External Validation and User Experiences of the ProPal-COPD Tool to Identify the Palliative Phase in COPD

Development of the conversation tool "I-HARP for COPD" for early identification of palliative care needs in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to develop the conversation tool "I-HARP for COPD" for timely identification of palliative care needs in Dutch patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

An iterative and participatory research design was used to develop "I-HARP for COPD". There were 2 phases to the development of "I-HARP for COPD": content development and testing. A review of current literature, parallel focus groups, and a questionnaire among experts were used to develop the content of "I-HARP for COPD". "I-HARP for COPD" was then assessed by health-care professionals (HCPs) in clinical practice for understanding, difficulty, and relevance.

RESULTS

A total of 46 HCPs, 6 patients, 1 informal caregiver, and 1 bereaved informal caregiver participated in this study. "I-HARP for COPD" included 14 screening questions, additional in-depth questions, and recommendations to address identified needs. The content of "I-HARP for COPD" was accepted by 86.2% of the HCPs.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

"I-HARP for COPD" was successfully developed for providing guidance in the palliative care of Dutch patients with COPD and their informal caregivers. By supporting HCPs with "I-HARP for COPD", they are better able to timely identify and direct palliative care needs.

Advance Care Planning in the Netherlands

The Dutch health care system fosters a strong public health sector offering accessible generalist care including generalist palliative care. General practitioners are well positioned to conduct ACP, for example, to continue or initiate conversations after hospitalization. However, research shows that ACP conversations are often ad hoc and in frail patients, ACP is often only initiated when admitted to a nursing home by elderly care physicians who are on the staff. Tools that raise awareness of triggers to initiate ACP, screening tools, information brochures, checklists and training have been developed and implemented with funding by national programs which currently focus on implementation projects rather than or in addition to, research. The programs commonly require educational deliverables, patient and public involvement and addressing diversity in patient groups. A major challenge is how to implement ACP systematically and continuously across sectors and disciplines in a way that supports a proactive yet person-centered approach rather than an approach with an exclusive focus on medical procedures. Digital solutions can support continuity of care and communication about care plans. Solutions should fit a culture that prefers trust-based, informal deliberative approaches. This may be supported by involving disciplines other than medicine, such as nursing and spiritual caregiving, and public health approaches.