The safety profile of parecoxib for the treatment of postoperative pain: a pooled analysis of 28 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials and a review of over 10 years of postauthorization data

[Parecoxib sodium down-regulates CXCL8-CXCR1/2 to improve inflammatory microenvironment and promote patient recovery following laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer]

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of parecoxib sodium on tumor microenvironment in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer.

METHODS

Sixty patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for radical rectal cancer resection were randomized into test group and control group (n=30). The patients in test control group received intravenous injections of 40 mg parecoxib sodium at the time of anesthesia induction, immediately after and at 12 h after the surgery, and those in the control group were injected with an equal volume of physiological saline at the same time points. Plasma levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and CXCL8 of the patients were measured using ELISA, and expressions of CXCL8, CXCR1, and CXCR2 in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were detected with Western blotting. Postoperative VAS scores and gastrointestinal reactions and disease regression at 6 months after the operation were recorded.

RESULTS

Compared with the control patients, the patients in the test group showed significantly reduced plasma levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and CXCL8 (P < 0.05) and milder elevations of CXCL8, CXCR1, and CXCR2 proteins in PBMCs (P < 0.05) with significantly lower VAS scores at 12 h and 24 h after the operation (P < 0.05) and lower postoperative incidence of adverse gastrointestinal reactions (P < 0.05). At 6 months after the operation, the number of patients with metastasis or tumor recurrence was significantly smaller in the test group than in the control group (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Parecoxib sodium can improve the inflammatory microenvironment to promote patient recovery after laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer possibly through a mechanism that down-regulates CXCL8-CXCR1/2 expressions in the PBMCs.

Efficacy and safety of parecoxib and flurbiprofen axetil for perioperative analgesia in children: a network meta-analysis

Objective

The aim of this study was to systematically review the efficacy and safety of parecoxib and flurbiprofen axetil for perioperative analgesia in children through Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Sinomed, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang Data databases on 18 July 2022 to obtain randomized controlled trials comparing perioperative parecoxib or flurbiprofen with placebo or standard treatment for pediatric analgesia. The outcomes were the postoperative pain score and the incidence of adverse events. The Gemtc package of R-4.0.3 and Stata 17.0 were used for Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Results

We retrieved 942 articles and 49 randomized controlled trials involving 3,657 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Compared with children who received placebo treatment, those who received flurbiprofen axetil had lower pain sores at each time point within 24 h postoperatively, and those who received parecoxib had lower pain sores at each time point within 12 h postoperatively. Compared with children who received tramadol treatment, both the children who received flurbiprofen axetil or parecoxib had lower pain scores at 8 h postoperatively. The ranking results demonstrated that flurbiprofen axetil had significant superiority in reducing pain scores at 2, 4, and 12 h postoperatively, and parecoxib had significant superiority in reducing pain scores at 0, 0.5, 1, 6, 8, and 24 h postoperatively. In terms of safety, compared with children who received placebo, those who received flurbiprofen axetil or parecoxib had a lower incidence of total adverse events and postoperative agitation. Compared with tramadol, flurbiprofen axetil and parecoxib both significantly reduced the incidence of total adverse events and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Compared with flurbiprofen axetil or fentanyl, parecoxib significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The ranking results showed that parecoxib was advantageous in decreasing the incidence of total adverse events and postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Conclusion

Flurbiprofen axetil was most effective at reducing pain scores at 2, 4, and 12 h postoperatively. Parecoxib had an advantage in terms of reducing pain scores at 0, 0.5, 1, 6, 8, and 24 h postoperatively, as well as the incidence of total adverse events and postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Systematic trial registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=348886, PROSPERO (CRD42022348886).

Acute Pain Management Pearls: A Focused Review for the Hospital Clinician

Acute pain management is a challenging area encountered by inpatient clinicians every day. While patient care is increasingly complex and costly in this realm, the availability of applicable specialists is waning. This narrative review seeks to support diverse hospital-based healthcare providers in refining and updating their acute pain management knowledge base through clinical pearls and point-of-care resources. Practical guidance is provided for the design and adjustment of inpatient multimodal analgesic regimens, including conventional and burgeoning non-opioid and opioid therapies. The importance of customized care plans for patients with preexisting opioid tolerance, chronic pain, or opioid use disorder is emphasized, and current recommendations for inpatient management of associated chronic therapies are discussed. References to best available guidelines and literature are offered for further exploration. Improved clinician attention and more developed skill sets related to acute pain management could significantly benefit hospitalized patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilization.

Effect of Parecoxib on Postoperative Pain Management After Total Knee/Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) are frequent procedures used to relieve the symptoms of hip or knee joint dysfunction, enhance disease recovery, and boost patients' quality of life. Nevertheless, postoperative pain has been a significant disadvantage since it strongly impacts patients' postoperative recovery. Parecoxib has been demonstrated to be useful in the management of postoperative pain in a variety of surgical procedures. While parecoxib can help with postoperative pain, its analgesic and unfavourable effects in TKA/THA patients have not been well studied.

METHODS

A systematic search of peer-reviewed articles was conducted through the PubMed database, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library to retrieve related studies published in the English language that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The publication date was restricted to the past 10 years (2012-2022). Results were analyzed using Review Manager software (RevMan version 5.4.1, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020). The quality of the studies included was assessed using Jadad scores. Risk ratios (RR) standard mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to analyze the primary and secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Eleven randomized controlled trials covering 1911 patients who underwent TKA/THA were selected. The pooled results indicated that the parecoxib group has lower visual analogue scale (VAS) scores than the placebo group. However, there was no significant difference in the secondary endpoint. The Jadad scores ranged from 3 to 5 and most of the studies were of high quality.

CONCLUSION

The results of our meta-analysis indicate that parecoxib has a better analgesic effect compared to placebo. It alleviates postoperative orthopaedic pain without raising the risk of adverse events.

Intravenous Parecoxib for Pain Relief after Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Orthopedic procedures have been associated with increased pain, making perioperative analgesia a major clinical concern. We assessed the efficacy and safety of intravenous parecoxib administration during the perioperative period for postoperative pain relief after orthopedic surgery in adults.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and clinicaltrial.gov were searched from inception to 23 August 2021 without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials comparing intravenous parecoxib with placebo or another active treatment for acute postoperative pain in adults after orthopedic surgery were included. The primary outcomes were the pain scores and cumulative morphine consumption. The secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients requiring rescue analgesics and the incidence of adverse events. The meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines and was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews Registration (PROSPERO).

RESULTS

Twenty-seven trials (n = 2840) from more than 20 countries involving six types of orthopedic surgery met the inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo, intravenous parecoxib administration led to reductions in postoperative resting pain scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h [mean difference (MD) -0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.71 to -0.03; MD -0.86, 95% CI -1.26 to -0.46; MD -0.57, 95% CI -0.84 to -0.31; MD -0.40, 95% CI -0.69 to -0.11, respectively], postoperative movement pain scores at 24 and 48 h (MD -0.66, 95% CI -1.14 to -0.19; MD -0.78, 95% CI -1.16 to -0.39, respectively), cumulative morphine consumption (MD -11.30 mg, 95% CI -14.79 to -7.81 mg), and the proportion of patients requiring rescue analgesia (relative risk 0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.89). There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events between groups.

CONCLUSION

Low to moderate evidence indicates that parecoxib might be an effective and safe analgesic in perioperative orthopedic settings. It relieves postoperative orthopedic pain while sparing opioid analgesic consumption without increasing the incidence of adverse events.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42021274939.

Structural Modification in Anesthetic Drug Development for Prodrugs and Soft Drugs

Among the advancements in drug structural modifications, the increased focus on drug metabolic and pharmacokinetic properties in the anesthetic drug design process has led to significant developments. Drug metabolism also plays a key role in optimizing the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of drug molecules. Thus, in the field of anesthesiology, the applications of pharmacokinetic strategies are discussed in the context of sedatives, analgesics, and muscle relaxants. In this review, we summarize two approaches for structural optimization to develop anesthetic drugs, by designing prodrugs and soft drugs. Drugs that both failed and succeeded during the developmental stage are highlighted to illustrate how drug metabolism and pharmacokinetic optimization strategies may help improve their physical and chemical properties.

Parecoxib Reduced Postsurgical Pain and Facilitated Movement More Than Patient Controlled Analgesia

Background

Postoperative pain management is an imperative issue for patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Delayed pain relief is associated with poor clinical outcomes. This study compared the effects of intravenously administered patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous parecoxib, both commonly used methods for analgesic pain control after surgery.

Methods

A non-randomized study was used to recruit 68 patients who were scheduled to receive lumbar spinal fusion surgery at a hospital in Taiwan from April through December of 2020. The group treated with parecoxib received an initial perioperative dose of parecoxib 40 mg during a 30-min period and then postoperative intravenous parecoxib at 40 mg per 12-h period, for 72 h. Those with PCA received morphine (0.4 mg/ml), droperidol (0.02 mg/ml), diphenhydramine (0.48 mg/ml), midazolam (0.02 mg/ml) and saline solution during the 3-day study course. Major outcomes, including visual scale pain score and Barthel index of activities of daily living, were collected via review of medical records at 4 times: 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after surgery. Comparative effects between two groups were assessed by the generalized estimating equations.

Results

After adjusting for potential confounders, the administration of parecoxib was associated with a significant decrease in pain scores and an increase in the Barthel Index, when compared with the PCA group (all p < 0.05). Notably, both effects would maintain for 72 h after surgery.

Discussion

This is the first trial of which the authors are aware, that supports intravenous parecoxib as significantly enhancing patient mobility, in addition to having pain control efficacy, when compared with PCA. This study could be used as a reference when instituting interventions to improve the adaptation process and clinical prognoses after lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

Postoperative analgesic effect of parecoxib sodium local anesthesia in patients with breast cancer through systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Postoperative pain can seriously affect a patient's recovery, and parecoxib sodium has a good analgesic effect. However, there is a lack of clinically systematic analyses of the effects of parecoxib sodium on postoperative pain in breast cancer patients. The aim of the present study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of parecoxib sodium local anesthesia in the treatment of postoperative pain in breast cancer patients.

Methods

Literature published from January 2010 to December 2020 was searched in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, Wanfang database, PubMed, and Cochrane Library. Literature on randomized controlled trials of parecoxib sodium local anesthesia in patients with breast cancer was collected. Method of treatment was extracted and literature quality was assessed. Meta-analyses of included literature were performed using RevMan 5.3.

Results

A total of 17 randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 1,032 breast cancer surgery patients. The experimental group was treated with parecoxib sodium anesthesia, and the control group was treated with other anesthesia methods. The meta-analysis results showed that there were obvious differences among visual analogue scale (VAS) score of the experimental group and control group 2 h after surgery [mean difference (MD): -0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.29 to -0.29; P=0.002], 4 h (MD =-0.77; 95% CI: =-1.51 to -0.03; P=0.04), 6 h (MD: -1.10; 95% CI: -1.41 to -0.80; P<0.00001), 8 h (MD: -0.66; 95% CI: -1.00 to -0.33; P=0.0001), 12 h (MD: -0.92; 95% CI: -1.24 to -0.60; P<0.00001), 24 h (MD: -0.86; 95% CI: -1.15 to -0.58; P<0.00001), and 48 h (MD: -0.90; 95% CI: -1.47 to -0.33; P=0.002). Moreover, visual analog scale score and the postoperative controlled analgesia frequency of patients in the experimental group (MD: -2.08; 95% CI: -2.88 to -1.27; P<0.00001) and the incidence of adverse reactions (odds ratio: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.34-0.80; P=0.002) were significantly reduced.

Discussion

Parecoxib sodium local anesthesia for breast cancer patients has good postoperative analgesia and treatment safety.

Correlation between perioperative parecoxib use and postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis

OBJECTIVE

The association of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) is controversial. However, there are few studies focusing on the association between parecoxib and postoperative AKI. Our study aimed at the possible correlation between the intraoperative administration of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors parecoxib and perioperative AKI.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University in Hunan Province, China.

PARTICIPANTS

The electronic medical records and laboratory results were obtained from 9246 adult patients (18-60 years) undergoing non-cardiac surgery performed between 1 January 2012 and 31 August 2017. Study groups were treated with or without parecoxib.

INTERVENTIONS

Univariable analysis identified demographic, preoperative laboratory and intraoperative factors associated with AKI. Logistic stepwise regression was used to calculate the adjusted OR of parecoxib and AKI association.

RESULTS

The incidence of AKI was lower in the parecoxib-administered group (4%) than that in the group without parecoxib (6.3%, p=0.005). In the multivariable regression analysis, postoperative AKI risk reduced by 39% (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.87) in the parecoxib-administered group after adjusting for interference factors. Sensitivity analysis showed that postoperative AKI risk reduced in four subgroups: eGRF <90 mL/min·1.73/m² (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.82), non-smoker (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.83), blood loss <1000 mL (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.83) and non-hypotension (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, parecoxib is associated with a modest reduction of postoperative AKI risk among adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

Do NSAIDs Really Interfere with Healing after Surgery?

Perioperative analgesia should be multimodal to improve pain relief, reduce opioid use and thereby adverse effects impairing recovery. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are an important non-opioid component of this approach. However, besides potential other adverse effects, there has been a longstanding discussion on the potentially harmful effects of NSAIDs on healing after surgery and trauma. This review describes current knowledge of the effects of NSAIDs on healing of bones, cartilage, soft tissue, wounds, flaps and enteral anastomoses. Overall, animal data suggest some potentially harmful effects, but are contradictory in most areas studied. Human data are limited and of poor quality; in particular, there are only very few good randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but many cohort studies with potential for significant confounding factors influencing the results. The limited human data available are not precluding the use of NSAIDs postoperatively, in particular, short-term for less than 2 weeks. However, well-designed and large RCTs are required to permit definitive answers.

An opioid-sparing protocol with intravenous parecoxib can effectively reduce morphine consumption after simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty

Multimodal pain management protocol effectively relieves pain following simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (SBTKA) but is associated with administration of large amounts of opioids in the perioperative period. In this prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded, single-surgeon clinical trial, the goal was to validate the efficacy of an opioid-sparing protocol for SBTKA with a reduced opioid dose, while achieving similar pain relief with few adverse events. Fifty-six patients who had undergone SBTKA were randomly allocated to receive either an opioid-sparing or opioid-based protocol. The primary outcome parameters were visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at rest, with movement, and cumulative morphine dose, through time. Secondary outcome parameters included drug-related adverse events and range of motion with continuous passive motion device, through time. In the opioid-sparing group, a lower VAS score with movement at postoperative 24 and 72 h was observed compared with the opioid-based group, but the difference did not reach the minimal clinically importance difference. A reduced cumulative morphine dose was noted in the opioid-sparing group at postoperative 24, 48 and 72 h. In conclusion, the opioid-sparing protocol may be used as an alternative modality for pain management following SBTKA. Similar pain relief effects may be achieved utilizing a reduced cumulative opioid dose, with few opioid related adverse events.

Perioperative Pain Management and Opioid Stewardship: A Practical Guide

Surgical procedures are key drivers of pain development and opioid utilization globally. Various organizations have generated guidance on postoperative pain management, enhanced recovery strategies, multimodal analgesic and anesthetic techniques, and postoperative opioid prescribing. Still, comprehensive integration of these recommendations into standard practice at the institutional level remains elusive, and persistent postoperative pain and opioid use pose significant societal burdens. The multitude of guidance publications, many different healthcare providers involved in executing them, evolution of surgical technique, and complexities of perioperative care transitions all represent challenges to process improvement. This review seeks to summarize and integrate key recommendations into a "roadmap" for institutional adoption of perioperative analgesic and opioid optimization strategies. We present a brief review of applicable statistics and definitions as impetus for prioritizing both analgesia and opioid exposure in surgical quality improvement. We then review recommended modalities at each phase of perioperative care. We showcase the value of interprofessional collaboration in implementing and sustaining perioperative performance measures related to pain management and analgesic exposure, including those from the patient perspective. Surgery centers across the globe should adopt an integrated, collaborative approach to the twin goals of optimal pain management and opioid stewardship across the care continuum.

Parecoxib Vs Paracetamol for Treatment of Acute Renal Colic Due to Ureteric Calculi: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare efficacy and safety of parecoxib and paracetamol for treatment of acute renal colic due to ureteric stones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized, double blinded, controlled trial included adult patients presented to emergency department with acute renal colic due to ureteric calculi between June 2019 and August 2020. Patients with hypersensitivity to either drug, peptic ulcer, coronary ischemia, peripheral vascular or cerebrovascular disease, hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score >10) or chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5 were excluded. Eligible patients were randomized to group 1 who received 1g intravenous Paracetamol infusion or group 2 who received 40mg intravenous Parecoxib infusion. Pain analogue score was evaluated before treatment and 30 minutes afterwards. The primary endpoint was the need for rescue analgesia for persistent pain. Safety was evaluated by the incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

The study included 203 patients (102 in group 1 and 101 in group 2). Pretreatment patients' data were comparable for both groups. The mean pain analogue score decrease from 7.6 to 3.8 in paracetamol group (P <.001) and from 7.8 to 3.4 in parecoxib group (P <.001). Rescue analgesia were needed in 36 patients (35.3%) in paracetamol group and 27 patients (26.7%) in parecoxib group (P = .187). Minor adverse events developed in 2 patients (2%) in paracetamol group and 3 patients (3%) in parecoxib group (P=0.683).

CONCLUSION

Paracetamol and Parecoxib were effective for treatment for patient with acute renal colic. Both treatments showed comparable results in reduction of pain and need for rescue analgesia with minimal adverse events.

Defined Daily Dose and Appropriateness of Clinical Application: The Coxibs and Traditional Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs for Postoperative Orthopaedics Pain Control in a Private Hospital in Malaysia

Introduction: Drug utilization of analgesics in a private healthcare setting is useful to examine their prescribing patterns, especially the newer injectable cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors (coxibs). Objectives: To evaluate the utilization of coxibs and traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (tNSAIDs) indicated for postoperative orthopaedic pain control using defined daily dose (DDD) and ratio of use density to use rate (UD/UR). Method: A retrospective drug utilization review (DUR) of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) at an inpatient department of a private teaching hospital in Seremban, Malaysia was conducted. Patients’ demographic characteristics, medications prescribed, clinical lab results, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores and length of hospital stay were documented. Orthopaedic surgeries, namely arthroscopy, reconstructive, and fracture fixation, were included. Stratified random sampling was used to select patients. Data were collected through patients’ medical records. The DDD per 100 admissions and the indicator UD/UR were calculated with the World Health Organization’s DDD as a benchmark. The inclusion criteria were patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery prescribed with coxibs (celecoxib capsules, etoricoxib tablets, parecoxib injections) and tNSAIDs (dexketoprofen injections, diclofenac sodium tablets). Data were analysed descriptively. This research was approved by the academic institution and the hospital research ethics committee. Result: A total of 195 records of patients who received NSAIDs were randomly selected among 1169 cases. In term of the types of orthopaedic surgery, the ratio of included records for arthroscopy:fracture fixation:reconstructive surgery was 55.4:35.9:8.7. Most of the inpatients had low rates of common comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease as supported by their baseline parameters. The majority were not prescribed with other concomitant prescriptions that could cause drug interaction (74.9%), or gastroprotective agents (77.4%). Overall, DDDs per 100 admissions for all NSAIDs were less than 100, except for parecoxib injections (389.23). The UD/UR for all NSAIDs were less than 100, except for etoricoxib tablets (105.75) and parecoxib injections (108.00). Discussion: As per guidelines, the majority (96.9%) received other analgesics to ensure a multimodal approach was carried out to control pain. From the UD/UR results, the arthroscopy surgery was probably the most appropriate in terms of NSAID utilization. Conclusion: The prescribing pattern of NSAIDs except parecoxib was appropriate based on adverse effect and concurrent medication profile. The findings of this DUR provide insight for a low-risk patient population at a private specialized teaching hospital on the recommended use of NSAIDs for postoperative orthopaedic pain control.

A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacies of ketorolac and parecoxib for early pain management after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used to reduce pain after orthopedic surgery. Currently, selective COX-2 inhibitors can provide effective pain reduction with less platelet inhibition compared with conventional NSAIDs. We aimed to compare the analgesic effect and perioperative blood loss (PBL) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between ketorolac and parecoxib administration.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective randomized controlled study of 100 unilateral TKAs. The ketorolac group of 50 patients received an intraoperative periarticular injection (PAI) with 100 mg of bupivacaine and 30 mg of ketorolac. Afterwards, 30 mg of ketorolac was intravenously injected every 12 h until 48 h. In the parecoxib group of 50 patients, 20 mg of parecoxib was added to PAI, and the first intravenous dose was 20 mg followed by 40 mg every 12 h. The primary outcomes were visual analog scales (VASs) of postoperative pain, amount of morphine consumption, PBL, and blood transfusion rate.

RESULTS

The ketorolac group had a significantly lower VAS pain score than the parecoxib group at 6 h after TKA (2.38 ± 2.52 vs. 4.12 ± 2.86, P < 0.01). Thereafter, the VAS of both groups and total morphine consumption at 24 and 48 h were comparable. The PBLs of the ketorolac and parecoxib groups were 529.72 ± 263.02 and 402.40 ± 191.47 ml, respectively (P = 0.01). However, the blood transfusion rates between groups were not different.

CONCLUSION

Parecoxib provides comparable analgesic effects to ketorolac. Additionally, perioperative use of parecoxib is safe and is associated with significantly less blood loss after TKA.

A fluorescent target-guided Paal-Knorr reaction

It has become increasingly apparent that high-diversity chemical reactions play a significant role in the discovery of bioactive small molecules. Here, we describe an expanse of this paradigm, combining a 'target-guided synthesis' concept with Paal-Knorr chemistry applied to the preparation of fluorescent ligands for human prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase (COX-2).

Efficacy and safety of three different analgesic methods for patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence suggests that additional analgesic regimens to periprostatic nerve block (PPNB) anesthesia provide substantial pain relief during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. In this regard, we investigated the efficacy and safety of tramadol alone or in combination with parecoxib as adjunct regimens to PPNB anesthesia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 51 participants were randomly allocated into three study groups: Group 1 received PPNB anesthesia, Group 2 received tramadol and PPNB anesthesia, whereas Group 3 received both tramadol and parecoxib as adjunct regimens to PPNB anesthesia. The pain was evaluated at three different time points during biopsy: at the time of probe insertion (NRS1), at the time of PPNB anesthesia (NRS2), and at the time of the actual biopsy itself (NRS3), using a numeric rating scale (NRS) of pain. Safety was evaluated by the occurrence of complications and adverse effects.

RESULTS

The mean NRS1 score was statistically significantly different in Groups 2 and 3 than in Group 1 (2.4 ± 1.3 and 1.1 ± 1.2 vs. 4.5 ± 1.8; p <0.0167). We found a statistically significant difference regarding NRS 2 score in Groups 2 and 3 than in Group 1 (2.6 ± 1.4 and 1.1 ± 1.3 vs. 4.1 ± 1.3; p <0.0167). The mean NRS1 and NRS2 scores were found to be statistically significantly different in Group 3 than in Group 2 (1.1 ± 1.2 vs. 2.4 ± 1.3 as well as 1.1 ± 1.3 vs. 2.6 ± 1.4; p <0.0167). Also, a statistically significant difference was found between Groups 2 and 3 regarding hematuria episodes [0 (0.0) vs. 5 (29.4); p <0.0167].

CONCLUSION

Tramadol as an adjunct regimen to PPNB anesthesia is a safe and straightforward technique that provides a significant analgesic effect. The effectiveness is even higher when tramadol is combined with parecoxib. HIPPOKRATIA 2020, 24(4): 166-172.

Effects of Dexmedetomidine on the Pharmacokinetics of Parecoxib and Its Metabolite Valdecoxib in Beagles by UPLC-MS/MS

A sensitive and reliable ultraperformance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method was developed for the simultaneous determination of parecoxib and its metabolite valdecoxib in beagles. The effects of dexmedetomidine on the pharmacokinetics of parecoxib and valdecoxib in beagles were studied. The plasma was precipitated by acetonitrile, and the two analytes were separated on an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.7 μm); the mobile phase was acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid with gradient mode, and the flow rate was 0.4 mL/min. In the negative ion mode, the two analytes and internal standard (IS) were monitored by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), and the mass transition pairs were as follows: m/z 369.1 → 119.1 for parecoxib, m/z 313.0 → 118.0 for valdecoxib, and m/z 380.0 → 316.0 for celecoxib (IS). Six beagles were designed as a double cycle self-control experiment. In the first cycle, after intramuscular injection of parecoxib 1.33 mg/kg, 1.0 mL blood samples were collected at different times (group A). In the second cycle, the same six beagles were intravenously injected with 2 μg/kg dexmedetomidine for 7 days after one week of washing period. On day 7, after intravenous injection of 2 μg/kg dexmedetomidine for 0.5 hours, 6 beagle dogs were intramuscularly injected with 1.33 mg/kg parecoxib, and blood samples were collected at different time points (group A). The concentration of parecoxib and valdecoxib was detected by UPLC-MS/MS, and the main pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by DAS 2.0 software. Under the experimental conditions, the method has a good linear relationship for both analytes. The interday and intraday precision was less than 8.07%; the accuracy values were from -1.20% to 2.76%. C_max of parecoxib in group A and group B was 2148.59 ± 406.13 ng/mL and 2100.49 ± 356.94 ng/mL, t_1/2 was 0.85 ± 0.36 h and 0.85 ± 0.36 h, and AUC_(0‐t) was 2429.96 ± 323.22 ng·h/mL and 2506.38 ± 544.83 ng·h/mL, respectively. C_max of valdecoxib in group A and group B was 2059.15 ± 281.86 ng/mL and 2837.39 ± 276.78 ng/mL, t_1/2 was 2.44 ± 1.55 h and 2.91 ± 1.27 h, and AUC_(0‐t) was 4971.61 ± 696.56 ng·h/mL and 6770.65 ± 453.25 ng·h/mL, respectively. There was no significant change in the pharmacokinetics of parecoxib in groups A and B. C_max and AUC_{(0 − ∞)} of valdecoxib in group A were 37.79% and 36.19% higher than those in group B, respectively, and t_1/2 was increased from 2.44 h to 2.91 h. V_z/F and CL_z/F were correspondingly reduced, respectively. The developed UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of parecoxib and valdecoxib in beagle plasma was specific, accurate, rapid, and suitable for the pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of parecoxib and valdecoxib. Dexmedetomidine can inhibit the metabolism of valdecoxib in beagles and increase the exposure of valdecoxib, but it does not affect the pharmacokinetics of parecoxib.

Perioperative analgesia with parecoxib sodium improves postoperative pain and immune function in patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES

Acute postoperative pain can result in immune dysfunction, which can be partly mitigated by efficient pain management. Opioids that have been widely applied to analgesia have been shown to suppress immune function, which has a negative impact on the treatment of patients with cancer. This study investigated the effects of perioperative fentanyl analgesia alone or in combination with parecoxib sodium on postoperative pain, immune function, and prognosis in patients undergoing hepatectomy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

A total of 80 patients scheduled for hepatectomy between October 2013 and August 2014 were included. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (n = 40) and allocated to receive parecoxibsodium 40 mg (group P) or placebo (group C) 30 minutes before induction of anaesthesia, followed by 40 mg every 12 hours for 48 hours after the operation. All patients had access to patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous fentanylpostoperatively. Venous blood samples were collected at the following time points: 30 minutes before induction of anaesthesia (T0), the end of the surgery (T1), 24 hours after surgery (T2), and 72 hours after surgery (T3). The percentages of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD4+/CD8+ T cells, and CD3+CD16+CD56+ (NK) cells at these time points were quantified by flow cytometry (FCM).Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, total fentanyl consumption, and adverse effects were recorded. The prognostic differences in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the two groups was also investigated.

RESULTS

For both groups, the percentages of CD3+, CD4+ T cells, and the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ significantly decreased at T1 and T2 (P < .05). The percentages of CD3+ T cells were significantly lower in group C than that in group P at T2 (P < .05). In group C, the amount of CD3+ T cells was lower at T3 compared with T0 (P < .05). The percentages of NK cells significantly decreased at T1 in both groups (P < .05). The percentages of NK in group P were recovered nearly to baseline (T0) at T2, which was higher than that of group C (P < .05). In group C, the percentages of NK cells have not recovered nearly to baseline at T3 compared with T0 (P < .05). VAS scores at rest and on cough in group P were significantly lower than those in group C at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after operation (P < .05), and there were no significant differences in VAS scores between the two groups at 48 hours after surgery (P > .05). There were no significant differences regarding the incidence of adverse effects between the two groups (P > .05). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the DFS time in group P was significantly longer than in group C (19.0 months, 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.8-28.2 vs 14.0 months, 95% CI, 8.1-19.9; P < .05). There was no significant difference in OS time (36.0 months, 95% CI, 13.4-58.9 vs 14.0 months, 95% CI, 10.6-25.4; P > .05) between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study indicated that perioperative analgesia of parecoxib sodium combined with patient-controlled analgesic fentanyl resulted in better preserved immune function with enhancement of the analgesic efficacy to fentanyl alone of HCC patients undergoing hepatectomy and helped postpone postoperative tumour recurrence.

Simultaneous Determination of Parecoxib and Its Metabolite Valdecoxib Concentrations in Beagle Plasma by UPLC-MS/MS and Application for Pharmacokinetics Study

A method for the simultaneous determination of parecoxib and its metabolite valdecoxib in beagle plasma by UPLC-MS/MS was developed and validated. After the plasma was extracted by acetonitrile precipitation, the analytes were separated on an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.7 μm) using acetonitrile-formic acid as the mobile phase in gradient mode. The analytes were monitored by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) in electrospray negative ion mode. The mass transfer pairs were m/z 368.97→119.01 for parecoxib, m/z 312.89→118.02 for valdecoxib, and m/z 379.98→316.02 for celecoxib (internal standard, IS). The correlation coefficients of parecoxib and valdecoxib ranged from 5 to 4000 ng/mL were greater than 0.9998. The recovery of parecoxib and valdecoxib was greater than 82.54%. The inter- and intra-day precision RSD values were 1.36~3.65% and 2.28~5.91%, respectively. The accuracy of RE values were −1.38%~1.96%. Finally, the matrix effect (ME) and stability were also within acceptable criteria. This method had been successfully applied to the pharmacokinetics of parecoxib and valdecoxib in beagle plasma after injection of parecoxib (1.33 mg/kg, intramuscular injection).

Parecoxib as an adjunct therapy for the treatment of refractory non-surgical cancer pain

BACKGROUND

Evidence for the use of short-term daily parenteral parecoxib for refractory or uncontrolled non-surgical cancer pain is limited. This study aimed to characterise the real-world off-label use and report on clinical experiences in an Australian cancer cohort.

METHODS

Eligible patients received at least one dose of parecoxib of an intended three-day course between October 2015 and December 2018. Data were collected to characterise the parecoxib treatment cohort (cancer diagnosis, metastases, sites and types of pain and prior analgesia). Parecoxib-related adverse events, pain scores (worst and median), and concurrent opioid use were assessed at 24 h pre (T0) and 24 (T1), 48 (T2), 72 (T3) and 96 h (T4) post first parecoxib dose.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients (39 males and 26 females) and 68 courses of parecoxib (three patients treated twice) were included in analyses: metastatic disease (86%), bone pain (54%) and taking ≥3 classes of analgesic medications (69%). Pain types varied (46% non-specific, 22% neuropathic and 32% other). Most (94%) received parecoxib by subcutaneous administration. Following parecoxib, median 24-h pain scores and worst pain scores improved for 59% (40/68) and 50% (34/68) of patients, respectively. In the first 24 h (T0 to T1), median (4 vs. 2, p < 0.01) and worst (6 vs. 5, p < 0.01) pain scores were reduced and sustained to T4 (4 vs. 2.5, p = 0.01). Breakthrough analgesia requirements reduced for 63% (43/68) of patients, while total concurrent opioid use remained constant. Mean/median oral morphine equivalence for T0 vs. T1 was 111 mg/75 mg vs. 162 mg/90 mg, (p > 0.8). Two patients ceased parecoxib due to renal/liver function abnormalities and two experienced mild injection-site reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world study, parecoxib was utilised as adjunctive therapy in a select patient cohort to contribute to reduced pain scores with no new safety signals. Prospective randomised studies in larger cohorts would improve understanding of the effects of parecoxib.

[Efficacy of local infiltration of ropivacaine combined with multimodal analgesia with parecoxib for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effect of local infiltration of ropivacaine combined with multimodal analgesia with parecoxib for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial was conducted among 98 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Department of Biliary Surgery of West China Hospital between March, 2017 and August, 2018. The patients were randomized to receive perioperative analgesia with local infiltration anesthesia with ropivacaine combined with multimodal analgesia with parecoxib (experimental group, n=50) or postoperative analgesia with dizosin (control group, n=48). The regimens for intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative pain relief were identical in the two groups. The differences in NRS pain score, use of pain relief agents, the incidences of adverse reactions to analgesia and wound infection, and the time to first ambulation and first flatus passage after the operation were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

At 12, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 7 days after the operation, the patients in the experimental group had significantly lower NRS scores (P < 0.05) than those in the control group. The rate of use of rescue analgesics was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (32% vs 66.67%, P < 0.05); the rate of tramadol hydrochloride use was also significantly lower in the experimental group (P < 0.05). Compared with those in the control group, the patients in the experimental group showed a significantly lower total incidence of adverse reactions (22% vs 54.17%, P < 0.05) as well as a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting (P < 0.05), an earlier time of first ambulation and first flatus passage after the operation (P < 0.05), and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, local infiltration of ropivacaine combined with multimodal analgesia with ropivacaine can effectively relieve perioperative pain, reduce the use of relief analgesics, lower the incidence of adverse reactions, and promote the recovery after the surgery.

A cost-consequence analysis of parecoxib and opioids vs opioids alone for postoperative pain: Chinese perspective

Purpose

The use of parecoxib plus opioids for postoperative analgesia in noncardiac surgical patients seems to be cost-saving in Europe due to a reduction in opioid use and opioid-related adverse events. Given the lack of information on postoperative analgesic use in Asia, this study assessed the economic consequences of the addition of parecoxib to opioids vs opioids alone to treat postsurgical pain in China.

Methods

A cost-consequence economic evaluation assessed direct medical costs related to opioid-related clinically meaningful events (CMEs) utilizing dosing information and reported frequency of events from a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global clinical trial (PARA-0505-069) of parecoxib plus opioids vs opioids alone for 3 days following major orthopedic, abdominal, gynecologic, or noncardiac thoracic surgery requiring general or regional anesthesia. The cost of CMEs was calculated using information on resource utilization and unit costs provided by a panel of clinical experts in China. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results.

Results

Patients treated with parecoxib plus opioids reported fewer CMEs (mean 0.62 vs 1.04 events per patient [P<0.0001]) compared with opioids alone for the 3-day postoperative period. This suggested a potential savings of 356 Chinese yuan (¥) per patient over the 3 days (total cost of ¥1,418 for parecoxib plus opioids vs ¥1,774 with opioid use alone).

Conclusion

Fewer CMEs with parecoxib plus opioids suggest a reduction in medical resource utilization and reduced costs compared to opioids alone when modeling analgesic use in non-cardiac surgery patients in China.

Medicinal chemistry of vicinal diaryl scaffold: A mini review

The privileged structures have been widely used as a valuable template in new drug discovery. 1,2-Diaryl or vicinal diaryl is a simple scaffold found in many drugs and naturally occurring compounds. From synthetic point of view, the vicinal diaryl derivatives are easily accessible due to their facile and expedient syntheses. These scaffolds have shown numerous interesting pharmacological activities against various diseases with lot of clinical potentials. This review aims to highlight the evidence of vicinal diaryl motif as a privileged scaffold in COX-2 inhibitors and CA-4 analogs.

Isoxazole Derivatives as Regulators of Immune Functions

In this review, we present reports on the immunoregulatory properties of isoxazole derivatives classified into several categories, such as immunosuppressive, anti-inflammatory, immunoregulatory, and immunostimulatory compounds. The compounds were tested in various models using resident cells from rodents and humans, cell lines, and experimental animal disease models corresponding to human clinical situations. Beneficial features of the described isoxazole derivatives include low toxicity and good bioactivity at low doses. In a majority of studies, the activities of investigated compounds were comparable or even higher than registered reference drugs. Whenever possible, a plausible mechanism of action of the investigated compounds and their potential therapeutic utility were proposed. Among the described compounds, particular attention was paid to the class of immune stimulators with a potential application in chemotherapy patients.