Micro-CT imaging as a method for comparing perfusion in graduated-height and single-height surgical staple lines

Does Tri-Staple™ technology reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery? A propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study evaluates the Tri-Staple™ technology in colorectal anastomosis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent rectosigmoidectomy between 2016 and 2022 were retrospectively evaluated and divided into two groups: EEA™ (EEA) or Tri-Staple™ (Tri-EEA). The groups were matched for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), and neoadjuvant radiotherapy using propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULT

Three hundred and thirty-six patients were included (228 EEA; 108 Tri-EEA). The groups were similar in sex, age, and neoadjuvant therapy. The Tri-EEA group had fewer patients with ASA III/IV scores (7% vs. 33%; p < 0.001). The Tri-EEA group had a lower incidence of leakage (4% vs. 11%; p = 0.023), reoperations (4% vs. 12%; p = 0.016), and severe complications (6% vs. 14%; p = 0.026). There was no difference in complications, mortality, readmission, and length of stay. After PSM, 108 patients in the EEA group were compared with 108 in the Tri-EEA group. The covariates sex, age, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, and ASA were balanced, and the risk of leakage (4% vs. 12%; p = 0.04), reoperation (4% vs. 14%; p = 0.014), and severe complications (6% vs. 15%; p = 0.041) remained lower in the Tri-EEA group.

CONCLUSION

Tri-Staple™ reduces the risk of leakage in colorectal anastomosis. However, this study provides only insights, and further research is warranted to confirm these findings.

Two-row, three-row or powered circular stapler, which to choose when performing colorectal anastomosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Three types of circular staplers can be used to perform a colorectal anastomosis: two-row (MCS), three-row (TRCS) and powered (PCS) devices. The objective of this meta-analysis has been to provide the existing evidence on which of these circular staplers would have a lower risk of presenting a leak (AL) and/or anastomotic bleeding (AB).

METHODS

An in-depth search was carried out in the electronic bibliographic databases Embase, PubMed and SCOPUS. Observational studies were included, since randomized clinical trials comparing circular staplers were not found.

RESULTS

In the case of AL, seven studies met the inclusion criteria in the PCS group and four in the TRCS group. In the case of AB, only four studies could be included in the analysis in the PCS group. The AL OR reported for PCS was 0.402 (95%-confidence interval (95%-CI): 0.266-0.608) and for AB: 0.2 (95% CI: 0.08-0.52). The OR obtained for AL in TRCS was 0.446 (95%-CI: 0.217 to 0.916). Risk difference for AL in PCS was - 0.06 (95% CI: - 0.07 to - 0.04) and in TRCS was - 0.04 (95%-CI: - 0.08 to - 0.01). Subgroup analysis did not report significant differences between groups. On the other hand, the AB OR obtained for PCS was 0.2 (95% CI: 0.08-0.52). In this case, no significant differences were observed in subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSION

PCS presented a significantly lower risk of leakage and anastomotic bleeding while TRCS only demonstrated a risk reduction in AL. Risk difference of AL was superior in the PCS than in TRCS.

Evaluating Performance of Circular Staplers Using Comparative Test Methods for Evidence-Based Surgery

BACKGROUND

Circular stapler anastomosis is a common surgical procedure. Despite technological advancements, anastomotic leak remains a postoperative concern. Assessment of new technologies is impeded by variations in test methods and analysis, precluding outcome reproducibility and direct comparisons of results across studies. The development of robust and reproducible preclinical test methods is critical to accelerating stapling technology advancements.

METHODOLOGY

Leak pressure, staple line perfusion and security, and device removal force were quantified for triple-row (Tri-staple EEA, TriEEA) and double-row staplers (Echelon Circular Powered, ECP). Leak and perfusion testing were performed in vivo. Device removal force and staple line security testing were performed with synthetic medium using an Instron. Data were analyzed using unpaired student's t-test or Kruskal-Wallis test, with statistical significance defined as P < .05.

RESULTS

Leak pressure was 73% higher in TriEEA vs ECP (P = .016). TriEEA staple line failure force was lower than ECP at 40 and 50 mmHg (P = .001 and P = .023, respectively). Perfusion to the staple line was higher (148%) for TriEEA than for ECP (P = .003) and the force required to remove the device from its stapled anastomosis was 78% lower for TriEEA than for ECP (P < .001).

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS

This report addresses a primary limitation in stapling research by presenting novel methodologies which enhance clinical relevance and provide sufficient detail for reproduction by independent investigators. These methods are applied to a comparison between triple-row and double-row staplers to demonstrate utility of new test methods in assessing key technology design features.

Air leaks: Stapling affects porcine lungs biomechanics

During thoracic operations, surgical staplers resect cancerous tumors and seal the spared lung. However, post-operative air leaks are undesirable clinical consequences: staple legs wound lung tissue. Subsequent to this trauma, air leaks from lung tissue into the pleural space. This affects the lung's physiology and patients' recovery. The objective is to biomechanically and visually characterize porcine lung tissue with and without staples in order to gain knowledge on air leakage following pulmonary resection. Therefore, a syringe pump filled with air inflates and deflates eleven porcine lungs cyclically without exceeding 10 cmH₂O of pressure. Cameras capture stereo-images of the deformed lung surface at regular intervals while a microcontroller simultaneously records the alveolar pressure and the volume of air pumped. The raw images are then used to compute tri-dimensional displacements and strains with the Digital Image Correlation method (DIC). Air bubbles originated at staple holes of inner row from exposed porcine lung tissue due to torn pleural on costal surface. Compared during inflation, left upper or lower lobe resections have similar compliance (slope of the pressure vs volume curve), which are 9% lower than healthy lung compliance. However, lower lobes statistically burst at lower pressures than upper lobes (p-value<0.046) in ex vivo conditions confirming previous clinical in vivo studies. In parallel, the lung deformed mostly in the vicinity of staple holes and presented maximum shear strain near the observed leak location. To conclude, a novel technique DIC provided concrete evidence of the post-operative air leaks biomechanics. Further studies could investigate causal relationships between the mechanical parameters and the development of an air leak.