1
|
Bove S, Arezzo F, Cormio G, Silvestris E, Cafforio A, Comes MC, Fanizzi A, Accogli G, Cazzato G, De Nunzio G, Maiorano B, Naglieri E, Lupo A, Vitale E, Loizzi V, Massafra R. Explainable machine learning for predicting recurrence-free survival in endometrial carcinosarcoma patients. Front Artif Intell 2024; 7:1388188. [PMID: 39712472 PMCID: PMC11659245 DOI: 10.3389/frai.2024.1388188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 11/20/2024] [Indexed: 12/24/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Endometrial carcinosarcoma is a rare, aggressive high-grade endometrial cancer, accounting for about 5% of all uterine cancers and 15% of deaths from uterine cancers. The treatment can be complex, and the prognosis is poor. Its increasing incidence underscores the urgent requirement for personalized approaches in managing such challenging diseases. METHOD In this work, we designed an explainable machine learning approach to predict recurrence-free survival in patients affected by endometrial carcinosarcoma. For this purpose, we exploited the predictive power of clinical and histopathological data, as well as chemotherapy and surgical information collected for a cohort of 80 patients monitored over time. Among these patients, 32.5% have experienced the appearance of a recurrence. RESULTS The designed model was able to well describe the observed sequence of events, providing a reliable ranking of the survival times based on the individual risk scores, and achieving a C-index equals to 70.00% (95% CI, 59.38-84.74). CONCLUSION Accordingly, machine learning methods could support clinicians in discriminating between endometrial carcinosarcoma patients at low-risk or high-risk of recurrence, in a non-invasive and inexpensive way. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study proposing a preliminary approach addressing this task.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Bove
- Laboratorio di Biostatistica e Bioinformatica, Fisica Sanitaria, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesca Arezzo
- Ginecologia Oncologica, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
- Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione e Rigenerativa e Area Jonica (DiMePRe-J), Università degli Studi di Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
| | - Gennaro Cormio
- Ginecologia Oncologica, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
- Dipartimento Interdisciplinare di Medicina (DIM), Università degli Studi di Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
| | - Erica Silvestris
- Ginecologia Oncologica, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Alessia Cafforio
- Dipartimento Interdisciplinare di Medicina (DIM), Università degli Studi di Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
| | - Maria Colomba Comes
- Laboratorio di Biostatistica e Bioinformatica, Fisica Sanitaria, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Annarita Fanizzi
- Laboratorio di Biostatistica e Bioinformatica, Fisica Sanitaria, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Accogli
- Laboratorio di Biostatistica e Bioinformatica, Fisica Sanitaria, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Gerardo Cazzato
- Dipartimento dell’Emergenza e dei Trapianti di Organi, Università degli Studi di Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
| | - Giorgio De Nunzio
- Laboratory of Biomedical Physics and Environment, Department of Mathematics and Physics "E. De Giorgi", Università del Salento, Lecce, Italy
- Advanced Data Analysis in Medicine (ADAM), Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Research Applied to Medicine (DReAM), Università del Salento, Lecce, Italy
| | - Brigida Maiorano
- Oncologica Medica, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Emanuele Naglieri
- Ginecologia Oncologica, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Andrea Lupo
- Laboratorio di Biostatistica e Bioinformatica, Fisica Sanitaria, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Elsa Vitale
- Direzione Scientifica, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Vera Loizzi
- Ginecologia Oncologica, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
- Dipartimento di Biomedicina Traslazionale e Neuroscienze (DiBraiN), Università degli Studi di Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Raffaella Massafra
- Laboratorio di Biostatistica e Bioinformatica, Fisica Sanitaria, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zadeh N, Bhatt A, Sripiparu V, Pasli M, Edwards G, Larkins MC, Peach MS. Malignant mixed mullerian tumors: a SEER database review of rurality and treatment modalities on disease outcome. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1296496. [PMID: 38390260 PMCID: PMC10881697 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1296496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Malignant Mixed Mullerian Tumors (MMMT) are rare and poorly understood sarcomas with limited research on risk factors, pathogenesis, and optimal treatments. This study aimed to address this knowledge gap and explore the impact of community size, patient characteristics, disease characteristics, and treatment modalities on MMMT outcomes. Methods Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER), the largest SEER cohort to date of 3,352 MMMT patients was analyzed for demographic factors, treatment modalities, and histologic characteristics. Data was processed, including the removal of incomplete entries, and analyzed in Python 3.1 using packages scikit-learn, lifelines, and torch; log-rank analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate a number of demographic characteristics and disease characteristics for significance in regard to survival. Results Our study found adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy significantly improved survival, with modest benefits from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Our findings also suggest age at diagnosis, disease grade, and suburban versus rural geographic locations may play key roles in patient prognosis. On multivariable analysis both disease Grade and surgical treatment were significant factors. Discussion MMMTs remain challenging, but appropriate treatment appears to enhance survival. The present findings suggest opportunities for improved outcomes and treatment strategies for patients with MMMTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neusha Zadeh
- Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC, United States
| | - Arjun Bhatt
- Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States
| | - Vaishnavi Sripiparu
- Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States
| | - Melisa Pasli
- Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States
| | - George Edwards
- Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States
| | - Michael C Larkins
- Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States
| | - M Sean Peach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Influence of Clinical and Surgical Factors on Uterine Carcinosarcoma Survival. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051463. [PMID: 36900255 PMCID: PMC10001122 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess the impact of prognostic factors on the survival of patients diagnosed with uterine carcinosarcoma. METHODS A sub-analysis of the SARCUT study, a multicentric retrospective European study, was carried out. We selected 283 cases of diagnosed uterine carcinosarcoma for the present study. Prognosis factors influencing survival were analyzed. RESULTS Significant prognostic factors for overall survival were: incomplete cytoreduction (HR = 4.02; 95%CI = 2.68-6.18), FIGO stages III and IV (HR = 3.21; 95%CI = 1.83-5.61), tumor persistence after any treatment (HR = 2.90; 95%CI = 1.97-4.27), presence of extrauterine disease (HR = 2.62; 95%CI = 1.75-3.92), a positive resection margin (HR = 1.56; 95%CI = 1.05-2.34), age (HR = 1.02; 95%CI = 1.00-1.05), and tumor size (HR = 1.01; 95%CI = 1.00-1.01). Significant prognostic factors for disease-free survival were: incomplete cytoreduction (HR = 3.00; 95%CI = 1.67-5.37), tumor persistence after any treatment (HR = 2.64; 95%CI = 1.81-3.86), FIGO stages III and IV (HR = 2.33; 95%CI = 1.59-3.41), presence of extrauterine disease (HR = 2.13; 95%CI = 1.44-3.17), administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 1.84; 95%CI = 1.27-2.67), a positive resection margin (HR = 1.65; 95%CI = 1.11-2.44), presence of LVSI (HR = 1.61; 95%CI = 1.02-2.55), and tumor size (HR = 1.00; 95%CI = 1.00-1.01). CONCLUSIONS Incomplete cytoreduction, presence of tumor residual after treatment, advanced FIGO stage, extrauterine disease, and tumor size are significant prognostic factors decreasing disease-free survival and overall survival of patients with uterine carcinosarcoma.
Collapse
|
4
|
Bogani G, Ray-Coquard I, Concin N, Ngoi NYL, Morice P, Caruso G, Enomoto T, Takehara K, Denys H, Lorusso D, Coleman R, Vaughan MM, Takano M, Provencher DM, Sagae S, Wimberger P, Póka R, Segev Y, Kim SI, Kim JW, Candido Dos Reis FJ, Ramirez PT, Mariani A, Leitao M, Makker V, Abu-Rustum NR, Vergote I, Zannoni G, Tan D, McCormack M, Paolini B, Bini M, Raspagliesi F, Benedetti Panici P, Di Donato V, Muzii L, Colombo N, Pignata S, Scambia G, Monk BJ. Endometrial carcinosarcoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:147-174. [PMID: 36585027 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial carcinosarcoma is a rare and aggressive high-grade endometrial carcinoma with secondary sarcomatous trans-differentiation (conversion theory). The clinical presentation and diagnostic work-up roughly align with those of the more common endometrioid counterpart, although endometrial carcinosarcoma is more frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. Endometrial carcinosarcoma is not a single entity but encompasses different histological subtypes, depending on the type of carcinomatous and sarcomatous elements. The majority of endometrial carcinosarcomas are characterized by p53 abnormalities. The proportion of POLE and microsatellite instablity-high (MSI-H) is directly related to the epithelial component, being approximately 25% and 3% in endometrioid and non-endometrioid components.The management of non-metastatic disease is based on a multimodal approach with optimal surgery followed by (concomitant or sequential) chemotherapy and radiotherapy, even for early stages. Palliative chemotherapy is recommended in the metastatic or recurrent setting, with carboplatin/paclitaxel doublet being the first-line regimen. Although the introduction of immunotherapy plus/minus a tyrosine kinase inhibitor shifted the paradigm of treatment of patients with recurrent endometrial cancer, patients with endometrial carcinosarcoma were excluded from most studies evaluating single-agent immunotherapy or the combination. However, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved the use of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib in endometrial cancer (all histotypes) after progression on chemotherapy and single-agent immunotherapy in MSI-H cancers. In the era of precision medicine, emerging knowledge on molecular endometrial carcinosarcoma is opening new promising therapeutic options for more personalized treatment. The present review outlines state-of-the-art knowledge and future directions for patients with endometrial carcinosarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Innsbruck Medical Univeristy, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave RoussT, Villejuif, France
| | - Giuseppe Caruso
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Takayuki Enomoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Belgium
| | - Kazuhiro Takehara
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Hannelore Denys
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Ghent, Gent, Belgium
| | | | - Robert Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michelle M Vaughan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Canterbury Regional Cancer and Haematology Service, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Masashi Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Medical, Japan
| | | | | | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universitat Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Yakir Segev
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carmel Hospital, Haifa, Israel
| | - Se Ik Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Weon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Andrea Mariani
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mario Leitao
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vicky Makker
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gianfranco Zannoni
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - David Tan
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Mary McCormack
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Biagio Paolini
- Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Marta Bini
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
| | | | | | - Violante Di Donato
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Sapienza of Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Maternal, Infantile, and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Medical Gynecologic Oncology Unit; University of Milan Bicocca; Milan; Italy, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| | - Sandro Pignata
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, National Cancer Institute Napels, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Bradley J Monk
- HonorHealth, University of Arizona, Creighton University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
da Silva JL, de Albuquerque LZ, Rodrigues FR, Bastos NC, Small IA, Barroso EBC, Cordero FL, Fernandes DDS, Paulino E, de Melo AC. Exploring biomarkers and prognostic factors in uterine carcinosarcoma: An insight into L1CAM, CDX2, p53, and MSI status. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0285447. [PMID: 37200263 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterine Carcinosarcomas (UCS) are a rare type of cancer composed of an admixture of high-grade carcinomatous and sarcomatous elements. Clinicopathological prognostic factors in UCS are well established, but studies that approach the impact of biomarkers in this unusual disease are scarce. The study objective was to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic impact of a panel of prominent biomarkers in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) using an immunohistochemical characterization with four biomarkers. METHODS AND FINDINGS The internal database of a single Brazilian institution was carefully explored to select women diagnosed with UCS who were submitted to surgery and postoperative chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel between January 2012 and December 2017. Tissue microarrays containing UCS samples were evaluated by immunohistochemistry for L1CAM, CDX2, p53 and microsatellite instability markers. A total of 57 cases were included. The mean age was 65.3 years (standard deviation, SD 7.0). L1CAM was negative (score 0, no staining) in 27 (47.4%) patients. Of L1CAM-positive, 10 (17.5%) showed weak (score 1, <10%), 6 (10.5%) showed moderate (score 2, between 10-50%), and 14 (24.6%) showed strong L1CAM staining (score 3, ≧50%). dMMR occurred in 3 (5.3%) cases. The p53 was aberrantly expressed in 15 (26.3%) tumors. CDX2 was positive in 3 (5.3%) patients. The three-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate in the general population of the study was 21.2% (95% CI: 11.7-38.1) and the three-year overall survival (OS) rate was 29.4% (95% CI: 18.1-47.6). By multivariate analysis, the presence of metastases and CDX2-positive were significantly associated with poorer PFS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively) and OS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSION The strong influence of CDX2 on prognosis requires further investigation. Biological or molecular variability may have impaired the assessment of the impact of the other markers on survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse Lopes da Silva
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Lucas Zanetti de Albuquerque
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | - Isabele Avila Small
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Fernando Lopes Cordero
- Gynecologic Oncology Section, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Eduardo Paulino
- Clinical Oncology Section, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Andreia Cristina de Melo
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van der Horst RL, van der Hel O, Lutgens L, van der Aa M, Slangen B, Kruitwagen R, Lalisang RI. The role of multimodal adjuvant therapy for FIGO I-II carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 175:103701. [PMID: 35533817 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is a rare entity with poor prognosis. Treatment of FIGO I-II UCS usually consists of surgery with or without adjuvant treatment. Due to the high metastatic potential, aggressive combined modality adjuvant treatment approaches, consisting of chemo- and radiotherapy, have been of interest. Our systematic review aims to compare survival, disease control and toxicity profiles in patients receiving adjuvant chemoradiation to other adjuvant strategies (e.g.observation, chemotherapy or radiotherapy). A total of ten studies were included for a combined cohort size of 6,520 patients. Generally, the studies showed a trend towards improved disease control and survival in patients undergoing adjuvant multimodal treatment, although statistical significance was often not reached. Selection bias and non-randomized treatment allocation pose serious challenges to extrapolate these outcomes to clinical practice. We recommend additional prospective research on the role of adjuvant chemoradiation in FIGO I-II UCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R L van der Horst
- Division Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht the Netherlands; GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Maastricht UMC+ Comprehensive Cancer Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - O van der Hel
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - L Lutgens
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, MAASTRO Clinic, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Maastricht UMC+ Comprehensive Cancer Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M van der Aa
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - B Slangen
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Maastricht UMC+ Comprehensive Cancer Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - R Kruitwagen
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Maastricht UMC+ Comprehensive Cancer Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - R I Lalisang
- Division Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht the Netherlands; GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Maastricht UMC+ Comprehensive Cancer Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|