Postoperative analgesia after combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: a randomized comparison of continuous infusion and intermittent bolus thoracic epidural regimens

Postoperative pain management following minimally invasive abdominal cancer surgeries -An audit

BACKGROUND

There is limited data comparing pain management following various minimally invasive oncological surgeries (MIOS). This retrospective audit was planned to determine the severity of pain and to study the analgesic modalities offered to these patients. Secondary objectives included studying opioid requirements, non-opioid analgesics, their side effects, and the influence of comorbidities on the choice of pain modalities.

METHODS

Following approval and registration of trial (CTRI/2018/10/016220), data were collected retrospectively from adult patients who underwent elective MIOS for abdominal tumors from August 2017 to July 2018. Pain scores (PS) on the day of surgery, and the average, worst PS, and the morphine equivalent (ME) dose in the perioperative period was recorded. Emergency surgeries and thoracic-abdominal MIOS were excluded. The association between the type of surgery, pain modalities, and PS were compared using Chi-square test. ME dose consumption of patients and type of surgery were compared using ANOVA with Bonferroni's correction.

RESULTS

Out of the 349 patients' data that were analyzed, 76% had mild, 22% had moderate, and 2% had severe pain after surgery. Port site infiltration was done in 27% of cases and epidural analgesia in 46 patients (13%). PS and opioid consumption (ME = 5.7 ± 5.2 mg) was significantly higher following pelvic surgeries when compared to other urological and diagnostic MIOS. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status did not affect PS or choice of pain management technique.

CONCLUSION

Most of the patients experience mild pain at movement in the immediate postoperative period, pelvic MIOS (abdominoperineal resection/exenteration surgeries) have higher PS and opioid consumption than other MIOS.

The Role of Ultrasound-Guided Multipoint Fascial Plane Block in ElderlyPatients Undergoing Combined Thoracoscopic-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study

INTRODUCTION

We estimated the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided multipoint fascial plane block, including serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and bilateral transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) in elderly patients who underwent combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy (TLE).

METHODS

The authors enrolled 80 patients in this prospective study after patient selection using the inclusion and exclusion criteria who were scheduled for elective TLE from May 2020 to May 2021. Patients were randomly assigned to the treated group (group N) or the control group (group C) (n = 40 per group) using the sealed-envelope method. Multipoint fascial plane blocks, including serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and bilateral TAPB, were performed on patients undergoing TLE using a solution of 60 mL 0.375% ropivacaine plus 2.5 mg dexamethasone by 3 injections of 20 mL each (group N) or no interventions (group C).

RESULTS

Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate (HR) at T incision and 30 min after T incision were significantly higher in group C than in group N, and also significantly higher than at baseline (P < 0.01). Blood glucose at 60 min, 2 h after T incision, was significantly higher in group C than in group N and significantly higher than at baseline (P < 0.01). Compared to group N, the dosages of propofol and remifentanil used during surgery in group C were more than those in group N (P < 0.01). The time to first rescue analgesic in group C was earlier than in group N. The total postoperative use of sufentanil, and the number of patients requiring rescue analgesics in group C, were more than in group N (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that applying the multipoint fascia pane block technique in TLE for elderly patients could significantly reduce postoperative pain, decrease the dosages of drugs used in general anesthesia, improve the quality of the awakening, and have no obvious adverse reactions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-2000033617).

Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus in Comparison with Continuous Epidural Infusion for Uterine Contraction Pain Relief After Cesarean Section: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial

Purpose

Programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) was reported to provide superior maintenance of labour analgesia with better pain relief and less motor block than continuous epidural infusion (CEI). Whether this is also evident for uterine contraction pain relief after cesarean section remains unknown.

Patients and Methods

Parturients scheduled for cesarean section were recruited for the study. At the end of the surgery, after a similar epidural loading dose given, patients received either PIEB (6 mL·h⁻¹) or CEI (6 mL·h⁻¹) of 0.1% ropivacaine. The primary outcome was the uterine contraction pain assessed with visual analog scale (VAS-U) at the postoperative 36 h. Secondary outcomes included incision pain at the rest (VAS-R) and in the movement-evoked (VAS-P), and lower extremity motor block (defined as Bromage score > 0). The whole profile of VAS scores between groups was analyzed using linear mixed model. When significant differences were found, the pairwise comparison was done with the Mann Whitney U-test followed by Bonferroni correction.

Results

One hundred and twenty parturients were studied (PIEB, 60; CEI, 60). VAS-U at the postoperative 36 h in the PIEB group was lower than in the CEI group (Bonferroni-adjusted P < 0.01). The linear mixed model indicated that VAS-U, VAS-R and VAS-P were lower in the PIEB group compared with the CEI group (all P < 0.01). Motor block was higher in the CEI group than in the PIEB group during the study period except 2 h (all P < 0.05). No differences of adverse events such as hypotension and urinary retention were observed between the two groups.

Conclusion

Programmed intermittent epidural bolus provides more effective uterine contraction and incision pain relief and less motor block after cesarean section than continuous epidural infusion without an increased risk of urinary retention and blood pressure instability.

Dexmedetomidine with sufentanil in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for relief from postoperative pain, inflammation and delirium after esophageal cancer surgery

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Postoperative pain can cause serious adverse reactions that severely affect postoperative outcome. The present study evaluated the effect of dexmedetomidine (DEX) added to sufentanil in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) on the relief of pain and inflammatory responses during postoperative recovery of patients undergoing a combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy (TLE).

METHODS

Sixty patients undergoing TLE were randomly allocated to receive 1 μg/ml of sufentanil alone (Group S) or 1 μg/ml of sufentanil plus 2.5 μg/ml of DEX (Group D) for postoperative intravenous (IV) PCA. Postoperative pain relief, cumulative PCA requirements, inflammatory marker levels, delirium and recovery were assessed.

RESULTS

A joint DEX and sufentanil regimen significantly reduced the area under the curve of numerical rating scores for pain at rest (NRSR) and coughing (NRSC) at 1-48 h postoperatively (P = 0.000) that were associated with lower PCA-delivered cumulative sufentanil consumption and less PCA frequency until 48 h postoperatively (P < 0.05 and P < 0.0001, respectively). The simultaneous administration of DEX and sufentanil significantly reduced plasma IL-6 and TNF-α concentrations and increased IL-10 level (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0003 and P = 0.0345, respectively), accompanied by better postoperative delirium categories and health statuses of patients (P = 0.024 and P < 0.05, respectively). There was no hypotension, bradycardia, respiratory depression or oversedation in Group D.

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving DEX in addition to IV PCA sufentanil for TLE exhibited better postoperative analgesia, fewer inflammatory responses and lower postoperative delirium categories and better health statuses.

Effect of Single-Injection Thoracic Paravertebral Block via the Intrathoracic Approach for Analgesia After Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Wedge Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction

Pain is still severe after single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic (SPVAT) lung wedge resection. We observed the effect of single-injection thoracic paravertebral block (TPB) via the intrathoracic approach for analgesia after SPVAT lung wedge resection.

Methods

Sixty patients undergoing SPVAT lung wedge resection were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group. All patients underwent TPB via the intrathoracic approach at the T4 level with a scalp needle before closing the chest. The patients in the observation group received 20 ml 0.375% ropivacaine at the T4 level, and the patients in the control group received 20 ml of 0.9% saline. A patient-controlled intravenous analgesic (PCIA) pump with sufentanil was attached to all patients after surgery. The sufentanil consumption and number of PCIA presses in the first 24 h after surgery were recorded. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (during rest and coughing) were recorded at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 36 h after surgery. The incidence of adverse reactions after surgery were recorded.

Results

The sufentanil consumption in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (34.2 ± 1.9 µg vs. 52.3 ± 2.3 µg; P < 0.001). The VAS score at 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery, the incidence of adverse reactions after surgery in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (all P < 0.05). The number of PCIA presses in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group [0 (0–0) times vs. 3 (2–4) times, P < 0.001].

Conclusions

Single-injection TPB via the intrathoracic approach under thoracoscopic direct vision is easy to perform and can effectively alleviate postoperative pain after SPVAT lung wedge resection, with fewer adverse reactions.

Trial Registration

ChiCTR2000034726.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40122-020-00231-y.

Feasibility and effectiveness of multi-injection thoracic paravertebral block via the intrathoracic approach for analgesia after thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

We observed the feasibility and effectiveness of multi-injection thoracic paravertebral block (TPB) via the intrathoracic approach under thoracoscopic direct vision for analgesia after thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy (TLE).

METHODS

Sixty patients undergoing TLE were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group. All patients underwent TPB via the intrathoracic approach at the three levels of T2, 5, and 8 with a scalp needle before closing the chest. The patients in the observation group received 10 ml 0.375% ropivacaine at each level, and the patients in the control group received 10 ml of 0.9% saline at each level. A patient-controlled intravenous analgesic (PCIA) pump with sufentanil was attached to all patients after surgery. The sufentanil consumption, number of PCIA presses and use of rescue analgesia in the first 24 h after surgery were recorded. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (rest and coughing) were recorded at 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery. The duration of postoperative hospital stay, active cough rate, first ambulation, and the incidence of adverse reactions after surgery was recorded.

RESULTS

The sufentanil consumption in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (34.7 ± 1.9 µg vs. 52.1 ± 2.1 µg; P < 0.001). The VAS score at each postoperative time point, number of PCIA presses, use of rescue analgesia, and the incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group. The postoperative active cough rate of patients in the observation group was significantly higher than those in the control group, and the times of the first ambulation after surgery and postoperative hospital stay in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Multi-injection TPB via the intrathoracic approach under thoracoscopic direct vision is easy to perform and can effectively alleviate postoperative pain after TLE with fewer adverse reactions and contributing to improved postoperative recovery.

Third-time ("redo-redo") anti-reflux surgery: patient-reported outcomes after a thoracoabdominal approach

BACKGROUND

Approximately 3-6% of patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery require "redo" surgery for persistent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Further surgery for patients with two failed prior anti-reflux operations is controversial due to the morbidity of reoperation and poor outcomes. We examined our experience with surgical revision of patients with at least two failed anti-reflux operations.

METHODS

Adults undergoing at least a second-time revision anti-reflux surgery between 1999 and 2017 were eligible. The primary outcomes were general and disease-specific quality-of-life (QoL) scores determined by Short-Form-36 (SF36) and GERD-Health-Related QoL (GERD-HRQL) instruments, respectively. Secondary outcomes included perioperative morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients undergoing redo-redo surgery (13 with 2 prior operations, 5 with 3 prior operations) were followed for a median of 6 years [IQR 3, 12]. Sixteen patients (89%) underwent open revisions (14 thoracoabdominal, 2 laparotomy) and two patients had laparoscopic revisions. Indications for surgery included reflux (10 patients), regurgitation (5 patients), and dysphagia (3 patients). Intraoperative findings were mediastinal wrap herniation (9 patients), misplaced wrap (2 patients), mesh erosion (1 patient), or scarring/stricture (6 patients). Procedures performed included Collis gastroplasty + fundoplication (6 patients), redo fundoplication (5 patients), esophagogastrectomy (4 patients), and primary hiatal closure (3 patients). There were no deaths and 13/18 patients (72%) had no postoperative complications. Ten patients completed QoL surveys; 8 reported resolution of reflux, 6 reported resolution of regurgitation, while 4 remained on proton-pump inhibitors (PPI). Mean SF36 scores (± standard deviation) in the study cohort in the eight QoL domains were as follows: physical functioning (79.5 [± 19.9]), physical role limitations (52.5 [± 46.3]), emotional role limitations (83.3 [± 36.1]), vitality (60.0 [± 22.7]), emotional well-being (88.4 [± 8.7]), social functioning (75.2 [± 31.0]), pain (66.2 [± 30.9]), and general health (55.0 [± 39.0]).

CONCLUSION

An open thoracoabdominal approach in appropriately selected patients needing third-time anti-reflux surgery carries low morbidity and provides excellent results as reflected in QoL scores.