Spotlight on Tepotinib and Capmatinib for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutation

Mapping kinase domain resistance mechanisms for the MET receptor tyrosine kinase via deep mutational scanning

Mutations in the kinase and juxtamembrane domains of the MET Receptor Tyrosine Kinase are responsible for oncogenesis in various cancers and can drive resistance to MET-directed treatments. Determining the most effective inhibitor for each mutational profile is a major challenge for MET-driven cancer treatment in precision medicine. Here, we used a deep mutational scan (DMS) of ~5764 MET kinase domain variants to profile the growth of each mutation against a panel of 11 inhibitors that are reported to target the MET kinase domain. We validate previously identified resistance mutations, pinpoint common resistance sites across type I, type II, and type I ½ inhibitors, unveil unique resistance and sensitizing mutations for each inhibitor, and verify non-cross-resistant sensitivities for type I and type II inhibitor pairs. We augment a protein language model with biophysical and chemical features to improve the predictive performance for inhibitor-treated datasets. Together, our study demonstrates a pooled experimental pipeline for identifying resistance mutations, provides a reference dictionary for mutations that are sensitized to specific therapies, and offers insights for future drug development.

Mapping kinase domain resistance mechanisms for the MET receptor tyrosine kinase via deep mutational scanning

Mutations in the kinase and juxtamembrane domains of the MET Receptor Tyrosine Kinase are responsible for oncogenesis in various cancers and can drive resistance to MET-directed treatments. Determining the most effective inhibitor for each mutational profile is a major challenge for MET-driven cancer treatment in precision medicine. Here, we used a deep mutational scan (DMS) of ~5,764 MET kinase domain variants to profile the growth of each mutation against a panel of 11 inhibitors that are reported to target the MET kinase domain. We validate previously identified resistance mutations, pinpoint common resistance sites across type I, type II, and type I ½ inhibitors, unveil unique resistance and sensitizing mutations for each inhibitor, and verify non-cross-resistant sensitivities for type I and type II inhibitor pairs. We augment a protein language model with biophysical and chemical features to improve the predictive performance for inhibitor-treated datasets. Together, our study demonstrates a pooled experimental pipeline for identifying resistance mutations, provides a reference dictionary for mutations that are sensitized to specific therapies, and offers insights for future drug development.

Targeted therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: past, present, and future

Targeted therapies are the mainstay of systemic therapies for patients with advanced, unresectable, or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. Several therapeutic targets, such as c-Met, TGF-β, and FGFR, have been evaluated in the past, though results from these clinical studies failed to show clinical benefit. However, these remain important targets for the future with novel targeted agents and strategies. The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, c-Myc oncogene, GPC3, PPT1 are exciting novel targets, among others, currently undergoing evaluation. Through this review, we aim to provide an overview of previously evaluated and potentially novel therapeutic targets and explore their continued relevance in ongoing and future studies for HCC.

The Treatment of a New Entity in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutation

BACKGROUND

MET (MET Proto-Oncogene, Receptor Tyrosine Kinase) exon 14 skipping mutation represents one of the most common MET alterations, accounting for approximately 1-3% of all mutations in advanced lung adenocarcinomas. While until 2020 no specific treatment was available for this subset of patients, as of today, three MET Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) are currently approved in this setting, namely capmatinib, tepotinib and savolitinib.

OBJECTIVE

This article aims to provide an extensive overview of the current therapeutic standard of care for exon 14 skipped advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients, alongside with mentions of the main future challenges and opportunities.

CONCLUSION

FDA-approved MET-TKIs currently represent the best option for treating exon 14 skipped advanced NSCLC patients, thanks to their excellent efficacy profile, alongside their manageable safety and tolerability. However, we currently lack specific agents to treat patients progressing on capmatinib or tepotinib, due to a limited understanding of the mechanisms underlying both on- and off-target resistance. In this respect, on-target mutations presently constitute the most explored ones from a mechanistic point of view, and type II MET-TKIs are currently under investigation as the most promising agents capable of overcoming the acquired resistance.

Lorlatinib and capmatinib in a ROS1-rearranged NSCLC with MET-driven resistance: tumor response and evolution

Acquired drug resistance remains a major problem across oncogene-addicted cancers. Elucidation of mechanisms of resistance can inform rational treatment strategies for patients relapsing on targeted therapies while offering insights into tumor evolution. Here, we report acquired MET amplification as a resistance driver in a ROS1-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma after sequential treatment with ROS1 inhibitors. Subsequent combination therapy with lorlatinib plus capmatinib, a MET-selective inhibitor, induced intracranial and extracranial tumor response. At relapse, sequencing of the resistant tumor revealed a MET D1246N mutation and loss of MET amplification. We performed integrated molecular analyses of serial tumor and plasma samples, unveiling dynamic alterations in the ROS1 fusion driver and MET bypass axis at genomic and protein levels and the emergence of polyclonal resistance. This case illustrates the complexity of longitudinal tumor evolution with sequential targeted therapies, highlighting challenges embedded in the current precision oncology paradigm and the importance of developing approaches that prevent resistance.

Prevalence of oncogenic driver mutations in Hispanics/Latin patients with lung cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The frequency of actionable mutations varies between races, and Hispanic/Latino (H/L) people are a population with different proportions of ancestry. Our purpose was to establish prevalence of actionable mutations in the H/L population with NSCLC.

METHODS

EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, and Virtual Health Library were searched for studies published up to April 2023 that evaluated the prevalence of ALK, BRAF, EGFR, HER-2, KRAS, MET, NTRK, RET, ROS1 in H/L patients. Meta-analyses were done to determine prevalence using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Fifty-five articles were included. EGFR and KRAS were the most prevalent genes with high heterogeneity across the countries. The overall mutation frequency for EGFR was 22%. The most frequent mutations in the EGFR gene were del19 (10%) and L858R (7%). The mean of KRAS mutation was a 14% prevalence. KRASG12C was the most frequent mutation with a 7% prevalence in an entire population. The overall frequency of ALK rearrangement was 5%. The mean frequency of ROS-1 rearrangement was 2%, and the frequencies of HER-2, MET, BRAF, RET, NTRK molecular alterations were 4%, 3%, 2%, 2%, and 1% respectively. Almost half of the cases were male, and 65.8% had a history of tobacco exposure. The most common clinical stage was IV.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of driver mutations such as EGFR and KRAS in LA populations differs from what is reported in Asians and Europeans. In the present article, countries with a high proportion of Amerindian ancestry show a greater prevalence of EGFR in contrast to countries with a high proportion of Caucasians. Lack of information on some countries or studies with a small sample size affects the real prevalence data for the region.

Real-World Experience in Treatment of Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with BRAF or cMET Exon 14 Skipping Mutations

BRAF and cMET exon 14 skipping are rare mutations of NSCLC. The treatment sequence in these cases for the first and second line is not clear. An international registry was created for patients with advanced NSCLC harboring BRAF or cMET exon 14 skipping mutations, diagnosed from January 2017 to June 2022. Clinicopathological and molecular data and treatment patterns were recorded. Data on 58 patients, from eight centers across five countries, were included in the final analysis. We found that 40 patients had the cMET exon 14 skipping mutation and 18 had the BRAF V600E mutation. In total, 53 and 28 patients received first- and second-line treatments, respectively, among which 52.8% received targeted therapy (TT) in the first line and 53.5% in the second line. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) for first-line treatment with TT vs. other treatment such as immune checkpoint inhibitors ± chemotherapy (IO ± CT) were 55.6% vs. 21.7% (p = 0.0084) and 66.7% vs. 39.1% (p = 0.04), respectively. The type of treatment in first-line TT vs. other affected time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) was 11.6 m vs. 4.6 m (p= 0.006). The overall survival for the whole group was 15.4 m and was not statistically affected by the type of treatment (19.2 m vs. 13.5 m; p = 0.83).

Breaking the 'Undruggable' Barrier: Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with KRAS Mutations-A Comprehensive Review and Description of Single Site Experience

Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) gene mutations are among the most commonly found oncogenic alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Unfortunately, KRAS mutations have been considered "undruggable" for many years, making treatment options very limited. Immunotherapy targeting programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), programmed death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for NSCLC patients. However, some studies have suggested a lower response rate to immunotherapy in KRAS-mutated NSCLC patients with the coexistence of mutations in the STK11 (Serine/Threonine Kinase 11) gene. However, recent clinical trials have shown promising results with the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy or immunotherapy and KRAS inhibitors (sotorasib, adagrasib) in such patients. In other studies, the high efficacy of immunotherapy has been demonstrated in NSCLC patients with mutations in the KRAS gene that do not coexist with other mutations or coexist with the TP53 gene mutations. In this paper, we review the available literature on the efficacy of immunotherapy in KRAS-mutated NSCLC patients. In addition, we presented single-site experience on the efficacy of immunotherapy in NSCLC patients with KRAS mutations. The effectiveness of chemoimmunotherapy or immunotherapy as well as KRAS inhibitors extends the overall survival of advanced NSCLC patients with the G12C mutation in the KRAS gene to 2-3 years. This type of management has become the new standard in the treatment of NSCLC patients. Further studies are needed to clarify the potential benefits of immunotherapy in KRAS-mutated NSCLC patients and to identify potential biomarkers that may help predict response to therapy.

The Importance of the Pyrazole Scaffold in the Design of Protein Kinases Inhibitors as Targeted Anticancer Therapies

The altered activation or overexpression of protein kinases (PKs) is a major subject of research in oncology and their inhibition using small molecules, protein kinases inhibitors (PKI) is the best available option for the cure of cancer. The pyrazole ring is extensively employed in the field of medicinal chemistry and drug development strategies, playing a vital role as a fundamental framework in the structure of various PKIs. This scaffold holds major importance and is considered a privileged structure based on its synthetic accessibility, drug-like properties, and its versatile bioisosteric replacement function. It has proven to play a key role in many PKI, such as the inhibitors of Akt, Aurora kinases, MAPK, B-raf, JAK, Bcr-Abl, c-Met, PDGFR, FGFRT, and RET. Of the 74 small molecule PKI approved by the US FDA, 8 contain a pyrazole ring: Avapritinib, Asciminib, Crizotinib, Encorafenib, Erdafitinib, Pralsetinib, Pirtobrutinib, and Ruxolitinib. The focus of this review is on the importance of the unfused pyrazole ring within the clinically tested PKI and on the additional required elements of their chemical structures. Related important pyrazole fused scaffolds like indazole, pyrrolo[1,2-b]pyrazole, pyrazolo[4,3-b]pyridine, pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine, or pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine are beyond the subject of this work.

Survival outcomes and prognostic factors of lung cancer patients with the MET exon 14 skipping mutation: A single-center real-world study

Introduction

The MET exon 14 skipping (METex14) mutation is an important oncogenic driver in lung cancer. We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical data from lung cancer patients with the METex14 mutation to analyze their survival outcomes and associated prognostic factors.

Methods

A one-step reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction to examine the presence of the METex14 mutation was performed using RNA samples from 1374 lung cancer patients with no detected EGFR and ALK mutations. Pathological features and immunohistochemistry (IHC) results for c-MET were analyzed in patients with METex14-positive tumors.

Results

METex14 was identified in 69 patients with lung cancer, including 53 adenocarcinoma (ADC) and 16 non-ADC patients. In comparison with patients without the METex14 mutation, lung cancer patients harboring the METex14 mutation were generally elderly individuals, never-smokers, and had poor performance scores. A higher frequency of METex14 mutations was detected in pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) patients (24.3%, n = 9/37). However, stage IV PSC patients with or without the METex14 mutations showed similarly poor overall survival (OS) (p = 0.429). For all 36 METex14-positive lung ADCs, multivariate analysis showed several poor prognostic factors, including strong c-MET IHC staining (p = 0.006), initial brain metastasis (p = 0.005), and administration of only supportive care (p < 0.001). After excluding seven patients who received only supportive care, we further analyzed 29 stage IV lung ADC patients with METex14 mutations who received anti-cancer treatment. Multivariate analysis showed that pemetrexed treatment (p = 0.003), lung radiotherapy (p = 0.020), initial brain metastasis (p = 0.005), and strong c-MET IHC staining (p = 0.012) were independent prognostic factors for OS in these patients.

Conclusions

A higher frequency of METex14 mutations was detected in PSC patients. Stage IV PSC patients with or without the METex14 mutations had similarly poor overall survival. Pemetrexed-based chemotherapy, strong c-MET ICH staining, initial brain metastasis, and lung radiotherapy, may help predict survival outcomes in patients with advanced lung ADCs harboring the METex14 mutation.

Case report: Success of tepotinib therapy in overcoming resistance to osimertinib in a patient with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with a potential acquired MET exon 14 skipping mutation

Osimertinib is a standard therapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) mutations, but most patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC develop secondary resistance to osimertinib. Mesenchymal-epithelial transition gene (MET) alterations and oncogene fusions have been identified as the most common mechanisms of resistance to osimertinib. However, MET exon 14 skipping mutation (METex14del) as an acquired resistance to osimertinib has rarely been reported. A non-smoking 76-year-old woman was diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma in the right lower lobe (cT2bN2M1c [pulmonary and bone metastases], cStage IVB). The primary tumor was submitted to cobas^® EGFR Mutation Test v2 (Roche Diagnostics Ltd.), next generation sequencing (Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3; Thermo Fisher Scientific), the AmoyDx^® Essential NGS panel (Amoy Diagnostics, Xiamen, China), all of which were positive for EGFR L858R and de novo T790M. We administered daily osimertinib (80 mg/day), and achieved a partial response. However, after 14.0 months, computed tomography showed progression of the primary tumor and lung metastases. Re-biopsy of the primary tumor was conducted, and the specimen was submitted to Archer^®MET companion diagnostic for detection of METex14del. Although the primary tumor was negative for METex14del, the re-biopsy specimen was positive for METex14del. We validated that the biopsy specimen of the primary tumor at diagnosis before osimertinib administration was negative for METex14del using local reverse transcription PCR. We administered daily tepotinib (500 mg/day) to the patient as a further-line treatment, and achieved a partial response (tumor shrinkage rate: 34.5%) after 2.0 months, who responded to tepotinib therapy for 8.0 months. We described a patient with lung adenocarcinoma harboring METex14del as a potential acquired resistance to osimertinib, who responded to subsequent tepotinib therapy. Re-biopsy and re-analysis of genetic profiles should be considered in NSCLC patients who develop osimertinib resistance.