Resection Margin Width Does Not Influence the Prognosis of Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Anatomic Resection: A Real-World Study from China

The Definition of the Best Margin Cutoff and Related Oncological Outcomes After Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review

Background/Objectives: Different cutoffs have been proposed to be the optimal resection margin of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review, investigating the different impacts on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of different margin cutoffs. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for comparative studies evaluating the oncological impacts of different types of liver resection margin for HCC. Results: A total of 48 studies were included in the final analysis. Among them, 36 evaluated the impact of resection margin width on OS and 42 on DFS. The margin cutoffs assessed varied widely, including 20 mm, 10 mm, 5 mm, 4 mm, 2 mm, and 1 mm. While wider margins (≥10 mm) were generally associated with improved outcomes, particularly in high-risk subgroups such as patients with microvascular invasion (MVI), elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, or a non-cirrhotic liver, other studies reported no significant differences. The findings were highly heterogeneous across the studies due to differences in patient populations, tumor biology, and surgical approaches. Consequently, the evidence suggests that the optimal margin is context-dependent rather than universal. Conclusions: Wider resection margins should be considered in select high-risk patients, while a tailored, case-by-case approach remains necessary given the overall heterogeneity of HCC presentations.

Nomogram for predicting early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma with narrow resection margin

PURPOSE

Narrow resection margin hepatocellular carcinoma (NRM-HCC) has a high incidence of early recurrence. Our study was designed to identify prognostic factors in patients with NRM-HCC, establish and validate a nomogram model to predict early recurrence of NRM-HCC patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 2957 NRM-HCC patients who underwent radical hepatectomy at three medical centers between December 2009 and January 2015. Patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort (n = 2069) and a validation cohort (n = 888). Using univariate and multivariate COX regression to determine early relapse factors in NRM-HCC patients, and used these factors to construct a nomogram. The accuracy of the prediction was evaluated using the C-index, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curve. Decision curve analysis (DCA) assessed the predictive value of the models. Finally, the recurrence-free survival of different risks was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method.

RESULTS

The nomogram of NRM model contains alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), tumor size, tumor number, microvascular invasion (MVI), tumor capsular, and satellite nodules. The model shows good discrimination with C-indexes of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.69-0.72) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.70-0.75) in the train cohort and test cohort respectively. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the model is clinically useful and the calibration of our model was favorable. Our model stratified patients into two different risk groups, which exhibited significantly different early recurrence. The web-based tools are convenient for clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

NRM model demonstrated favorable performance in predicting early recurrence in NRM-HCC patients. This novel model will be helpful to guide postoperative follow-up and adjuvant therapy.

Evaluation of the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation followed by adjuvant therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Objective

This study aimed to explore the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA) adjuvant to lenvatinib and anti-PD-1 antibodies for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 67 patients with HCC treated at our hospital between October 2018 and May 2022 was conducted. All patients underwent a combination of TACE and MWA. Among them, 29 received postoperative treatment with molecular-targeted agents, like lenvatinib, along with anti-PD-1 antibodies such as sindilizumab, karelizumab, or tirilizumab. The remaining 38 patients did not receive postoperative systemic therapies, like targeted or immunotherapy. The survival and prognosis of all patients were analyzed.

Results

Nine patients in the observation group and 29 patients in the control group experienced recurrence, and the median progression-free survival 1 (PFS1) was not reached 'Not Applicable'(NA) and 17.05 months (P=0.035), respectively. Failure to combine adjuvant therapy was identified as an independent risk factor for tumor recurrence, and the observation group had a 0.245 times lower risk of recurrence compared to that in the control group (P=0.005). Multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed that the maximum tumor size, and tumor number were risk factors for tumor recurrence. Patients with a large maximum tumor size had a 1.519 times higher risk of recurrence compared to those with a small maximum tumor size (P=0.006), and patients with a large number of tumors had a 5.978 times higher risk of recurrence compared to those with a small number of tumors (P=0.02). The median PFS2 of the two groups was 11.795 and 21.257 months, respectively, though not statistically significant (P=0.955). However, there was a disparity in the percentage of BCLC stages associated with recurrence between the two groups. In the observation group approximately 22.22% of patients progressed to stage C, while in the control group, this proportion was 34.48%. The observation group exhibited a lower risk of distant metastasis compared to the control group.

Conclusion

Adjuvant treatment of HCC following TACE combined with MWA improved PFS and achieved better clinical outcomes compared to that with TACE combined with MWA alone.