A Real-World Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of Biologicals and Bronchial Thermoplasty for Severe Refractory Asthma (BIOTERM)

Bronchial thermoplasty reduces asthma exacerbation and improves quality of life in asthma with type 2 inflammation

Background

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is suggested for asthma patients with type 2 inflammation who are not eligible for or unresponsive to biologic drugs. In this study, we aimed to study the effectiveness of BT in asthma patients with type 2 inflammation.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational analytic study that enrolled moderately-severe asthma patients with type 2 inflammation; who did not respond to medium-dosed inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting beta2-agonists, and at least one other controller; to receive BT. All patients did not respond to or could not afford biologics. We collected the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Asthma Control Test (ACT), pulmonary function test, number of emergency department visits, and hospitalizations at baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12-month post-treatment. Adverse events were also recorded.

Results

Seventeen patients completed the 12-month follow-up after BT. There were significant improvements from baseline in total AQLQ scores from 3.57 [interquartile range (IQR): 2] to 4.88 [IQR: 2.3] (P=0.004). All AQLQ domains were significantly improved. The ACT score also significantly improved from 13 [IQR: 5] to 20 [IQR: 7] (P=0.004). There were significant decreases in emergency department visits from 4 [IQR: 11] to 2 [IQR: 5] (P=0.01), hospitalizations from 1 [IQR: 2] to 0 [IQR: 1] (P=0.03), systemic steroid dose used from 5 [IQR: 5] to 1.25 [IQR: 5] mg per day (P=0.03), and days of reliever used in 2 weeks from 14 [IQR: 6] to 0 [IQR: 3] (P=0.001). All Omalizumab was discontinued within 12 months after BT. Common adverse events were wheezing and dyspnea and no serious complications were found.

Conclusions

BT is an alternative and effective treatment for asthma with type 2 inflammation without serious complications.

Effectiveness of anti-IL-5/5Rα biologics in severe asthma in real-world studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Three biologics targeting interleukin 5 (anti-IL-5) or its receptor-α (anti-IL-5Rα) are approved for patients with severe asthma.

Methods

We systematically searched the literature published in Medline and Embase up to 1 May 2023 to identify observational studies and nonrandomised trials that assess the response to anti-IL-5/5Rα in real-life patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. We also performed random-effects meta-analyses.

Results

We identified 6401 studies, of which 92 with 9546 patients were analysed. Biologics use was associated with a 62% reduction in severe exacerbations (risk ratio 0.38, 95% CI 0.29-0.50) and a 54% reduction in hospitalisations (risk ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.35-0.61) at 12 months of treatment, compared to pre-treatment. Biologics improved asthma control (decrease in asthma control questionnaire score by 1.11 points (95% CI -1.29--0.94) and increase in asthma control test score by 6.41 points (95% CI 5.66-7.16)) and increased the asthma quality of life questionnaire score by 1.08 points (95% CI 0.88-1.28) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s by 0.21 L (95% CI 0.15-0.27) at 12 months. There was a significant reduction in oral corticosteroids use of 51% (risk ratio 0.49, 95% CI 0.42-0.56), with a mean dose reduction of 6.01 mg·day-1 (95% CI -7.55--4.48) at 12 months of treatment. Similar findings were observed at 3-4, 6 and 24 months. A biomarker-related response to treatment was also noted.

Conclusions

This comprehensive meta-analysis summarises the significant clinical response to anti-IL-5/5Rα biologics in real-life studies, providing important insights for their use in clinical practice.

Biologics and airway remodeling in asthma: early, late, and potential preventive effects

Although airway remodeling in severe and/or fatal asthma is still considered irreversible, its individual components as a cause of clinical symptoms and/or lung function changes remain largely unknown. While inhaled glucocorticoids have not consistently been shown to affect airway remodeling, biologics targeting specific pathways of airway inflammation have been shown to improve lung function, mucus plugging, and airway structural changes that can exceed those seen with glucocorticoids. This superiority of biologic treatment, which cannot be solely explained by insufficient doses or limited durations of glucocorticoid therapies, needs to be further explored. For this field of research, we propose a novel classification of the potential effects of biologics on airway remodeling into three temporal effects: early effects (days to weeks, primarily modulating inflammatory processes), late effects (months to years, predominantly affecting structural changes), and potential preventive effects (outcomes of early treatment with biologics). For the identification of potential preventive effects of biologics, we call for studies exploring the impact of early biological treatment on airway remodeling in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, which should be accompanied by a long-term evaluation of clinical parameters, biomarkers, treatment burden, and socioeconomic implications.

Identifying super-responders: A review of the road to asthma remission

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease marked by heterogeneity and variable clinical outcomes. Recent therapeutic advances have highlighted patients achieving optimal outcomes, termed "remission" or "super-response." This review evaluates the various definitions of these terms and explores how disease burden impedes the attainment of remission. We assessed multiple studies, including a recent systematic review and meta-analysis, on biologic treatments for asthma remission. Our review highlights that type 2 inflammation may be the strongest predictor of biologic response. Key comorbidities (eg, obesity and mood disorders) and behavioral factors (eg, poor adherence, improper inhalation technique, and smoking) were identified as dominant traits limiting remission. In addition, asthma burden and longer disease duration significantly restrict the potential for remission in patients with severe asthma under the current treatment paradigm. We review the potential for a "predict-and-prevent" approach, which focuses on early identification of high-risk patients with type 2 inflammation and aggressive treatment to improve long-term asthma outcomes. In conclusion, this scoping review highlights the following unmet needs in asthma remission: (1) a harmonized global definition, with better defined lung function parameters; (2) integration of nonbiologic therapies into remission strategies; and (3) a clinical trial of early biologic intervention in patients with remission-prone, very type 2-high, moderately severe asthma with clinical remission as a predefined primary end point.

Efficacy of bronchial thermoplasty in a patient panel with uncontrolled severe persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is an approved procedure to manage uncontrolled severe persistent asthma. Many insurance providers are reluctant to pay for BT without proven benefit among their specific patient panel.

OBJECTIVE

Determine if BT is effective in a panel patient panel with uncontrolled severe persistent asthma.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This was an unblinded prospective study of adult subjects with uncontrolled severe persistent asthma who underwent BT. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and then 3-, 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-months post-BT. The primary metric was an improved Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score. Other metrics included improved Asthma Control Test (ACT), peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR), spirometry, fractional excretion of nitric oxide (FeNO), number of unscheduled medical visits, and lost days of work/activity. Respiratory adverse events were assessed during the BT treatment period and at each post-BT visit.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine subjects completed the study; the median interquartile range (IQR) age was 47 (42-61), and the majority were female (69%), white (93%), and non-Hispanic (90%). After BT, mean (±std) AQLQ scores improved by 1.6(±1.1) at 3 months (p < 0.0001), 1.6(±1.2) at 6 months (p < 0.0001), 1.4(±1.0) at 12 months (p < 0.0001), 1.8(±1.1) at 18 months (p < 0.0001), and 1.6 (±1.5) at 24 months (p < 0.0001). There were significant improvements in ACT, PEFR, unscheduled medical visits and lost days of work and activity. Spirometry and FeNO metrics were unchanged. The average cost for subjects completing all 3 BT procedures was approximately $15,000.

CONCLUSION

BT is an effective adjunctive therapeutic modality in subjects with uncontrolled severe persistent asthma.

Bronchial thermoplasty for severe asthma: potential mechanisms and response markers

Severe asthma (SA) poses a significant challenge to management and treatment, leading to a reduced quality of life and a heavy burden on society and healthcare resources. Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) has emerged as a non-pharmacological intervention for SA, demonstrating its efficacy and safety in improving patients' quality of life and reducing exacerbation rates for over a decade. In particular, BT encounters various obstacles in its clinical application. Since asthma is characterized by high heterogeneity, not all patients derive effective outcomes from BT. Furthermore, current knowledge of markers that indicate response to BT remains limited. Recent research has shed light on the intricate mechanism of action of BT, which extends beyond simple smooth muscle ablation. Therefore, to enhance the clinical practice and implementation of BT, this paper aims to elucidate the mechanism of action and identify potential markers associated with BT response.

Asthma and COPD: A Focus on β-Agonists - Past, Present and Future

Asthma has been recognised as a respiratory disorder for millennia and the focus of targeted drug development for the last 120 years. Asthma is one of the most common chronic non-communicable diseases worldwide. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, is caused by exposure to tobacco smoke and other noxious particles and exerts a substantial economic and social burden. This chapter reviews the development of the treatments of asthma and COPD particularly focussing on the β-agonists, from the isolation of adrenaline, through the development of generations of short- and long-acting β-agonists. It reviews asthma death epidemics, considers the intrinsic efficacy of clinical compounds, and charts the improvement in selectivity and duration of action that has led to our current medications. Important β2-agonist compounds no longer used are considered, including some with additional properties, and how the different pharmacological properties of current β2-agonists underpin their different places in treatment guidelines. Finally, it concludes with a look forward to future developments that could improve the β-agonists still further, including extending their availability to areas of the world with less readily accessible healthcare.

S100A alarmins and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) regulation in severe asthma following bronchial thermoplasty

RATIONALE

Severe asthma affects a small proportion of asthmatics but represents a significant healthcare challenge. Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is an interventional treatment approach preconized for uncontrolled severe asthma after considering biologics therapy. It was showed that BT long-lastingly improves asthma control. These improvements seem to be related to the ability of BT to reduce airway smooth muscle remodeling, reduce the number of nerve fibers and to modulate bronchial epithelium integrity and behavior. Current evidence suggest that BT downregulates epithelial mucins expression, cytokine production and metabolic profile. Despite these observations, biological mechanisms explaining asthma control improvement post-BT are still not well understood.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether BT affects gene signatures in bronchial epithelial cells (BECs).

METHODS

In this study we evaluated the transcriptome of cultured bronchial epithelial cells (BECs) of severe asthmatics obtained pre- and post-BT treatment using microarrays. We further validated gene and protein expressions in BECs and in bronchial biopsies with immunohistochemistry pre- and post-BT treatment.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Transcriptomics analysis revealed that a large portion of differentially expressed genes (DEG) was involved in anti-viral response, anti-microbial response and pathogen induced cytokine storm signaling pathway. S100A gene family stood out as five members of this family where consistently downregulated post-BT. Further validation revealed that S100A7, S100A8, S100A9 and their receptor (RAGE, TLR4, CD36) expressions were highly enriched in severe asthmatic BECs. Further, these S100A family members were downregulated at the gene and protein levels in BECs and in bronchial biopsies of severe asthmatics post-BT. TLR4 and CD36 protein expression were also reduced in BECs post-BT. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) and human β-defensin 2 (hBD2) were significantly decreased while no significant change was observed in IL-25 and IL-33.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that BT might improve asthma control by downregulating epithelial derived S100A family expression and related downstream signaling pathways.

Long-Term Real-World Outcomes of Mepolizumab and Benralizumab Among Biologic-Naive Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: Experience of 3 Years' Therapy

BACKGROUND

Biologic therapies such as mepolizumab and benralizumab offer treatment options for severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA), although long-term real-world data on their use are limited.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of benralizumab and mepolizumab treatment among biologic-naive patients with SEA over 36 months and describe the incidence of super-response at 12 and 36 months, identifying potential predictive factors.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of patients with SEA who were given mepolizumab or benralizumab from May 2017 to December 2019, and who completed 36 months of therapy. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and medication use were described. Data on clinical outcomes, including maintenance oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, annual exacerbation rate (AER), mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6), and eosinophil count were collected at baseline and at 12 and 36 months. Super-response was evaluated at 12 and 36 months.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients were included. Maintenance OCS use significantly improved from baseline (5.3 mg/d) to 12 months (2.4 mg/d, P < .0001) and 36 months (0.6 mg/d; P < .0001). Annual exacerbation rate decreased from baseline (5.8) to 12 months (0.9; P < .0001) and 36 months (1.2; P < .0001). Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, ACQ-6, and eosinophil count significantly improved from baseline to 12 and 36 months. Twenty-nine patients demonstrated super-response at 12 months. Compared with those without a super-response, these patients had better baseline AER (4.7 vs 6.5; P = .009), mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (3.41 vs 2.54; P = .002), and ACQ-6 (3.38 vs 4.06; P = .03) scores. Most maintained a super-response up to 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Mepolizumab and benralizumab are associated with significant improvements in OCS use, AER, and asthma control in real-world cohorts for up to 36 months, providing insight into long-term use for SEA.

Which Endoscopic Procedure to Use and in What Patient? Valves, Coils, Foam, and Heat in COPD and Asthma

Despite the latest developments in therapeutic agents targeting airway endotypes, a significant proportion of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remain symptomatic. Endoscopic therapies have a complementary role in the management of these airway diseases. The sustained efficacy of bronchial thermoplasty (BT) among patients with asthma over 10 years has been encouraging, as it has been shown to improve symptom control and reduce hospital admissions and exacerbations. Studies suggest that BT helps ameliorate airway inflammation and reduce airway smooth muscle thickness. While studies suggest that it is as effective as biologic agents, its role in the management of severe asthma has yet to be clearly defined and GINA 2022 still suggests limiting its use to patients with characteristics of the various populations studied. Conversely, bronchoscopic lung volume reduction has shown promise among patients with advanced COPD. Rigorous patient selection is important. Patients with minimal collateral ventilation (CV) and higher heterogeneity index have shown to benefit the most from endobronchial valve (EBV) therapy. For those with ongoing CV, endobronchial coils would be more appropriate. Both therapeutic modalities have demonstrated improved quality of life, effort tolerance, and lung function indices among appropriately selected patients. The emerging evidence suggests that endoscopic procedures among airway disease still have a substantial role to play despite the development of new therapeutic options.

Comparison between clinical trials and real-world evidence studies on biologics for severe asthma

In recent years, the more widespread availability of biological drugs with specific mechanisms of action has led to significant breakthroughs in the management of severe asthma. Over time, numerous randomised clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these biologics and define the eligibility criteria of patients suitable for various therapeutic options. These studies were conducted under controlled conditions not always applicable to real life. For this and other reasons, real-world evidence and pragmatic studies are required to provide useful information on the effectiveness of biological drugs and their safety, even in the long term. Because differences in outcomes have sometimes emerged between clinical trials and real-life studies, it is important to clarify the causes of these discrepancies and define the significance of the results of studies conducted in the course of daily clinical practice. Thus, a scientific debate is ongoing, and no consensus has been reached. The purpose of this narrative review is to analyse the differences between randomised trials and real-world evidence studies, focusing on their roles in guiding clinicians among different therapeutic options and understanding the reasons for the large discrepancies often found in the results obtained.

Bronchial thermoplasty: State of the art

Since the publication of a sham-controlled, randomized trial (AIR2) and subsequent marketing approval by the US Food and Drug Administration, we have significantly advanced our understanding of bronchial thermoplasty (BT)'s scientific basis, long-term safety, clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness. In particular, the last 2 years have witnessed multiple research publications on several of these counts. In this review, we critically appraise our evolving understanding of BT's biologic underpinnings and clinical impact, offer an evidence-based patient workflow guide for the busy pulmonologist and highlight both current challenges as well as potential solutions for the researcher and the clinician.

Therapeutic advances in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In recent years, therapeutic advances in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) have changed our treatment paradigm. This review will summarize and discuss updates in management of EGPA, with a particular focus on biologic therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The anti-interleukin (IL)-5 agent mepolizumab (the first FDA-approved drug specifically for EGPA) is effective in induction and maintenance of remission particularly in patients with predominantly asthma and allergic manifestations, though efficacy in ANCA-positive, vasculitic disease is unclear; additional anti-IL-5 agents are under study. Rituximab is currently recommended for remission induction in severe disease, particularly in ANCA-positive patients with vasculitic manifestations, though the supportive evidence is mostly observational. Evidence supporting use of traditional DMARDs and other biologic agents such as omalizumab remains limited and observational.

SUMMARY

Although management of this heterogeneous disease remains challenging and unanswered questions remain, advances in biologics (particularly anti-IL-5 agents and an evolving interest in rituximab) have expanded our treatment armamentarium in EGPA.