A year in the life of German patients with COPD: the DACCORD observational study

Triple Therapy De-Escalation and Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroids to Dual Bronchodilator Therapy in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: The interpretation of evidence on the de-escalation of triple therapy with the withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) to dual bronchodilator therapy with a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is conflicting. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ICS discontinuation from LABA-LAMA-ICS triple therapy compared to its continuation. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web Of Science, clinicaltrial.gov, and CENTRAL for RCTs and observational studies from inception to 22 March 2024, investigating the effect of triple therapy de-escalation with the withdrawal of ICSs to dual therapy on the risk of COPD exacerbation, pneumonia, and lung function. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024527942. Results: A total of 3335 studies was screened; 3 RCTs and 3 real-world non-interventional studies were identified as eligible. The analysis of the time to the first moderate or severe exacerbation showed a pooled HR of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.80-1.15; I2 = 77%) for ICS withdrawal compared to triple therapy continuation. The analysis according eosinophil levels showed that COPD subjects with ≥300 eosinophils/µL had a significant increase in the incidence of moderate or severe exacerbations when de-escalated to LABA/LAMA (pooled HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.00-1.82; I2: 56%). ICS withdrawal did not significantly affect the risk of mortality and pneumonia. Conclusions: The de-escalation of triple therapy with ICS withdrawal does not affect the main outcomes evaluated (moderate or severe exacerbations, change in trough FEV1). COPD patients with high blood eosinophils (≥2% or ≥300 cells/µL) are most likely to benefit from continuing triple therapy.

Adjustments to maintenance therapy and the reasoning behind them among COPD outpatients in Austria: the STEP study

Background

Adjustments to COPD maintenance treatment are based on different guidelines. In Austria, there is a lack of real-world data on treatment adjustments of COPD outpatients and their underlying rationale. The STEP study characterised change patterns of pharmacological maintenance therapy in COPD outpatients in predefined categories of step-up, step-down and switch, the underlying reasons, and predictors in clinical routine in Austria.

Methods

STEP was a single-visit non-interventional study in Austria. 77 pulmonologists based in outpatient clinics documented previous and adapted COPD therapy, reason for change, patient characteristics, COPD phenotype, and lung function. Patients' COPD symptom burden was assessed by using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Predictors for therapy changes were identified.

Results

1137 patients were studied (mean±sd age 67±10 years; 56.9% male; mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s 56.3% predicted; Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease B and E stages 66% and 19%, respectively; mean CAT score 17.5). Therapy step-up was observed in 59.3%, treatment switch in 21.7% and step-down in 19.0% of patients. Triple therapy comprised the biggest proportion of inhalation treatment (53.3%). Physicians reported lung function, symptom burden and exacerbations as the main reasons for step-up or step-down, whereas switches within the same treatment class were predominantly caused by device issues. Predictors for step-up were comorbid asthma and exacerbations among others.

Conclusions

STEP was the first study to investigate COPD therapy changes in clinical routine in Austria. The most frequent treatment adjustment was step-up, followed by treatment switch and step-down. Symptom burden, stable or improved lung function and inhalation device handling were the most frequently given reasons for adjustments.

Baseline patient demographics for TETRIS: a prospective, noninterventional study to characterize the use of triple therapy for COPD in Germany

BACKGROUND

Evidence on how decisions regarding escalation to triple therapy and de- or re-escalation are taken and the rationale on which these decisions are based is currently limited in Germany.

OBJECTIVES

The TETRIS study aims to elucidate influences on treatment decisions surrounding triple therapy in a real-world practice setting in Germany.

DESIGN

TETRIS is an ongoing, multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study recruiting patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with or without asthma who have already been treated with triple therapy for 2-48 weeks.

METHODS

For better representation of the treatment reality in Germany, patients are recruited from general practitioners and pulmonologists. Data are collected in two parts. Part 1 involves cross-sectional phenotyping of patients at enrollment. Part 2 involves a 2-year longitudinal follow-up period to monitor/document all visits by the patients during the 24-month observation period per routine clinical practice. Here, we report the demographic and baseline characteristics of 1213 eligible patients recruited to part 1 of the study.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 66.4 years overall, and 29.3% (356/1213) of patients had no comorbidities. The mean CAT score was 19.4; the number of exacerbations and hospitalizations due to exacerbations in the past 3 years before starting triple therapy was 0.6 and 0.1, respectively. Dual bronchodilation with a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) plus a long-acting β-2 agonist (LABA) was the most common therapy for COPD before initiation of triple therapy in 58.3% of patients.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world setting in Germany, patients with COPD have a relatively low reported exacerbation rate but high symptom burden, and over 70% are multimorbid. Triple therapy is initiated in patients who are primarily highly symptomatic despite being on LAMA + LABA. Future prospective studies in patients with multimorbidity are warranted to better understand the treatment landscape across the disease spectrum.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04657211.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emerging ER stress-related therapeutic targets

COPD pathogenesis is frequently associated with endoplasmic reticulum stress (ER stress) progression. Targeting the major unfolded protein response (UPR) branches in the ER stress pathway may provide pharmacotherapeutic selection strategies for treating COPD and enable relief from its symptoms. In this study, we aimed to systematically review the potential role of the ER stress inhibitors of major UPR branches (IRE1, PERK, and ATF6) in COPD-related studies and determine the current stage of knowledge in this field. The systematic review was carried out adhering to the PRISMA checklist based on published studies obtained from specific keyword searches of three databases, namely PubMed, ScienceDirect and Springer Database. The search was limited to the year 2000-2022 which includes all in vitro studies, in vivo studies and clinical trials related to the application of ER stress inhibitors toward COPD-induced models and disease. The risk of bias was evaluated using the QUIN, SYRCLE, revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0) and NIH tool respectively. A total of 7828 articles were screened from three databases and a final total of 37 studies were included in the review. The ER stress and UPR pathways are potentially useful to prevent COPD progression and attenuate the exacerbation of COPD and related symptoms. Interestingly, the off-target effects from inhibition of the UPR pathway may be desirable or undesirable depending on context and therapeutic applications. Targeting the UPR pathway could have complex consequences as the production of ER molecules involved in folding may be impaired which could continuously provoke misfolding of proteins. Although several emerging compounds were noted to be potentially useful for targeted therapy against COPD, clinical studies have yet to be thoroughly explored.

Rational use of inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of COPD

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the mainstay of treatment for asthma, but their role in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is debated. Recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in patients with COPD and frequent or severe exacerbations demonstrated a significant reduction (~25%) in exacerbations with ICS in combination with dual bronchodilator therapy (triple therapy). However, the suggestion of a mortality benefit associated with ICS in these trials has since been rejected by the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration. Observational evidence from routine clinical practice demonstrates that dual bronchodilation is associated with better clinical outcomes than triple therapy in a broad population of patients with COPD and infrequent exacerbations. This reinforces guideline recommendations that ICS-containing maintenance therapy should be reserved for patients with frequent or severe exacerbations and high blood eosinophils (~10% of the COPD population), or those with concomitant asthma. However, data from routine clinical practice indicate ICS overuse, with up to 50-80% of patients prescribed ICS. Prescription of ICS in patients not fulfilling guideline criteria puts patients at unnecessary risk of pneumonia and other long-term adverse events and also has cost implications, without any clear benefit in disease control. In this article, we review the benefits and risks of ICS use in COPD, drawing on evidence from RCTs and observational studies conducted in primary care. We also provide a practical guide to prescribing ICS, based on the latest global treatment guidelines, to help primary care providers identify patients for whom the benefits of ICS outweigh the risks.

In 'real world' patients with COPD, exacerbation history, and not blood eosinophils, is the most reliable predictor of future exacerbations

INTRODUCTION

There is an interest in the role of blood eosinophils for predicting inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) response in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Most data are from interventional clinical studies; data from unselected real-world populations may help better inform treatment decisions. DACCORD is a non-interventional real-world study. Cohort 3 recruited patients with COPD who had received triple therapy for ≥ 6 months; prior to entry patients either continued triple therapy, or switched to a long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting beta₂-agonist (LABA/LAMA), and were followed for 12 months.

METHODS

For these post-hoc analyses, patients were divided into four groups based on exacerbation history and baseline blood eosinophil count (< 100 vs. > 300 cells/µL). Exacerbation rates were calculated overall and for the two treatments.

RESULTS

Among the 430 patients in the current analyses, the largest groups had low exacerbation history with high (44.2%) or low eosinophils (36.7%). Most patients did not exacerbate during follow-up (68.8% overall; 83.2% and 63.7% with LABA/LAMA and triple therapy). The highest exacerbation rates were in groups with high exacerbation history, differing significantly in the overall analyses from those with low exacerbation history (matched by eosinophil count); rates did not differ when grouped by eosinophil count (matched by exacerbation history).

CONCLUSIONS

Although most patients in these analyses did not exacerbate during follow-up, whereas exacerbation history is a predictor of future exacerbations, blood eosinophil count is not. This suggests that although eosinophil count may help to guide ICS initiation, this is less of a consideration when 'stepping-down' from triple therapy to a LABA/LAMA.

Stepwise management of COPD: What is next after bronchodilation?

Inhaled bronchodilator therapy with long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) in combination is currently the mainstay of treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Treatment guidelines recommend the addition of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) to LABA/LAMA only in patients with a history of frequent/severe exacerbations and high blood eosinophil counts, or in those with concomitant asthma. Despite this, real-world data suggest that clinicians are not adhering to this guidance and that ICS are frequently overused. This is possibly due to the incorrect assumption that when LABA/LAMA therapy is not sufficient, adding an ICS to the treatment regimen is the logical next step. In this narrative review, we describe global and country-specific guideline recommendations from Germany, Spain, and Japan and compare these with real-world data on LABA/LAMA and ICS use in clinical practice. We also provide a clinical guide to the use of add-on therapies with LABA/LAMA for different patient phenotypes, including (1) patients still symptomatic (but not exacerbating) despite LABA/LAMA treatment; (2) patients still exacerbating despite LABA/LAMA treatment who have high blood eosinophil counts; and (3) patients still exacerbating despite LABA/LAMA treatment who do not have high blood eosinophils or concomitant asthma.

LABA/LAMA as First-Line Therapy for COPD: A Summary of the Evidence and Guideline Recommendations

Inhaled bronchodilators (alone or in combination) are the cornerstone of treatment for symptomatic patients with COPD, either as initial/first-line treatment or for second-line/treatment escalation in patients who experience persistent symptoms or exacerbations on monotherapy. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2022 report recommends initial pharmacological treatment with a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) or a long-acting β₂-agonist (LABA) as monotherapy for most patients, or dual bronchodilator therapy (LABA/LAMA) in patients with more severe symptoms, regardless of exacerbation history. The recommendations for LABA/LAMA are broader in the American Thoracic Society treatment guidelines, which strongly recommend LABA/LAMA combination therapy over LAMA or LABA monotherapy in patients with COPD and dyspnea or exercise intolerance. However, despite consistent guideline recommendations, real-world prescribing data indicate that LAMA and/or LABA without an inhaled corticosteroid are not the most widely prescribed therapies in COPD. This article reviews global and regional/national guideline recommendations for the use of LABA/LAMA in COPD, examines the evidence for the effectiveness and safety of LABA/LAMA versus other therapies and offers a practical guide for clinicians to help ensure appropriate use of LABA/LAMA therapy.

Real-World Treatment of Patients Newly Diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Retrospective German Claims Data Analysis

Purpose

This study aimed to describe the real-world treatment of German incident COPD patients, compare that treatment with clinical guidelines, and provide insight into disease development after incident diagnosis. In addition, the economic burden of the disease by assessing COPD-related healthcare costs was described.

Patients and Methods

Based on a German claims dataset, continuously insured individuals (04/2014-03/2019) aged 40 years or older with at least two incident pulmonologist's diagnoses or one inpatient diagnosis of COPD (ICD-10-GM code J44.-; no respective diagnosis in a 12-month baseline period) were selected. Treatment patterns after incident diagnosis considering inhaled maintenance therapies identified by ATC codes (outpatient prescriptions) were analyzed. Prescription patterns were compared with recommendations of German COPD treatment guidelines. Severe exacerbations were assessed as hospitalizations with main diagnosis ICD-10-GM code J44.1. COPD-associated costs from the perspective of the health insurance fund AOK PLUS were calculated per patient-year (PY).

Results

The sample comprised 17,464 incident COPD patients with a mean age of 71.5 years. 58.9% were male and the mean Charlson-Comorbidity-Index was 5.3. During follow-up (median: 2.0 years), 57.1% of the patients received at least one prescription of an inhaled maintenance therapy, whereas 42.9% did not. Among treated patients, 35.2% started their treatment with LABA/LAMA, 25.3% with LAMA monotherapy, 16.2% with LABA/ICS, and 7.8% with LABA/LAMA/ICS therapy. Within four weeks after initial diagnosis, ICS-containing therapies were prescribed in 14.1% of patients. Of all patients with a prescribed triple therapy, 68.9% had no corresponding exacerbation history documented. On average, 0.16 severe exacerbations and 0.19 COPD-related hospitalizations were observed per PY during available follow-up. Direct COPD-related costs were 3,693 €/PY, with COPD-related hospitalizations being responsible for about 79.2% of these costs.

Conclusion

Long-acting bronchodilators are the mainstay of pharmacological treatment of incident COPD patients in Germany, in line with guideline recommendations. Yet, a considerable proportion of incident COPD patients did not receive any inhaled maintenance therapy.

Impact of switching from triple therapy to dual bronchodilation in COPD: the DACCORD ‘real world’ study

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) guidelines recommend reserving triple therapy of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), long-acting β₂-agonist (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) for patients with exacerbations despite dual therapy. However, many patients receive triple therapy without a clear indication. For these patients, it would be useful to know whether ICS can be withdrawn.

Methods

DACCORD was a longitudinal, non-interventional ‘real-world’ study in three cohorts. This manuscript describes the results of Cohort 3, which recruited patients with COPD who had received triple therapy for ≥ 6 months. Prior to entry, each patient’s physician decided to continue triple therapy, or switch to a LABA/LAMA; patients were then followed for 12 months, with exacerbations and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) data recorded every 3 months. The primary endpoint was the time until COPD worsening, defined as the occurrence of a moderate/severe exacerbation or clinically relevant CAT worsening.

Results

Of the 1192 patients recruited into the study, 967 completed the end-of-study visit and ≥ 2 of the three interim visits, 292 and 675 receiving LABA/LAMA and triple therapy, respectively. Most baseline demographics were similar between the two groups. A lower proportion of patients in the LABA/LAMA group had COPD worsening than with triple therapy (32.5% vs 55.7% at 12 months), with the time to worsening extended in the LABA/LAMA group (hazard ratio 2.004, p < 0.001). In addition, a significantly lower proportion of patients in the LABA/LAMA group exacerbated (18.5% vs 28.7%; p < 0.001), accompanied by a greater improvement from baseline in CAT total score. Overall, fewer patients in the LABA/LAMA group reported adverse events than in the triple therapy group (12.9% vs 15.1%).

Conclusions

These results suggest that in a real world setting physicians are able to identify patients who can be ‘stepped down’ from triple therapy to LABA/LAMA. Following step down, there was no overall decline in COPD—indeed, some patients had better outcomes.

COPD Exacerbation History and Impact on Future Exacerbations - 8-Year Retrospective Observational Database Cohort Study from Germany

Background

Recent studies evaluating the predictive value of different variables on future exacerbations suggest exacerbation history as the strongest predictor. We examined the effect of exacerbation history on subsequent events in a large sample population with over 250,000 COPD patients using up to 8 years of longitudinal healthcare data from Germany.

Methods

Patients 40 years or older with any COPD diagnosis in primary or secondary care were included from 2011 to 2017 (index period) from healthcare insurance claims (Germany; WIG2 research database), with 12 months before index date as baseline and at least 12-month follow-up. Exacerbations during baseline were defined as moderate (treatment with oral corticosteroids or antibiotics, J01AA, J01CA) or severe (emergency visit or hospitalization).

Results

Patients without (category A), with one moderate (category B), or with either one severe or several baseline exacerbations (category C) experienced an average of 0.9 (CI 0.9-0.9), 1.9 (CI 1.9-1.9), and 6.3 (CI 6.1-6.3) exacerbations during the first 3 years of follow-up, respectively. By 8 years, 87.0% (CI 86.6-87.4), 70.5% (CI 69.9-71.0) and 49.1% (CI 48.9-49.3) of category C, B and A patients had experienced a subsequent exacerbation.

Conclusion

Baseline exacerbations increased the likelihood of, and reduced time to subsequent exacerbations. Even patients without baseline exacerbations experienced exacerbations within three years, emphasizing the importance of adequate treatment in patients with less severe disease presentation as well.

COPD Assessment Test Changes from Baseline Correlate with COPD Exacerbations: A Longitudinal Analysis of the DACCORD Observational Study

PURPOSE

A number of analyses have shown the immediate impact of COPD exacerbations on health status. However, none evaluated the long-term correlation between health status and the occurrence of exacerbations.

METHODS

DACCORD is an observational study in patients with COPD recruited across Germany following initiation or change in COPD maintenance medication. Data collected include COPD Assessment Test (CAT) total score on entry and after 1 and 2 years, and the occurrence of exacerbations. We analysed the correlation between change from baseline in CAT total score and exacerbations, after excluding patients who exacerbated during the quarter immediately prior to the CAT assessment of interest.

RESULTS

The initial correlation analysis was performed in 6075 patients, 28% with ≥ 1 exacerbation over the 2-year follow-up, and 58% with a clinically relevant CAT improvement. There was a significant correlation between exacerbations over 2 years and CAT change from baseline at Year 2 (p = 0.0041). The Spearman's correlation coefficient was 0.03711, indicating very weak correlation-potentially driven by the high proportion of non-exacerbating patients. In a subsequent logistic regression, the probability of experiencing frequent (≥ 2 per year) or severe exacerbations was higher in patients with worsening in CAT total score (p < 0.001). However, the probability of a patient exacerbating in Year 1 or Year 2 did not correlate with CAT change.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population (initiating or changing maintenance COPD medication), patients with frequent or severe exacerbations had a long-term worsening in health status (beyond the acute effect of an exacerbation) compared with patients who do not exacerbate.

COPD patients' characteristics, usual care, and adherence to guidelines: the Greek UNLOCK study

Purpose

GOLD guidelines classify COPD patients into A–D groups based on health status as assessed by COPD Assessment Test (CAT) or mMRC tools and exacerbations and recommend single or dual long-acting bronchodilators as maintenance therapy, with additional inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) if the disease remains uncontrolled. We aimed to classify primary care COPD patients into A–D groups, assess usual treatment and adherence to guidelines, potential mismatches between CAT-and mMRC-based classification and described symptoms within groups.

Patients and methods

A total of 257 primary care COPD patients were enrolled between 2015 and 2016 in Greece. Physicians used structured interviews to collect cross-sectional data including demographics, symptoms, CAT, mMRC scores, and medications. Patients were classified into A–D groups based on CAT and mMRC, and prevalence of symptoms and medication was estimated within A–D groups. Interviews with physicians were also performed to explore additional issues about treatment and adherence to guidelines.

Results

Mean (SD) age was 65 (12.3) years with 79% males. The majority of patients reported uncontrolled symptoms (91% and 61% with ≥10 CAT or ≥2 mMRC scores, respectively). Thirty-seven percentage had $2 exacerbations in the past year. Group B was the largest followed by Groups D, A, and C. Patients were classified as more severe by CAT than by mMRC. In all groups, the majority were treated with combined long-acting beta agonist/ICS (> 50%). When patients were asked to report their main symptoms, dyspnea and cough were the most important symptoms mentioned, and there was a great variation between the A–D groups. However, Groups A–C reported mainly morning symptoms, whereas Group D suffered symptoms all day. Physicians reported a significant number of barriers to implementing guidelines, eg, frequent lack of guideline updates, access to diagnostic procedures, and prescription-reimbursement issues.

Conclusion

Our study confirms poor adherence to guidelines regarding treatment with an overuse of ICS and important barriers to implementation. A mismatch in classification occurs depending on the tool used, which can mislead clinicians in their choice of treatment.

COPD treatment pathways in France: a retrospective analysis of electronic medical record data from general practitioners

Background

Increasing availability of therapeutic options for COPD may drive new treatment pathways. This study describes COPD treatment in France, focusing on identifying initial treatment modifications in patients with COPD who either initiated long-acting bronchodilator (LABD)-based therapy or escalated to triple therapy (long-acting muscarinic antagonist [LAMA] + long-acting β₂-agonist [LABA] + inhaled corticosteroid [ICS]).

Methods

This retrospective analysis of patients with COPD in a large general practitioner database (IQVIA Longitudinal Patient Database) in France included two cohorts: Cohort 1 – new initiators of LABD-based therapy (LAMA, LABA, LAMA + LABA, LAMA + ICS, LABA + ICS or LAMA + LABA + ICS); Cohort 2 – patients escalating to triple therapy from mono- or dual-bronchodilator-based maintenance treatment. Both cohorts were indexed on the date of initiation/escalation (January 2008–December 2013), and the first treatment modification (at class level) within the 18-month post-index observational period was described. Five mutually exclusive outcomes were defined: continuous use (no modification), discontinuation (permanent [≥91 days with no restart] or temporary [≥91 days with subsequent restart]), switch, and augmentation (Cohort 1 only). Exploratory analysis of Cohort 1 explored potential drivers of treatment initiation.

Results

Overall, 5,065 patients initiated LABD-based therapy (Cohort 1), and 501 escalated to triple therapy (Cohort 2). In Cohort 1, 7.0% of patients were continuous users, 46.5% discontinued permanently, 28.5% discontinued temporarily, 2.8% augmented (added LAMA and/or LABA and/or ICS), and 15.2% switched therapy. In Cohort 2, 18.2% of patients were continuous users, 7.2% discontinued permanently, 27.9% discontinued temporarily, and 46.7% switched therapy. Exploratory analyses showed that time since COPD diagnosis was first recorded, pre-index exacerbation events, and concomitant medical conditions were potential drivers of initial maintenance treatment choices.

Conclusion

Discontinuation among new initiators of LABD-based therapy was high in France, whereas few switched or augmented treatment. In comparison, permanent discontinuation within 18 months was low in patients escalating to triple therapy.

Understanding low COPD exacerbation rates in Japan: a review and comparison with other countries

COPD is associated with significant morbidity and is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Periods of exacerbation, the acute worsening of symptoms, are interspersed throughout the disease's natural history and can result in increased treatment burden and hospitalization for patients with COPD. The frequency of exacerbations varies between countries, with both epidemiological studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showing significant differences in observed prevalence rates. Differences in study design and the healthcare setting are likely to contribute to differences in exacerbation frequency, however the perceived rate of exacerbations in Japan is currently lower then the rest of the world. This review identified nine cohort studies and five RCTs that reported COPD annual exacerbation rates in Japan in the ranges of 0.1-2.1 and 0.33-1.79, respectively. The difference in exacerbation rate between studies appeared greater than the difference between Japan and Western countries, likely because of disparities between settings, design, and inclusion criteria. Of these, only one (Understanding the Long-Term Impacts of Tiotropium) had uniform inclusion criteria across different regions. This study found that the annual rate of exacerbation events per patient in Japan was 0.61, compared with 0.85 worldwide in the placebo groups. This review summarizes the published rates of COPD exacerbations in Japan and the rest of the world and explores the hypotheses as to why rates in Japan might be lower than other countries. These include access to medical care, variance in the associated morbidity profile, environmental factors, diagnostic crossover with related diseases, and differences in study design (including the underreporting of COPD exacerbations in Japan). Understanding the reasons why COPD exacerbation rates appear lower in Japan could help clinicians to recognize and modify treatment behaviors, which may lead to improved patient outcomes in all populations.

Dual bronchodilation vs triple therapy in the "real-life" COPD DACCORD study

Background

No observational studies have evaluated the "real-world" effectiveness of dual bronchodilation comprising a long-acting β₂-agonist plus a long-acting muscarinic antagonist vs that of triple therapy (long-acting β₂-agonist plus long-acting muscarinic antagonist plus inhaled corticosteroid) in COPD.

Materials and methods

DACCORD is a non-interventional, observational clinical study that recruited patients following COPD maintenance therapy initiation or change in maintenance therapy between or within therapeutic class. Given the non-interventional nature of the study, the decision to initiate or change medication had to be made by the patients' physicians prior to inclusion in DACCORD. We used a matched-pairs analysis to compare disease progression in two patient groups: those receiving dual bronchodilation vs those receiving triple therapy (each group n=1,046).

Results

In two subgroups of patients matched according to a broad range of demographic and disease characteristics, over 1 year, fewer patients receiving dual bronchodilation exacerbated than those receiving triple therapy (15.5% vs 26.6%; P<0.001), with a greater improvement from baseline in COPD Assessment Test total score at 1 year (mean±SD -2.9±5.8 vs -1.4±5.5;P<0.001). When analyzed according to prior therapy, the highest rate of exacerbations was in patients on triple therapy prior to the study who remained on triple therapy. Those changing from mono-bronchodilator to dual bronchodilation had the greatest COPD Assessment Test total score improvement.

Conclusion

In this "real-life" cohort of patients with COPD, most of whom had not exacerbated in the 6 months prior to entry, triple therapy did not seem to improve outcomes compared with dual bronchodilation in terms of either exacerbations or health status. Our analyses clearly demonstrate the potential impact of prior medication on study results, something that should be taken into account when interpreting the results even of controlled clinical trials.

The COPDnet integrated care model

Introduction

This research project sets out to design an integrated disease management model for patients with COPD who were referred to a secondary care setting and who qualified for pharmacological and nonpharmacological intervention options.

Theory and methods

The integrated disease management model was designed according to the guidelines of the European Pathway Association and the content founded on the Chronic Care Model, principles of integrated disease management, and knowledge of quality management systems.

Results

An integrated disease management model was created, and comprises 1) a diagnostic trajectory in a secondary care setting, 2) a nonmedical intervention program in a primary care setting, and 3) a pulmonary rehabilitation service in a tertiary care setting. The model also includes a quality management system and regional agreements about exacerbation management and palliative care.

Discussion

In the next phase of the project, the COPDnet model will be implemented in at least two different regions, in order to assess the added value of the entire model and its components, in terms of feasibility, health status benefits, and costs of care.

Conclusion

Based on scientific theories and models, a new integrated disease management model was developed for COPD patients, named COPDnet. Once the model is stable, it will be evaluated for its feasibility, health status benefits, and costs.

Evaluation of the COPDnet integrated care model in patients with COPD: the study protocol

Background

Projections on the future suggest a further rise in the prevalence of patients with COPD, and in COPD related morbidity, mortality, and health care costs worldwide. Given the substantial impact on the individual and on society, it is important to establish a care process that maximizes outcomes in relation to the costs and efforts made. In an attempt to bridge this gap, we set out to develop an evidence-based model of integrated care for patients with COPD, named the COPDnet integrated care model.

Purpose

The current study protocol sets out to 1) evaluate the feasibility of employing the COPDnet model in present real-life care within the context of the Dutch health care system, 2) explore the potential health status benefits, and 3) analyze the costs of care of this model.

Patients and methods

In this prospective study, feasibility and health status changes will be evaluated with an experimental before and after study design. The costs of the diagnostic trajectory will be calculated according to a standard economic health care evaluation approach. Furthermore, the feasibility and cost of care studies will comprise both quantitative and qualitative data collection. For the studies on the feasibility and change in health status, all new patients qualifying for shared care by primary and secondary care professionals according to the Dutch Standard of Care for COPD, and patients referred by their general practitioners to one of the COPDnet hospitals will be included. To evaluate the feasibility and costs of care, semi-structured interviews will be held with patients, hospital personnel, health care professionals in the affiliated primary care region, and hospital and primary care group managers.

Conclusions

The COPDnet integrated care model for COPD patients has been designed according to the current insights regarding effective care for patients with a chronic condition in general, and for patients with COPD in particular. It will be evaluated for its feasibility, potential health status benefits, and the costs of care of the diagnostic trajectory in secondary care.

Health status in patients with COPD treated with roflumilast: two large noninterventional real-life studies: DINO and DACOTA

Purpose

DINO and DACOTA were prospective, noninterventional studies assessing the health status and quality of life of patients with COPD newly treated with roflumilast 500 μg once-daily add-on therapy.

Patients and methods

Patients were evaluated over 6 months. Clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ) and COPD assessment test (CAT) scores were recorded at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. In DACOTA, post-bronchodilator FEV1 was recorded at each time point.

Results

Of 5,462 and 3,645 patients recruited into DINO and DACOTA, respectively, 3,274 patients in DINO and 916 patients in DACOTA completed the 6-month visit. Almost all patients had severe or very severe airway obstruction; mean baseline CCQ total score was 3.9 in DINO and 3.7 in DACOTA. Overall, 33.8% of patients in DACOTA and 30.6% in DINO discontinued treatment prematurely. Significant and clinically relevant improvements in CCQ total scores were observed in both studies (mean change from baseline of 1.36 in DINO and 0.91 in DACOTA at Month 6 [all P<0.001]). Changes in CAT total score from baseline to Month 6 indicated that the average clinical impact of COPD was reduced from a severe (score: 21-30) to a moderate (score: 11-20) impairment. In DACOTA, mean change in post-bronchodilator FEV1 was 202 mL (P<0.001). Diarrhea, nausea, and weight decrease were the most frequently reported adverse drug reactions.

Conclusion

In real-life clinical practice, roflumilast treatment as an add-on therapy is associated with clinically relevant improvements in health status and quality of life.

Longitudinal change of COPD assessment test (CAT) in a telehealthcare cohort is associated with exacerbation risk

Background

There are only scarce data regarding the evolution of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT) over time. Our aim was to investigate the evolution of the CAT in a telehealthcare (THC) cohort and to evaluate its potential to predict exacerbations.

Patients and methods

The CAT was measured weekly over up to 1 year in 40 COPD patients undergoing a THC intervention. The evolution of the CAT was analyzed using linear regression. The association between this evolution and the occurrence of exacerbations was evaluated using the Andersen–Gill formulation of the Cox proportional hazards model for the analysis of recurrent time-to-event data with time-varying predictors.

Results

The median CAT at inclusion was 17 (interquartile range 13–22) points. During the study, 25% of patients had a significant negative slope (median −7 points per year [ppy]), 38% were stable (median +0 ppy) and 38% had a significant positive slope (median +6 ppy). The median slope of the CAT in the overall cohort was +1 (interquartile range −3 to +6) ppy. A significant positive association was found between the change in CAT scores and the risk of exacerbations (hazard ratio =1.08, 95% CI: 1.03–1.13; p<0.001). There was an 8% increase of the risk of exacerbation per unit increase in CAT. We detected a significant learning effect in filling out the CAT in 18.4% of patients with a median learning phase of five filled questionnaires.

Conclusion

Sixty-three percent of the COPD patients monitored by THC experienced a stable or improved CAT during 1-year follow-up. We found a significant positive association between the evolution of the CAT over time and the risk of exacerbations. In about one-fifth of patients, there was a significant learning effect in filling out the CAT, before reliable results could be obtained. The evolution of the CAT could help to assess the risk for future exacerbations.

GOLD 2017 treatment pathways in 'real life': An analysis of the DACCORD observational study

INTRODUCTION

The 2017 update to the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) strategy document includes recommendations for treatment intensification or step-down in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), although recognises that limited supporting information is available. DACCORD is an ongoing observational, non-interventional study, recruiting patients following COPD maintenance treatment change or initiation, a subset of whom were receiving a long-acting β₂-agonist (LABA) plus a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) fixed-dose combination (FDC) on entry. Since there were no requirements in terms of prior medication (and no washout before commencing LABA/LAMA FDC), this provides an opportunity to generate 'real world' data to test the GOLD 2017 recommendations.

METHODS

To reduce heterogeneity, the current analyses include patients receiving indacaterol/glycopyrronium at baseline, and who, prior to the study, were receiving no COPD maintenance medication ('none'), LABA or LAMA monotherapy ('mono'), LABA plus inhaled corticosteroid (ICS; 'LABA/ICS'), or triple therapy ('triple'). At the baseline visit, data collected included: demographic and disease characteristics; COPD Assessment Test (CAT); and exacerbations in the 6 months prior to entry. At 3, 6, 9 and 12 months data on exacerbations were collected, with CAT recorded at 3 and 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 2724 patients were included in the baseline analyses: 795, 954, 598 and 377 in the 'none', 'mono', 'LABA/ICS' and 'triple' subgroups, respectively. There were no clinically relevant differences in baseline demographics between the four groups. In terms of disease characteristics, the 'triple' group had the highest proportion of patients with a disease duration of more than 1 year since diagnosis and with severe/very severe airflow limitation, but a similar percentage of non-exacerbators compared to the 'none' group. Over the 1-year follow-up, the majority of patients in all four subgroups did not exacerbate (exacerbation rates 0.16, 0.19, 0.21, and 0.26 in the 'none', 'mono', 'LABA/ICS' and 'triple' groups, respectively). At 12 months, 61.4%, 65.0%, 71.0% and 52.4% of patients had a clinically relevant improvement in CAT score.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the results support the GOLD recommendations in suggesting that a switch from a mono-bronchodilator or LABA plus ICS to LABA/LAMA FDC is a valid treatment option for patients with COPD. The results also validate the use of a LABA/LAMA FDC as initial maintenance treatment for COPD, and provide first 'real world' evidence to support the newly added 'step down' recommendation (from triple to LABA/LAMA FDC).

A two-year evaluation of the 'real life' impact of COPD on patients in Germany: The DACCORD observational study

INTRODUCTION

DACCORD is an observational, non-interventional study being conducted in German primary and secondary care centres. The study aims to describe the impact of disease (including exacerbations) and treatments over 2 years on 'real-life' patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients had a clinical and spirometry diagnosis of COPD, were aged ≥40 years and, on recruitment, were initiating or changing COPD maintenance medication. The only exclusion criteria were asthma and randomised clinical trial participation. Exacerbations data were collected every 3 months. COPD medication, COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) were recorded at baseline and after 1 and 2 years.

RESULTS

A total of 6122 patients were recruited, 3137 (51.2%) of whom completed the 2-year visit. The mean age of these patients was 65.6 years, 59% were male, 69% had mild or moderate airflow limitation, and their mean COPD Assessment Test (CAT) total score was 20.3. Overall, there was a trend towards decreasing COPD exacerbation rates over the 2-year follow-up period, with rates of 0.390 during Year 1 and 0.347 during Year 2. Rates were lower in patients with no exacerbation during the 6 months prior to entry (0.263 and 0.251 during Years 1 and 2, respectively), with 51.6% of patients having no exacerbation during the 6 months prior to entry and over the 2-year follow-up. Approximately 50% of the overall population experienced a clinically relevant improvement from baseline in CAT total score at Year 1 and 2. When assessed by treatment class (or classes), persistence to medication was high (77.8% in Year 1 and 71.4% in Year 2).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the 2-year follow-up data from DACCORD suggest that for most patients with COPD exacerbations are a rare event. For the majority of patients, the focus should be on managing symptoms, and the impact that these symptoms have on their daily lives. Even for those patients who do exacerbate, although prevention of exacerbations is an important factor, management of symptoms should be a key consideration. DACCORD also suggests that COPD disease progression is not inevitable - providing patients are receiving pharmacological treatment.

"Real-life" inhaled corticosteroid withdrawal in COPD: a subgroup analysis of DACCORD

Many patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receive inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) without a clear indication, and thus, the impact of ICS withdrawal on disease control is of great interest. DACCORD is a prospective, noninterventional 2-year study in the primary and secondary care throughout Germany. A subgroup of patients were taking ICS prior to entry - 1,022 patients continued to receive ICS for 2 years; physicians withdrew ICS on entry in 236 patients. Data from these two subgroups were analyzed to evaluate the impact of ICS withdrawal. Patients aged ≥40 years with COPD, initiating or changing COPD maintenance medication were recruited, excluding patients with asthma. Demographic and disease characteristics, prescribed COPD medication, COPD Assessment Test, exacerbations, and lung function were recorded. There were few differences in baseline characteristics; ICS withdrawn patients had shorter disease duration and better lung function, with 74.2% of ICS withdrawn patients not exacerbating, compared with 70.7% ICS-continued patients. During Year 1, exacerbation rates were 0.414 in the withdrawn group and 0.433 in the continued group. COPD Assessment Test total score improved from baseline in both groups. These data suggest that ICS withdrawal is possible with no increased risk of exacerbations in patients with COPD managed in the primary and secondary care.