Erector Spinae Plane Block as an Analgesic Intervention in Acute Rib Fractures: A Scoping Review

The emergency/trauma regional anesthesia service - A novel concept for provision of regional anesthesia to emergency department and inpatients with acute pain

The treatment of acute pain with opioid sparing techniques has become a particular interest given the recent epidemic of opioid misuse. While acute pain and regional anesthesia are typically managed by the department of anesthesiology in large academic institutions, smaller community hospitals may have limited options for the treatment of acute pain outside of the perioperative setting. Emergency physicians are uniquely positioned to fill this gap given that US guided nerve blocks are now considered a core skill. In this article we outline a successful implementation of a business proposal for provision of regional anesthesia by emergency physicians as consultants to emergency department and hospitalized patients.

Use of fascial plane blocks for traumatic rib fractures: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

The primary cause of morbidity and mortality in traumatic rib fractures is respiratory complications due to compromised respiratory mechanics secondary to pain and opioid-related respiratory depression. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) provides effective analgesia but may not be possible in patients due to spinal cord injuries, thoracic vertebral fractures, and coagulopathy. New thoracic fascial plane blocks provide new options for patients with multiple rib fractures (MRFs).

OBJECTIVE

Our primary objective was to assess the effectiveness of thoracic fascial plane blocks for patients with MRFs by looking at pain control, opioid consumption, and respiratory function postblock compared with preblock.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Literature was searched using keywords and controlled terms, based on the two concepts "rib fractures" and "fascial plane blocks". Terms were searched in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to October 11, 2023, using medical subject headings (MeSH) and free-text terms without date or language restrictions. The terms included rib fractures, thoracic trauma, chest injuries, fascial plane blocks, PEC 1, PEC 2, PEC 3, pectoralis plane, serratus anterior plane (SAPB) and erector spinae plane block.

FINDINGS

The available evidence shows that erector spinae plane block and SAPB are effective blocks to provide analgesia and reduce opioid requirements in patients with unilateral or bilateral rib fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

More randomized control studies are needed to compare these blocks with paravertebral block or TEA to see if they provide analgesia, improve respiratory function, and reduce opioid requirements.

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) enhances hemodynamic stability decreasing analgesic requirements in surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on intraoperative hemodynamic stability, opioid and inhalation anesthetic requirements and postoperative analgesic effects in patients undergoing surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 173 patients who underwent surgical stabilization of rib fractures between May 2020 and December 2023. The patients were allocated into the ESPB group or the control group. Demographic data, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, total intraoperative opioid consumption, the average minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of inhalational anesthetics, postoperative simple analgesics and opioid consumption and the length of hospital stay were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the ESPB group had a lower heart rate (HR) in the first 90 min after surgical incision and lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at the beginning of surgery. Intraoperatively, a notable reduction in fentanyl consumption was observed in the ESPB group (p = 0.004), whereas no significant difference was observed in the average MAC of inhalational agents (p = 0.073). Postoperatively, the ESPB group required fewer doses of simple analgesics in the first 24 h (p < 0.001) and 48 h (p = 0.029). No statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay (p = 0.608) was observed between the groups.

CONCLUSION

ESPB was shown to enhance intraoperative hemodynamic stability, reduce opioid consumption and decrease postoperative analgesic consumption in patients who underwent SSRF. These results suggest that ESPB may serve as a valuable component of multimodal analgesia protocols for SSRF. Larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm the results and evaluate long-term outcomes.

Meta-analysis of the efficacy of the erector spinae plane block after spinal fusion surgery

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of erector spinal plane block (ESPB) after spinal fusion surgery in this study.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of Science databases were searched with a search deadline of March 30, 2024, and Stata 15.0 was used to analyze the data from the included studies.

Result

Nine randomized controlled trials involving 663 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that EPSB could reduce pain scores at 2h (standard mean difference (SMD) = -0.78, 95% CI [-1.38 to -0.19], GRADE: Moderate), 6 h (SMD = -0.81, 95% CI [-1.23 to -0.38], GRADE: Moderate), 12 h (SMD = -0.59, 95% CI [-1.05 to -0.13], GRADE: Moderate), 24 h (SMD = -0.54, 95% CI [-0.86 to -0.21], GRADE: Moderate), 48 h (SMD = -0.40, 95% CI [-0.75 to -0.05], GRADE: Moderate) after spinal fusion surgery, as well as the PCA (analgesia medication use) (SMD = -1.67, 95% CI [-2.67 to -0.67], GRADE: Moderate). However, EPSB had no effect on intraoperative blood loss (SMD = -0.28, 95% CI [-1.03 to 0.47], GRADE: Low) and length of hospital stay (SMD = -0.27, 95% CI [-0.60-0.06], GRADE: Low).

Conclusion

Combined with the current findings, EPSB may reduce pain scores in spinal fusion surgery, possibly reducing the use of postoperative analgesics. However, due to the limitations of the study, we need more high-quality, multi-center, large sample randomized controlled trials to merge.

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF): the WSES and CWIS position paper

BACKGROUND

Rib fractures are one of the most common traumatic injuries and may result in significant morbidity and mortality. Despite growing evidence, technological advances and increasing acceptance, surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) remains not uniformly considered in trauma centers. Indications, contraindications, appropriate timing, surgical approaches and utilized implants are part of an ongoing debate. The present position paper, which is endorsed by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), and supported by the Chest Wall Injury Society, aims to provide a review of the literature investigating the use of SSRF in rib fracture management to develop graded position statements, providing an updated guide and reference for SSRF.

METHODS

This position paper was developed according to the WSES methodology. A steering committee performed the literature review and drafted the position paper. An international panel of experts then critically revised the manuscript and discussed it in detail, to develop a consensus on the position statements.

RESULTS

A total of 287 studies (systematic reviews, randomized clinical trial, prospective and retrospective comparative studies, case series, original articles) have been selected from an initial pool of 9928 studies. Thirty-nine graded position statements were put forward to address eight crucial aspects of SSRF: surgical indications, contraindications, optimal timing of surgery, preoperative imaging evaluation, rib fracture sites for surgical fixation, management of concurrent thoracic injuries, surgical approach, stabilization methods and material selection.

CONCLUSION

This consensus document addresses the key focus questions on surgical treatment of rib fractures. The expert recommendations clarify current evidences on SSRF indications, timing, operative planning, approaches and techniques, with the aim to guide clinicians in optimizing the management of rib fractures, to improve patient outcomes and direct future research.

The Analgesic Mechanism and Recent Clinical Application of Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Narrative Review

Now, the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is widely used in various thoracolumbar surgeries. It has unique advantages: simple and convenient operation, low safety risks, and reduced opioid use. The ESPB is used in thoracic surgery, abdominal surgery, and spinal surgery. There are also relevant research reports on postoperative analgesia during general anesthesia surgery. This article searches the PubMed and Web of Science databases to find and screen relevant studies on ESPB since 2019 and retrospectively summarizes the current indications of ESPB. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane bias risk tool. The results showed that the current research on ESPB generally provides low-level clinical evidence. The complex anatomy of the erector spinae muscles is both responsible for its unique advantages and restricts its development. Few anatomical studies have clearly and completely demonstrated the diffusion relationship of local anesthetics among the anatomical structures of the erector spinal muscles. The uncontrollability of the diffusion plane prevents ESPB from being applied on a wider scale with a high level of evidence. To further clarify the scope of application of ESPB and achieve the best analgesic effect, in the future, we should focus on the unique anatomical course and distribution of the erector spinal muscles and their fascia and nerves. It is necessary to combine anatomical, imaging, and histological methods to obtain high-quality evidence to guide clinical application.

Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Case Series Demonstrating Utility for Acutely Painful Conditions in the Emergency Setting

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has emerged as a valuable technique in pain management. Though frequently used in chronic and postoperative pain, it remains underutilized in the emergency department (ED) setting. In particular, this block has become attractive because it is rapid, safe, and efficacious for a variety of different pain syndromes that are commonly encountered in the emergency department setting. Of particular importance is that this block results in pure sensory blockade, allowing patient movement after the procedure has been performed. This case series explores the efficacy of the ESPB in various clinical scenarios, including refractory cervical radiculopathy, rib fractures, obstructive nephrolithiasis, and sciatica. Each of these patients presented with symptoms of refractory aggressive pain management strategies, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), acetaminophen, narcotics, muscle relaxers, and ketamine. After undergoing ESPB, the patients were able to be successfully discharged without return visits to the emergency department for the return of their pain. This case series aims to show the utility of this procedure for refractory painful conditions and also reviews other indications where the block may be used. While previous reports have shown the utility of this block at individual levels, we present the flexibility of this block being used at multiple levels of the spine.

Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block compared to sham procedure in adult patients with rib fractures presenting to the emergency department: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with a sham procedure in adult patients presenting with rib fractures to the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was conducted at an academic ED over a 17-month period. Forty-six adults with confirmed rib fractures and numeric rating score (NRS) greater than 4 were randomized to one of two treatment arms: ultrasound-guided ESPB group or placebo (sham procedure). Intravenous opioids were prescribed as rescue analgesia when self-reported pain scores were ≥4. The primary outcome measure, pain intensity reduction, was derived using the 11-point NRS at six time points over 12 h. Secondary outcome measures included the amount of rescue analgesia, in morphine equivalents, and the occurrence of adverse events. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare the trend in NRSs across the two arms. The association between the complications and intervention was explored using the Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients (23 in each arm) completed the study. There was no difference between treatment groups with respect to age, sex, vital signs, preenrollment analgesia, or baseline pain intensity. In comparing pain intensity during the study period, NRS scores at 30, 60, and 120 min were significantly lower in the ESPB group (p < 0.001) during rest and deep inspiration. Moreover, patients in the ESPB group received lesser rescue analgesia than those in the sham group (10 mg, IQR 2.5 vs. 20 mg, IQR 5 mg; p ≤ 0.01). There was no difference in adverse events between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided ESPB resulted in significantly reduced pain intensity over the study period and reduced amount of rescue analgesia and had no discernible difference in adverse events when compared with a sham.

Erector spinae plane blocks: A narrative update

The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is perhaps one of the most interesting of the tissue plane blocks described recently. There has been an exponential increase in the number of publications for both adults and children over the past 5 years. Single-shot, intermittent bolus, and continuous infusion techniques have been used effectively. Both the efficacy and safety of the procedure are widely accepted, but the exact mechanism by which the local anesthetic spreads from the tip of the transverse process to block the dorsal and ventral rami of the spinal nerves is controversial and needs clarification. Anatomical differences in children, particularly in neonates and infants, may explain the spread in this age group. In most pediatric studies, erector spinae plane block was opioid sparing, and noninferiority was observed when compared with other regional techniques.

Regional anesthesia and POCUS in the intensive care unit

This chapter focuses on resident recruitment and recent US National Resident Matching Program changes and the impact in the evaluation and ranking of applicants within the specialty of anesthesiology. Recruitment challenges are examined as well as program strategies and potential future directions. Also discussed are DEI initiatives within the recruitment process.

Perioperative considerations for patients undergoing surgical stabilization of rib fractures: A narrative review

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has become an increasingly common management strategy for traumatic rib fractures. Although historically managed with supportive care, patients with multiple rib fractures and flail chest increasingly undergo SSRF, and so the anesthesiologist must be well-versed in the perioperative management and pain control for these patients, as controlling pain in this population is associated with decreased length of stay and improved outcomes. There are multiple modalities that can be used for both pain control and as part of the anesthetic plan in patients undergoing SSRF. This narrative review provides a comprehensive summary of anesthetic considerations for surgical rib fracture patients, covering the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods. We describe an approach to the assessment of high-risk patients, analgesic and anesthetic techniques including emerging techniques within locoregional anesthesia, ventilation strategies, and potential complications. This review also identifies areas where additional research is needed to ensure optimal anesthetic management for patients undergoing SSRF.

Effective Postoperative Pain Management in Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Surgery: The Role of the Erector Spinae Plane Block

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) often necessitates surgical intervention to alleviate neurovascular bundle compression, which can result in severe postoperative pain. The myriad of surgical techniques available for TOS treatment, the intricate involvement of diverse sensory pathways, and the limited literature on effective analgesic methods for these specific cases underscore the need for successful approaches. This report introduces an efficacious multimodal analgesic strategy that incorporates the erector spinae plane (ESP) block to enhance postoperative pain management after a supraclavicular surgical approach. By combining this fascial block with a comprehensive rationale for its implementation, this case offers valuable insights into improving the postoperative care of TOS patients, ultimately aiming to enhance their comfort and recovery.