Genetic/Environmental Contributions and Immune Dysregulation in Children with Atopic Dermatitis

Comparison of Old and New Systemic Treatments for Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Historically, systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD) primarily consisted of immunosuppressive agents such as corticosteroids and Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDS), which provided symptomatic relief but often had long-term adverse effects. Newer treatments have shown significant efficacy with less side effects in clinical trials. This review discusses and compares conventional and newer systemic treatments for AD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Newer medications for AD including dupilumab, tralokinumab, lebrikizumab, and oral JAK inhibitors have been shown to be safe and efficacious. High dose cyclosporine and dupilumab were more effective than methotrexate and azathioprine in improving clinical signs of AD. High-dose upadacitinib was shown in another meta-analysis to be most effective in the measured outcomes but had the highest frequency of adverse events. Targeted biologic treatments are increasingly favored over traditional immunosuppressive treatments of AD. Treatment can be individualized based on potency, adverse side effects, mechanism of action, and administration preference. Ongoing research continues to expand treatment options for AD.

The immunomodulatory activity of Orthosiphon aristatus against atopic dermatitis: Evidence-based on network pharmacology and molecular simulations

Objectives

To explore the potential activity of Orthosiphon aristatus (OA) against atopic dermatitis (AD).

Methods

Phytocompounds from OA were identified through chromatography analysis, then continued to target identification and functional annotation to explore the potential target of OA. Then, network pharmacology from annotated proteins determined protein targets for OA phytocompounds. Protein with highest rank according to the betweenness and closeness algorithm then continued to molecular docking and validated through molecular dynamics analysis.

Results

Chromatography data analysis revealed thirty-six compounds, predominantly classified as carboxylic acid, fatty acyls, and polyphenols. Upon identifying these compounds, network biology-based target identification revealed their potential bioactivity in modulating inflammation in AD. Tumour Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α) and Prostaglandin G/H synthase 2 (PTGS2) emerged as the most probable targets based on hub centrality in the protein-protein interaction network. Later, molecular docking analyses highlighted sixteen compounds with good inhibitory activity against these two proteins. Notably, molecular dynamics simulation revealed that three compounds out of the previous sixteen potential compounds were more likely to act as the TNF-α and PTGS2 inhibitor as well as their native inhibitor. Those compounds are (1R,9R)-5-Cyclohexyl-11- (propylsulfonyl)-7,11- diazatricyclo[7.3.1.02,7]trideca- 2,4-dien-6-one, also known as ZINC8297940, as the best TNF-α inhibitor along with dl-Leucineamide and Benazol P as the potential inhibitor of PTGS2.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that OA may exert therapeutic effects against AD by controlling inflammation through TNF-α and PTGS2 signalling pathways.

Should Emollients Be Recommended for the Prevention of Atopic Dermatitis?-New Evidence and Current State of Knowledge

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, pruritic skin disease with complex pathogenesis, which affects about 43 million children aged 1-4 years. One of the most known methods of alleviating symptoms of AD is emollient treatment, which varies depending on formulation and additional active ingredients. There is some evidence that emollients could be used in AD prevention in high-risk children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of the literature from Cochrane Library, PubMed and Medline was conducted between August and September 2023 with the following keywords: "atopic dermatitis", "emollients", and "prevention". Only randomised clinical trials published in the last 5 years were included into the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Considering the inclusion criteria only 11 randomized clinical trials were taken into account, and six of them proved lack of effect of emollients in the prevention of atopic dermatitis among neonates from AD risk groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Emollient treatment has a good safety profile and most of the ingredients used in formulations are nonirritant for sensitive newborn and infant skin. There is some evidence of the positive effects of emollient treatment in prevention of AD in predisposed populations. The relatively high cost of emollient treatment (vs regular infant skin-care routine) would support the necessity for further evaluation of their effectiveness in nonpredisposed populations.

Molluscum Contagiosum Virus: Biology and Immune Response

Molluscum contagiosum virus is a poxvirus belonging to the Poxviridae family, which includes Orthopoxvirus, Parapoxvirus, Yantapoxvirus, Molluscipoxvirus, Smallpox virus, Cowpox virus and Monkeypox virus. MCV belongs to the genus Molluscipoxvirus and has a tropism for skin tissue. MCV infects keratinocytes and, after an incubation period of 2 weeks to 6 weeks, causes a breakdown of the skin barrier with the development of papules of variable size depending on the proper functioning of the immune response (both adaptive and acquired). MCV only infects humans and does not cause viraemia. MCV encodes for several inhibitory proteins responsible to circumvent the immune response through different signalling pathways. Individuals who can be infected with MCV are children, immunocompromised individuals such as organ transplant recipients and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-infected individuals. Current treatments to manage MCV-induced lesions are different and include the use of immunomodulators, which, however, do not provide an effective response.

Recent advances in immunomodulators for atopic dermatitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Conventional treatments of atopic dermatitis have been inadequate, especially in patients with moderate-to-severe disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the past 5 years, four immunomodulators have been approved for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children. These include dupilumab, ruxolitinib, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib. The review summarizes the pivotal phase 3 trials of these medications.

SUMMARY

The newer immunomodulators have transformed the treatment of atopic dermatitis, particularly in patients with moderate-to-severe disease. Dupilumab targets IL-4 and IL-13, which are the main causes of allergic inflammation, resulting in great efficacy and few side effects. Upadacitinib and abrocitinib are alternative systemic medications for adolescents who have failed or are unable to tolerate dupilumab. Ruxolitinib cream is the latest addition to the current topical therapy. It is indicated for children 12 years and older with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. Further studies are needed to confirm its safety and efficacy for younger children and for patients with more severe disease.

Fruitful or unfruitful: strawberry and tomato specific immunoglobulin E testing at a tertiary pediatric center

Background

Suspected strawberry and tomato (S/T) food allergy (FA) can be evaluated using specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) testing despite its low specificity and positive predictive value.

Objective

This study aims to understand ordering patterns for S/T sIgE testing and identify relevant factors to clinical decision-making.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 814 patients with sIgE testing available for strawberries (651), tomatoes (276), or both (113) from January 2012 to May 2022 at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Patient demographics, provider specialty, and reasons for testing were collected. Student's t-test and multiple regression analyses were performed to test the association between the S/T sIgE level and clinically relevant outcome (CRO) status. Fisher's exact test and general linear models were used to evaluate and compare potential predictive factors for CRO status.

Results

Allergy and immunology, gastroenterology, and general pediatrics ordered most S/T sIgE testing. Testing was ordered most frequently for non-IgE-mediated gastrointestinal symptoms, mild possible IgE-mediated reactions, and eczema. Testing was most often ordered for infants and school-age children. Mean sIgE levels were higher for S/T tests resulting in a CRO when controlling for other predictor variables (p = 0.015; p = 0.002 for S/T, respectively). Only 2.2% and 5.4% of tests resulted in a CRO for S/T, and severe allergy was rare. Testing for non-IgE-mediated GI symptoms or eczema, or in non-atopic patients, yielded no CROs. Exposure and reaction history of present illness (ERH) was associated with CROs (p < 0.001; p = 0.04) with a high negative predictive value (99.5%; 100%) and low positive predictive value (11.5%; 15.0%). ERH (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.073; p = 0.009, η2 = 0.123) was a more significant predictor than the sIgE level (p = 0.002, η2 = 0.037; p = 0.212, η2 = 0.030) for CRO status.

Conclusion

The diagnosis of S/T food allergy is made primarily based on clinical history. S/T sIgE testing for children and adolescents should be avoided for patients without an ERH and in the workup of non-IgE-mediated GI symptoms. Testing for eczema and non-atopic patients is likely low-yield.