Clinicopathological features of epiretinal membranes in eyes filled with silicone oil

Emulsification of Silicone Oils: Altering Factors and Possible Complications-A Narrative Review

Background: Endotamponade of the vitreous body with silicone oil is a common procedure, being the basis of many vitreoretinal surgeries. However, emulsification may happen, which is a clinically relevant adverse event of silicone oil use. Methods: This review provides a thorough analysis of the emulsification process. It focuses on describing factors affecting this event as well as its possible subsequent complications. Results: The viscosity of silicone oil, the duration of emulsification, the status of the lens and many other factors have an influence on the onset and intensity of emulsification. This phenomenon carries several risks for operated eyes such as increased intraocular pressure, keratopathy or structural changes to the retina. Conclusions: The use of modern imaging techniques, especially optical coherence tomography, enables faster detection of the emulsification process. This allows for an adequate clinical response and more accurate follow-up of the patient.

Retinal and Corneal Changes Associated with Intraocular Silicone Oil Tamponade

Silicone oils (SO) are used as long-term intraocular tamponades and have an irreplaceable role in vitreoretinal surgery. They can, however, be associated with multiple and potentially severe complications, involving different ocular tissues, in particular retina and cornea. Recent advances in ophthalmic imaging have allowed the precise characterization of retinal and corneal microstructural changes, at a subclinical level. This detailed analysis of SO-related retinal and corneal changes has improved our understanding of their pathogenesis and offer the potential for optimized monitoring and management of patients with SO-filled eyes. This review aims to provide clinicians and ophthalmic scientists with an updated and comprehensive overview of the corneal and retinal changes associated with SO tamponade.

Macular pucker formation after macular hole surgery with inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique and silicone oil tamponade

Purpose

The inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) technique was recently introduced for refractory macular hole. Here, we evaluate a case of macular pucker formation after macular hole surgery using the inverted ILM flap technique and silicone oil tamponade. After undergoing vitrectomy combined with ILM removal, the patient had a good visual prognosis.

Observations

A 49-year-old male with macular hole affecting both of his eyes underwent vitrectomies. Three months after the first surgery in his right eye, macular pucker formation was observed in the macula, which was associated with the ILM flap used to cover the macular hole. After peeling the ILM, the macula returned to a normal contour and visual acuity improved. Examination of the removed ILM revealed macrophage-like cells containing silicone oil particles that were responsible for the ILM contraction.

Conclusions and Importance

When using the inverted ILM flap technique and silicone oil, macular pucker may occur after macular hole surgery. Peeling of the ILM flap restored the macular shape and did not reopen the macular hole, thereby improving visual acuity. Thus, silicone oil should be used with caution when performing macular hole surgery with the ILM flap technique.

A NOVEL FINDING OF HYPERREFLECTIVE MATERIAL IN THE SILICONE-RETINA INTERFACE: An Optical Coherence Tomographic and Histopathological Study

PURPOSE

To describe novel findings of hyperreflective material in the silicone-retina interphase on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) imaging in eyes with silicone oil tamponade.

METHODS

Retrospective observational clinical study of consecutive patients who underwent primary pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Repeat clinical examination and spectral domain optical coherence tomography macular imaging performed 3 months after surgery were evaluated to identify any macular pathologies, including formation of epiretinal membranes, intraretinal changes, subretinal fluid, and edema before scheduled secondary vitrectomy for silicone oil removal.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients (mean age 54 years, range 22-89) were included. Twelve eyes (14%) showed discrete preretinal hyperreflective organized coarse material in the silicone-retina interphase on spectral domain optical coherence tomography. The material was scattered in the posterior pole, with several foci showing additional hyperreflectivity of the inner retinal layers beneath. These findings did not resemble silicone oil emulsification in size, shape, or reflectivity.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report on hyperreflective material detected by spectral domain optical coherence tomography in the silicone-retina interphase in eyes with silicone oil tamponade. These findings may represent an inflammatory response to silicone oil exposure that may be the initial manifestation of a future proliferative process, warranting a rigorous follow-up protocol for affected patients.

Silicone oil removal: post-operative complications

PURPOSE

To describe the characteristics, outcomes and complications of eyes after silicone oil removal.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of eyes that underwent oil removal between 2012 and 2016 at The Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science. Visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and rates of retinal re-detachment, hypotony, ocular hypertension, corneal decompensation, cystoid macular edema (CME) and cataract progression were evaluated.

RESULTS

Totally, 101 eyes of 99 patients (65% male, average age 47.2 years) were identified. Oil tamponade had been used for retinal detachment (RD) repair in all eyes; 15 eyes had also undergone an open globe repair previously. The most common vitreous substitutes used after oil removal were balanced salt solution (BSS) and air in 90% of eyes. The average time of oil tamponade before removal was 9.46 months. The average logMAR VA before oil removal was 1.7 which improved to an average of 1.4 post-operatively. The average IOP pre-operatively was 16.1 mm Hg, which decreased to an average of 14.8 mm Hg post-operatively. Complications after oil removal, included retinal re-detachment (6.9%), hypotony (7.9%), ocular hypertension (12.9%), corneal decompensation (9.9%), CME (2%) and cataract progression (68%).

CONCLUSION

This study showed an overall improvement in VA and decrease in IOP after oil removal. Cataract progression was the most common complication.