Differing efficacies of autologous platelet-rich plasma treatment in reducing pain following rotator-cuff injury in a single patient

Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Glenohumeral Joint Injections of Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Hyaluronic Acid in the Treatment of Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided hyaluronic acid (HA) versus leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma (LP-PRP) injection in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

DESIGN

Double-blind randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Academic institution.

PATIENTS

Seventy patients with chronic glenohumeral osteoarthritis were randomly assigned to receive a single injection of HA (n = 36) or LP-PRP (n = 34).

INTERVENTIONS

Leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma was processed using Harvest/TerumoBCT Clear PRP kits. Ultrasound-guided injections of 6 mL HA or 6 mL LP-PRP into the glenohumeral joint were performed. Patients, the injecting physician, and outcomes assessor were blinded to treatment assignments.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, current/average numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores, satisfaction, and side effects were assessed at the 5 follow-up time points over 12 months.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. There were no significant between-group differences regarding SPADI, ASES, and current/average NRS pain scores at any time point up to 12 months postinjection ( P > 0.05). However, significant improvements in SPADI, ASES, and current/average NRS pain scores were observed in both groups starting at 1 or 2 months ( P < 0.01, P < 0.01, P < 0.001, and P < 0.01, respectively). These improvements were observed regardless of osteoarthritis severity. For patients who received LP-PRP, there was no effect of platelet yield on outcomes. Side effect and satisfaction rates were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in pain and functional outcomes after a single injection of LP-PRP versus HA. However, significant improvements in pain and function were observed after both treatments in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection in the Management of Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Review of the Current Literature

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is being projected as a newer and superior treatment option for rotator cuff tendinopathy. With the first use of PRP in trauma and orthopedics dating back only to 1998, its advent into the field is relatively recent. Thus, data on long-term efficacy, large cohort studies, or large randomized controlled trials are fairly limited. Moreover, owing to the absence of standardized methods of platelet extraction and lack of consensus on the ideal concentration of platelets in PRP, data comparison from different studies is difficult. Things are complicated by the fact that it is also not clear whether a single injection of PRP is therapeutic or if multiple serial injections are needed to produce the desired effects. The literature on efficacy and pain relief is also obtained from studies with low sample sizes and short follow-ups. The dropout rate and noncompliance rate were also found to be high in some studies. Thus, the data is often not clinically significant and may also be biased due to the non-standardized inclusion and exclusion criteria of the studies. Though multiple studies have suggested good pain control with PRP injection, many studies have found that PRP injection therapy may not be any better than the physical therapy regimen prescribed to patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy. Also, the data on the efficacy of PRP on shoulder function and shoulder range of motion is at variance. This submission aims to evaluate the efficacy and use of PRP in the management of rotator cuff tendinopathy.

Variables affecting the potential efficacy of PRP in providing chronic pain relief

Although chronic pain affects about 1% of the US population, it remains largely resistant to treatment. Despite great variability in pain outcomes, the application of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has become increasingly popular in attempts to reduce chronic pain. The variability in PRP efficacy raises the question of whether PRP actually has an analgesic capacity, and if so, can that capacity be made consistent and maximized. The best explanation for the variability in PRP analgesic efficacy is the failure during PRP preparation and application to take into account variables that can increase or eliminate its analgesic capabilities. This suggests that if the variables are reduced and controlled, a PRP preparation and application protocol can be developed leading to PRP inducing reliable, complete, and long-term pain relief. The goal of this study was to examine some of the variables that influence platelets and see how they might be controlled to increase the analgesic potential of PRP. Among the variables examined are the physiological status of the patient, methods used to prepare PRP, and methods of PRP application. The goal of modifying these variables is to minimize platelet serotonin content, maximize platelet content of factors that reduce inflammation and pain, while maintaining their bioactivity, maximize platelet capacity to aggregate at injury sites, induce rapid and simultaneous release of their contents, and optimize PRP application protocols. It is concluded that controlling some or many of these variables will lead to PRP that induces reliable, maximum, and long-term relief of chronic pain.