Therapeutic Success of Tiotropium/Olodaterol, Measured Using the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), in Routine Clinical Practice: A Multinational Non-Interventional Study

Benefit of dual bronchodilator therapy on exacerbations in former and current smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in real-world clinical practice: a multicenter validation study (TOReTO)

BACKGROUND

Dual bronchodilator therapy, consisting of a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), has proven effective for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, it remains uncertain whether there are efficacy differences between current and former smokers with COPD. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of LABA/LAMA therapies in both these groups.

METHODS

The TOReTO trial assessed lung function, symptoms, health status, the occurrence of exacerbations, clinically significant exacerbations, and the use of LABA/LAMA therapies. These therapies include Tio/Olo, umeclidinium/vilanterol (Umec/Vi), and umeclidinium/vilanterol (Umec/Vi) are used in patients with COPD. The study examined the differences in outcomes between current and former smokers. To balance the baseline characteristics, propensity score matching (PSM) was employed.

RESULTS

Data from 967 patients were collected. After PSM, the time to the first acute exacerbation in current smokers was analyzed separately for the three treatment groups and was significantly different between them (p = 0.0457). Among, there are differences in the occurrence of acute exacerbation between treatment and smoking status in Umec/Vi (p = 0.0114). There is no significant difference in the treatment of former smokers among the three different groups of LABA/LAMA fixed-dose combinations (p = 0.3079). COPD-related symptoms remained stable throughout the treatment period. There were no significant differences in symptom scores, including CAT and mMRC, among the three groups at the end of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The three fixed-dose combinations of LABA/LAMA showed no difference in reducing exacerbations in former smokers but did show differences in current smokers. This trend has clinical significance, and future research will be conducted to control influencing variables to validate this point. However, due to the non-randomized study design, these findings should be interpreted with caution.

Long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting β2-agonist combination for the treatment of maintenance therapy-naïve patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a narrative review

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Faster lung function impairment occurs earlier in the disease, particularly in mild-to-moderate COPD, highlighting the need for early and effective targeted interventions. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2024 report recommends initial pharmacologic treatment with a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) combination in group B (0 or 1 moderate exacerbation not leading to hospitalization, modified Medical Research Council score of ⩾2, and COPD Assessment Test™ score of ⩾10) and E (⩾2 moderate exacerbations or ⩾1 exacerbation leading to hospitalization and blood eosinophil count <300 cells/µL) patients. In randomized controlled trials (RCTs), LAMA/LABA combination therapy improved lung function, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score, and Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score and reduced the use of rescue medications, exacerbation risk, and risk of first clinically important deterioration (CID), compared with LAMA or LABA monotherapy. However, there is limited evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of LAMA/LABA combination therapy versus LAMA or LABA monotherapy in maintenance therapy-naïve patients. This review discusses the rationale for the early initiation of LAMA/LABA combination therapy in maintenance therapy-naïve patients with COPD. In post hoc analyses of pooled data from RCTs, compared with LAMA or LABA monotherapy, LAMA/LABA combination therapy improved lung function and quality of life and reduced COPD symptoms, risk of first moderate/severe exacerbation, risk of first CID, and use of rescue medication, with no new safety signals. In a real-world study, patients initiating LAMA/LABA had significantly reduced risk of COPD-related inpatient admissions and rate of on-treatment COPD-related inpatient admissions over 12 months than those initiating LAMA. Consequently, LAMA/LABA combination therapy could be considered the treatment of choice in maintenance therapy-naïve patients with COPD, as recommended by the GOLD 2024 report.

Therapeutic Success in Swiss COPD Patients Receiving Dual Bronchodilation Therapy as COPD Maintenance Treatment

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is often reduced by high symptom burden and frequent exacerbations. So far, data on therapeutic success in Swiss COPD patients receiving dual bronchodilation therapy as COPD maintenance treatment are limited. Data from a recently published, non-interventional study on clinical benefit after the start of combined tiotropium-olodaterol treatment were analyzed focusing on Swiss patients compared to the overall cohort including patients from various European countries. Demographic data on the changes in Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) for the assessment of HRQoL in correlation to symptoms and the number of exacerbations, as well as physician's global assessment (PGE), were evaluated 6 weeks after treatment start. In Switzerland (n = 61), significantly more patients had comorbidities and exacerbations but showed less symptoms compared to the overall cohort (n = 4639). HRQoL improved in both cohorts, with a negative correlation to symptom burden and number of exacerbations in the overall cohort. PGE scores improved after 6 weeks with a better general condition at baseline in Swiss patients (PGE score 4/5: 68.9% [Swiss cohort] vs. 49.0% [overall cohort]. Despite significant differences regarding the presence of symptoms and exacerbations, therapeutic success was similar in both patient groups. Highly symptomatic patients benefited mostly from tiotropium-olodaterol treatment.

Effectiveness of Tiotropium/Olodaterol in the Real World: A Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis After the First Year of Use

INTRODUCTION

Real-world evidence is needed to optimize pharmacotherapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The effectiveness of inhaled tiotropium/olodaterol according to baseline symptoms and previous COPD treatment and predictors of response were assessed.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of a 52-week post-marketing surveillance study of tiotropium/olodaterol in 1255 Japanese patients with COPD of all severities. We analyzed change in total COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score and lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV₁] and forced vital capacity [FVC]). Patient subgroups were analyzed based on baseline CAT score (< 10 [n = 184], ≥ 10 [n = 507]) and previous COPD treatment (treatment-naive [n = 407], previously treated [n = 848], treatment with long-acting muscarinic antagonist monotherapy [n = 161]).

RESULTS

In the CAT ≥ 10 subgroup, tiotropium/olodaterol showed statistically significant improvements in mean total CAT score (- 6.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 7.2, - 5.1), FEV₁ (0.109 L; 95% CI 0.059, 0.159) and FVC (0.171 L; 95% CI 0.096, 0.245), which continued through Week 52. CAT score and lung function improvement were greatest in treatment-naive patients: - 7.6 (95% CI - 9.2, - 6.1) mean total CAT score, 0.177 L (95% CI 0.076, 0.279) mean FEV₁ and 0.178 L (95% CI 0.036, 0.319) mean FVC. Baseline factors associated with treatment response (total CAT score improvement ≥ 2 points) were: shorter COPD duration (odds ratio [OR] 0.91; 95% CI 0.87, 0.96), total CAT score ≥ 10 (OR 3.86; 95% CI 2.46, 6.06) and treatment-naive status (OR 1.86; 95% CI 1.12, 3.07). Baseline total CAT scores ≥ 13 predicted responses to tiotropium/olodaterol in all previous COPD treatment subgroups including treatment-naive patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Tiotropium/olodaterol improved symptoms and lung function in Japanese COPD patients. Our results support the possible use of tiotropium/olodaterol in treatment-naive patients and those with total CAT scores ≥ 10.

TRAIL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier for parent study: NCT02850978.

An Observational Study Assessing Changes in Health and Functional Status in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) During Therapy with Spiolto® Respimat® in Everyday Clinical Practice: The Greek ELLACTO Study

INTRODUCTION

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often report deteriorated functional status and poor health-related quality of life, both core aspects of their overall health status. The study objective was to assess tiotropium/olodaterol Respimat^® effects on health and functional status of COPD patients requiring long-acting dual bronchodilation treatment in the real world.

METHODS

ELLACTO was an open-label, observational, prospective study conducted in Greece, measuring changes on health and functional status of COPD patients treated with a fixed dose of tiotropium/olodaterol Respimat^® for approximately 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was "therapeutic success" defined as a ≥ 0.4-point decrease in the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) score at week 6. Secondary endpoints included absolute changes in the CCQ and the functional subscale CCQ-4 at week 6, patient general condition measured by Physician's Global Evaluation (PGE) score at baseline and week 6, patient satisfaction and preference with Respimat^® device (assessed by the abbreviated Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ)) at week 6 and treatment continuation with tiotropium/olodaterol Respimat^® after the study.

RESULTS

After approximately 6 weeks of treatment with tiotropium/olodaterol Respimat^®, therapeutic success was achieved by 64.3% of 1332 patients included in the final analysis [95% confidence interval [CI] 62-67]. Mean [standard deviation (SD)] absolute changes in CCQ and CCQ-4 scores at week 6 were - 0.63 (0.635) and - 0.59 (0.714) points, respectively. Patient general condition improved and more than 77.4% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the use of the Respimat^® device. Among patients previously using the HandiHaler^® device (n = 254), 85.4% expressed a preference for Respimat^® over 6.7% for HandiHaler^®. Most patients (95.7%) were willing to continue treatment with tiotropium/olodaterol Respimat^® after the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with tiotropium/olodaterol Respimat^® led to an improved health status in Greek COPD patients. Most patients also expressed a preference for the Respimat^® device and willingness to continue treatment with it.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03419962.