<p>Inter-Eye Vault Differences of Implantable Collamer Lens Measured Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography</p>

Comparison of clinical outcomes and vault between two types of posterior phakic intraocular lenses in correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism

PurposeTo compare refractive and clinical outcomes of two posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses (pIOLs) for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. To evaluate the vault and its variance for the phakic lenses by anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM).SettingQuinze-Vingts National Ophthalmology Hospital, Paris, France.Designretrospective case seriesMethodsPatients received an Implantable Collamer Lens (V5 EVO + ICL, Staar surgical AG, Switzerland) or Intraocular Phakic Contact Lens (V2.0 IPCL Caregroup Sight Solution, India). AS-OCT, optical biometry and corneal topography were performed to measure biometric parameters and evaluate post-operative vault.Results12 eyes received an ICL and 14 eyes an IPCL. At 12 months postoperatively, the mean UDVAs were 0.06 ± 0.18 logMAR and 0.16 ± 0.23 logMAR in the ICL and IPCL groups, respectively (p = 0.30). No eye lost CDVA in either group. By AS-OCT, the mean vault was 335.33 ± 165.83 μm and 532.64 ± 167.25 μm in the ICL and IPCL groups, respectively (p = 0.006). By UBM, the mean vault was 355.6 ± 136.6 μm and 509.3 ± 180.79 μm in the ICL and IPCL groups, respectively (p = 0.041).ConclusionsICL and IPCL offer similar refractive and clinical outcomes. IPCL tends to display a more consistent vault with less variation from one patient to another.

Immediate versus delayed sequential bilateral ICL implantation: A retrospective comparison of vault height and visual outcomes

PURPOSE

To compare the visual outcomes and risks of suboptimal vault-related complications between immediate sequential bilateral ICL surgery (ISBICLS) and delayed sequential bilateral ICL surgery (DSBICLS).

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Patients who underwent bilateral ICL implantation between November 2014 and December 2021 at the Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University (Shanghai, China) were included and divided into two groups: (1) ISBICLS: both eye surgeries performed on the same day, and (2) DSBICLS: second eye surgery performed < 7 days following the first one. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compare the visual outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of the suboptimal vaults.

RESULTS

Finally, 10,985 eyes were included. After PSM, 204 first surgery eyes and 162 s surgery eyes with complete postoperative data were matched. The safety and efficacy indices did not statistically differ between groups (all > 1.00), except that ISBICLS first surgery eyes achieved better efficacy index than DSBICLS group (1.03 ± 0.26 vs. 1.08 ± 0.23, P = 0.034). Excessive vault was observed in eight (4.06 %) ISBICLS first eyes, one (0.50 %) DSBICLS first eye, and none in the second surgery eye in either group. An insufficient vault was observed in one second eye and one DSBICLS second eye. We found no evidence of differences in the rate of excessive vault (OR = 0.831, 95 % CI: 0.426-1.622, P = 0.588) or insufficient vault (OR = 0.609, 95 % CI:0.062-5.850, P = 0.668).

CONCLUSION

ISBICLS provided safety, efficacy, and refraction predictability comparable to DSBICLS without increasing the risk of suboptimal vault-related complications.

Comparison of a new implantable collamer lens formula to standards formulas using spectral domain optical coherence tomography

PURPOSE

To use spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) data to develop a new implantable collamer lens (ICL) sizing formula and compare vault outcomes with the Online Calculation and Ordering System™ (OCOS) and the NK2 formula.

METHODS

Consecutive eyes (n = 237) were evaluated that had undergone ICL/toric ICL implantation. Actual ICL vaults were measured, and a what-if analysis was performed to predict vault values with the NK2 formula using SD-OCT data. To develop a new formula (EPB), multiple regression analysis was performed with different parameters than the NK2 formula. Predicted vaults with NK2 and EPB formulas were compared to the actual vaults.

RESULTS

Parameters that were correlated with optimal ICL size were white-to-white, anterior chamber width, lens rise and desired refractive correction. The mean postoperative vault was 489 ± 258 μm. At last visit, 94.5% of eyes were within the manufacturer's acceptable vault range. Predicted vaults in the acceptable range were 74 and 87% with the NK2 and EPB formulas, respectively. Six percent had a predicted vault less than 100 μm with the EPB formula compared to 1% for actual outcomes. The NK2 formula resulted in a shift toward higher predicted vaults while the EPB formula was similar to the actual postoperative vaults but with slightly more cases with extremely low and high vaults.

CONCLUSION

SD-OCT data with OCOS result in good postoperative vaults. Further refinement is required to the NK2 for use with SD-OCT data. Although the EPB formula provides acceptable predicted vaults, further refinement with a larger sample size is needed.

The influence of iris -ciliary angle (ICA) on the vault after implantation of V4c implantable collamer lens: a chain mediation model of ICL haptic related factors

BACKGROUND

This study aims to identify the relationship between iris -ciliary angle (ICA) and the vault. Additionally, we also seek to investigate the chain mediating effects of the ICL haptic related factors on this relationship.

METHODS

The participants were categorized into three groups according to the ICA value as follows: low ICA group (< 35°); moderate ICA group (35°-70°); high ICA group (> 70°). We compared the preoperative ocular characteristics and postoperative examinations among the three groups. Multiple variable stepwise regression was performed to establish the vault prediction formula. The Process V4.0 in SPSS and Hayes's PROCESS model 6 was conducted to further elucidate the mediating effects of the final tip point of ICL haptic and the ICL arc-lens arc on the relationship between the ICA and vault.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the positions of the ICL haptic among three ICA groups. The regression vault equation was Vault = 679.42-7.26*TCA + 192.30*ACD-196.37*CLR + 73.21* STS(horizontal).A significant negative correlation was found between the ICA and vault (P < 0.01).The chain mediation model revealed that the final tip point of ICL haptic and the ICL arc-Lens arc were sequential mediators between ICA and vault (effect = -1.63, 95% CI = -2.72--0.73).

CONCLUSION

The ICA was associated with vault via the mediation effect of the final tip point of the ICL haptic and the ICL arc -lens arc. Assessment of ICL haptic related parameters adds significant information to interpret the vault after surgery.

Analysis of Inter-Eye Vault Differences After Implantable Collamer Lens (V4c) Implantation

Purpose

The safety and stability of implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation are closely related to the vault. We aimed to assess clinical data from patients with similar anterior segment anatomy who received ICL of the same model placed in the same position and analyze common range and factors affecting the vault inter-eye difference.

Patients and Methods

A prospective study was performed, including 162 eyes of 81 patients with a bilateral ICL (V4c) implantation. Subjects were evaluated before the surgery and 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively, and they were divided into 4 groups based on the ICL size. Bivariate correlation and multiple linear regression (stepwise) analyzed associations between vault inter-eye differences and horizontal sulcus-to-sulcus diameter, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, ICL size, spherical equivalent, and vault.

Results

One month after surgery, mean vault inter-eye differences were 74.59 ± 55.59 µm. Nearly 70% of patients presented with vault inter-eye differences lower than 100 µm. The second eye vault variance of 69% was attributed to the first eye vault. Vault inter-eye differences were positively correlated with ICL spherical equivalent (regression equation: vault inter-eye differences (μm) = 139.415 + 6.295 × ICL spherical equivalent). Vaults after ICL implantation were similar in fellow eyes, with some considerable differences. The 95% confidence interval of the vault inter-eye difference was -34.4 ~ 183.6 μm.

Conclusion

In eyes with similar anterior segment anatomy, there is a 95% probability that the vault will vary from -34.4 μm to -183.6 μm when a similar ICL is implanted. These results can help surgeons to select an appropriate ICL size to achieve an ideal vault. The smaller the spherical equivalent, the larger the difference between the two vaults, which provides a reference for size in moderate myopia. ICL spherical equivalent affects and predicts vault inter-eye differences after ICL implantation.

Characteristics and factors associated with the position of the haptic after ICL V4C implantation

PURPOSE

To assess the position of implantable collamer lens (ICL) haptic after ICL V4C implantation using standardized panoramic ultrasound bimicroscopy (UBM), to analyze its characteristics, associated factors, and the relationship with the clinical vault quantitatively.

SETTING

Hankou Aier Eye Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

167 subjects (323 eyes) implanted with ICL V4C who had a 3-month follow-up with UBM examination were included in this study. The relative position of ICL to the adjacent structure and ICL haptic-related parameters (the final tip point of ICL haptic [ftICL haptic], measured from the scleral spur to the final tip of the ICL haptic, the posterior of the ICL to ICL haptic [ICL arc], measured from the posterior surface of the ICL to the ICL haptic plane, and the height of the crystalline lens from the ICL haptic (lens arc), measured from the anterior surface of the crystalline lens to the ICL haptic plane and other parameters), were estimated on the UBM image. Eyes were divided into 3 subgroups according to the ftICL haptic (Group 1: ≤0.5 mm; Group 2: 0.5 to 1.0 mm; and Group 3:≥1.0 mm, respectively), and the factors associated with the ICL haptic-related parameters and their impact on the clinical vault were evaluated.

RESULTS

The haptics could be imaged in the ciliary sulcus, on the ciliary body, and under the ciliary body in 629 (48.7%), 525 (40.6%), and 138 (10.7%) eyes, respectively. The ftICL haptic and the summation of ICL arc and lens arc showed a correlation with the clinical vault ( r = -0.34, P = .00; r = 0.87, P = .00). When the ftICL haptic results were divided into 3 groups, the percentage of eyes that exhibited clinical vault >750 μm were lowest in Group 3. Multivariate regression analysis showed spherical equivalent, white-to-white (WTW), anterior chamber volume (ACV) and iris-ciliary angle (ICA); the difference between the implanted ICL size and horizontal sulcus-to-sulcus (ICL size-STS) were associated with the ftICL haptic. The IOP, WTW, ACV, and the ICL size-STS were significantly associated with ICL arc, while the ICA and lens rise were associated with lens arc.

CONCLUSIONS

The position of ICL haptic was associated with the clinical vault. Its quantitative evaluation may provide valuable information to help clinicians to select the best ICL size before surgery and understand the formation of clinical vault after surgery.

Vault differences in eyes implanted with spherical and toric implantable collamer lenses: an inter-eye analysis

Purpose

To determine the influence of implantable collamer lenses (ICL) geometry, i.e. spherical and toric on the vault, and report the refractive and visual outcomes of patients bilaterally implanted with the two ICL geometries.

Methods

This retrospective case series analysed 41 patients implanted with a spherical ICL (sICL) in one eye and an equal sized toric ICL (tICL) in the fellow eye. The anatomical and ICL-related parameters were assessed using anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT Visante, Zeiss Meditec AG) and optical tomography (Pentacam, OCULUS). The influence of the anatomical and ICL-related parameters on the vault was determined using generalised estimating equations (GEE) to incorporate inter-eye correlations.

Results

Postoperative spherical equivalent was within ± 0.50D in 66% and 83% of the eyes, respectively implanted with sICL and tICL. The efficacy index in the sICL group was 1.06 and 1.14 in the tICL group. The mean inter-eye vault difference was -1.46 µm, anatomical and ICL-related parameters showed similar associations with the vault for sICL and tICL. The GEE identified the ICL size minus the anterior chamber width, the ICL spherical power and ICL central thickness as significant factors influencing the vault.

Conclusions

Spherical and toric ICL showed good efficacy for the correction of myopia and astigmatism. Patients implanted bilaterally with sICL and tICL tend to present similar vaults. The vault produced by both types of ICL was mainly regulated by the oversizing of the ICL. This suggests that the ICL geometry (spherical vs toric) is a factor with limited influence on the vault, thus the sizing method of a sICL and tICL should be similar.

Immediate or Delayed Sequential Bilateral ICL Surgery: a Survey of Chinese Ophthalmologists

INTRODUCTION

In China, the demand for implantable collamer lens (ICL) surgery is booming. Immediate sequential bilateral ICL surgery (ISBICLS) benefits patients and clinics, but it remains controversial and lacks standardization. We aim to investigate the prevalence of, factors for, and surgeon attitudes toward ISBICLS.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional survey study, an electronic questionnaire about the practice and attitudes toward performing ISBICLS or delayed sequential bilateral ICL surgery (DSBICLS) was distributed to 792 qualified ICL surgeons in Mainland China, between 4 April and 22 April 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 531 surgeons (66.79%) from 30 provinces in Mainland China responded. Among them, 374 (67.23%) were currently performing ISBICLS. Fifty-two percent (277) of surgeons reported performing ISBICLS more than 50% of the time, while 85.05% of surgeons chose to perform the second eye surgery 1 day after the first eye surgery. Seventy percent (248) of surgeons performing ISBICLS chose to perform the second eye surgery less than 30 min after the first eye surgery. Surgeons who started ICL surgery earlier (before 2010, OR = 2.772, 95% CI = 1.290-5.957, P = 0.009; 2011-2013, OR = 2.479, 95% CI = 1.060-5.800, P = 0.036), completed one-eye ICL surgery faster (< 3 min, OR = 3.936, 95% CI = 1.505-10.293, P = 0.005) and modified the second eye ICL selection less frequently (1-25%, OR = 0.203, 95% CI = 0.054-0.771, P = 0.019; 26-50%, OR = 0.173, 95% CI = 0.041-0.726, P = 0.017; 51-75%, OR = 0.299, 95% CI = 0.041-0.726, P = 0.123; 76-100%, OR = 0.163, 95% CI = 0.039-0.688, P = 0.014) tended to perform ISBICLS. No significant association was found among clinical settings, preoperative measurement devices, and hospital policies with performing ISBICLS. Regarding their attitudes toward ISBICLS, 54.63% preferred ISBICLS and 45.37% preferred DSBICLS. The main supporting reasons were patient convenience (98.64%), faster vision rehabilitation (73.56%), and improved perioperative compliance (73.22%). The concerns regarding ISBICLS included the risk of endophthalmitis (62.22%), lack of recommendation in expert consensus (61.67%), and decreased vault predictability (60.93%). The most common desires for further adoption were expert consensus on surgical criteria and patient indicators for ISBICLS (82.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

ISBICLS has been gradually adopted in Mainland China, but has not been widely accepted as a routine procedure. Surgeons' experience and skills mainly influence whether ISBICLS is performed. Further research is needed to explore standardized protocols to prevent endophthalmitis, the appropriate time interval of two eye surgery, and requisitions for surgeon skills.

Inter-eye and postoperative prediction of vault after implantation of EVO + Visian phakic implantable collamer lens

PURPOSE

To assess whether the postoperative outcomes of the implantation of an EVO + implantable collamer lens (ICL) in one eye can be used as a predictor of the vault of the fellow eye, and to evaluate the vault changes of the implantation in both eyes during the postoperative period.

METHODS

A prospective study including 40 eyes of 20 patients with a bilateral EVO + ICL implantation was performed. Subjects were evaluated before the surgery and 1 day, 1 week and 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Central vault was assessed using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. The inter-eye and follow-up analyses were performed using lineal models and the Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

The vault of the first implanted eye at the 1-day visit highly predicts the vault of the second eye (R² = .87; P < .001); the mean inter-eye difference was - 0.95 μm, and the superior and inferior limits of agreement were -50.27 μm and 148.37 μm, respectively. This relationship was maintained during the medium-term follow-up, not finding differences in the slopes among visits (P ≥ .09). A progressive decrease of vault was found during the follow-up (P < .001). Larger vault change 6 months after the surgery was associated with higher vault 1 day after the ICL implantation (R² = .19;P = .005).

CONCLUSION

One-day postoperative vault in the first eye can help to predict the optimal ICL sizing in the second eye. Vault tends to decrease during the first 6 months after EVO + ICL implantation. Eyes with higher initial vaults will also show larger reductions during the medium-term follow-up.

Advances in OCT Imaging in Myopia and Pathologic Myopia

Advances in imaging with optical coherence tomography (OCT) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) technology, including the development of swept source OCT/OCTA, widefield or ultra-widefield systems, have greatly improved the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of myopia and myopia-related complications. Anterior segment OCT is useful for imaging the anterior segment of myopes, providing the basis for implantable collamer lens optimization, or detecting intraocular lens decentration in high myopic patients. OCT has enhanced imaging of vitreous properties, and measurement of choroidal thickness in myopic eyes. Widefield OCT systems have greatly improved the visualization of peripheral retinal lesions and have enabled the evaluation of wide staphyloma and ocular curvature. Based on OCT imaging, a new classification system and guidelines for the management of myopic traction maculopathy have been proposed; different dome-shaped macula morphologies have been described; and myopia-related abnormalities in the optic nerve and peripapillary region have been demonstrated. OCTA can quantitatively evaluate the retinal microvasculature and choriocapillaris, which is useful for the early detection of myopic choroidal neovascularization and the evaluation of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in these patients. In addition, the application of artificial intelligence in OCT/OCTA imaging in myopia has achieved promising results.