Visual and Refractive Long-Term Outcomes Following Standard Cross-Linking in Progressive Keratoconus Management

Analysis of the outcomes of three different cross-linking protocols for treatment of paediatric keratoconus: A multicentre randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To analyse long-term outcomes of standard cross-linking (SCXL), accelerated cross-linking (ACXL) and transepithelial cross-linking (TCXL) in the treatment of progressive paediatric keratoconus regarding stability, safety and efficacy.

METHODS

This prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial included 97 eyes of 97 paediatric patients with stages I-III ABCD keratoconus grading system, who were randomized into three groups; SCXL group (control group, n = 32; 3 mW/cm2  × 30 min/5.4 J/cm2 ), ACXL (n = 33; 18 mW/cm2  × 5 min/5.4 J/cm2 ) and TCXL (n = 32; 18 mW/cm2  × 5 min/5.4 J/cm2 ). Subjective refraction, uncorrected and corrected visual acuity, keratometry and pachymetry measurements using corneal topography were recorded preoperatively and 1, 2 and 3 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

SCXL group exhibited significant successive improvements in the mean visual, refractive and keratometric parameters throughout the entire postoperative 3 years while ACXL group exhibited significant improvements in visual and keratometric parameters in the first postoperative year that remained stable in second and third postoperative years. TCXL group exhibited significant progressive deterioration in all mean parameters compared to SCXL and ACXL (p < 0.0001). Both SCXL and ACXL revealed final 100% success rate with good stability while TCXL revealed final 22% failure rate with keratoconus progression (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

SCXL and ACXL were comparable in halting keratoconus progression and achieved good stability and safety; however, SCXL was more efficient than ACXL as it yielded greater significant postoperative mean visual, refractive and keratometric improvements achieving smoother corneal remodelling. Both SCXL and ACXL were much superior to TCXL. SCXL is the best CXL treatment option for paediatric keratoconus while ACXL is a good and effective alternative.

Outcomes of the Q value-based nomogram in managing pediatric versus adult keratoconus: a prospective interventional study

Background

Keratoconus (KCN) is an ectatic disorder of the cornea characterized by stromal weakness and apical protrusion of the cornea, and is associated with a gradual and painless reduction in visual acuity. KCN in pediatric patients has certain important characteristics, such as a progressive and aggressive nature. We aimed to analyze the visual, refractive, and topographic outcomes of implanting a single 210° arc-length Keraring segment according to a novel, objective, Q value-based nomogram (Q-N) for the treatment of pediatric versus adult KCN.

Methods

This prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, open-label trial included 47 eyes of 47 patients who were allocated to one of two groups. The adult group included 33 eyes of patients ≥ 18 years of age, whereas the pediatric group included 14 eyes of patients aged 14 - 17 years. All patients underwent femtosecond laser-assisted implantation of a single 210° arc-length Keraring segment according to the Q-N and were followed up for 6 months. All eyes underwent visual acuity measurement, cycloplegic refraction, and corneal topography at baseline and 6 months after surgery.

Results

The study groups were comparable in terms of sex proportions and KCN grades (both P > 0.05). The adult group exhibited significant postoperative improvements in mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), sphere, cylinder, spherical equivalent (SE), and Kmax (all P < 0.001) with a mean change of -0.56 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR), - 0.40 logMAR, 3.07 diopters (D), 0.70 D, 3.42 D, and - 5.26 D, respectively. The pediatric group exhibited significant postoperative improvements in mean UDVA, CDVA, sphere, SE, and Kmax (all P < 0.05) with a mean change of - 0.62 logMAR, - 0.34 logMAR, 3.18 D, 3.67 D, and - 5.37 D, respectively. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the mean change in visual, refractive, and topographic variables (all P > 0.05). No postoperative complications were observed in either group.

Conclusions

Use of the objective Q-N was efficient in the treatment of pediatric KCN, with postoperative improvements in the mean visual, refractive, and topographic parameters, comparable to outcomes in adult keratoconus. Q-N achieved good corneal remodeling with subsequent improvements in visual, refractive, and topographic outcomes in both adult and pediatric patients with keratoconus. To verify our preliminary findings, we recommend further multicenter randomized clinical trials using the Q-N nomogram in a larger sample of pediatric patients with KCN as an adjunct treatment before or after CXL.

Visual Acuity Examination Methodology in Keratoconus

Visual acuity is one of the most important parameters for evaluating the vision of patients with keratoconus. This study reviewed 295 articles related to keratoconus published between 2017 and 2022 in which visual acuity was one of the parameters measured. The methodology of visual acuity testing in studies on keratoconus was thoroughly analyzed. The analysis showed that the most commonly indicated chart for testing visual acuity papers on keratoconus is the Snellen chart. It was shown that in 150 out of 295 articles, the authors do not describe the methodology for testing visual acuity. What is more, it was also shown that in 68 of the 295 articles which were analyzed, a procedure for converting visual acuity tested with a Snellen chart into a logMAR scale was used. In this review, we discuss the validity and reliability of such conversions. In particular, we show that insufficient description of visual acuity testing methodology and lack of information on the conversion of visual acuity results into the logMAR scale may contribute to the misinterpretation of visual acuity test results.

Comparison of corneal measurements in normal and keratoconus eyes using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT) and Pentacam HR topographer

BACKGROUND

Keratoconus (KC) is easily recognized by its unique topographic pattern, but it can be difficult to distinguish subclinical form of the disease from the normal cornea. Optovue anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) helps diagnose KC.

AIM OF THE WORK

To assess and the level of agreement of Keratometry-readings (K), Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) and Thinnest Corneal Thickness (TCT) measurements obtained by Optovue AS-OCT and Wavelight Oculyzer Pentacam HR in two groups: KC eyes and normal eyes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a prospective clinical observational study. The study included 110 eyes divided into two groups. The study group included 62 eyes with topographic evidence of KC. The control group included 48 eyes of normal subjects with no topographic evidence of KC. All of the participants underwent full cycloplegic refraction, spectacle best-corrected distance visual acuity, comprehensive slit-lamp biomicroscopy and fundoscopy. All participants underwent corneal topography by Pentacam HR and AS-OCT.

RESULTS

There were highly significant differences between the studied groups as regarding BCVA, intraocular pressure and CCT measurements which were found to be lower among KC group compared to the control one. There were highly significant differences between the studied groups regarding TCT measurement detected by Pentacam HR and AS-OCT which was found to be lower among the keratoconus group compared to the control one (470.9, 455.7 versus 541.9 and 518.7 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Both Scheimpflug-based imaging and AS-OCT provide comparable readings with a good agreement regarding corneal pachymetry in keratoconus group with accurate identification of KC eyes and healthy ones. However, there was a significant difference in K readings between both devices in Keratoconus and control group.

The Safety Profile of FDA-Approved Epithelium-Off Corneal Cross-Linking in a US Community-Based Healthcare System

Purpose

To determine the occurrence of early post-operative complications following FDA-approved epithelium-off corneal cross-linking in the United States.

Materials and Methods

This multicenter, retrospective cohort study identified patients who underwent epithelium-off (epi-off) corneal cross-linking (CXL) for keratoconus and post-refractive keratectasia within the Kaiser Permanente Northern California healthcare system between 2016 and 2018. Post-operative complications including delayed epithelial healing, infection, and loss of visual acuity were recorded.

Results

The study included 878 eyes of 654 patients. The mean age was 27±9.4 years (range 7–71). Five hundred ninety-nine patients (91.6%) had keratoconus while 55 had post-refractive corneal ectasia (8.4%). Forty-seven eyes had prolonged follow-up because of the occurrence of complications in the early post-operative period. The respective rates of delayed epithelial healing, and keratitis were 3.9% (95% CI 2.7–5.3%), and 1.5% (95% CI 0.8–2.5%). Four approaches for management of delayed epithelial healing were compared; epithelium healing duration was the longest in the repeat bandage contact lens (BCL) group (23.8 days) and the shortest in the antibiotic ointment group (14.3 days), with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in the healing time between these 2 groups.

Conclusion

The concern for early clinical complications after epi-off CXL often leads to delayed CXL intervention and further keratoconus progression with increased economic burdens. A large retrospective review of 878 eyes found that FDA-approved epi-off CXL protocol appears to be safe with low occurrence rates of early post-operative complications. The recommended management for delayed epithelial healing is using antibiotic ophthalmic ointment.

Long-term visual, anterior and posterior corneal changes after crosslinking for progressive keratoconus

AIM

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of corneal cross-linking (CXL) in patients with progressive keratoconus.

METHOD

In this retrospective non-comparative study, forty-five eyes of 31 patients with progressive keratoconus were treated with 30 min "epi-off" corneal cross-linking. The visual, refractive, topographic and tomographic outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and at least 10 years after cross-linking.

RESULTS

Ten years post-corneal cross-linking, the mean anterior maximum keratometry decreased (-2.10 ± 3.25 D, P = 0.0001). Conversely, the posterior maximum keratometry increased (6.38 ± 9.79 D, P = 0.065). Both uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity improved (LogMAR -0.08 ± 0.30) and (LogMAR -0.05 ± 0.21), respectively (P > 0.05, both). A statistically significant hyperopic shift was observed postoperatively (0.70 ± 1.31 D, P = 0.0009). The anterior topographic cylinder values revealed no change (-0.17 ± 1.31 D, P = 0.3), whereas the mean posterior cylinder values decreased (absolute value increased) significantly compared to baseline from -1.31 ± 0.97 D to -1.82 ± 1.78 D, (P < 0.05). The minimum corneal thickness values decreased significantly (-35.11 ± 48.63 µm, P = 0.0001). Four eyes (8.8%) showed more than 1 D increase in the anterior maximum keratometry.

CONCLUSION

This protocol and duration of Epi-off corneal cross-linking was found to be effective in halting keratoconus progression over the follow up period (10 years). Anterior corneal flattening and a hyperopic shift were observed. A statistically significant increase in the posterior corneal cylinder was observed. Although, not reaching statistical significance, the logMAR uncorrected and corrected visual acuity were improved.

A novel Q-value-based nomogram for single intracorneal ring segment implantation versus standard manufacturer's nomogram combined with accelerated cross-linking for treatment of keratoconus: a randomized controlled trial

Purpose

To compare the efficacy of implanting a single Keraring segment according to a novel Q‐value‐based nomogram (QN) to that of segment implantation according to the manufacturer's standard nomogram (SN), for keratoconus treatment.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial of 104 patients (104 eyes) with Amsler‐Krumeich grade 1 or 2 keratoconus, and type 1 or 2 cone asymmetry determined according to manufacturer's classification. They were randomly distributed into two groups: group A patients (n = 52) underwent Keraring implantation according to the SN, and group B patients (n = 52) underwent implantation of a single (210° arc‐length) Keraring segment according to the QN. Both treatments were combined with accelerated transepithelial cross‐linking, and follow‐up was 6 months. Main outcome measures were preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, subjective refraction and corneal topography.

Results

At postoperative month 6, group B exhibited statistically significantly higher values of mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), sphere, K2, K‐average, K‐max and Q‐anterior (p = 0.02, 0.01, 0.002, 0.001, 0.0001 and 0.03, respectively) compared to that of group A. However, group A exhibited better refractive cylindrical improvements (p = 0.04). In group A, we documented spontaneous extrusion of one Keraring segment.

Conclusion

Single 210° arc‐length segment implantation using our objective QN was more efficacious for keratoconus treatment than using the subjective SN. The nomograms were comparable when the Q‐anterior value was >−1.00; however, the QN was superior to the SN when the Q‐anterior value was ≤−1.00. The QN yielded greater postoperative UDVA and smoother corneal remodelling than did the SN for treatment of grade 1 and 2 keratoconic eyes.

Long-Term Visual, Refractive and Topographic Outcomes of KeraRings Combined with Accelerated Transepithelial Crosslinking for Management of Different Grades of Progressive Keratoconus: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose:

To evaluate long-term visual, refractive, and topographic outcomes of KeraRings intrastromal implantation combined with accelerated transepithelial cross-linking for management of different stages of progressive keratoconus.

Materials and Methods:

This retrospective cohort study included 70 eyes of 70 patients with Amsler-Krumeich grades 1 to 4 keratoconus. They were divided into two groups: group-A included 37 eyes with grades 1-2 keratoconus, and group-B included 33 eyes with grades 3-4 keratoconus. Both groups underwent combined Keraring implantation with TCXL treatment. The main outcome measures included the preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, refraction, keratometry readings, and pachymetry.

Results:

At postoperative month 60, group-B exhibited significantly higher values of all mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), sphere/cylinder/spherical equivalent/defocus equivalent (DEQ), and K1/K2/Kaverages/Kmax parameters compared to that of group A. However, group-A exhibited better stability of postoperative improvements. Keratoconus progression (KCP) was greater in group-B (45.5%) than group-A (10.8%). Two eyes revealed segments' migration while one eye showed tunnel vascularization and opacification with segments' migration.

Conclusion:

The diagnostic criteria of preoperative-KCP are not adequate for the diagnosis of postoperative-KCP following ICRS implantation. UDVA and K average posterior seemed to be more sensitive parameters than K max in documenting early postoperative-KCP. We suggest that deterioration of UDVA≥0.10 log MAR and/or K average posterior ≥0.25 D are highly suspicious of post-ring implantation keratoconus progression (PR-KCP). The occurrence of two of the following parameters: Kmax≥0.50 D, Kaverageanterior≥0.50 D, K average posterior ≥0.25 D, or pachymetry≥1.5% thinning, is diagnostic of PR-KCP. The occurrence of two or more of the following parameters: Kmax≥0.50 D, Kaverageanterior≥0.50 D, Kaverageposterior ≥0.25 D, pachymetry≥ 1.5% thinning or UDVA≥0.10 logMAR, is diagnostic of PR-KCP. We also suggest that Kmax≥0.75 D alone is diagnostic of PR-KCP.

Successful Regression in Patients with Progressive Keratoconus by Corneal Crosslinking

BACKGROUND

Since 2019, corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) is included in the catalog of procedures covered by statutory health insurance in Germany. CXL is an established ophthalmological procedure for the last 20 years. The aim of this investigation was the measurement of progression before and after CXL.

MATERIAL UND METHODS

65 consecutive eyes with progressive keratoconus from 53 patients were included in the retrospective study, which were observed at the University Eye Hospital Tübingen at least two years before and at least two years after CXL. The time of observation took place from October 2009 until March 2018. Parameters of interest had been the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the keratometric values from the elevation maps measured by a Scheimpflug camera.

RESULTS

65 eyes of 53 patients had been documented. The study population included 46 (86.8%) male and 7 (13.2%) female subjects. The mean age was 24 ± 8 years. The averaged observation time between the primary consultation and CXL showed 25 ± 15 months. Preoperatively the mean BCVA pointed out in a significant increase (0.13 ± 0.17 [first visit] vs. 0.23 ± 0.22 [preOP], p < 0.0001) while the mean Kmax resulted in a statistically significant increase (46.34 ± 3.33 dpt [first visit] vs. 48.78 ± 4.17 dpt [preOP], p < 0.0001). The mean thinnest point of the cornea showed a significant decrease (490.48 ± 34.23 µm [first visit] vs. 468.62 ± 29.84 µm [preop], p < 0.0001). Postoperatively the mean BCVA resulted in a significant improvement at the 12th postoperative month in comparison to the preoperative measurement (0.23 ± 0.22 [preOP] vs. 0.16 ± 0.14 [12 months], p = 0.04 respectively 0.17 ± 0.17 [24 months], p = 0.0006). The mean Kmax demonstrated in the 12th postoperative month a significant reduction (48.78 ± 4.17 dpt [preOP] vs. 47.91 ± 3.41 dpt [12 months], p = 0.0009 respectively 48 ± 4.56 dpt [24 months], p = 0.0051). The mean thinnest point of the cornea indicated a decrease at the 12th postoperative month (468.62 ± 29.84 µm [preOP] vs. 459.82 ± 35.88 µm [12 months], p = 0.0078 respectively 453.47 ± 43.39 µm [24 months], p = 0.0227).

CONCLUSION

CXL is a successful procedure for the therapy of progressive keratoconus.

Efficacy of Standard and Accelerated (10 Minutes) Corneal Crosslinking in Keratoconus Stabilization

Purpose

To evaluate whether Accelerated CXL for 10 minutes is as effective as standard CXL for 30 minutes for the treatment of progressive keratoconus.

Patients and Methods

Eighty-two eyes of 62 patients with keratometry examinations performed before and 6 months after surgery were studied. A total of 39 eyes underwent standard CXL with UVA irradiation of 3 mW/cm² for 30 minutes and 32 eyes underwent Accelerated CXL UVA irradiation of 9 mW/cm² for 10 minutes. The eyes of all patients had corneal thicknesses of at least 450 microns (400 microns after epithelium removal).

Results

The means of the keratometry measurements in the preoperative period for the eyes subjected to standard CXL were 46.27 dioptres (D) on the flat axis (K1) and 48.93 D on the steep axis (K2). Postoperatively, K1 was 46.21 D and K2 was 48.97 D, a difference without statistical significance (p = 0.47 and p = 0.48, respectively). In the Accelerated CXL protocol, the preoperative measurements were 44.55 D and 46.19 D for K1 and K2, respectively. In the postoperative period, K1 was 43.37 D, and K2 was 46.64 D (p = 0.38 and p = 0.27, respectively). In the standard group, the mean maximum keratometry (Kmax) preoperatively was 55.87 D, with no statistical significance (p = 0.29). In the preoperative period, the Kmax of the Accelerated group was 51.15 D, with no statistical significance (p = 0.32).

Conclusion

Based on the keratometry results, the accelerated protocol was as effective as the standard protocol for keratoconus stabilization.