1
|
Saucedo AM, Calvert C, Chiem A, Groves A, Ghartey K, Cahill AG, Harper LM. Periviable Premature Rupture of Membranes-Maternal and Neonatal Risks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Perinatol 2024. [PMID: 38593987 DOI: 10.1055/a-2302-8657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Periviable premature rupture of membranes (PROM) counseling should describe maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with both immediate delivery and expectant management. Unfortunately, most published data focuses on neonatal outcomes and maternal risk estimates vary widely. We performed a meta-analysis to describe outcomes associated with expectant management compared with immediate delivery of periviable PROM. STUDY DESIGN We performed a search on PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, PROSPERO, Cochrane library, and ClinicalTrials.gov utilizing a combination of key terms. Published clinical trials and observational cohorts were included if published after 2000. Publications were selected if they included maternal and/or neonatal outcomes for both expectant management and immediate delivery. Gestational age range was limited from 14 to 25 weeks. The primary outcome was maternal sepsis. Secondary outcomes included chorioamnionitis, hemorrhage, laparotomy, and neonatal survival. Pooled risk differences (RDs) were calculated for each outcome using a random-effects model. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Harbord test. RESULTS A total of 2,550 studies were screened. After removal of duplicates and filtering by abstract, 44 manuscripts were reviewed. A total of five publications met inclusion for analysis: four retrospective and one prospective. Overall, 364 (68.0%) women underwent expectant management and 171 (32.0%) underwent immediate delivery. Maternal sepsis was significantly more frequent in the expectant group (RD, 4%; 95% confidence interval, 2-7%) as was chorioamnionitis (RD 30%; p < 0.01) and any laparotomy (RD, 28%; p < 0.01). Neonatal survival in the expectant group was 39% compared with 0% in the immediate group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Women who undergo expectant management following periviable rupture of membranes experience significantly increased risks of sepsis, chorioamnionitis, and laparotomy. Overall, 39% of neonates survive to discharge. Knowledge of these risks is critical to counseling patients with this diagnosis. KEY POINTS · Expectant management associated with 4% increased risk of sepsis.. · Expectant management associated with 30% increased risk of chorioamnionitis.. · A total of 39% of neonates survived to discharge with expectant management..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander M Saucedo
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Chase Calvert
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Adrian Chiem
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Alan Groves
- Department of Pediatrics, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Kobina Ghartey
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Alison G Cahill
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Lorie M Harper
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Goodfellow L, Curran C, Care A. Early PPROM: women and babies who should not be lost in the system. BMJ 2024; 384:q690. [PMID: 38508672 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.q690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Goodfellow
- Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK
| | - Ciara Curran
- Patient author, Little Heartbeats Patient Support Group, Buxton, UK
| | - Angharad Care
- Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Goodfellow L, Care A, Curran C, Roberts D, Turner MA, Knight M, Zarko A. Preterm prelabour rupture of membranes before 23 weeks' gestation: prospective observational study. BMJ MEDICINE 2024; 3:e000729. [PMID: 38601318 PMCID: PMC11005708 DOI: 10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
Objective To describe perinatal and maternal outcomes of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) before 23 weeks' gestation in a national cohort. Design Prospective observational study. Setting National population based cohort study with the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS), a research infrastructure of all 194 obstetric units in the UK, 1 September 2019 to 28 February 2021. Participants 326 women with singleton and 38 with multiple pregnancies with PPROM between 16+0 and 22+6 weeks+days' gestation. Main outcome measures Perinatal outcomes of live birth, survival to discharge from hospital, and severe morbidity, defined as intraventricular haemorrhage grade 3 or 4, or requiring supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age, or both. Maternal outcomes were surgery for removal of the placenta, sepsis, admission to an intensive treatment unit, and death. Clinical data included rates of termination of pregnancy for medical reasons. Results Perinatal outcomes were calculated with all terminations of pregnancy for medical reasons excluded, and a worst-best range was calculated assuming that all terminations for medical reasons and those with missing data would have died (minimum value) or all would be liveborn (maximum value). For singleton pregnancies, the live birth rate was 44% (98/223), range 30-62% (98/326-201/326), perinatal survival to discharge from hospital was 26% (54/207), range 17-53% (54/326-173/326), and 18% (38/207), range 12-48% (38/326-157/326) of babies survived without severe morbidity. The rate of maternal sepsis was 12% (39/326) in singleton and 29% (11/38) in multiple pregnancies (P=0.004). Surgery for removal of the placenta was needed in 20% (65/326) and 16% (6/38) of singleton and twin pregnancies, respectively. Five women became severely unwell with sepsis; two died and another three required care in the intensive treatment unit. Conclusions In this study, 26% of women who had very early PPROM with expectant management had babies that survived to discharge from hospital. Morbidity and mortality rates were high for both mothers and neonates. Maternal sepsis is a considerable risk that needs more research. These data should be used in counselling families with PPROM before 23 weeks' gestation, and currently available guidelines should be updated accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Goodfellow
- Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Angharad Care
- Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ciara Curran
- Little Heartbeats Patient Support Group, Buxton, UK
| | | | - Mark A Turner
- Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Alfirevic Zarko
- Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sylvester MA, Mintz G, Sisti G. Maternal Outcomes Following Active vs. Expectant Management of Previable Preterm Pre-Labor Rupture of Membranes: A Meta-Analysis. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 10:1347. [PMID: 37628346 PMCID: PMC10453507 DOI: 10.3390/children10081347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
The diagnosis of previable preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes (PROM) is known to be associated with poor outcomes for both the mother and the fetus. Following previable preterm PROM, patients are generally offered either active management through the termination of the pregnancy or expectant management to increase the chances of fetal survival. It is difficult to counsel patients because there is a lack of data directly comparing maternal outcomes following active vs. expectant management. Using the data in the current literature, the goal of the present meta-analysis was to determine if there were any differences in terms of maternal risks when active versus elective management was chosen. PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched. We found four studies accounting for a total of 506 patients. The risk ratio (RR) of chorioamnionitis in active vs. expectant management was 0.30 (with a 95% confidence interval, CI, of 0.09-1.02). The heterogeneity of the study results was 81% (I2). A sub-analysis of two included studies revealed an RR of postpartum hemorrhage in active vs. expectant management of 0.75 (95% CI 0.27-2.07) and an RR of maternal sepsis of 0.23 (95% CI 0.04-1.28). The heterogeneity of the study results for this sub-analysis was 68% (I2) for postpartum hemorrhage and 0% (I2) for maternal sepsis. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of chorioamnionitis, postpartum hemorrhage, or maternal sepsis when active management was chosen over expectant management in previable preterm PROM at <24 weeks. The scarcity and the high heterogeneity of the available data likely contributed to the lack of statistical significance and calls for further work directly comparing maternal outcomes following active vs. expectant management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Giovanni Sisti
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine-Tucson, University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA; (M.A.S.); (G.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ronzoni S, Boucoiran I, Yudin MH, Coolen J, Pylypjuk C, Melamed N, Holden AC, Smith G, Barrett J. Directive clinique n o 430 : Diagnostic et prise en charge de la rupture prématurée des membranes avant terme. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2022; 44:1209-1225.e1. [PMID: 36202728 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIF Fournir des directives claires et concises pour le diagnostic et la prise en charge de la rupture prématurée des membranes avant terme (RPMAT). POPULATION CIBLE Toute patiente manifestant une rupture prématurée des membranes avant 37 semaines d'aménorrhée. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: La présente directive clinique vise à fournir les premières recommandations générales canadiennes sur la prise en charge de la rupture des membranes avant terme. Elle repose sur un examen complet et à jour des données probantes sur le diagnostic de la rupture et sur la prise en charge, le bon moment et les modes d'accouchement. DONNéES PROBANTES: Des recherches ont été effectuées dans PubMed-Medline et Cochrane en 2021 en utilisant les termes suivants : preterm premature rupture of membranes, PPROM, chorioamnionitis, Nitrazine test, ferning, commercial tests, PAMG-1, IGFBP-1 test, ultrasonography, PPROM/antenatal corticosteroids, PPROM/Magnesium sulphate, PPROM/antibiotic treatment, PPROM/tocolysis, PPROM/preterm labour, PPROM/neonatal outcomes, PPROM/mortality, PPROM/outpatient/inpatient, PPROM/cerclage, previable PPROM. Les articles retenus sont des essais cliniques randomisés, des méta-analyses, des revues systématiques, des directives cliniques et des études observationnelles. D'autres publications pertinentes ont été sélectionnées à partir des notices bibliographiques de ces articles. Seuls les articles en anglais ont été examinés. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Voir l'annexe A (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et faibles). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Tous les fournisseurs de soins de santé prénatale ou périnatale. DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ronzoni S, Boucoiran I, Yudin MH, Coolen J, Pylypjuk C, Melamed N, Holden AC, Smith G, Barrett J. Guideline No. 430: Diagnosis and management of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2022; 44:1193-1208.e1. [PMID: 36410937 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide clear and concise guidelines for the diagnosis and management of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) TARGET POPULATION: All patients with PPROM <37 weeks gestation BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: This guideline aims to provide the first Canadian general guideline on the management of preterm membrane rupture. It includes a comprehensive and up-to-date review of the evidence on the diagnosis, management, timing and method of delivery. EVIDENCE The following search terms were entered into PubMed/Medline and Cochrane in 2021: preterm premature rupture of membranes, PPROM, chorioamnionitis, Nitrazine test, ferning, commercial tests, placental alpha microglobulin-1 (PAMG-1) test, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) test, ultrasonography, PPROM/antenatal corticosteroids, PPROM/Magnesium sulphate, PPROM/ antibiotic treatment, PPROM/tocolysis, PPROM/preterm labour, PPROM/Neonatal outcomes, PPROM/mortality, PPROM/outpatient/inpatient, PPROM/cerclage, previable PPROM. Articles included were randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, guidelines, and observational studies. Additional publications were identified from the bibliographies of these articles. Only English-language articles were reviewed. VALIDATION METHODS The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE All prenatal and perinatal health care providers. SUMMARY STATEMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS.
Collapse
|
7
|
Early Neurodevelopmental Outcomes after Previable Preterm Prelabour Rupture of Membranes (pPPROM). Case Rep Pediatr 2022; 2022:3428841. [PMID: 36193210 PMCID: PMC9526558 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3428841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To describe the early neurodevelopmental outcomes following fetal exposure to previable preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (pPPROM). Methods This was a secondary analysis of a subgroup of neonates born following pPPROM from a retrospective cohort study (2009–2015). Surviving infants who underwent standardized neurodevelopmental evaluation at 18–24 months corrected age (CA) between 2017 and 2019 were eligible for inclusion. Data abstracted from hospital charts were linked to prospectively collected developmental outcomes stored in an electronic database from a regional neonatal follow-up clinic. The primary outcome was Bayley-III composite scores (compared to the population mean 100, standard deviation (SD) 15). Secondary outcomes included presence of cerebral palsy, vision loss, hearing impairment, and requirement of rehabilitation therapy. Descriptive statistics were used to present results. Results 25.7% (19/74) of neonates born after pPPROM survived to hospital discharge, but only 21.6% (16/74) survived to 18–24 months CA. Of these, 9 infants were eligible for follow-up at the regional clinic and 7 had developmental outcomes stored in the electronic database. Infants exposed to pPPROM exhibited Bayley-III scores more than 1 SD below the population mean across all three domains: cognitive 84.9 (SD 12.2); motor 82.3 (SD 11.5); and language 66.4 (SD 18.9). There were particular deficiencies in language development with 71% (5/7) scoring more than 2 SDs below the population mean. There were no cases of cerebral palsy. Conclusions Only 1 in 5 infants born following expectantly managed pPPROM survived to 18–24 months CA. These infants born after pPPROM had significantly lower Bayley-III scores and particular deficiencies in language development. Better understanding of early neurodevelopmental challenges following pPPROM will help refine counselling of families contemplating expectant management and provide insights into the postnatal educational resources required to improve long-term developmental outcomes for these children.
Collapse
|