Real Life Experience of Dexamethasone Implant in Refractory Diabetic Macular Oedema

The Role of Intravitreal Corticosteroids in the Treatment of DME: Predictive OCT Biomarkers

This work aims to summarize predictive biomarkers to guide treatment choice in DME. Intravitreal anti-VEGF is considered the gold standard treatment for centers involving DME, while intravitreal steroid treatment has been established as a second-line treatment in DME. However, more than 1/3 of the patients do not adequately respond to anti-VEGF treatment despite up to 4-weekly injections. Not surprisingly, insufficient response to anti-VEGF therapy has been linked to low-normal VEGF levels in the serum and aqueous humor. These patients may well benefit from an early switch to intravitreal steroid treatment. In these patients, morphological biomarkers visible in OCT may predict treatment response and guide treatment decisions. Namely, the presence of a large amount of retinal and choroidal hyperreflective foci, disruption of the outer retinal layers and other signs of chronicity such as intraretinal cysts extending into the outer retina and a lower choroidal vascular index are all signs suggestive of a favorable treatment response of steroids compared to anti-VEGF. This paper summarizes predictive biomarkers in DME in order to assist individual treatment decisions in DME. These markers will help to identify DME patients who may benefit from primary dexamethasone treatment or an early switch.

Behavior of hyperreflective spots noted on optical coherence tomography following intravitreal therapy in diabetic macular edema: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose:

Hyperreflective spots (HRS) are considered as spectral domain optical coherence tomography biomarkers in predicting response to intravitreal therapy (IVT) in diabetic macular edema (DME). We aimed to determine if there was a quantitative reduction in HRS following IVT in DME, if the response to antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs was different from steroids, and if HRS-response was associated with improvement in visual acuity (VA) or reduction in central macular thickness (CMT).

Methods:

PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, ProQuest, CINAHL, Wiley online, and Web of Science were searched (between January 1, 2011 and July 1, 2020). Publication bias and heterogeneity were assessed. Meta-analysis was done using the random-effects model.

Results:

Totally, 1168 eyes from 19 studies were eligible for inclusion. IVT was associated with a reduction in quantitative HRS (z = -6.3, P < 0.0001). Studies, however, showed heterogeneity (I² = 93.2%). There was no difference between anti-VEGF and steroid therapies (P = 0.23). The evidence on predicting VA and CMT outcomes were limited by the number of analyzable studies, owing to the wide variation in individual study designs, and lack of randomized controlled trials.

Conclusion:

We could conclude that there is a definite reduction in quantitative HRS following either form of IVT. We highlight the lacunae in the existing literature on HRS in DME and propose goals for future studies to harness the advantage of this promising biomarker.