Evaluation of pain relief treatment and timelines in emergency care in six European countries and Australia

Acute Traumatic Pain in the Emergency Department

Trauma is a major cause of mortality throughout the world. Traumatic pain—acute, sudden, or chronic—is defined as “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage”. Patients’ perceptions of pain assessment and management have become an important criterion and relevant outcome measure for healthcare institutions. Several studies show that 60–70% of ER patients experience pain, and more than half of them express a feeling of sorrow, which can be moderate or severe, at triage. The few studies that have analyzed how pain is assessed and managed in these departments agree that approximately 70% of patients receive no analgesia or receive it with remarkable delay. Specifically, less than half of the patients receive treatment for pain during admission and 60% of discharged patients have higher intensity pain than at admission. Trauma patients are also the ones who most commonly report low satisfaction with pain management. Associated with this lack of satisfaction, we can describe the poor use of tools for measuring and recording pain, poor communication among caregivers, inadequate training in pain assessment and management, and widespread misconceptions among nurses about the reliability of patients’ estimation of pain. The aim of this article is to review the scientific literature to explore the methodologies of pain management in trauma patients attending the emergency room and analyzing their weaknesses as a starting point to improve the approach to this, unfortunately too often, underestimated issue. A literature search was performed using the major databases to identify relevant studies in indexed scientific journals. The literature showed that the multimodal approach in trauma patients is the best approach to pain management. It is becoming increasingly crucial to manage the patient on multiple fronts. Drugs acting on different pathways can be administered together at lower doses, minimizing risks. Every emergency department must have staff trained in the assessment and immediate management of pain symptoms as this allows the reduction of mortality and morbidity and shortens hospital stays, contributing to early mobilization, reduced hospital costs, and enhanced patient satisfaction and quality of life.

Evaluation of the effectiveness and costs of inhaled methoxyflurane versus usual analgesia for prehospital injury and trauma: non-randomised clinical study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate clinical benefits and economic costs of inhaled methoxyflurane when used by ambulance staff for prehospital emergency patients with trauma. Comparison is to usual analgesic practice (UAP) in the UK in which patient records were selected if treatment had been with Entonox® or intravenous morphine or intravenous paracetamol.

METHODS

Over a 12-month evaluation period, verbal numerical pain scores (VNPS) were gathered from adults with moderate to severe trauma pain attended by ambulance staff trained in administering and supplied with methoxyflurane. Control VNPS were obtained from ambulance database records of UAP in similar patients for the same period. Statistical modelling enabled comparisons of methoxyflurane to UAP, where we employed an Ordered Probit panel regression model for pain, linked by observational rules to VNPS.

RESULTS

Overall, 96 trained paramedics and technicians from the East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust (EMAS) prepared 510 doses of methoxyflurane for administration to a total of 483 patients. Comparison data extracted from the EMAS database of UAP episodes involved: 753 patients using Entonox®, 802 patients using intravenous morphine, and 278 patients using intravenous paracetamol. Modelling results included demonstration of faster pain relief with inhaled methoxyflurane (all p-values < 0.001). Methoxyflurane's time to achieve maximum pain relief was estimated to be significantly shorter: 26.4 min (95%CI 25.0-27.8) versus Entonox® 44.4 min (95%CI 39.5-49.3); 26.5 min (95%CI 25.0-27.9) versus intravenous morphine 41.8 min (95%CI 38.9-44.7); 26.5 min (95%CI 25.1-28.0) versus intravenous paracetamol 40.8 (95%CI 34.7-46.9). Scenario analyses showed that durations spent in severe pain were significantly less for methoxyflurane. Costing scenarios showed the added benefits of methoxyflurane were achieved at higher cost, eg versus Entonox® the additional cost per treated patient was estimated to be £12.30.

CONCLUSION

When administered to adults with moderate or severe pain due to trauma inhaled methoxyflurane reduced pain more rapidly and to a greater extent than Entonox® and parenteral analgesics. Inclusion of inhaled methoxyflurane to the suite of prehospital analgesics provides a clinically useful addition, but one that is costlier per treated patient.

Organisation und Durchführung der Schmerztherapie in deutschen Notaufnahmen – eine Onlineumfrage

Einleitung

Obwohl Schmerzen der häufigste Grund für eine Vorstellung in der Notaufnahme sind, ist ihre Erfassung und Therapie sehr heterogen organisiert und wird vielfach von Patienten als unzureichend beschrieben. Eine spezielle Leitlinie existiert bislang nicht und so wird beispielsweise die Delegation an die Notfallpflege nach Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) sehr unterschiedlich gehandhabt.

Methode

Mithilfe einer Umfrage erfolgte eine Ist-Analyse zur Organisation und Durchführung der akuten Schmerztherapie in deutschen Notaufnahmen. 18 Fragen wurden onlinebasiert erstellt und über das Notaufnahmeverzeichnis der DGINA e. V. (Deutsche Gesellschaft für interdisziplinäre Notfall- und Akutmedizin) und DIVI e. V. (Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin) an die Leiter von 951 deutschen Notaufnahmen verschickt.

Ergebnis

Es konnten 166 vollständige Fragebögen ausgewertet werden. Die Erfassung der Schmerzen erfolgt bei 77,7 % der Notaufnahmen innerhalb der ersten 10 min nach Erstkontakt, meist mit der numerischen Rating-Skala (46,4 %). Obwohl 17,7 % nicht dauerhaft ärztlich besetzt sind, dürfen in insgesamt 32,5 % der Notaufnahmen Pflegekräfte keine eigenständige Schmerztherapie durchführen. Eine spezielle SOP gab es nur in 44,8 % der befragten Notaufnahmen. Die am häufigsten verwendeten Analgetika sind Piritramid und Morphin sowie Metamizol und Ibuprofen.

Schlussfolgerung

Eine entsprechende nationale Leitlinie könnte Handlungssicherheit geben und als Grundlage für angepasste, örtliche SOP helfen, Verzögerungen bei der akuten Schmerztherapie zu vermeiden.

Nurse-Administered Analgesic Treatment in Italian Emergency Medical Services: A Nationwide Survey

Background

Acute pain is common among patients requiring assistance from prehospital emergency medical services (EMS). Nonetheless, the undertreatment of pain in this context remains a frequent phenomenon. Timely and effective analgesia is a crucial feature in emergency medicine. To ensure analgesia provision, prehospital paramedics and nurses can administer analgesics via standard operating protocols or under a physician’s remote supervision. Information about such protocols in Italian EMS is lacking.

Objective

Evaluation of the availability of nurse’s standard analgesia protocols in Italy’s prehospital EMS settings.

Methods

A cross-sectional online survey involved all 74 Italian emergency medical dispatch centres (EMDCs). Aside from descriptive statistics, we used χ²-analysis and Spearman-rank correlation to look for associations between geographical areas’ dependence upon independent variable categories and their correlations.

Results

Of all the 74 Italian EMDCs, 70 (94.6%) completed the survey, covering 100 provinces out of a total of 107 (93.5%). Operating nurses’ prehospital analgesia protocols are available in 46 provinces (46.0%). The availability of prehospital analgesia protocols is more extended in northern Italy EMDCs (n=30, 66.7%) than in central Italy (n=9, 42.8%) and southern Italy and islands (n=7, 20.6%). Morphine (76.1% for medical patients and 95.7% for trauma) and paracetamol (89.1% for both) are the most common drugs included in the prehospital analgesia protocols.

Conclusion

Despite international consensus on the necessity, efficacy, and safety of nurses’ prehospital analgesia provision, nurse-administered analgesia protocols are available in less than half of Italian provinces, with substantial differences between northern, central, and southern areas. These results indirectly indicate potential undertreatment of prehospital pain in Italy and yield practice improvements.

Healthcare resource use and cost implications of low dose methoxyflurane for severe trauma-related pain: a qualitative study

Aims

Management of moderate-to-severe trauma-associated pain is often reported as suboptimal, due in part to limitations associated with frequently used analgesics. Low-dose methoxyflurane (LDM) is an inhaled, non-opioid analgesic, recently approved for emergency relief of moderate-to-severe trauma-associated pain in conscious adults. This study assessed the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCPs) with regard to the time to analgesia and healthcare cost of LDM versus morphine IV, for patients with severe trauma-related pain receiving emergency care in Belgium.

Materials and methods

Interviews and questionnaires were completed by four healthcare HCPs providing emergency care at different hospitals in Belgium. Processes describing analgesic provision in pre-hospital and hospital emergency department (ED) settings were qualitatively mapped and a cost model applied which included reimbursed analgesic costs, time spent by HCPs making analgesic treatment decisions, preparing and administering the analgesic, and post-dose monitoring and management of analgesic-related adverse events (AEs).

Results

LDM was associated with substantial time and costs savings per patient, largely due to no requirement for AE monitoring. Compared with morphine IV, LDM in the hospital ED was associated with a time saving of 4 minutes to analgesic provision (35 vs 39 min) and ≥224 min in total (35 vs ≥259 min; including monitoring and managing AEs). In the pre-hospital setting, LDM was also associated with a time saving of 4 minutes to analgesic provision (21 vs 25 min) and 198 minutes in total. The corresponded total cost savings with LDM vs morphine IV were ≥€27.32 and ≥€17.95 in the ED or prehospital setting, respectively.

Conclusions

The cost model showed that LDM was associated with substantial time and costs savings versus morphine IV for severe trauma-related emergency pain in pre-hospital and hospital ED settings in Belgium.

Analgesia in adult trauma patients in physician-staffed Austrian helicopter rescue: a 12-year registry analysis

Background

Sufficient analgesia is an obligation, but oligoanalgesia (NRS> 3) is frequently observed prehospitally. Potent analgesics may cause severe adverse events. Thus, analgesia in the helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) setting is challenging. Adequacy, efficacy and administration safety of potent analgesics pertaining to injured patients in HEMS were analysed.

Methods

Observational study evaluating data from 14 year-round physician-staffed helicopter bases in Austria in a 12-year timeframe.

Results

Overall, 47,985 (34.3%) patients received analgesics, 26,059 of whom were adult patients, injured and not mechanically ventilated on site. Main drugs administered were opioids (n=20,051; 76.9%), esketamine (n=9082; 34.9%), metamizole (n=798; 3.1%) and NSAIDs (n=483; 1.9%). Monotherapy with opioids or esketamine was the most common regimen (n=21,743; 83.4%), while opioids together with esketamine (n= 3591; 13.8%) or metamizole (n=369; 1.4%) were the most common combinations. Females received opioids less frequently than did males (n=6038; 74.5% vs. n=14,013; 78.1%; p< 0.001). Pain relief was often sufficient (> 95%), but females more often had moderate to severe pain on arrival in hospital (n=34; 5.0% vs. n=59; 3.2%; p=0.043). Administration of potent analgesics was safe, as indicated by MEES, SpO₂ and respiratory rates. On 10% of all missions, clinical patient assessment was deemed sufficient by HEMS physicians and monitoring was spared.

Conclusions

Opioids and esketamine alone or in combination were the analgesics of choice in physician-staffed HEMS in Austria. Analgesia was often sufficient, but females more than males suffered from oligoanalgesia on hospital arrival. Administration safety was high, justifying liberal use of potent analgesics in physician-staffed HEMS.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-021-00839-9.

Low-Dose Methoxyflurane versus Standard of Care Analgesics for Emergency Trauma Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pooled Data

Purpose

Undertreatment of trauma-related pain is common in the pre-hospital and hospital settings owing to barriers to the use of traditional standard of care analgesics. Low-dose methoxyflurane is an inhaled non-opioid analgesic with a rapid onset of pain relief that is approved for emergency relief of moderate-to-severe trauma-related pain in adults. This analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose methoxyflurane with standard of care analgesics in adults with trauma-related pain.

Methods

A meta-analysis was performed on pooled data from randomized controlled trials identified via a systematic review. The primary endpoint was the pain intensity difference between baseline and various time intervals (5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 minutes) after initiation of treatment.

Results

The pain intensity difference was statistically superior with low-dose methoxyflurane compared with standard of care analgesics (overall estimated treatment effect=11.88, 95% CI=9.75–14.00; P<0.0001). The superiority of low-dose methoxyflurane was demonstrated at 5 minutes after treatment initiation and was maintained across all timepoints. Significantly more patients treated with methoxyflurane achieved response criteria of pain intensity ≤30 mm on a visual analog scale, and relative reductions in pain intensity of ≥30% and ≥50%, compared with patients who received standard of care analgesics. The median time to pain relief was shorter with methoxyflurane than with standard of care analgesics. The findings were consistent in a subgroup of elderly patients (aged ≥65 years).

Conclusion

Methoxyflurane can be considered as an alternative to standard of care analgesics in pre-hospital and hospital settings for treatment of adult patients with acute trauma-related pain.

RWE Framework: An Interactive Visual Tool to Support a Real-World Evidence Study Design

OBJECTIVES

Real-world evidence (RWE) is essential for the development of pharmaceutical and medical technologies and informs treatment-related decisions by regulatory agencies, payers, healthcare providers, and patients. Given that planning RWE studies present diverse challenges, we developed the RWE Framework, a concise, visual, interactive tool designed to align multidisciplinary stakeholders toward common goals and encourage a methodical approach to RWE study planning.

METHODS

A search of published literature and internet-based resources was performed to identify guidance on RWE study planning with decision and/or visual aids. A conceptual framework for a study design tool was developed based on best practices for RWE studies, enhanced with an infographic design, and refined by multidisciplinary input from RWE researchers.

RESULTS

The searches confirmed an unmet need for a concise tool to support a broad range of RWE study designs: only two sources with decision/visual aids were identified. The novel RWE Framework comprises sequential decision steps with instructions to guide users through consideration of research objectives, product approval status, study setting, outcomes of interest, data availability in routine practice, need for primary data collection and/or randomization, study type and methodology, and applicable regulatory standards. Pilot testing using case studies of pharmaceutical assets demonstrated the utility of RWE Framework and applicability for use in team environments.

CONCLUSIONS

The RWE Framework is a novel, concise, visual, and interactive tool to inform RWE study planning. It addresses a broad range of real-world study types and research objectives and was found to enhance RWE decision-making by multidisciplinary teams. Further validation is warranted.