection is still difficult to predict despite intense clinical research in this topic. In our study, we noticed that w-PED might be a phenotypic prognosis factor for better visual acuity and longer maximal recurrence-free interval.

POOLED ESTIMATES OF INCIDENCE OF ENDOPHTHALMITIS AFTER INTRAVITREAL INJECTION OF ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR AGENTS WITH AND WITHOUT TOPICAL ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of topical antibiotic prophylaxis on postoperative endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed from inception to March 2016 using PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, to identify articles that reported cases of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents. We used a pooled analysis to estimate the incidence of cases of endophthalmitis who developed after injections performed with and without topical antibiotic prophylaxis. We used regression analysis to explore the effects of study characteristics on heterogeneity.

RESULTS

From our search of electronic databases, we identified and screened 4,561 unique records. We judged 60 articles to have reported findings for cohorts of patients who met our inclusion criteria, (12 arms of randomized clinical trials, 11 prospective cohort studies, and 37 retrospective cohort studies), which included 244 cases of endophthalmitis and 639,391 intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents. The final pooled estimate endophthalmitis proportions were 9/10,000 (95% confidence interval, 7/10,000-12/10,000) in the antibiotic-treated group and 3/10,000 (95% confidence interval, 2/10,000-5/10,000) in the untreated group. The estimated incidence of endophthalmitis with topical antibiotic prophylaxis was approximated three times the incidence without prophylaxis. Random effects regression showed that none of the study characteristics significantly affected the effect size in either group.

CONCLUSION

Topical antibiotic after intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents is associated with a higher risk of endophthalmitis.

The Impact of Switching Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in the Management of Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Switching of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in the management of poorly responsive exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) has had suggested benefits in individual reports that have yet to be consolidated. In this retrospective review, 24 studies published between 2009 and 2014 were identified. Reasons for switching included tachyphylaxis, health insurance coverage, cost issues, and nonresponse or inadequate response. Nine studies had data that could be used for comparison between studies. Median follow-up was 10.6 months (range: 4.2 months to 21.8 months). Mean baseline visual acuity (VA) ranged from 0.42 logMar to 0.94 logMar (standard deviation [SD] range: 0.05 logMar to 0.50 logMar) and mean VA on final follow-up ranged from 0.38 logMar to 0.78 logMar (SD range: 0.08 logMar to 0.50 logMar). Five of nine studies reported no statistically significant change in vision, and five of nine studies reported a statistically significant improvement in central retinal thickness. This review found that switching anti-VEGF did not confer significant improvement of VA, although it provided some anatomical improvement. Pertinent considerations for evaluating response following anti-VEGF therapy are also presented in this review. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017;48:859-869.].

Submacular hemorrhage in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A synthesis of the literature

Large submacular hemorrhage, an uncommon manifestation of neovascular age-related macular degeneration, may also occur with idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Submacular hemorrhage damages photoreceptors owing to iron toxicity, fibrin meshwork contraction, and reduced nutrient flux, with subsequent macular scarring. Clinical and experimental studies support prompt treatment, as tissue damage can occur within 24 hours. Without treatment the natural history is poor, with a mean final visual acuity (VA) of 20/1600. Reported treatments include retinal pigment epithelial patch, macular translocation, pneumatic displacement, intravitreal or subretinal tissue plasminogen activator, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs, and combinations thereof. In the absence of comparative studies, we combined eligible studies to assess the VA change before and after each treatment option. The greatest improvement occurred after combined pars plana vitrectomy, subretinal tissue plasminogen activator, intravitreal gas, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment, with VA improving from 20/1000 to 20/400. The best final VA occurred using combined intravitreal tissue plasminogen activator, gas, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy, with VA improving from 20/200 to 20/100. Both treatments had an acceptable safety profile, but most studies were small, and larger randomized controlled trials are needed to determine both safety and efficacy.

Treating the untreatable patient: current options for the management of treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents represent the current standard of care for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Although effective in a majority of cases, a significant proportion of patients have persisting retinal exudation despite regular anti-VEGF therapy. This exudation is considered to produce poorer visual outcomes in these patients. Some of these patients may have misdiagnosed nAMD variants such as polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy; however, the majority of these eyes have what has been termed treatment-resistant nAMD. Currently, the best way to care for these patients is uncertain. Here, we review the evidence for different approaches to the management of treatment-resistant nAMD, including high-dose anti-VEGF therapy, combination regimes and switching of anti-VEGF agents, and discuss possible therapeutic approaches for patients with treatment-resistant nAMD.

Switch from intravitreal ranibizumab to bevacizumab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: clinical comparison

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes after switching from intravitreal ranibizumab to bevacizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

METHODS

A retrospective review of 110 eyes treated in a 1+PRN (pro re nata) clinical setting with ranibizumab that were switched to bevacizumab. Patients analyzed had at least 3 ranibizumab injections followed by at least 3 bevacizumab injections. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal thickness and frequency of injections were compared.

RESULTS

The mean duration of ranibizumab treatment was 18.1 months, followed by 12.2 months of bevacizumab. Mean injection rates per month were similar (0.54 and 0.56 respectively, p = 0.230). There were no significant differences between BCVA at baseline and at the time of the switch (52.4 and 54.8 letters, p = 0.059). After the switch, there was a statistically significant decrease in BCVA to 51.7 letters (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Switching patients to bevacizumab may have a minor negative effect on the initial gain obtained with ranibizumab; however the degenerative history of wet AMD could explain this small variation in visual acuity.

Switching intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes after switching between bevacizumab and ranibizumab therapy due to poor treatment effect in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of patients with neovascular AMD with first treatment using intravitreal bevacizumab (group 1) or ranibizumab (group 2) who switched to the other drug due to poor treatment effect. Primary outcome measures were change in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and mean central retinal thickness (CRT) at 1 year and last visit.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven eyes met the inclusion criteria. In group 1 (43 eyes), the mean BCVA decreased from 20/94 to 20/100 at 1 year after being switched (p = 0.573) and to 20/150 (p = 0.015) at final visit (mean 29.2 months, range 12-53). In group 2 (44 eyes), mean BCVA decreased from 20/72 to 20/90 (p = 0.401) and 20/100 (p = 0.081) at 1 year after switch and at final visit (mean 20.1 months, range 10-40), respectively. The mean CRT at switch, 1 year after switch, and at final visit were 344.4 ± 140 µm (mean ± SD), 286.26 ± 155 µm (p = 0.019), and 290.58 ± 196 µm (p = 0.009) in group 1 and 329.36 ± 144 µm, 302.0 ± 179 µm (p = 0.215), and 309.5 ± 220 µm (p = 0.154) in group 2, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The mean BCVA decreased over time in both groups; however, nearly 30% of the eyes in each group showed vision improvement after switching. Mean CRT decreased in both groups, which was more pronounced after being switched from bevacizumab to ranibizumab. In neovascular AMD, a switch between ranibizumab and bevacizumab can be considered as a further therapy option if poor treatment effect is seen with the initial therapy.

The proliferation of malignant melanoma cells could be inhibited by ranibizumab via antagonizing VEGF through VEGFR1

PURPOSE

Angiogenesis is an important mediator in tumor progression. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is one of the major cytokines that can influence angiogenesis. However, the potential mechanism of tumor growth inhibition through anti-VEGF agents is still unclear. This study was performed to examine whether ranibizumab could inhibit malignant melanoma growth in vitro and to determine the safety of ranibizumab on human adult retinal pigment epithelium cell line (ARPE-19 cells).

METHODS

Malignant melanoma cells obtained from a clinic were cultured in vitro. VEGF concentrations secreted by malignant melanoma cells and the ARPE-19 cells were examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The two kinds of cells were both treated with VEGF and its antagonist, ranibizumab. The dynamic changes of the two types of cells were monitored by real-time cell electronic sensing (RT-CES) assay. The effect of ranibizumab on both types of cells was verified by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl (MTT) assay. The expression of VEGF receptor 1 (VEGFR1) RNA in uveal melanoma was further investigated through the PCR technique.

RESULTS

The levels of VEGF secreted by malignant melanoma cells were much higher than those of ARPE-19 cells, and were markedly decreased in the action of 0.1 mg/ml ranibizumab. However, there was no obvious reduction of VEGF in the presence of ranibizumab for ARPE-19 (p>0.05). Meanwhile, RT-CES showed that the viability of malignant melanoma cells increased greatly in the presence of VEGF. When VEGF was 20 ng/ml, viability of the malignant melanoma cells increased by 40% compared with the negative control. There was no evident effect on proliferation of ARPE-19 (p>0.05). Furthermore, the growth of malignant melanoma cells was obviously inhibited after ranibizumab intervention. When ranibizumab was administered at 0.25 mg/ml, the survival rate of the malignant melanoma cells decreased to 57.5%. Nevertheless, low-dose exposure to ranibizumab had only a slight effect on the growth of ARPE-19, and PCR result demonstrated that VEGFR1 plays a role in this tumor tissue rather than VEGFR2.

CONCLUSIONS

Ranibizumab can selectively inhibit malignant melanoma cell proliferation by decreasing the expression of VEGF; the possible mechanism of the inhibitory effect may involve VEGFR1 antagonism.

Switch of anti-VEGF agents is an option for nonresponders in the treatment of AMD

BACKGROUND

Although anti-VEGF therapy of exudative AMD with bevacizumab and ranibizumab proved efficacious in the majority of patients, CNV activity does not respond to continued treatment after repeated injections in a considerable amount of patients. These are referred to as nonresponders. A change of the drug to bevacizumab or ranibizumab could possibly offer an alternative option for the treatment of nonresponding exudative AMD.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 138 nonresponders who switched therapy from bevacizumab to ranibizumab (n=114) or vice versa (n=24) were included in a retrospective study. Visual acuity (VA) and foveal thickness before and after the switch of therapy were compared. By means of linear regression analysis, we analyzed possible prognostic factors associated with a favorable outcome for visual acuity.

RESULTS

Linear regression analysis revealed a statistically significant benefit for nonresponders when treatment was changed to a different anti-VEGF drug (bevacizumab or ranibizumab). VA at the time of the switch was positively correlated with a beneficial development of VA after changing the drug. There was no significant correlation with age, macular thickness, number of injections before the switch, or the development of VA under treatment before the switch. Both patients switching to Avastin and Lucentis benefitted without statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

An exchange of bevacizumab with ranibizumab or vice versa should be considered in nonresponders in the treatment of exudative AMD. Further prognostic factors may help to identify patients who might benefit from a switch. These factors should be investigated in further studies.

The results of switching between 2 anti-VEGF drugs, bevacizumab and ranibizumab, in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

To report the results of switching from intravitreal bevacizumab to ranibizumab or vice versa in the treatment of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) due to age-related macular degeneration.

METHODS

Twenty eyes of 18 patients that underwent switch from intravitreal bevacizumab to ranibizumab and 10 eyes of 8 patients that underwent switch from ranibizumab to bevacizumab were retrospectively analyzed. The results were compared with 41 eyes of 37 patients treated with ranibizumab only. All eyes initially received 3 injections of ranibizumab or bevacizumab, which were repeated as needed (PRN dosing). Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies were switched because of general health insurance applications and cost problems. The main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), injection number, and central macular thickness (CMT) obtained by optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

Once all patients evaluated together at the final visit, the mean BCVA improved and CMT decreased. When switching groups were taken into consideration, switching yielded improved BCVA and reduced CMT following switching. After switching, BCVA continuously improved in the bevacizumab to ranibizumab group, but stayed stable in the ranibizumab to bevacizumab group. The CMT was reduced at the switching time in both groups, but did not change after the switch. Final visual acuity improved or stabilized in all eyes in the ranibizumab-only group. The BCVA worsened in 20% of eyes in the bevacizumab to ranibizumab group and in 40% of eyes in the ranibizumab to bevacizumab group.

CONCLUSION

The ranibizumab-only group and the switching from bevacizumab to ranibizumab group seemed superior to the ranibizumab to bevacizumab group.

Comparison of outcomes after switching treatment from intravitreal bevacizumab to ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration

OBJECTIVE

To compare visual acuity and central retinal thickness in patients initially treated with bevacizumab (Avastin) and switched to ranibizumab (Lucentis) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

DESIGN

A retrospective chart review.

PARTICIPANTS

This study included 87 eyes from 80 patients over the age of 65 with neovascular AMD.

METHODS

Patients were initially treated with bevacizumab injections every 6 weeks and then switched to ranibizumab every 4 weeks when it became publicly funded by the Ontario government. Outcomes include comparison of visual acuity and central retinal thickness after bevacizumab treatment, and after switching to ranibizumab.

RESULTS

Visual acuity improved significantly versus initial baseline values following a treatment course of 3 or more injections of bevacizumab (0.58 logMar, SD = 0.30 vs 0.73 logMar, SD = 0.41; p = 0.0007). Patients then showed a further significant improvement in visual acuity after switching and receiving a course of ranibizumab (0.51 logMar, SD = 0.32) (p = 0.0122). Mean central retinal thickness as measured by optical coherence tomography significantly decreased after a course of bevacizumab (p = 0.0158), and a further decrease was noted after a subsequent course of ranibizumab (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant improvement in visual acuity and central retinal thickness in patients with neovascular AMD initially treated with bevacizumab. When these patients were uniformly switched to ranibizumab there was a further significant improvement in visual acuity and a reduction of retinal thickness. It appears that ranibizumab can maintain, or improve the effect achieved after an initial course of bevacizumab.

Successful management of choroidal metastasis with intravitreal ranibizumab injections

Uveal metastases are the most frequent intraocular malignancy in adults. Among various treatment modalities, previous studies have described intravitreal injections of bevacizumab to suppress tumor vascularity. Because of its smaller molecular size, compared to bevacizumab, ranibizumab may offer better tissue penetration and be more efficient in suppressing neovascularization in choroidal lesions. This report presents two cases of choroidal metastases from bronchial and nasopharyngeal carcinoma that were treated as a series of three intravitreal ranibizumab injections (0.5 mg each), showing definite signs of regression. The encouraging results imply that intravitreal ranibizumab may be effective in the management of choroidal metastases, but this finding will have to be confirmed by larger prospective studies.

Lasting controversy on ranibizumab and bevacizumab

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an important angiogenic factor that is able to stimulate the proliferation and migration of endothelial cells, is the best-studied hallmark of angiogenesis. Neovascularization is a major cause of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) which is a leading cause of blindness in the elderly population. Specific molecular inhibitors of VEGF have been proved to be useful in the treatment of AMD. Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab are structurally similar to anti-VEGF drugs in the treatment of AMD. Many studies have indicated that Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab are of roughly equal short-term efficacy and safety, Bevacizumab is an attractive alternative to Ranibizumab due to its lower cost. However, only Ranibizumab has received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the treatment of macular degeneration. More multicenter clinical trials are required to compare the relative efficacy and safety of these two drugs and some progress has been achieved. This review discusses the clinical effectiveness, safety, cost and other practical implications of Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab.

Subretinal recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and pneumatic displacement for the management of subretinal hemorrhage occurring after anti-VEGF injections for wet AMD

We describe three cases of submacular hemorrhage that occurred two to four days after anti-VEGF intravitreal injection for occult choroidal neovascularisation in age-related macular degeneration and their management with 25 gauge pars plana vitrectomy with injection of subretinal recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rTPA) followed by fluid-air exchange and postoperative prone position. Vitrectomy, subretinal rTPA injection and fluid-gas exchange apply as a safe and effective treatment in these cases. Functional results seem to be positive especially if surgical treatment is promptly performed.

Switching from intravitreal ranibizumab to bevacizumab for age-related macular degeneration

Purpose. To report our experiences in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) treated initially with intravitreal ranibizumab and then switched to bevacizumab. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 7 patients (7 eyes) who were treated with monthly injections of intravitreal ranibizumab and then switched to injections of bevacizumab (every 6 weeks) for six months. The best-corrected visual acuity measurements (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed at the baseline examination and then at each visit. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for the statistical analysis. Results. Following three monthly ranibizumab treatments, there was no significant difference in the BCVA, while the foveal retinal thickness (FRT) significantly decreased (P < 0.01). Switching from ranibizumab to bevacizumab resulted in maintenance (57.2%) of the BCVA and a further decrease in the FRT (P < 0.01) after 6 months. Conclusions. Switching to intravitreal bevacizumab may be effective in patients who wish to discontinue intravitreal ranibizumab treatment due to the high cost.