Prognostic value of quantitative sensory testing in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature

Sex Differences in the Serum Proteomic Profile During Acute Low Back Pain-A Preliminary Study of the Relationship to Future Low Back Pain

The molecular processes driving the transition from acute to chronic low back pain (LBP) remain poorly understood and are likely to be sexually dimorphic. This study aimed to explore sex differences in the serum proteomic profile of people experiencing an acute LBP episode and determine if serum protein concentrations were associated with three-month outcome. Serum samples were collected through venepuncture from 30 female and 29 male participants experiencing an acute LBP episode. Serum samples underwent trypsin digestion and fractionation using hydrophobic interaction chromatography and were then analysed using mass-spectrometry. Mass-spectrometry spectra were searched in the Swissprot database for protein identification. Sex differences in protein abundance changes were evident upon inspection of fold changes. Multivariable data analysis identified 21 serum proteins during the acute episode that correctly classified 93% of males and 23 serum proteins that correctly classified 90% of females with ongoing LBP at 3 months. Pathway analysis suggested the differentially expressed proteins during acute LBP were frequently involved in immune, inflammatory, complement, or coagulation responses. This data provides preliminary evidence that biological processes during an acute LBP episode may contribute to the resolution, or persistence, of LBP symptoms at 3 months, however, these processes differ between males and females. PERSPECTIVE: Differential expression of serum proteins was observed between male and female participants during an acute LBP episode. This preliminary work provides a foundation for future research targeting distinct immune system processes in males and females that may interfere with the transition from acute to chronic LBP.

Reference intervals and sources of variation of pressure pain threshold for quantitative sensory testing in a Japanese population

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is useful when analysing musculoskeletal pain disorders. A handheld algometer is most commonly used for pressure pain threshold (PPT) tests. However, reference intervals for PPTs are not elucidated. We assessed reference intervals of PPTs for QST in 158 healthy adult Japanese with no history of musculoskeletal or neurological problems. A handheld algometer was used to record PPT at five different assessment sites on the body: lumbar paravertebral muscle, musculus gluteus maximus, quadriceps, tibialis anterior muscle, and anterior talofibular ligament. Multiple regression analysis was performed to explore sources of variation of PPT according to sex, age, body mass index, UCLA Activity Level Rating, and Tegner Activity Score. Reference intervals were determined parametrically by Gaussian transformation of PPT values using the two-parameter Box-Cox formula. Results of multiple regression analysis revealed that age was significantly associated with PPT of lumbar paravertebral muscle and musculus gluteus maximus. In females, body mass index showed significant positive correlation with PPT of anterior talofibular ligament, and UCLA Activity Level Rating also showed significant positive association with tibialis anterior muscle and anterior talofibular ligament. Site-specific reference intervals of PPTs for Japanese are of practical relevance in fields of pain research using a handheld algometer.

Nonoperative treatment for pain sensitization in patients with low back pain: protocol for a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Low back pain is a disability that occurs worldwide. It is a heterogeneous disorder that affects patients with dominant nociceptive, neuropathic, and central sensitization pain. An important pathophysiology of low back pain involves pain sensitization. Various nonoperative interventions are available for treatment, but there is inconclusive evidence on the effectiveness of these interventions for pain sensitization, leading to arbitrary nonoperative treatments for low back pain.

METHODS

We will conduct a systematic review of RCTs evaluating the effectiveness and safety of nonoperative treatment for pain sensitization in patients with low back pain. The primary outcomes will be static quantitative sensory testing, dynamic quantitative sensory testing, and pain algometry. The secondary outcome will be adverse events. We will search the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Cochrane Library databases. Two independent authors will screen the titles and abstracts, review full texts, extract data, assess the risk of bias, and evaluate the quality of evidence. We will qualitatively and quantitatively synthesize the results using a random effects model for meta-analysis.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review aims to provide evidence regarding which treatment, if any, provides the greatest benefit for pain sensitization and safety among patients with low back pain. Evidence synthesized from this systematic review will inform clinical practice and further research. Since there is still a small amount of research, additional studies might need to be conducted in the future.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

Submitted to PROSPERO on March 20, 2021, CRD42021244054.

Brain Imaging Biomarkers for Chronic Pain

The prevalence of chronic pain has reached epidemic levels. In addition to personal suffering chronic pain is associated with psychiatric and medical co-morbidities, notably substance misuse, and a huge a societal cost amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars annually in medical cost, lost wages, and productivity. Chronic pain does not have a cure or quantitative diagnostic or prognostic tools. In this manuscript we provide evidence that this situation is about to change. We first start by summarizing our current understanding of the role of the brain in the pathogenesis of chronic pain. We particularly focus on the concept of learning in the emergence of chronic pain, and the implication of the limbic brain circuitry and dopaminergic signaling, which underly emotional learning and decision making, in this process. Next, we summarize data from our labs and from other groups on the latest brain imaging findings in different chronic pain conditions focusing on results with significant potential for translation into clinical applications. The gaps in the study of chronic pain and brain imaging are highlighted in throughout the overview. Finally, we conclude by discussing the costs and benefits of using brain biomarkers of chronic pain and compare to other potential markers.

Association between temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation in chronic low back pain: baseline results from 2 clinical trials

Introduction

Temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) represent different aspects of central pain processing. Their relationship and differential performance within distinct body locations are not well understood.

Objectives

To examine the association between TS and CPM in chronic low back pain and the influence of testing location on this relationship.

Methods

We analyzed baseline data from 2 clinical trials on participants with chronic low back pain (n = 264; 47.3% female; mean age = 41 years, SD = 12; mean pain = 5.3/10, SD = 1.4). Measures used included questionnaires assessing pain and negative affect, phasic thermal TS at the hand (thenar) and the lower back (lumbar), followed by CPM that included a thermal testing stimulus (Heat-6, the temperature where pain rating is 6/10) and a cold-pressor conditioning stimulus. Nonparametric, proportional odds logistic regression was used to model thenar, and separately, lumbar TS, using CPM, Heat-6, negative affect, and demographics.

Results

Our models revealed a small association (βs = 0.17, P = 0.01) between reduced CPM and heightened TS at both testing sites, regardless of demographics or negative affect.

Conclusion

Results suggest a modest association between TS and CPM, irrespective of anatomical testing location, demographics, and negative affect. These findings will help improve the methodology and interpretation of TS and CPM measurement in clinical pain populations.

Can Central Sensitization after injury persist as an autonomous pain generator? - A comprehensive search for evidence

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a comprehensive search for evidence whether Central Sensitization following an injury can act as a persistent autonomous pain generator after the inducing injury has healed.

METHODS

We searched Medline on PubMed and the Cochrane Library, screening 3,572 abstracts, from which 937 full text articles were obtained, with 186 of these discarded as irrelevant to the question being posed. The remaining 751 articles were studied for evidence.

RESULTS

Fourteen publications were judged to provide weak evidence for the hypothesis of central sensitization as a persisting autonomous pain generator, but none addressed the question directly. No strong evidence for the affirmative answer was found.Sixty-two publications were judged to provide weak evidence for a negative answer, and nine judged to provide strong evidence.Unexpectedly, serious weaknesses were discovered in the literature underpinning the validity of the clinical diagnosis of Central Sensitization in man:(i)  Inappropriate extrapolation, in many publications, of laboratory animal data to humans.(ii) Failure to demonstrate the absence of peripheral pain generators which might be perpetuating Central Sensitization.(iii) Many factors now shown to confound what is being measured by quantitative sensory testing, conditioned pain modulation, and Central Sensitization Inventory.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence proving that central sensitization can persist as an autonomous pain generator after the initiating injury has healed.Our review has also shown that the evidential basis for the diagnosis of CS in individual patients is seriously in question.

Pain Catastrophizing, Self-reported Disability, and Temporal Summation of Pain Predict Self-reported Pain in Low Back Pain Patients 12 Weeks After General Practitioner Consultation: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Patients with low back pain (LBP) often demonstrate pain sensitization, high degree of pain catastrophizing, and psychological distress. This study investigated whether pain sensitization mechanisms, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Start Back Screening Tool were associated with pain in recurrent LBP patients 12 weeks after consulting their general practitioner (GP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 45 LBP patients, pressure pain thresholds, temporal summation of pain (TSP), conditioned pain modulation (CPM), the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and the PCS were assessed before consultation. Patients were classified into low to medium or high risk of poor prognosis on the basis of the Start Back Screening Tool. Worst pain within the last 24 hours was assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS) at inclusion and 12 weeks after GP consultation.

RESULTS

VAS scores were reduced after 12 weeks in the low-to-medium (N=30, P<0.05), but not the high-risk group (N=15, P=0.40). RMDQ was reduced after 12 weeks (P<0.001), but with no difference between the groups. PCS was reduced in the low-to-medium and the high-risk group (P<0.05). TSP was significantly higher at follow-up in the high-risk group compared with the low-to-medium-risk group (P<0.05). A linear regression model explained 54.9% of the variance in VAS scores at follow-up utilizing baseline assessments of TSP, RMDQ, and PCS.

DISCUSSION

This study indicate that patients with LBP and high self-reported disability, high pain catastrophizing, and facilitated TSP assessed when consulting the GP might predictive poor pain progression 12 weeks after the consultation.

Health-related quality of life deviations from population norms in patients with lumbar radiculopathy: associations with pain, pain cognitions, and endogenous nociceptive modulation

PURPOSE

The primary goal of this study was to compare the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of people with lumbar radiculopathy to age- and sex-adjusted population norms. Additionally, it aimed to explore the associations between the HRQoL difference scores and measures related to pain cognitions, pain intensity, and endogenous nociceptive modulation.

METHODS

Using answers from the Short Form 36-item Health Survey and UK population norms, SF-6D difference scores were calculated. A one-sample t test was used to assess the SF-6D difference scores. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to assess the associations between SF-6D difference scores and pain intensity [Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain], pain cognitions [Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire (PVAQ)], and correlates for endogenous nociceptive modulation using quantitative sensory testing.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty people with lumbar radiculopathy scheduled for surgery were included in this study. The mean SF-6D difference score of - 0.26 [SD = 0.09] was found to be significantly less than 0 [95%CI: - 0.27 to - 0.24]. Univariate analyses showed a significant influence from PCS, TSK, and PVAQ on the SF-6D difference scores. The final multivariate regression model included PCS and PVAQ, with only PCS maintaining a statistically significant regression coefficient [b = - 0.002; 95% CI: - 0.004 to - 0.001].

CONCLUSION

People diagnosed with lumbar radiculopathy report significantly lower HRQoL scores when compared with age- and sex-adjusted UK norm values. Even though all examined pain cognitions were found to have a significant association, pain catastrophizing showed the most significant relation to the SF-6D difference scores.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier No. NCT02630732. Date of registration: November 25, 2015.

Spinal manipulation and modulation of pain sensitivity in persistent low back pain: a secondary cluster analysis of a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Pain hypersensitivity can be assessed using Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) and is associated with persistent low back pain. Spinal manipulation appears to modify pain hypersensitivity, and this could function as one mechanism leading to clinical improvements. In the current study, we applied a comprehensive QST battery to assess pain sensitivity in a cohort of low back pain patients before and after spinal manipulation to improve our understanding of the association between QST and clinical improvements. This study addresses two questions: Are clinical improvements following spinal manipulation in low back pain patients contingent on pain hypersensitivity, and does pain sensitivity change following spinal manipulation?

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial. One hundred and thirty-two participants with persistent LBP were treated with spinal manipulation four times over two weeks. Patient-reported outcomes and QST were assessed at baseline, after the fourth spinal manipulation session, and 14-days later. The clinical outcomes were changes in low back pain intensity and disability. Using latent profile analysis, we categorized the participants into clusters depending on their baseline QST scores. We used linear mixed models to examine the association between clusters and changes in patient-reported outcomes and QST.

RESULTS

Two clusters emerged: a Sensitized and a Not sensitized. The former had significantly lower regional pressure and thermal pain thresholds, remote pressure pain tolerance, and lower inhibitory conditioned pain modulation than the Not sensitized group. However, we only found between-cluster differences for regional pressure pain threshold following spinal manipulation. Thus, the clusters were not associated with patient-reported pain and disability changes or the remaining QST outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

We report that the baseline QST profile was not associated with clinical improvements following spinal manipulation. We did observe a substantial change for regional pressure pain threshold, which suggests that any effect of spinal manipulation on pain sensitivity is most likely to be observed as changes in regional, mechanical pain threshold. However, the mechanism that invokes clinical improvement and pain sensitivity changes appear distinct. Due to methodological caveats, we advise caution when interpreting the results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical.Trial.gov identifier: NCT04086667 , registered 11 September 2019 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04086667.

Alterations in pronociceptive and antinociceptive mechanisms in patients with low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Altered pronociceptive and antinociceptive mechanisms are often implicated in painful conditions and have been increasingly studied over the past decade. For some painful conditions, alterations are well-established, but in populations with low back pain (LBP), there remains considerable debate whether these mechanisms are altered. The present systematic review aimed to address this issue by identifying studies assessing conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and/or temporal summation of pain (TSP) in patients with LBP, comparing with either a healthy control group or using a method with reference data available. Qualitative synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis of group differences were performed. For CPM and TSP, 20 and 29 original articles were eligible, with data for meta-analysis obtainable from 18 (1500 patients and 505 controls) and 27 (1507 patients and 1127 controls) studies, respectively. Most studies were of poor-to-fair quality with significant heterogeneity in study size, population, assessment methodology, and outcome. Nonetheless, CPM was impaired in patients with LBP compared with controls (standardized mean difference = -0.44 [-0.64 to -0.23], P < 0.001), and the magnitude of this impairment was related to pain chronicity (acute/recurrent vs chronic, P = 0.003), duration (RS = -0.62, P = 0.006), and severity (RS = -0.54, P = 0.02). Temporal summation of pain was facilitated in patients with LBP compared with controls (standardized mean difference = 0.50 [0.29-0.72], P < 0.001), and the magnitude of this facilitation was weakly related to pain severity (RS= 0.41, P = 0.04) and appeared to be influenced by test modality (P < 0.001). Impaired CPM and facilitated TSP were present in patients with LBP compared with controls, although the magnitude of differences was small which may direct future research on the clinical utility.

Quantitative Sensory Testing Discriminates Central Sensitization Inventory Scores in Participants with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: An Exploratory Study

BACKGROUND

The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) is often used in clinical settings to screen for the presence of central sensitization. However, various cutoff scores have been reported for this tool, and scores have not been consistently associated with widespread pain sensitivity as measured with quantitative sensory testing (QST). The purpose of this study was to compare QST profiles among asymptomatic controls and participants with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP), and to determine the association between self-report questionnaires and QST in participants with CMP.

METHODS

Twenty asymptomatic controls and 46 participants with CMP completed the CSI, PROMIS-29, and QST assessments of mechanical and thermal pain thresholds remote to the area of pain. Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis revealed a cutoff score of 33.5 for the CSI. PROMIS-29 Quality of Life (QOL) inventory and QST measures were compared between low and high CSI groups.

RESULTS

The high CSI group (n = 19) had significantly lower mechanical and thermal pain thresholds, and larger impairments in QOL measures, compared to the low CSI group (n = 27) and asymptomatic controls. Participants with CSI scores < 33.5 presented similarly to asymptomatic controls. Anxiety, pain interference, and CSI scores demonstrated the highest number of significant associations to QST measures.

CONCLUSION

A cutoff score of 33.5 on the CSI may be useful for discriminating widespread pain sensitivity and quality of life impairments in participants with CMP. Future studies should consider how the presence of high or low CSI may impact differential diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment responsiveness for patients with primary or secondary CMP.

Quantitative sensory testing to evaluate and compare the results after epidural injection and simple discectomy, in patients with radiculopathy secondary to lumbar disc herniation

The objective assessment of the radiculopathy secondary to lumbar disc herniation is essential to optimize treatment. The quantitative sensory test (QST) is a useful tool to evaluate somatosensory nerves. The aim of our study is quantifying by QST the alterations of patients treated by epidural injections (EI) or surgical lumbar decompression (LD). A prospective, cohort study has done in Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain, between January 2014 and December 2016.The study includes 74 patients (40 men) who underwent EI (50) or LD (24) with lumbar disc herniation and treated by EI or LD. Participants underwent a brief battery of QST at baseline and after 1, 3 and 6 months of follow-up. QST threshold were measured in three series of five warm and cold stimuli (cold detection threshold, warm detection threshold, cold pain threshold, heat pain threshold) bilateral. Additionally, pain assessment (Visual Analogue Scale) and neurological examination was performed. Thermal thresholds were analysed and compared. In the EI group, warm detection threshold (WDT) measurements were significantly lower after 3 and 6 months of follow-up (40.44 ± 3.42°C vs. 38.30 ± 3.73°C and 37.48 ± 4.58°C respectively, p = 0.031 and p = 0.043). LD group showed lower WDT measurements at 1, 3 and 6 months of follow up (40.20 ± 2.97°C vs., 37.98 ± 2.04°C, 37.43 ± 3.80°C and 36.55 ± 2.77°C respectively, p = 0.049, p = 0.032 and p = 0.024) and lower heat pain threshold (HPT) levels after 3 and 6 months of follow-up (48.75 ± 1.37°C vs. 43.26 ± 0.60°C and 42.06 ± 1.37°C respectively, p = 0.037 and p = 0.021). QST explorations were compared between both groups. At 1-month follow-up only the WDT parameter was different, higher in EI group (40.98 ± 4.04°C vs. 37.98 ± 2.04°C, p = 0.043). There were no differences in any parameter measured by QST after 3 and 6-months follow-up between both groups. Epidural injection should be considered the first-step of treatment.

Hybrid Approach to Treatment Tailoring for Low Back Pain: A Proposed Model of Care

Various approaches have been used to guide the treatment of low back pain. These approaches have been considered in isolation and often tested against each other. An alternative view is that a model of care that involves a hybrid approach may benefit patients with low back pain. This commentary considers the potential benefits of a sequentially applied hybrid approach for treatment tailoring to optimize resource allocation to those most likely to require comprehensive care, and then decision making toward treatment paths with the greatest potential for success. In a first step, a prognosis-based approach, such as the Subgroups for Targeted Treatment Back Screening Tool (STarT Back), identifies individuals likely to require greater resource allocation. Although a clear path is indicated toward simple and psychologically informed care for the low- and high-risk groups, respectively, there is limited guidance for the large medium-risk group. For that group, the hybrid model provides a stepwise path of additional methods to guide treatment selection. This includes subgrouping based on pain mechanism to guide priority domains for the next phase, which includes tailoring of psychological and movement-based approaches. Motor control approaches to exercise would be indicated for individuals with medium risk and a nociceptive pain mechanism, with treatment guided by detailed assessment via one of several paradigms. Psychologically informed treatments are tailored to those with medium risk and a predominantly central pain mechanism, guided by detailed assessment of psychosocial features. A hybrid approach to a model of care could simplify treatment selection and take advantage of the benefits of each method in a time- and cost-efficient manner. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(6):453-463. Epub 13 Feb 2019. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8774.

Neuroplasticity of Sensorimotor Control in Low Back Pain

Low back pain (LBP) is an important medical and socioeconomic problem. Impaired sensorimotor control has been suggested to be a likely mechanism underlying development and/or maintenance of pain. Although early work focused on the structural and functional abnormalities within the musculoskeletal system, in the past 20 years there has been an increasing realization that patients with LBP might also have extensive neuroplastic changes within the central nervous system. These include changes related to both the structure (eg, gray matter changes) and function (eg, organization of the sensory and motor cortices) of the nervous system as related to processing of pain and nociception and to motor and somatosensory systems. Moreover, clinical interventions increasingly aim to drive neuroplasticity with treatments to improve pain and sensorimotor function. This commentary provides a contemporary overview of neuroplasticity of the pain/nociceptive and sensorimotor systems in LBP. This paper addresses (1) defining neuroplasticity in relation to control of the spine and LBP, (2) structural and functional nervous system changes as they relate to nonspecific LBP and sensorimotor function, and (3) related clinical implications. Individuals with recurrent and persistent LBP differ from those without LBP in several markers of the nervous system's function and structure. Neuroplastic changes may be addressed by top-down cognitive-based interventions and bottom-up physical interventions. An integrated clinical approach that combines contemporary pain neuroscience education, cognition-targeted sensorimotor control, and physical or function-based treatments may lead to better outcomes in patients with recurrent and persistent LBP. This approach will need to consider variation among individuals, as no single finding/mechanism is present in all individuals, and no single treatment that targets neuroplastic changes in the sensorimotor system is likely to be effective for all patients with LBP. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(6):402-414. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8489.

Short- and long-term impact of remifentanil on thermal detection and pain thresholds after cardiac surgery: A randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The clinical relevance of the suggested hyperalgesic effects of remifentanil is still unclear, especially in the long term.

OBJECTIVE

The current study evaluated the impact of remifentanil on thermal thresholds 3 days and 12 months after surgery, measured with Quantitative Sensory Testing.

DESIGN

A single-blind, randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

A tertiary care teaching hospital in The Netherlands, from 2014 to 2016.

PATIENTS

A total of 126 patients aged between 18 and 85 years, undergoing cardiothoracic surgery via sternotomy (coronary artery bypass grafts and/or valve replacement) were included. Exclusion criteria were BMI above 35 kg m, history of cardiac surgery, chronic pain conditions, neurological conditions, allergy to opioids or paracetamol, language barrier and pregnancy.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were allocated randomly to receive intra-operatively either a continuous remifentanil infusion or intermittent intra-operative fentanyl as needed in addition to standardised anaesthesia with propofol and intermittent intravenous fentanyl at predetermined time points.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Warm and cold detection and pain thresholds 3 days and 12 months after surgery. In addition the use of remifentanil, presence of postoperative chronic pain, age, opioid consumption and pre-operative quality of life were tested as a predictor for altered pain sensitivity 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Both warm and cold detection, and pain thresholds, were not significantly different between the remifentanil and fentanyl groups 3 days and 12 months after surgery (P > 0.05). No significant predictors for altered pain sensitivity were identified.

CONCLUSION

Earlier reports of increased pain sensitivity 1 year after the use of remifentanil could not be confirmed in this randomised study using Quantitative Sensory Testing. This indicates that remifentanil plays a minor role in the development of chronic thoracic pain. Still, the relatively high incidence of chronic thoracic pain and its accompanying impact on quality of life remain challenging problems.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at EudraCT (ref: 2013-000201-23) and ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02031016).

Potential biomarkers for persistent and neuropathic pain therapy

Persistent, in particular neuropathic pain affects millions of people worldwide. However, the response rate of patients to existing analgesic drugs is less than 50%. There are several possibilities to increase this response rate, such as optimization of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of analgesics. Another promising approach is to use prognostic biomarkers in patients to determine the optimal pharmacological therapy for each individual. Here, we discuss recent efforts to identify plasma and CSF biomarkers, as well as genetic biomarkers and sensory testing, and how these readouts could be exploited for the prediction of a suitable pharmacological treatment. Collectively, the information on single biomarkers may be stored in knowledge bases and processed by machine-learning and related artificial intelligence techniques, resulting in the optimal pharmacological treatment for individual pain patients. We highlight the potential for biomarker-based individualized pain therapies and discuss biomarker reliability and their utility in clinical practice, as well as limitations of this approach.

STarT Back Tool risk stratification is associated with changes in movement profile and sensory discrimination in low back pain: A study of 290 patients

BACKGROUND

Investigation of movement and sensory profiles across STarT Back risk subgroups.

METHODS

A chronic low back pain cohort (n = 290) were classified as low, medium or high risk using the STarT Back Tool, and completed a repeated spinal bending task and quantitative sensory testing. Pain summation, time taken and the number of protective behaviours with repeated bending were measured. Sensory tests included two-point discrimination, temporal summation, pressure/thermal pain thresholds and conditioned pain modulation. Subgroups were profiled against movement and sensory variables.

RESULTS

The high-risk subgroup demonstrated greater pain summation following repeated forward bending (p < 0.001). The medium-risk subgroup demonstrated greater pain summation following repeated backward bending (p = 0.032). Medium- and high-risk subgroups demonstrated greater forward/backward bend time compared to the low-risk subgroup (p = 0.001, p = 0.005, respectively). Medium- and high-risk subgroups demonstrated a higher number of protective behaviours per forward bend compared to the low-risk subgroup (p = 0.008). For sensory variables, only two-point discrimination differed between subgroups, with medium- and high-risk subgroups demonstrating higher thresholds (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed altered movement characteristics and sensory discrimination across SBT risk subgroups in people with CLBP. Membership of the high SBT risk subgroup was associated with greater pain and disability levels, greater pain summation following repeated bending, slower bending times, a greater number of protective behaviours during forward bending, and a higher TPD threshold. Treatment outcomes for higher risk SBT subgroups may be enhanced by interventions specifically targeting movement and sensory alterations.

SIGNIFICANCE

In 290 people with chronic low back pain movement profile and two-point discrimination threshold differed across risk subgroups defined by the STarT Back Tool. Conversely, pain sensitivity did not differ across these subgroups. These findings may add further guidance for targeted care in these subgroups.

Current use of measurement instruments by physiotherapists working in Germany: a cross-sectional online survey

Background

The use of measurement instruments in physiotherapy has been recommended in clinical practice guidelines to improve evidence-based practice. The aims of the study were (a) to describe the current use of measurement instruments by physiotherapists working in Germany and (b) to investigate the facilitators and barriers to use measurement instruments.

Methods

This cross-sectional study used a nationwide online survey, which was accessible to all physiotherapists working in Germany.

Results

In total, 522 adult physiotherapists working in Germany completed the questionnaire. The mean age of the respondents was 38 years, 63% were female, and 53% had >10 years of work experience.

Thirty-one percent of the respondents used measurement instruments in ≥80% of their patients, and 26% used measurement instruments in ≤20%. Measurement instruments were used for diagnostic and prognostic purposes by 69% and 22% of respondents, respectively. The three most frequently reported measurement instruments were “goniometer” (n = 254), some kind of a “visual/numeric analogue scale” (n = 139), and the “manual examination of muscle-strength” (n = 54). Seven of the 13 most stated measurement instruments measure activities or participation.

The most important facilitator was physiotherapists’ positive attitudes towards measurement instruments. Two out of three respondents reported having sufficient knowledge and skills to apply measurement instruments in clinical practice. The most pronounced barriers were insufficient additional financial compensations and requiring extra time to document test scores. Seventy-eight percent of the respondents could imagine using an electronic device for a user-friendly patient health record system in clinical practice.

Conclusions

The limited use of measurement instruments reported by physiotherapists working in Germany appears to be due to organisational issues, in combination with a lack of knowledge and skills needed to apply the measurement instruments, rather than due to individual or managerial reasons. To support the use of measurement instruments, sufficient time resources and adequate financial compensation are required. Educational approaches should focus on imparting patient-centred and patient-reported outcomes to quantify activities and participation. Electronic patient health record systems have potential to facilitate the application of standardised measurement instruments if the barriers identified in this survey are addressed properly.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3563-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Central Sensitization Inventory and Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire: An exploration of construct validity and associations with widespread pain sensitivity among individuals with shoulder pain

BACKGROUND

The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) and Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) are alternatives to quantitative sensory testing (QST) for inferring central sensitization.

OBJECTIVE

Explore 1) comparative validity of the CSI and PSQ with QST (construct validity) and pain-related psychological questionnaires (concurrent validity), and 2) associations with widespread pain sensitivity.

METHODS

Seventy-eight participants with unilateral shoulder pain less than 6 months (mean ± SD age = 39.0 ± 14.5 years, N (%) females = 36 (46.2%)) completed the CSI, PSQ, psychological questionnaires, and underwent QST for local and remote pressure pain thresholds (PPT), heat pain threshold, and suprathreshold heat pain ratings. Data from 25 age and sex-matched healthy participants (mean ± SD age = 35.2 ± 11.1 year, N (%) females = 13 (52.0%)) were used to determine a composite index for widespread pressure pain sensitivity in the shoulder pain group. Analyses included correlations between measures and between-group comparisons.

RESULTS

Only the PSQ was associated with remote PPT (rho range = -0.25 to -0.27). Both the CSI and PSQ were associated with resilience (rho range = -0.29 to -0.39), anxiety (rho range = 0.25 to 0.66), and negative affect (rho range = 0.27 to 0.67). Neither the CSI nor PSQ were associated with widespread pain sensitivity (p > 0.05). Resilience (adjusted OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.18; 0.94) was a distinctive feature for widespread pain sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary findings challenge the exclusive use of the CSI or PSQ for inferring central sensitization among individuals with shoulder pain.

Convergent Validity of the Dutch Central Sensitization Inventory: Associations with Psychophysical Pain Measures, Quality of Life, Disability, and Pain Cognitions in Patients with Chronic Spinal Pain

OBJECTIVE

Symptoms of central sensitization (CS) have been described in patients with chronic spinal pain (CSP). Although a gold standard to diagnose CS is lacking, psychophysical pain measures are often used. The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) is proposed as an alternative method and indirect tool for the evaluation of CS symptomatology. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the convergent validity of the CSI by investigating the association with psychophysical pain measures and self-reported measures of current pain intensity, quality of life, disability, and catastrophizing in CSP patients.

METHODS

One hundred sixteen patients with nonspecific CSP were included in the present study. Patients completed the CSI, were subjected to pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) and a conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm, and completed questionnaires for current pain intensity, quality of life, pain disability, and pain catastrophizing.

RESULTS

Higher CSI scores were weakly correlated with lower PPTs (-0.276 ≤ r ≤ -0.237; all P ≤ 0.01) and not with CPM efficacy (r = 0.017; P = 0.858). Higher CSI scores were moderately correlated with higher current pain intensity (r = 0.320; P < 0.001), strongly correlated with lower physical (r = -0.617; P < 0.001) and emotional (r = -0.635; P < 0.001) quality of life, and moderately correlated with higher pain disability (r = 0.472; P < 0.001) and higher pain catastrophizing (r = 0.464; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The CSI was weakly associated with PPTs and not with CPM efficacy in CSP patients. Moderate to strong associations were found with current pain intensity, quality of life, disability, and catastrophizing. The current results illustrate that the CSI does not reflect a direct measure of CS, yet is a representation of general distress, possible originating from CS symptoms.

Test Procedures to Assess Somatosensory Abnormalities in Individuals with Peripheral Joint Pain: A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties

BACKGROUND

Test procedures that were developed to assess somatosensory abnormalities should possess optimal psychometric properties (PMPs) to be used in clinical practice. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature to assess the level of evidence for PMPs of test procedures investigated in individuals with peripheral joint pain (PJP).

METHODS

A comprehensive electronic literature search was conducted in 7 databases from inception to March 2016. The Quality Appraisal for Reliability Studies (QAREL) checklist and the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) tool were used to assess risk for bias of the included studies. Level of evidence was evaluated based on the methodological quality and the quality of the measurement properties.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies related to PJP were included. The majority of included studies were considered to be of insufficient methodological quality, and the level of evidence for PMPs varied across different test procedures. The level of evidence for PMPs varied across different test procedures in different types of PJP. Hand-held pressure algometry is the only test procedure that showed moderate positive evidence of intrarater reliability, agreement, and responsiveness, simultaneously, when it was investigated in patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review identified that the level of evidence for PMPs varied across different testing procedures to assess somatosensory abnormalities for different PJP populations. Further research with standardized protocols is recommended to further investigate the predictive ability and responsiveness of reported test procedures in order to warrant their extended utility in clinical practice.

Association between pain sensitivity in the hand and outcomes after surgery in patients with lumbar disc herniation or spinal stenosis

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between pain sensitivity in the hand pre-surgery, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in function, pain and health pre- and post-surgery in patients with disc herniation or spinal stenosis.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study with 82 patients. Associations between pressure-, cold- and heat pain threshold (PPT, CPT, HPT) in the hand pre-surgery and Oswestry, VAS pain, EQ-5D, HADS, and Self-Efficacy Scale, pre- and three months post-surgery; were investigated with linear regression.

RESULTS

Patients with disc herniation more sensitive to pressure pain pre-surgery showed lower function and self-efficacy, and higher anxiety and depression pre-surgery, and lower function, and self-efficacy, and higher pain post-surgery. Results for cold pain were similar. In patients with spinal stenosis few associations with PROs were found and none for HPT and PROs.

CONCLUSIONS

Altered pain response in pressure- and cold pain in the hand, as a sign of widespread pain pre-surgery had associations with higher pain, lower function and self-efficacy post-surgery in patients with disc herniation.