Influence of the type of emphysema in the relationship between COPD and lung cancer

Analysis of clinical characteristics and prognosis of lung cancer patients with CPFE or COPD: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer (LC) commonly occurs in patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but comparative research is limited. This study examines clinical characteristics, treatments, and prognosis in LC patients with CPFE or COPD.

METHODS

The retrospective study involved 75 lung cancer patients with CPFE and 182 with COPD. It analyzed clinical features, tumor pathology, pulmonary function, laboratory parameters, and treatment responses.

RESULTS

Notable differences were found between the CPFE + LC and COPD + LC groups. Both groups were mostly elderly, male smokers. The CPFE + LC group had higher BMI and more adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, while COPD + LC had predominantly squamous cell carcinoma. CPFE + LC tumors were mostly in the lower lobes; COPD + LC's were in the upper lobes. The CPFE + LC group showed higher tumor metastasis rates, more paraseptal emphysema, and elevated levels of TG, CEA, NSE, and Killer T Cells. In advanced stages (IIIB-IV), the CPFE + LC group receiving first-line treatment had shorter median progression-free survival (PFS) and a higher risk of progression or death than the COPD + LC group, regardless of whether it was non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or small cell lung cancer (SCLC). No significant PFS difference was found within CPFE + LC between chemotherapy and immunotherapy, nor in immune-related adverse events between groups, with interstitial pneumonia being common.

CONCLUSION

This study emphasizes distinct lung cancer characteristics in CPFE or COPD patients, highlighting the need for tailored diagnostic and treatment approaches. It advocates for further research to improve care for this high-risk group.

Quantifying emphysema in lung screening computed tomography with robust automated lobe segmentation

Purpose

Anatomy-based quantification of emphysema in a lung screening cohort has the potential to improve lung cancer risk stratification and risk communication. Segmenting lung lobes is an essential step in this analysis, but leading lobe segmentation algorithms have not been validated for lung screening computed tomography (CT).

Approach

In this work, we develop an automated approach to lobar emphysema quantification and study its association with lung cancer incidence. We combine self-supervised training with level set regularization and finetuning with radiologist annotations on three datasets to develop a lobe segmentation algorithm that is robust for lung screening CT. Using this algorithm, we extract quantitative CT measures for a cohort (n = 1189 ) from the National Lung Screening Trial and analyze the multivariate association with lung cancer incidence.

Results

Our lobe segmentation approach achieved an external validation Dice of 0.93, significantly outperforming a leading algorithm at 0.90 (p < 0.01 ). The percentage of low attenuation volume in the right upper lobe was associated with increased lung cancer incidence (odds ratio: 1.97; 95% CI: [1.06, 3.66]) independent of PLCO m 2012 risk factors and diagnosis of whole lung emphysema. Quantitative lobar emphysema improved the goodness-of-fit to lung cancer incidence (χ 2 = 7.48 , p = 0.02 ).

Conclusions

We are the first to develop and validate an automated lobe segmentation algorithm that is robust to smoking-related pathology. We discover a quantitative risk factor, lending further evidence that regional emphysema is independently associated with increased lung cancer incidence. The algorithm is provided at https://github.com/MASILab/EmphysemaSeg.

The adjusted impact of different severities of acute exacerbations and medications on the risk of developing dementia in COPD patients

BACKGROUND

Although a relationship between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and dementia has been reported, the initial severity upon emergency department (ED) visits and the medications used have not been well evaluated as risk factors for increased dementia occurrence. We aimed to analyze the risks of dementia development over 5 years among patients with COPD compared to matched controls (primary) and the impact of different severities of acute exacerbations (AEs) of COPD and medications on the risk of dementia development among COPD patients (secondary).

METHOD

This study used the Taiwanese government deidentified health care database. We enrolled patients during the 10-year study period (January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2010), and each patient was followed up for 5 years. Once these patients received a diagnosis of dementia or died, they were no longer followed up. The study group included 51,318 patients who were diagnosed with COPD and 51,318 matched (in terms of age, sex, and the number of hospital visits) non-COPD patients from the remaining patients as the control group. Each patient was followed up for 5 years to analyze the risk of dementia with Cox regression analysis. Data on medications (antibiotics, bronchodilators, corticosteroids) and severity at the initial ED visit (ED treatment only, hospital admission, or ICU admission) were collected for both groups, as well as demographics and baseline comorbidities, which were considered confounding factors.

RESULTS

In the study and control groups, 1,025 (2.0%) and 423 (0.8%) patients suffered from dementia, respectively. The unadjusted HR for dementia was 2.51 (95% CI: 2.24-2.81) in the study group. Bronchodilator treatment was associated with the HRs, especially among those who received long-term (> 1 month) treatment (HR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.91-2.45). Furthermore, among 3,451 AE of COPD patients who initially visited the ED, patients who required ICU admission (n = 164, 4.7%) had a higher risk of dementia occurrence (HR = 11.05, 95% CI: 7.77-15.71).

CONCLUSION

Bronchodilator administration might be associated with a decreased risk of dementia development. More importantly, patients who suffered AEs of COPD and initially visited the ED and required ICU admission had a higher risk of developing dementia.

From COPD to Lung Cancer: Mechanisms Linking, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis

Many studies have proved that the pathogenesis of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer is related, and may cause and affect each other to a certain extent. In fact, the change of chronic airway obstruction will continue to have an impact on the screening, treatment, and prognosis of lung cancer.In this comprehensive review, we outlined the links and heterogeneity between COPD and lung cancer and finds that factors such as gene expression and genetic susceptibility, epigenetics, smoking, epithelial mesenchymal transformation (EMT), chronic inflammation, and oxidative stress injury may all play a role in the process. Although the relationship between these two diseases have been largely determined, the methods to prevent lung cancer in COPD patients are still limited. Early diagnosis is still the key to a better prognosis. Thus, it is necessary to establish more intuitive screening evaluation criteria and find suitable biomarkers for lung cancer screening in high-risk populations with COPD. Some studies have indicated that COPD may change the efficacy of anti-tumor therapy by affecting the response of lung cancer patients to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). And for lung cancer patients with COPD, the standardized management of COPD can improve the prognosis. The treatment of lung cancer patients with COPD is an individualized, comprehensive, and precise process. The development of new targets and new strategies of molecular targeted therapy may be the breakthrough for disease treatment in the future.

Association between Chest CT-defined Emphysema and Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background Given the different methods of assessing emphysema, controversy exists as to whether it is associated with lung cancer. Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between chest CT-defined emphysema and the presence of lung cancer. Materials and Methods The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched up to July 15, 2021, to identify studies on the association between emphysema assessed visually or quantitatively with CT and lung cancer. Associations were determined by emphysema severity (trace, mild, or moderate to severe, assessed visually and quantitatively) and subtype (centrilobular and paraseptal, assessed visually). Overall and stratified pooled odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% CIs were obtained. Results Of the 3343 screened studies, 21 studies (107 082 patients) with 26 subsets were included. The overall pooled ORs for lung cancer given the presence of emphysema were 2.3 (95% CI: 2.0, 2.6; I² = 35%; 19 subsets) and 1.02 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.02; six subsets) per 1% increase in low attenuation area. Studies with visual (pooled OR, 2.3; 95% CI: 1.9, 2.6; I² = 48%; 12 subsets) and quantitative (pooled OR, 2.2; 95% CI: 1.8, 2.8; I² = 3.7%; eight subsets) assessments yielded comparable results for the dichotomous assessment. Based on six studies (1716 patients), the pooled ORs for lung cancer increased with emphysema severity and were higher for visual assessment (2.5, 3.7, and 4.5 for trace, mild, and moderate to severe, respectively) than for quantitative assessment (1.9, 2.2, and 2.5) based on point estimates. Compared with no emphysema, only centrilobular emphysema (three studies) was associated with lung cancer (pooled OR, 2.2; 95% CI: 1.5, 3.2; P < .001). Conclusion Both visual and quantitative CT assessments of emphysema were associated with a higher odds of lung cancer, which also increased with emphysema severity. Regarding subtype, only centrilobular emphysema was significantly associated with lung cancer. Clinical trial registration no. CRD42021262163 © RSNA, 2022 See also the editorial by Hunsaker in this issue. Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Spanish COPD Guideline (GesEPOC) Update: Comorbidities, Self-Management and Palliative Care

The current health care models described in GesEPOC indicate the best way to make a correct diagnosis, the categorization of patients, the appropriate selection of the therapeutic strategy and the management and prevention of exacerbations. In addition, COPD involves several aspects that are crucial in an integrated approach to the health care of these patients. The evaluation of comorbidities in COPD patients represents a healthcare challenge. As part of a comprehensive assessment, the presence of comorbidities related to the clinical presentation, to some diagnostic technique or to some COPD-related treatments should be studied. Likewise, interventions on healthy lifestyle habits, adherence to complex treatments, developing skills to recognize the signs and symptoms of exacerbation, knowing what to do to prevent them and treat them within the framework of a self-management plan are also necessary. Finally, palliative care is one of the pillars in the comprehensive treatment of the COPD patient, seeking to prevent or treat the symptoms of a disease, the side effects of treatment, and the physical, psychological and social problems of patients and their caregivers. Therefore, the main objective of this palliative care is not to prolong life expectancy, but to improve its quality. This chapter of GesEPOC 2021 presents an update on the most important comorbidities, self-management strategies, and palliative care in COPD, and includes a recommendation on the use of opioids for the treatment of refractory dyspnea in COPD.

Discordant Quantitative and Visual CT Assessments in the Diagnosis of Emphysema

Purpose

Visual assessment of computed tomography (CT) of the lung is routinely employed in the diagnosis of emphysema. Quantitative CT (QCT) can complement visual CT but must be well validated. QCT emphysema is defined as ≥5% of lung volume occupied by low attenuation areas ≤-950 Hounsfield units (LAA-950). Discordant visual and QCT assessments are not uncommon. We examined the association between visual and quantitative chest CT evaluation within a large cohort of subjects to identify variables that may explain discordant visual and QCT findings.

Materials and Methods

Volumetric inspiratory CT scans of 1221 subjects enrolled in phase 1 of the COPDGene study conducted at the University of Iowa were reviewed. Participants included never smokers, smokers with normal spirometry, preserved ratio impaired spirometry, and Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stages I-IV. CT scans were quantitatively scored and visually interpreted by both the COPDGene Imaging Center and the University of Iowa radiologists. Individual-level visual assessments were compared with QCT measurements. Agreement between the two sets of radiologists was calculated using kappa statistic. We assessed variables associated with discordant results using regression methods.

Results

There was a fair agreement for the presence or absence of emphysema between our center's radiologists and QCT (61% concordance, kappa 0.22 [0.17-0.28]). Similar comparisons showed a slight agreement between the COPDGene Imaging Center and QCT (56% concordance, kappa 0.16 [0.11-0.21]), and a moderate agreement between both sets of visual assessments (80% concordance, kappa 0.60 [0.54-0.65]). Current smoking and female gender were significantly associated with QCT-negative but visually detectable emphysema.

Conclusion

The slight-to-fair agreement between visual and quantitative CT assessment of emphysema highlights the need to utilize both modalities for a comprehensive radiologic evaluation. Discordant results may be attributable to one or more factors that warrant further exploration in larger studies.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT000608764.

Lung emphysema and lung cancer: what do we know about it?

Emphysema and lung cancer (LC) are two diseases which share common risk factors, e.g., smoking. In recent years, many studies have sought to analyse this association. By way of illustration, we conducted a review of the scientific literature of the studies published to date, whose main designated aim was to demonstrate the relationship between emphysema and LC, and this association's influence on the histology, prognosis and molecular mechanisms responsible. We included over 40 studies (ranging from case-control and cohort studies to systematic reviews and meta-analyses), which highlight the association between emphysema and LC, independently of smoking habit. These studies also report a possible influence on histology, with adenocarcinoma being the most frequent lineage, and an association with poor prognosis, which affects both survival and post-operative complications. Oxidative stress, which generates chronic inflammatory status as well as the presence of certain polymorphisms in various genes (CYP1A1, TERT, CLPTM1L, ERK), gives rise-in the case of patients with emphysema-to alteration of cellular repair mechanisms, which in turn favours the proliferation of neoplastic epithelial cells responsible for the origin of LC.

Quantitative Emphysema on Low-Dose CT Imaging of the Chest and Risk of Lung Cancer and Airflow Obstruction: An Analysis of the National Lung Screening Trial

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer risk prediction models do not routinely incorporate imaging metrics available on low-dose CT (LDCT) imaging of the chest ordered for lung cancer screening.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the association between quantitative emphysema measured on LDCT imaging and lung cancer incidence and mortality, all-cause mortality, and airflow obstruction in individuals who currently or formerly smoked and are undergoing lung cancer screening?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In 7,262 participants in the CT arm of the National Lung Screening Trial, percent low attenuation area (%LAA) was defined as the percentage of lung volume with voxels less than -950 Hounsfield units on the baseline examination. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for competing risks where appropriate, were built to test for association between %LAA and lung cancer incidence, lung cancer mortality, and all-cause mortality with censoring at 6 years. In addition, multivariable logistic regression models were built to test the cross-sectional association between %LAA and airflow obstruction on spirometry, which was available in 2,700 participants.

RESULTS

The median %LAA was 0.8% (interquartile range, 0.2%-2.7%). Every 1% increase in %LAA was independently associated with higher hazards of lung cancer incidence (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03; P = .004), lung cancer mortality (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.05; P = .045), and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; P = .042). Among participants with spirometry, 892 had airflow obstruction. The likelihood of airflow obstruction increased with every 1% increase in %LAA (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.06-1.09; P < .001). A %LAA cutoff of 1% had the best discriminative accuracy for airflow obstruction in participants aged > 65 years.

INTERPRETATION

Quantitative emphysema measured on LDCT imaging of the chest can be leveraged to improve lung cancer risk prediction and help diagnose COPD in individuals who currently or formerly smoked and are undergoing lung cancer screening.

Objective quantitative multidetector computed tomography assessments in patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis with emphysema: Relationship with pulmonary function and clinical events

BACKGROUND

Combined pulmonary fibrosis with emphysema (CPFE) is a clinically meaningful syndrome characterized by coexisting upper-lobe emphysema and lower-lobe interstitial fibrosis. However, ambiguous diagnostic criteria and, particularly, the absence of objective methods to quantify emphysematous/fibrotic lesions in patients with CPFE confound the interpretation of the pathophysiology of this syndrome. We analyzed the relationship between objectively quantified computed tomography (CT) measurements and the results of pulmonary function testing (PFT) and clinical events in CPFE patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 46 CPFE patients who underwent CT and PFT. The extent of emphysematous lesions was obtained by calculating the percent of low attenuation area (%LAA). The extent of fibrotic lesions was calculated as the percent of high attenuation area (%HAA). %LAA and %HAA values were combined to yield the percent of abnormal area (%AA). We assessed the relationships between CT parameters and other clinical indices, including PFT results. Multivariate analysis was performed to examine the association between the CT parameters and clinical events.

RESULTS

A greater negative correlation with percent predicted diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO %predicted) existed for %AA (r = -0.73, p < 0.001) than for %LAA or %HAA alone. The %HAA value was inversely correlated with percent predicted forced vital capacity (r = -0.48, p < 0.001), percent predicted total lung capacity (r = -0.48, p < 0.01), and DLCO %predicted (r = -0.47, p < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that %AA showed the strongest association with hospitalization events (odds ratio = 1.20, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.54, p = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

Quantitative CT measurements reflected deterioration in pulmonary function and were associated with hospitalization in patients with CPFE. This approach could serve as a useful method to determine the extent of lung morphology, pathophysiology, and the clinical course of patients with CPFE.

Endothelial dysfunction is not a predictor of outcome in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background

Local airway inflammation may cause systemic changes which result in endothelial dysfunction. Only a few studies have used reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in order to measure their endothelial dysfunction.

Objective

To determine the efficacy of endothelial dysfunction, measured by RH-PAT, in assessing disease severity and systemic burden in a cohort of COPD patients.

Methods

In this prospective, monocentric study, 157 patients with moderate to very severe COPD (GOLD class II-IV) were examined for endothelial dysfunction using RH-PAT (Itamar medical Ltd., Caesarea, Israel). In a nested-cohort, examination was repeated at exacerbation. The association between reactive hyperemia index (RHI), augmentation index (AI) and disease severity and outcome parameters was analysed.

Results

57% of the COPD patients had a dysfunctional endothelium and the median (IQR) RHI was 1.42 (1.27–1.53). Exacerbation of COPD was not associated with a significant change in RHI (p = 0.625) or ΑΙ (p = 0.530). None of the diagnostic or clinical outcomes of COPD was associated with RHI or arterial stiffness.

Conclusion

Endothelial dysfunction is common in COPD. However, it does not seem to be a predictor neither of disease severity, nor of outcome and does not change during exacerbations of the disease.