Rechallenge with Multi-Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Single-Center Experience

Lenvatinib Monotherapy Versus Lenvatinib in Combination with PD-1 Blockades as Re-Challenging Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Osteosarcoma: A Real-World Study

Purpose

To explore the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib, either as a monotherapy or in combination with programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockades, as re-challenging treatment in patients with metastatic osteosarcoma following treatment failure with previous tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 26 patients with metastatic osteosarcoma who received rechallenge treatment with lenvatinib monotherapy or lenvatinib plus PD-1 blockades after failure of the initial TKI treatment from January 2020 to June 2024 in our center. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and safety.

Results

Of the 26 patients, ORR and CBR were 11.5% and 61.5%, respectively. The median duration of follow-up was 15 months (range, 4.3-25.6) with a median PFS of 7.2 months (95% CI: 1.9-12.5). A total of 14 patients received lenvatinib as a monotherapy, and 12 received a combination therapy of lenvatinib and PD-1 blockade. No significant differences were observed in ORR (0 vs 25%) and CBR (57.1 vs 66.7%) between the two groups. Additionally, the combination cohort exhibited a significantly longer PFS compared to the monotherapy cohort (8.6 [95% CI: 5.0-12.1] vs 4.0 months [95% CI: 1.0-7.0], p = 0.022). 96.2% of patients experienced grade 1 or more adverse events (AEs). Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 6 (23.1%) patients. The safety profiles of the lenvatinib and PD-1 blockade combination group were found to be comparable to those of the lenvatinib monotherapy group.

Conclusion

Our data indicated that patients with metastatic osteosarcoma could potentially benefit from lenvatinib rechallenge after progress with initial TKI treatment. The combination of lenvatinib and PD-1 blockade therapy demonstrated promising survival outcomes in patients with metastatic osteosarcoma, accompanied by a manageable toxicity profile.

Real-world efficacy, safety data and predictive clinical parameters for treatment outcomes in advanced soft tissue sarcoma treated with combined immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy

BACKGROUND

The combination of immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy has shown potential in the treatment of numerous malignant tumors, but limited evidence was available for soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Therefore, the aim of the present study is to assess the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in conjunction with antiangiogenic therapy in patients diagnosed with advanced STS (aSTS).

METHODS

The study enrolled patients with aSTS from January 2014 to October 2022. Eligible participants had previously received anthracycline-based chemotherapy, presented with an anthracycline-resistant sarcoma subtype, or were ineligible for anthracycline treatment due to medical conditions. Following enrollment, these patients received a combination of immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy. The primary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary endpoints included the disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and the incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were included in this cohort study. The median duration of follow-up was 15.8 months. The ORR and DCR were 17.6%, and 76.5%, respectively. The median PFS (mPFS) was 5.8 months (95% CI: 4.8-6.8) for all patients, and the median OS had not been reached as of the date cutoff. Multivariate analysis indicated that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 and ≤ second-line treatment were positive predictors for both PFS and OS. Patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma or clear cell sarcoma had longer mPFS (16.2 months, 95% CI: 7.8-25.6) when compared to those with other subtypes of STS (4.4 months, 95% CI: 1.4-7.5, P < 0.001). Among the observed adverse events, hypertension (23.5%), diarrhea (17.6%), and proteinuria (17.6%) were the most common, with no treatment-related deaths reported.

CONCLUSION

The combination of immunotherapy and antiangiogenic agents showed promising efficacy and acceptable toxicity in patients with aSTS, especially those with alveolar soft part sarcoma or clear cell sarcoma.

Safety and efficacy of fruquintinib-based therapy in patients with advanced or metastatic sarcoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib-based therapy as a salvage therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic sarcoma, including soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and bone sarcoma.

METHODS

Patients with advanced or metastatic sarcoma were divided into two groups. One group received fruquintinib monotherapy, while the other received fruquintinib combined therapy. Safety and efficacy of fruquintinib-based therapy were recorded and reviewed retrospectively, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Between August 2021 and December 2022, 38 sarcoma patients were retrospectively included. A total of 14 patients received fruquintinib alone (including 6 STS and 8 bone sarcoma), while 24 were treated with fruquintinib combined therapy (including 2 STS and 22 bone sarcoma). The median follow-up was 10.2 months (95% CI, 6.4-11.5). For the entire population, the median PFS was 8.0 months (95% CI, 5.5-13.0). The ORR was 13.1%, while the disease control rate (DCR) was 86.8%. The univariate analysis showed that radiotherapy history (HR, 4.56; 95% CI, 1.70-12.24; p = 0.003), bone sarcoma (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.14-0.87; p = 0.024), and treatment method of fruquintinib (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.85; p = 0.021) were significantly associated with PFS. The multivariate analysis showed that patients without radiotherapy history were associated with a better PFS (HR, 3.71; 95% CI: 1.31-10.55; p = 0.014) than patients with radiotherapy history. Patients in combination group reported pneumothorax (8.3%), leukopenia (33.3%), thrombocytopenia (12.5%), diarrhea (4.2%), and anemia (4.2%) as the most frequent grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), while there was no severe TEAEs occurred in the monotherapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Fruquintinib-based therapy displayed an optimal tumor control and an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced or metastatic sarcoma.

Case report: the dissociated response and clinical benefit of primary leiomyosarcoma of the bone treated with penpulimab plus lenvatinib after failed multi-line therapy

Leiomyosarcoma occurring in the bone as primary tumor localization is extremely scarce with limited cases described in the literature, accounting for less than 0.7% of all primary bone malignancies. Once distant metastasis occurs, patients have limited treatments and often a somber prognosis, which underscore the need for innovative and effective treatment approaches. The emerging evidence suggests that anti-angiogenic therapy could inhibit angiogenesis and normalize vascular permeability in the tumor microenvironment, which, in turn, would increase immune effector cell infiltration into tumors. Immunotherapy depends on the accumulation and activity of immune effector cells within the tumor microenvironment, and immune responses and vascular normalization seem to be reciprocally regulated. Immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic therapy has recently made great progress in the treatment of various types of tumors. However, the effectiveness of the combination treatment in metastatic leiomyosarcoma is undetermined. In this study, we presented a rare case of primary leiomyosarcoma of the bone located in the trochanteric region of the femur, accompanied by multiple distant metastases. After the failure of multi-line therapies including AI regiments as the adjuvant chemotherapy, anlotinib as the first-line therapy, GT regiment as the second-line therapy, and eribulin as the third-line therapy, the patient received combinational therapy with penpulimab plus lenvatinib. The best efficacy for this regimen was a partial response, with a progression-free survival of 8.4 months according to the iRECIST criteria. After a dissociated response was detected without severe toxicities, the patient received local radiotherapy and continued treatment on penpulimab plus lenvatinib and eventually achieved long-term survival benefits with a total of over 60 months of overall survival with good quality of life and ongoing treatment. As our previous retrospective study found that one-third of advanced STS patients could still achieve clinical benefits from rechallenge with multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), after the failure of previous TKI therapy, this case provided the potential clinical activity of immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic TKI rechallenge in metastatic leiomyosarcoma.

Case Report: Immunotherapy for low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma of the pharynx

Low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma (LGMS) characterized by the increased proliferation of myofibroblasts is a rare type of malignant myofibroblastic tumor that frequently occurs in the head and neck region. Presently, there is no consensus regarding the treatment of LGMS. Here, we report a rare case of LGMS of the pharynx in a 40-year-old male admitted to our hospital. The patient underwent resection for a right metastatic lesion and parapharyngeal mass. However, he had recurrence and multiple metastases without a surgical indication. Then the patient received the treatment of anlotinib plus pembrolizumab for 4 cycles, and there was a partial response (PR) to the treatment. Due to the adverse reaction of anlotinib, the patient subsequently received monotherapy of pembrolizumab for 22 cycles and achieved a complete response (CR). As the first case report of the immunotherapy for LGMS, our study highlights that this strategy may be of great significance to the treatment of LGMS.

Axitinib and HDAC Inhibitors Interact to Kill Sarcoma Cells

We have extended our analyses of HDAC inhibitor biology in sarcoma. The multi-kinase inhibitor axitinib interacted with multiple HDAC inhibitors to kill sarcoma cells. Axitinib and HDAC inhibitors interacted in a greater than additive fashion to inactivate AKT, mTORC1 and mTORC2, and to increase Raptor S722/S792 phosphorylation. Individually, all drugs increased phosphorylation of ATM S1981, AMPKα T172, ULK1 S317 and ATG13 S318 and reduced ULK1 S757 phosphorylation; this correlated with enhanced autophagic flux. Increased phosphorylation of ULK1 S317 and of Raptor S722/S792 required ATM-AMPK signaling. ULK1 S757 is a recognized site for mTORC1 and knock down of either ATM or AMPKα reduced the drug-induced dephosphorylation of this site. Combined exposure of cells to axitinib and an HDAC inhibitor significantly reduced the expression of HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, HDAC4, HDAC6 and HDAC7. No response was observed for HDACs 10 and 11. Knock down of ULK1, Beclin1 or ATG5 prevented the decline in HDAC expression, as did expression of a constitutively active mTOR protein. Axitinib combined with HDAC inhibitors enhanced expression of Class I MHCA and reduced expression of PD-L1 which was recapitulated via knock down studies, particularly of HDACs 1 and 3. In vivo, axitinib and the HDAC inhibitor entinostat interacted to significantly reduce tumor growth. Collectively our findings support the exploration of axitinib and HDAC inhibitors being developed as a novel sarcoma therapy.