Accuracy of fetal anatomy survey in the diagnosis of velamentous cord insertion: a case-control study

Current practice of placental cord insertion documentation in Australia - A sonographer survey

Introduction

During pregnancy, the umbilical cord attaches to the placenta in a central, eccentric, marginal or velamentous location. Maternal and fetal complications are associated with marginal and velamentous cord insertions, the most clinically significant being perinatal mortality due to undiagnosed vasa praevia. Current literature describes a wide variation regarding regulation of placental cord insertion (PCI) documentation during antenatal ultrasound examinations. This prospective cross-sectional study aimed to assess the current practice of antenatal PCI documentation in Australia.

Methods

Members of the Australian Sonographer Accreditation Registry were invited to participate in an online survey which was distributed between February and March 2022.

Results

Four hundred ninety sonographers met the inclusion criteria for the study of which 330 (67.3%) have more than 10 years' experience as a sonographer and 375 (76.5%) are employed primarily in a public or private setting offering general ultrasound. Most respondents (89.6%) indicated documentation of the PCI site is departmental protocol at the second trimester anatomy scan (17-22 weeks gestation), but PCI documentation is protocol in less than 50% of other obstetric ultrasound examinations listed in the survey. The PCI site is included in the formal ultrasound report at a rate significantly less than inclusion in the departmental protocol and the sonographer's worksheet.

Conclusions

Considering the potential maternal and fetal complications associated with abnormal PCI and the ease at which the PCI site is identified in the first and second trimesters, we believe that standard inclusion of the PCI site in departmental protocol and in the formal ultrasound report from 11 weeks gestation, regardless of whether it is normal or abnormal, would prove invaluable.

Impact of velamentous cord insertion on perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Velamentous cord insertion may be identified prenatally, but the clinical implications of this diagnosis remain controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to quantitatively summarize current data on the association of velamentous cord insertion and adverse perinatal outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from inception until May 22, 2022 to identify eligible studies.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Observational studies including singleton pregnancies with velamentous cord insertion, either prenatally or postnatally identified, and comparing them with those with central/eccentric cord insertion were considered eligible.

METHODS

The quality of the studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the risk of bias with the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. The main outcome was small-for-gestational-age neonates. Heterogeneity of the studies was evaluated using a Q test and an I² index. Analyses were performed using a random-effects model, with outcome data reported as relative risk or mean difference with 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

In total, 9 cohort and 2 case-control studies, of which 4 had prenatal and 7 had postnatal velamentous cord insertion diagnosis, were included. The overall prevalence of velamentous cord insertion was estimated to be 1.4% among singleton pregnancies. Compared with the central/eccentric cord insertion control group, pregnancies with velamentous cord insertion were at higher risk of several adverse perinatal outcomes, namely small-for-gestational-age neonates (relative risk, 1.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.54-2.41), preeclampsia (relative risk, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-3.39), pregnancy-induced hypertension (relative risk, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-1.70), stillbirth (relative risk, 4.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.92-8.87), placental abruption (relative risk, 2.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.72-5.03), preterm delivery (relative risk, 2.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.73-2.65), emergency cesarean delivery (relative risk, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-3.38), 1-minute Apgar score <7 (relative risk, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.05), 5-minute Apgar score <7 (relative risk, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-2.71), and neonatal intensive care unit admission (relative risk, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.02). In a subgroup analysis, prenatally diagnosed velamentous cord insertion was associated with small-for-gestational-age neonates (relative risk, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-2.32), stillbirth (relative risk, 4.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-16.08), and preterm delivery (relative risk, 2.69; 95% confidence interval, 2.01-3.60). In a sensitivity analysis of studies excluding cases with vasa previa, velamentous cord insertion was associated with an increased risk of small-for-gestational-age neonates (relative risk, 2.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.73-4.17), pregnancy-induced hypertension (relative risk, 1.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-3.01), and stillbirth (relative risk, 9.42; 95% confidence interval, 3.19-27.76), but not preterm delivery (relative risk, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-4.54).

CONCLUSION

Velamentous cord insertion is associated with several adverse perinatal outcomes, including stillbirth, and these associations persist when only prenatally diagnosed cases are considered and when vasa previa cases are excluded. According to these findings, the exact pathophysiology should be further investigated and an effective prenatal monitoring plan should be developed.