Pediatricians' perceptions of clinical practice guidelines

Prevalence and correlates of paediatric guideline non-adherence for initial empirical care in six low and middle-income settings: a hospital-based cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the prevalence and correlates of guideline non-adherence for common childhood illnesses in low-resource settings.

DESIGN AND SETTING

We used secondary cross-sectional data from eight healthcare facilities in six Asian and African countries.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2796 children aged 2-23 months hospitalised between November 2016 and January 2019 with pneumonia, diarrhoea or severe malnutrition (SM) and without HIV infection were included in this study.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

We identified children treated with full, partial or non-adherent initial inpatient care according to site-specific standard-of-care guidelines for pneumonia, diarrhoea and SM within the first 24 hours of admission. Correlates of guideline non-adherence were identified using generalised estimating equations.

RESULTS

Fully adherent care was delivered to 32% of children admitted with diarrhoea, 34% of children with pneumonia and 28% of children with SM when a strict definition of adherence was applied. Non-adherence to recommendations was most common for oxygen and antibiotics for pneumonia; fluid, zinc and antibiotics for diarrhoea; and vitamin A and zinc for SM. Non-adherence varied by site. Pneumonia guideline non-adherence was more likely among patients with severe disease (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.38, 2.34) compared with non-severe disease. Diarrhoea guideline non-adherence was more likely among lower asset quintile groups (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.01, 1.35), older children (OR 1.10; 95% CI 1.06, 1.13) and children presenting with wasting (OR 6.44; 95% CI 4.33, 9.57) compared with those with higher assets, younger age and not wasted.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-adherence to paediatric guidelines was common and associated with older age, disease severity, and comorbidities, and lower household economic status. These findings highlight opportunities to improve guidelines by adding clarity to specific recommendations.

Physicians’ Attitudes Against Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Use of Guidelines: A Scale Development Study

This study aims at developing scale measuring attitudes of physicians against clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and investigate whether the attitude of physicians against CPGs has an effect on the use of CPGs. ‘The Physicians’ Attitudes Against CPGs and The Use of CPGs’ was developed and used to collect data from the physicians working in a public education and research hospital. Physicians’ attitudes that were constructed as an upper latent variable were significant, positive and highly effective on the use of CPGs. Furthermore, the attitude upper latent variable explained 30% of the variance in the observed variable for the use of CPGs. The attitude upper latent variable was affected significantly, positively and at a remarkably high level by positive attitude latent variable while it was affected significantly, negatively and at a remarkably high level by negative attitude latent variable. Physicians’ attitudes against CPGs were found to be a highly important factor in the use of CPGs. And it was also observed that physicians’ positive attitudes against CPGs affected the use of CPGs in a positive way while negative attitudes had negative effect on use of CPGs.

Hospital intranet system is major barrier to paediatric clinical guideline use a cross-sectional single-centre survey of NHS doctors and nurses

Across clinical specialties, the use of clinical guidelines is integral to maintaining patient safety, reducing variation in clinical practice and optimising patient care. Identifying specific barriers to the effective use of guidelines within individual healthcare settings allows for the implementation of effective strategies to overcome them, and ultimately improvements in patient care. Here, we report a single-centre survey of paediatric doctors and nurses, which formed part of a quality improvement project within the Acute Paediatrics Department of an NHS district general hospital. The primary aim of the study was to explore the perspective and resource barriers paediatrics healthcare staff experience when using local and national clinical guidelines. The secondary aim of the study was to examine the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on local and national clinical guideline use. We found that local and national guidelines are frequently used by paediatric doctors and nurses, and that they have positive perceptions of guidelines, overall. However, the NHS Trust's Intranet system was identified as a direct barrier to the use of local paediatric clinical guidelines. Staff throughout the UK in the NHS rely on their Intranet system in order to access local guidelines. Our results provide an impetus for interventions within this NHS Trust, and in the many other NHS Trusts with similar Intranet systems, to increase clinical guideline use and, ultimately, improve patient care.

Clinical Practice Guidelines on Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Quality Appraisal of International Guidelines

PURPOSE

While regurgitation is a common and often benign phenomenon in infants and younger children, it can also be a presenting symptom of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). If untreated, GERD can lead to dangerous or lifelong complications. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been published to inform clinical diagnosis and management of pediatric GERD, but to date there has been no comprehensive review of guideline quality or methodological rigor.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed, and a total of eight CPGs pertaining to pediatric GERD were identified. These CPGs were evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation instrument.

RESULTS

Three CPGs were found to be "high" quality, with 5 of 6 domains scoring >60%, one "average" quality, with 4 of 6 domains meeting that threshold, and the remaining four "low" quality.

CONCLUSION

Areas of strength among the CPGs included "Scope and Purpose" and "Clarity and Presentation," as they tended to be well-written and easily understood. Areas in need of improvement were "Stakeholder Involvement," "Rigor of Development," and "Applicability," suggesting these CPGs may not be appropriate for all patients or providers. This analysis found that while strong CPGs pertaining to the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric GERD exist, many published guidelines lack methodological rigor and broad applicability.

Factors Related to Self-Reported Distress Experienced by Physicians During Their First COVID-19 Triage Decisions

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with distress experienced by physicians during their first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) triage decisions.

METHODS

An online survey was administered to physicians licensed in New York State.

RESULTS

Of the 164 physicians studied, 20.7% experienced severe distress during their first COVID-19 triage decisions. The mean distress score was not significantly different between physicians who received just-in-time training and those who did not (6.0 ± 2.7 vs 6.2 ± 2.8; P = 0.550) and between physicians who received clinical guidelines and those who did not (6.0 ± 2.9 vs 6.2 ± 2.7; P = 0.820). Substantially increased odds of severe distress were found in physicians who reported that their first COVID-19 triage decisions were inconsistent with their core values (adjusted odds ratio, 6.33; 95% confidence interval, 2.03-19.76) and who reported having insufficient skills and expertise (adjusted odds ratio 2.99, 95% confidence interval 0.91-9.87).

CONCLUSION

Approximately 1 in 5 physicians in New York experienced severe distress during their first COVID-19 triage decisions. Physicians with insufficient skills and expertise, and core values misaligned to triage decisions are at heightened risk of experiencing severe distress. Just-in-time training and clinical guidelines do not appear to alleviate distress experienced by physicians during their first COVID-19 triage decisions.

Perception, attitude, and satisfaction of paediatric physicians and nurses towards clinical practice guidelines at a university teaching hospital

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES

To explore perception, attitude, and satisfaction of paediatric clinicians, trainees, and nurses at King Khalid University Hospital towards clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) including the locally adapted diabetic ketoacidosis CPG (DKA-CPG).

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was distributed to 260 doctors and nurses working in the paediatrics department.

RESULTS

The response rate was 95.4%. The respondents had a positive perception and attitude towards general CPGs and specifically for the DKA-CPG; 98.7% thought CPGs were useful sources of advice, improved safety, and decreased risk, and reduced variation in practice. A total of 99.2% thought CPGs were good clinical tools, 98.3% satisfied with, had confidence in well-developed CPGs, and would recommend them to their colleagues to use, and 94.6% agreed they were cost-effective. The preferred format for CPGs was paper (46.6%) and electronic (42.9%). The DKA-CPG helped in managing patients and respondents were all satisfied and had confidence with it (100%). The rationale and objectives of the DKA-CPG were clear for 99.25%; 98.5% thought the layout was clear and well organized and user-friendly (96.2%). Compared with nurses, physicians had a higher perception towards CPGs in general (P < .05) and the DKA-CPG (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The paediatric doctors, and nurses have a great perception and satisfaction and positive attitude towards CPGs in general, towards the paediatric diabetic ketoacidosis CPG in particular, which in turn had a positive impact on the acceptability and implementation of the CPGs. These findings could help in sustaining a safe and high-quality health care environment through implementation of evidence-based CPGs.