Diagnostic Performance of Point-of-Care Troponin I and Laboratory Troponin T in Patients Presenting to the ED with Chest Pain: A Comparative Study

Diagnostic performance of a point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay among Chinese patients with chest pain

BACKGROUND

A novel handheld point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I analyser has recently been introduced to the market. Evaluating its diagnostic performance against laboratory standards is imperative, given the variations in cardiac troponin levels across populations. This study compared the diagnostic performance between the point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay (Siemens Healthineers Atellica VTLi) and a laboratory high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay (Abbott ARCHITECT STAT High Sensitive Troponin-I) performed using blood samples from various populations (overall, male, female, younger and older) of Chinese patients with chest pain.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 585 consecutive Chinese patients (age ≥18 year) who presented to an emergency department with chest pain (lasting >5 min) and were managed following the chest pain protocol between 1 August 2023 and 12 June 2024. For both assays, blood samples were collected at two time points (0 hour (initial) and 3 hour (subsequent)). The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance of the two assays, evaluated with their 99th percentile upper reference limits used as the cut-off values for diagnosing myocardial infarction. The gold standard for comparison was the final diagnoses made by attending physicians.

RESULTS

The point-of-care and laboratory assays exhibited equivalent sensitivity and negative predictive values (both 100%) for blood samples collected at both time points. However, the point-of-care assay outperformed the laboratory assay in terms of specificity (initial: 90.5% to 96.3% vs 79.8% to 94.7%; subsequent: 87.8% to 94.8% vs 77.7% to 92.4%) and positive predictive value (initial: 24.4% to 30.8% vs 11.6% to 23.5%; subsequent: 12.5% to 25.0% vs 5.9% to 18.8%), particularly in older patients.

CONCLUSION

The point-of-care assay is recommended for rapid clinical decision-making. Future studies should explore the effects of its integration into clinical practice and the feasibility of using sex-race-age-specific 99th percentile upper reference limits to enhance its diagnostic performance.

Diagnostic Performance of Point-of-Care High-Sensitivity Troponin in the Exclusion of Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of high-sensitivity troponin using point-of-care testing (POCT) devices compared with main laboratory measurements for ruling out non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in emergency department (ED) patients presenting with non-traumatic chest pain.

METHODS

This multicenter, observational, prospective, non-interventional study was conducted in two Spanish hospitals from 1 June to 31 December 2023 and included adult patients presenting with non-traumatic chest pain admitted to the ED. High-sensitivity troponin levels were measured using both the Siemens Atellica® VTLi POCT device and main laboratory testing, with data collected on analytical results and measurement times.

RESULTS

Of the 201 patients who met the inclusion criteria, a significant correlation was observed between the POCT and laboratory assays. The area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC curve was consistently greater than 0.9, indicating a high diagnostic accuracy for ruling out NSTEMI. In addition, measurement times were significantly reduced using POCT compared to the core laboratory.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that high-sensitivity troponin POCT devices offer comparable diagnostic performance to traditional laboratory methods for the diagnosis of NSTEMI in the emergency department, potentially speeding up clinical decisions and optimizing resource utilization.

Clinical performance of 0/1 h cardiac troponin algorithm for diagnosing non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in an emergency setting

BACKGROUND

Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is a common form of acute myocardial infarction and rapid and accurate diagnosis is crucial for timely treatment. Current guidelines recommend using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays to determine circulating cTnI or cTnT levels. While the accuracy of the 0 h/1 h algorithm for diagnosing NSTEMI in different regions and patient populations remains controversial. Additionally, point-of-care testing (POCT) cTn assays have the potential to provide troponin readings to physicians within 15 min, but their accuracy in diagnosing NSTEMI in the emergency department (ED) requires further investigation.

METHODS

A single-center prospective observational cohort study was conducted at Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital to assess the analytical and diagnostic performance of the laboratory-based Roche Modular E170 hs-cTnT using the 0 h/1 h algorithm with Radiometer AQT90-flex POCT cTnT assay in undifferentiated chest pain patients presenting to the ED. Whole-blood samples were collected and hs-cTnT and POCT cTnI were measured simultaneously at baseline and after 1 h.

RESULTS

The study results showed that the POCT cTnT assay using the 0 h/1 h algorithm had comparable diagnostic accuracy to the laboratory-based Roche Modular E170 hs-cTnT assay in diagnosing NSTEMI in patients with chest pain.

CONCLUSION

The laboratory-based Roche Modular E170 hs-cTnT using the 0 h/1 h algorithm is reliable and accurate method for diagnosing NSTEMI in undifferentiated chest pain patients presenting to the ED. POCT cTnT assay has comparable diagnostic accuracy to the hs-cTnT assay and its rapid turnaround time makes it a valuable tool in expediting the diagnostic workup of chest pain patients.

Comparison of Point-of-Care and Highly Sensitive Laboratory Troponin Testing in Patients Suspicious of Acute Myocardial Infarction and Its Efficacy in Clinical Outcome

BACKGROUND

The use of high-sensitivity troponin (hs-cTnI) assays is recommended in current guidelines for managing patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) symptoms. However, point-of-care (POC) assays are frequently used in emergency departments (EDs) to reduce turnaround time and length of stay. This study aimed to compare the results of POC-cTnI testing with those of the gold standard, automated central laboratory testing of troponin (i.e., hs-cTnI). The primary and secondary outcomes were the diagnostic performance of POC-cTnI in diagnosing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during 30 days, respectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this diagnostic accuracy study, 136 patients with suspected ACS who were referred or admitted to the Al Zahra Hospital, Shiraz, Iran, were included between March (2020) and July (2020). For the diagnosis of AMI, central laboratory cTnI levels were assessed at the time of presentation (0 hour) and reassessed at least 3 hours later. The POC-cTnI was measured at 0 hour in all patients and at 3 hours if a patient was diagnosed with AMI but had a 0-hour negative result for the POC-cTnI assay. Additionally, the 30-day follow-up period for these participants began on the day of the initial presentation to assess MACE.

RESULTS

Out of 180 patients, 136 patients (median age of 59.5 years; 57.5% male) were left for the qualitative POC-cTnI and hs-cTnI assays. In 86 (63.24%) subjects, hs-cTnI was positive (either initial or serial); however, AMI was diagnosed in 85 patients according to positivity of troponin by hs-cTnI and clinical signs and symptoms, which were diagnosed by a cardiologist. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of 0-hour POC-cTnI were observed to be 91.76% (95% CI: 83.77-96.62%), 98.04% (95% CI: 89.55-99.95%), and 87.72% (95% CI: 77.82-93.56%), respectively. Moreover, considering both the 0-hour and 3-hour POC-cTnI, all AMI cases were correctly identified, yielding a perfect test performance result. None of the 50 patients with negative cTnI results (by 0-hour and 3-hour POC-cTnI and hs-cTnI) experienced at least one MACE.

CONCLUSION

In this small sample-size study, a new qualitative POC-cTnI assay was statistically equal to a hs-cTnI assay in terms of diagnostic accuracy for AMI or MACE in patients with suspected myocardial infarction. The POC-cTnI was observed to be acceptable for the identification of AMI and prediction of MACE in the ED environment.