Prognostic Value of Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio for EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with First-Line EGFR-TKIs: A Large Population-Based Study and Literature Review

Clinical role of pretreatment albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio in lung cancer: a meta-analysis

The association between pretreatment albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) and clinicopathological parameters and prognosis in lung cancer is unclear. The study aimed to identify the clinical role of pretreatment AAPR among lung cancer patients. Several databases were searched for relevant studies. The primary outcome and secondary outcome were long-term survival including the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and clinicopathological characteristics, respectively. The hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined. A total of 11 publications involving 10,589 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results manifested that a lower pretreatment AAPR predicted poorer OS (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.59-0.71, P < 0.001) and PFS (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.59-0.78, P < 0.001). Furthermore, subgroup analysis for the OS and PFS based on the pathological type and treatment showed similar results and pretreatment AAPR was significantly associated with worse prognosis. Besides, pretreatment AAPR was significantly associated with male (RR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.13, P < 0.001), poor differentiation (RR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.03-1.73, P = 0.029), advanced T stage (RR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.52, P = 0.026), N stage (RR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.15-1.55, P < 0.001) and TNM stage (RR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.223, P < 0.001). Therefore, pretreatment AAPR is significantly related to prognosis and tumor stage in lung cancer and patients with a lower pretreatment AAPR are more likely to experience poor survival and advanced tumor stage.

Prognostic value of modified-Gustave-Roussy Immunity Score in resectable proximal gastric cancer

The prognostic evaluation of GRIm score has been confirmed in many tumor species. The purpose of this study is to clarify the value of GRIm score in the prognostic evaluation of patients with resectable proximal gastric cancer. A single center retrospective study was conducted in 174 patients with proximal gastric cancer who underwent radical total gastrectomy. An in-depth analysis was carried out to explore the prognostic differences between high and low GRIm, and the influencing factors of disease-free survival rates and overall survival rates were analyzed by Cox regression model and Kaplan-Meier method. A total of 174 patients were divided into two groups: 135 patients were marked in L-mGRIm and 39 patients in H-mGRIm groups respectively. The median OS of the H-mGRIm and L-mGRIm groups were 23.2 and 38.6 months, respectively. The median DFS of the H-mGRIm and L-mGRIm groups was 16.9 and 31.7 months, respectively. Both DFS and OS were significantly different between groups (P = .000, P = .000). In multivariate analysis, ZPS (2 vs 0-1: HR 1.99 95% CI 1.05-3.76 P = .035), LDH (≥193 vs <193:HR 0.6; 95% CI 0.38-0.95 P = .028), mGRIm score (2-3 vs 0-1: HR 2.4; 95% CI 1.09-5.23 P = .029) was independent risk factors of OS. The age (>65 vs ≤65 years HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.4-0.95 P = .003), LDH (>193 U/L vs ≤193 U/L: HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.37-0.82 P = .004) and mGRIm score (2-3 vs 0-1: HR 4.74; 95% CI 2.24-9.9 P = .000) as an independent risk factor for DFS. mGRIm score is a novel, simple and effective index for prognosis evaluation of resectable cardiac cancer and can be used as a part of the risk stratification process.