A Case of Intraocular Lymphoma Diagnosed by Subretinal Fluid Biopsy

From diagnosis to therapy: The transformative role of lncRNAs in eye cancer management

The genomic era has brought about a transformative shift in our comprehension of cancer, unveiling the intricate molecular landscape underlying disease development. Eye cancers (ECs), encompassing diverse malignancies affecting ocular tissues, pose distinctive challenges in diagnosis and management. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), an emerging category of non-coding RNAs, are pivotal actors in the genomic intricacies of eye cancers. LncRNAs have garnered recognition for their multifaceted roles in gene expression regulation and influence on many cellular processes. Many studies support that the lncRNAs have a role in developing various cancers. Recent investigations have pinpointed specific lncRNAs associated with ECs, including retinoblastoma and uveal melanoma. These lncRNAs exert control over critical pathways governing tumor initiation, progression, and metastasis, endowing them with the ability to function as evaluation, predictive, and therapeutic indicators. The article aims to synthesize the existing information concerning the functions of lncRNAs in ECs, elucidating their regulatory mechanisms and clinical significance. By delving into the lncRNAs' expanding relevance in the modulation of oncogenic and tumor-suppressive networks, we gain a deeper understanding of the molecular complexities intrinsic to these diseases. In our exploration of the genomic intricacies of ECs, lncRNAs introduce a fresh perspective, providing an opportunity to function as clinical and therapeutic indicators, and they also have therapeutic benefits that show promise for advancing the treatment of ECs. This comprehensive review bridges the intricate relationship between lncRNAs and ECs within the context of the genomic era.

Variability of Replicates of Intraocular Inflammatory Biomarkers in Ocular Fluid Samples Analyzed with Multiplex Assays

Purpose

Certain factors such as instrumental and sample processing errors may contribute to variability of ocular biofluid samples when they are run as replicates with multiplex assays. There is a paucity of literature on the variability of replicates in multiplex assays. This study aims to evaluate whether there is significant variability in replicate analyses of multiplex assays.

Methods

A total of 152 human ocular biofluid samples (51 aqueous humor and 101 vitreous) were collected and assayed for 27 cytokine biomarker concentrations (pg/mL). Samples were evaluated as replicates (duplicate analysis) at four different time points. Statistical methods including paired samples t-test, 3-way ANOVA, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC; <0.5-0.75=poor-moderate, 0.75->0.90 =good-excellent reliability), and coefficients of variation (CV) were employed to evaluate for statistical significance, with Bonferroni corrected P=0.002.

Results

Among the 4104 biomarker replicate assays for aqueous humor and vitreous, two analytes (PDGF-BB and IL-7) had a statistically significant difference between the sampled concentrations of the replicates in vitreous samples (mean (diff)=2.05, P<0.001, mean (diff)=1.56, P<0.001, respectively). Majority of the ICC values fell within the good-excellent range (86% of samples) with a minority falling in the poor-moderate range (14% of samples). More variability was noted in the vitreous humour, with five analytes (IL-2, IL-10, IL-12(p70), IL-13, IL-17) demonstrating an average ICC of less than 0.5. The CV calculated for each set of replicates suggested that 93% of replicates had an acceptable level of quantitative assay variability (CV<20%).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that the analysis of most biomarkers in ocular fluids may not require the use of replicates. However, certain analytes such as PDGF-BB and IL-7 may require the use of replicates to ensure reliable results. Caution should be taken when applying these findings to other laboratory settings as our study was conducted by an experienced technician using a standardized protocol. In less standardized settings, replicates may be required in order to ensure accuracy of results. These findings may guide researchers with the design of their studies on ophthalmic biomarker analysis.