The Role of Dexmedetomidine in Tumor-Progressive Factors in the Perioperative Period and Cancer Recurrence: A Narrative Review

Dexmedetomidine hydrochloride plus sufentanil citrate inhibits glucose metabolism and epithelial‑mesenchymal transition in human esophageal squamous carcinoma KYSE30 cells by modulating the JAK/STAT3/HIF‑1α axis

Dexmedetomidine hydrochloride (DEX-HCl) and sufentanil citrate (SFC) are commonly used anesthetic drugs for esophageal cancer (EC) surgery. The present study was performed to investigate the effect of DEX-HCl and SFC treatment on glucose metabolism and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in EC. Cell counting kit-8 (CCK8), clonogenic, wound healing and Transwell migration assays were performed to assess the effects of the DEX-HCl and SFC on KYSE30 cell proliferation, invasion and migration. Changes in lactate and glucose levels in KYSE30 cells were also detected. Western blot analysis was used to determine the protein expression levels of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway and glucose metabolism-related proteins. The results of CCK8, clonogenic and wound healing assays demonstrated that DEX-HCl and SFC inhibited KYSE30 cell proliferation, invasion and migration. Similarly, the combined DEX-HCl and SFC treatment significantly reduced lactate production, ATP production and glucose levels in KYSE30 cells. Western blotting indicated that DEX-HCl and SFC could reduce JAK/STAT and metastasis-related protein expression. Demonstrating a reduction in Hexokinase 2, matrix metallopeptidase 2 and 9, N-cadherin and lactate dehydrogenase A protein expression levels. The effects of DEX-HCl and SFC combined treatment were counteracted by the addition of JAK/STAT pathway activator RO8191, which suggested that DEX-HCl and SFC could serve a role in mediating the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in KYSE30 cells.

Dexmedetomidine promotes colorectal cancer progression via Piwil2 signaling

PURPOSE

α2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine (DEX) has been reported to promote tumorigenesis. Stem-cell protein Piwil2 is associated with cancer progression. Whether Piwil2 plays a role in tumor-promoting effects of DEX is unknown.

METHODS

We examined the expression of Piwil2 in human colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines with/without DEX treatment. We also studied the roles of Piwil2 in proliferation, invasion, migration, as well as expressions of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related proteins in DEX-treated in vitro and in vivo CRC models. And the experiments with genetic and pharmacological treatments were conducted to investigate the underlying molecular mechanism.

RESULTS

RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis found Piwil2 is one of most upregulated genes upon DEX treatment in CRC cells. Furthermore, Piwil2 protein levels significantly increased in DEX-treated CRC cancer cells, which promoted proliferation, invasion, and migration in both CRC cell lines and human tumor xenografts model. Mechanistically, DEX increased nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) expression, which enhanced Piwil2 transcription via binding to its promoter. Furthermore, in vitro experiments with Piwil2 knockdown or Siah2 inhibition indicated that DEX promoted EMT process and tumorigenesis through Siah2/PHD3/HIF1α pathway. The experiments with another α2-adrenoceptor agonist Brimonidine and antagonists yohimbine and atipamezole also suggested the role of Piwil2 signaling in tumor-promoting effects via an α2 adrenoceptor-dependent manner.

CONCLUSION

DEX promotes CRC progression may via activating α2 adrenoceptor-dependent Nrf2/Piwil2/Siah2 pathway and thus EMT process. Our work provides a novel insight into the mechanism underlying tumor-promoting effects of α2-adrenoceptor agonists.

Attenuation of intestinal ischemia-reperfusion-injury by anesthetics: a potentially protective effect of anesthetic management in experimental studies

Intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is a potentially severe clinical syndrome after major surgical procedures. In addition to causing intestinal mucosa injury, intestinal IRI further damages distant organs, causing the severity of the condition in patients. So far, effective therapy for intestinal IRI is still absent, and the survival rate of the patients is low. Previous experimental studies have shown that some anesthetics can alleviate intestinal IRI and protect organs while exerting their pharmacological effects, indicating that reasonable perioperative anesthesia management may provide potential benefits for patients to avoid intestinal IRI. These meaningful findings drive scholars to investigate the mechanism of anesthetics in treating intestinal IRI in-depth to discuss the possible new clinical uses. In the present mini-review, we will introduce the protective effects of different anesthetics in intestinal IRI to help us enrich our knowledge in this area.

Dexmedetomidine promotes ferroptotic cell death in gastric cancer via hsa_circ_0008035/miR-302a/E2F7 axis

Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a common anesthetic, has significant effects on the biological features of cancer cells. Although numerous studies have been published on the impact of DEX on the biological characteristics of GC cells, the mechanism remains unknown. This study aimed to explore the effect of DEX on the biological properties of GC cells. DEX suppressed the viability and increased the apoptosis of GC cells in vitro and inhibited tumor growth in vivo. Besides, DEX raised the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and iron, but decreased the levels of glutathione (GSH), glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), and solute carrier family 7 member 11 (SLC7A11) in GC cells, which were abolished by Ferrostatin-1 (the inhibitor of ferroptosis) treatment. In addition, the level of circ0008035 and E2F7 were downregulated, but miR-302a level was upregulated in DEX-treated GC cells. Circ0008035 increased the expression of E2F2 by acting as a sponge for miR-302a. Circ0008035 inhibited DEX-induced ferroptotic cell death in GC cells, which was reversed by miR-302a overexpression or E2F7 reduction. Taken together, DEX mediated ferroptotic cell death in GC through regulating the circ0008035/miR-302a/E2F7 axis, suggesting a feasible therapy option for GC.

Effects of dexmedetomidine on oxidative stress, programmed cell death, liver function, and expression of peripheral immune cells in patients with primary liver cancer undergoing hepatectomy

Study background: Primary liver cancer is a severe health issue that imposes a significant health burden on families. Oxidation and subsequent cell death impair liver function and provoke an immune response. The present article investigates the effect of Dexmedetomidine on oxidation, cell death, the expression of peripheral immune cells, and liver function. The clinical data will represent the facts and evidence of the effects of this intervention. Methods: We analyzed clinical data reporting various accounts of the effects of Dexmedetomidine on oxidation, cell death, the expression of peripheral immune cells, and liver function among patients who underwent hepatectomy. The surgical procedure reported the differences in cell death as procedural outcomes among pre- and post-treatment records were compared and contrasted. Results: We found decreased cell apoptosis in the treatment group: the number of incisions to remove dead cells was lower in the treatment group than in the pre-treatment group. Likewise, lower oxidation was reported in pre-treatment than in post-treatment records. The expression of peripheral immune cells was higher in the pre-treatment clinical data than in post-treatment, suggesting a reduction in oxidation following dexmedetomidine treatment. Liver function was a function of oxidation and cell death outcomes. In the pre-treatment clinical data, liver function was poor, whereas improved functions were reported in the post-treatment clinical data. Discussion: We found compelling evidence of Dexmedetomidine's effects on oxidative stress and programmed cell death. The intervention suppresses the production of reactive oxygen species and the consequential apoptosis. Additionally, liver functions improve due to the decrease in hepatocyte apoptosis. Since the peripheral immune cells are expressed against tumors, a decrease in the progression of primary liver cancer decreased the expression of the peripheral immune cells. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine's positive effects stood out in the present research article. The intervention reduced oxidation by balancing the production of reactive oxygen species and the detoxification processes. Reduced oxidation induced reduced cell death through apoptosis, resulting in a low expression of peripheral immune cells and improved liver functions.

Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Systemic Inflammation and Postoperative Complications in Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) may induce intense inflammatory response which might be related to the patient's outcomes. Clinical dexmedetomidine (DEX) has been widely used for opioid-sparing anesthesia and satisfactory sedation. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of DEX on inflammatory response and postoperative complications in LPD.

METHODS

Ninety-nine patients undergoing LPD were randomly assigned to two groups: normal saline (NS) and DEX. The primary outcome was the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) differences postoperatively within 48 h. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications, the length of postoperative hospital stay and the incidence of ICU admission. Other outcomes included anesthetics consumption and intraoperative vital signs.

RESULTS

NLR at postoperative day 2 to baseline ratio decreased significantly in the DEX group (P = 0.032). Less major complications were observed in the DEX group such as pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying and intra-abdominal infection (NS vs. DEX, 21.7% vs. 13.6%, P = 0.315; 10.9% vs. 2.3%, P = 0.226; 17.4% vs. 11.4%, P = 0.416, respectively) though there were no statistical differences. Three patients were transferred to the ICU after surgery in the NS group, while there was none in the DEX group (P = 0.242). The median postoperative hospital stay between groups were similar (P = 0.313). Both intraoperative propofol and opioids were less in the DEX group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative DEX reduced the early postoperative inflammatory response in LPD. It also reduced the use of narcotics that may related to reduced major complications, which need additional research further.