Glucose abnormalities in Asian patients with chronic hepatitis C

Hypoglycemia associated with direct-acting anti-hepatitis C virus drugs: An epidemiologic surveillance study of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Hypoglycemia induced by direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a rare but potentially life-threatening adverse reaction, which led to warnings by competent authorities. We therefore aimed to examine the hypoglycemic safety signal for DAAs.

METHODS

Reports to the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 1 October 2012 to 31 March 2020 were analyzed. The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities was used to identify hypoglycemia cases. A case by non-case disproportionality approach was used whereby reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

In HCV infection with diabetes patients, the cumulative frequency of hypoglycemic ADRs was 21.85/1000 for reports involving DAAs versus 13.50/1000 for reports involving other medications; For DAAs as a class drug, a nearly double increased reporting odds for hypoglycemia was observed (ROR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.11-2.41). However, in DAAs subgroup analysis, only telaprevir (ROR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.01-2.74) and elbasvir/grazoprevir (ROR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.05-4.83) were associated with increased reporting risk of hypoglycemia during corresponding marketing period; when combined with insulins and sulfonylureas, DAAs were associated with increased reporting risk for hypoglycemia (ROR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.36-2.88; ROR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.06-2.48), but concomitant biguanides, dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the current recommendation for cautious about hypoglycemic risk relating to the use of DAAs. Treatment with DAAs and antidabetic agents (especially insulins and sulfonylureas) will increase hypoglycemia reporting risk. Physicians and pharmacists should be aware of this risk when prescribing DAAs for patients suffering from diabetes, advanced age or liver decompensation.

Safety and tolerability of empagliflozin in East Asian patients with type 2 diabetes: Pooled analysis of phase I-III clinical trials

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

We investigated the safety and tolerability of empagliflozin (EMPA) in East Asian patients with type 2 diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were pooled from participants with type 2 diabetes evenly randomized to a placebo, EMPA 10 mg or EMPA 25 mg in 15 phase I-III trials. Adverse events (AEs) were analyzed in the subgroup of trial participants from East Asian countries/regions.

RESULTS

In total, 709, 724 and 708 East Asian trial participants with type 2 diabetes received a placebo, EMPA 10 mg and EMPA 25 mg, respectively; total exposure was 953, 1,072, and 1,033 patient-years in these groups, respectively. The EMPA and placebo groups had similar incidences of severe AEs, serious AEs and AEs leading to discontinuation. Incidences of hypoglycemia differed according to anti-diabetes medication used at baseline. Higher rates of events consistent with genital infection were observed with EMPA (EMPA 1.5-1.7/100, placebo 0.2/100 patient-years). Rates of AEs consistent with volume depletion were comparable among treatment groups (0.8-1.4/100 patient-years), but in trial participants aged ≥65 years, the rate was greater with EMPA 25 mg (EMPA 25 mg 3.5/100, placebo 2.0/100 patient-years). Incidences of events consistent with urinary tract infection, thromboembolic events, renal events, hepatic AEs, diabetic ketoacidosis, fractures and lower limb amputation were similar between EMPA and the placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present pooled analysis, EMPA was well tolerated in East Asian type 2 diabetes patients based on >2,100 patient-years' exposure, consistent with results from the overall analysis population.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: extrahepatic manifestations in chronic hepatitis C virus-infected patients in East Asia

BACKGROUND

Although the prevalence of extrahepatic manifestations of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been reported from Western countries, their prevalence in East Asian countries is not well known.

AIM

To perform a systematic review to quantify the prevalence of selected extrahepatic manifestations of HCV among patients from East Asia.

METHODS

Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane and country-specific databases were reviewed according to standard guidelines for meta-analyses. Only articles with patients from East Asian countries were included.

RESULTS

After review, 34 articles were selected (Japan = 9; China = 5, Korea = 3, Taiwan = 16, multiple countries = 1) with 646 228 subjects, 66 436 with HCV. Mean age for HCV-infected patients was 56 years (range 41-72 years), 50% were male (range 26%-73%). The pooled prevalence of type 2 diabetes in East Asian HCV patients was 19.0% (95% confidence interval 15.6%-22.9%) (n = 19 studies) with an increased risk when compared to non-HCV: odds ratio (OR) 1.58 (1.28-1.94). The prevalence of chronic kidney disease in HCV was 9.2% (5.0%-16.2%) (n = 7 studies), also with a significantly increased risk: OR=1.98 (1.41-2.77). Pooled prevalence of cardiovascular disease in HCV was 8.6% (3.5%-19.9%) (n = 6 studies), also with an increased risk: OR = 1.55 (1.21-1.98). The prevalence of lichen planus in HCV was 8.9% (3.6%-20.6%) (n = 6 studies) while the prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis was 4.5% (0.6%-25.7%) (n = 4 studies).

CONCLUSIONS

These data show increased risk of developing extrahepatic manifestations in East Asian patients with HCV. Both hepatic and extrahepatic manifestations of the infection should be used to accurately determine the total burden of the disease in the region.

Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus among Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The ever-increasing global prevalence of hepatitis C infection is fueling the burden of diabetes mellitus, which exacerbates various complications and may be a cause of death of millions of people. Several studies have reported that hepatitis C virus infection is an important risk factor for the development of diabetes mellitus. However, fragmented studies have reported variable and inconsistent findings regarding the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus among hepatitis C virus-infected patients. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to estimate the overall prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus among patients infected with hepatitis C virus. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This systematic review and meta-analysis includes original articles reporting on cohort and cross-sectional studies. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to estimate the global pooled prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus among hepatitis C-infected patients. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to check the stability of the summary estimate. Heterogeneity was assessed using the <i>I</i>² statistic. A subgroup analysis was also conducted based on geographical region. Funnel plots were used to spot publication bias. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 40 eligible articles reporting data on 14,765 study participants were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus among hepatitis C virus-infected patients was 19.67% (95% CI: 17.25, 22.09). The subgroup analysis showed a pooled prevalence of 27.72% (95% CI: 20.79, 34.65) in Africa, 20.73% (95% CI: 17.57, 23.90) in Asia, 16.64% (95% CI: 6.79, 26.49) in North America, and 15.02% (95% CI: 10.66, 19.38) in Europe. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The overall prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus among hepatitis C virus-infected patients was considerably higher than in the general population in a global perspective. The highest prevalence was noted in Africa and Asia, followed by North America and Europe. Therefore, early intervention is needed (prevention and early treatment of hepatitis C virus infection) to prevent the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus.