Radial keratotomy associated endothelial degeneration

Implantation of a toric intraocular lens after repeated radial keratotomy procedures: A case report

Corneal alterations due to radial keratotomy (RK) complicate intraocular lens calculations, which may explain why there have been few reports of toric intraocular lens (TIOL) implantation after excessive or multiple operations. A 71-year-old male with a history of repeated RKs and at least 30 corneal incisions in each eye was referred for cataract surgery. Preoperatively, the best-corrected distance visual acuity was 0.7 decimal (0.15 logMAR) in the right eye and 0.9 decimal (0.05 logMAR) in the left eye. The refractive errors were -8.00 -3.00 × 80 and -6.00 -3.50 × 80, respectively. The total corneal cylindrical powers (real power; anterior and posterior) were, respectively, -0.90 D and -3.60 D at 9 a.m., compared to -1.60 D and -3.80 D at 1 p.m. Corneal astigmatism in the left eye was considered symmetric and diurnally stable; therefore, an XY1AT6 TIOL (Hoya, Tokyo, Japan; cylindrical power at the plane, +3.75 D) was implanted. A non-toric intraocular lens, the XY1 (Hoya), was implanted in the right eye. Six-month postoperative best-corrected distance visual acuities were 1.2 decimal (-0.08 logMAR) and 1.0 decimal (0.00 logMAR) in the right and left eyes, respectively. Post-operative manifest refractions were +0.00 -3.00 × 70 and -1.00 -2.00 × 85, respectively. The TIOL reduced refractive astigmatism in the left eye; therefore, we believe that even after multiple RKs, the TIOL can be a suitable candidate to correct astigmatism if the corneal astigmatism is diurnally stable and symmetric.

Long-Term Corneal Refractive Power Changes Two Decades After Radial Keratotomy With Microperforations

ABSTRACT

We retrospectively examined corneal refractive power in three patients who had been followed up for more than 20 years after radial keratotomy (RK) with microperforations (MPs). All patients underwent RK in both eyes and were referred to our clinic because of postoperative decreased vision. MP was observed in five of the six eyes at the initial visit. The corneal refractive power of the anterior and posterior surfaces of the 6-mm-diameter cornea was examined using Fourier analysis based on corneal shape analysis using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. The spherical components decreased in all three cases. The asymmetry and higher-order irregularity components and fluctuations in corneal refractive power were markedly greater in the two cases with MP in both eyes. Fluctuations in corneal refractive power were observed at more than 20 years after RK with MP. Therefore, careful observation is necessary, even after a long-term postoperative follow-up period.

Therapeutic visual rehabilitation in a patient with high hyperopia and flat cornea years after radial keratotomy

A 51-year-old man was referred for refractive surgery evaluation. Spectacle dependence and poor visual quality in both eyes was his chief complaint. He cannot tolerate contact lenses. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 20/40 in both eyes. Manifest refraction was +5.25 -2.25 @ 90 (20/40) in the right eye and +6.25 -2.25 @ 105 (20/40) in the left eye. The patient had a history of radial keratotomy (RK) almost 30 years ago in both eyes and at the slitlamp presented 8 RK incisions, proportionally spaced between one another. All incisions were closed, and there were no relevant signs of scarring. The patient denied any history of ocular trauma, systemic disease, or medications. Corneal topography with different technologies revealed an irregular pattern with marked central flattening in both eyes, with some points below 30 diopters (D) (Supplemental Figures 1 and 2, available at http://links.lww.com/JRS/A862 and http://links.lww.com/JRS/A863, respectively). There were no signs of cataract, and fundus examination was normal. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the right eye revealed a more homogeneous thickness pattern, little variation between the thinnest and thickest areas, and adequate transparency (Figure 1JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202306000-00018/figure1/v/2023-05-31T172126Z/r/image-tiff). In the left eye, there is wide variability between the thinnest and thickest stromal points, with annular thinning and central thickening (Figure 2JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202306000-00018/figure2/v/2023-05-31T172126Z/r/image-tiff). Both eyes show marked epithelial irregularity. Considering this patient's current ocular status, how would you reach visual rehabilitation? Because he is contact lens intolerant, would you consider surface ablation, for example, photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with mitomycin-C (MMC)? If that were the case, would you think of an optimized or a topography-guided (TG) treatment? Would you immediately consider a corneal transplant option? Would you instead consider a more conservative approach? Which one and why?

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in a patient with iris-fixated intraocular lens and prior radial keratotomy: a case report

Background

Anterior segment surgeries such as cataract surgery, intraocular lens (IOL) repositioning, and radial keratotomy (RK) may hasten endothelial dysfunction, particularly in the context of pre-existing Fuchs dystrophy, necessitating future corneal transplantation.

Case presentation

A 68-year-old woman with a history of RK with associated irregular astigmatism in both eyes and iris-fixated intraocular lens (IF-IOL) in the left eye presented with six months of decreased vision in the left eye. She was found to have Fuchs dystrophy and underwent DMEK surgery. She had an uncomplicated postoperative course, with uncorrected visual acuity improving to 20/20 three months after surgery.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a highly successful DMEK surgery in a patient with prior RK and IF-IOL.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-021-02103-1.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for endothelial decompensation after previous radial keratotomy

Purpose

To report Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for endothelial decompensation in an eye with previous radial keratotomy.

Observations

A history of radial keratotomy may hasten endothelial dysfunction. Previously reported surgical treatments include penetrating kerotoplasty and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Conclusions and Importance

DMEK may be successfully used in post-RK eyes with good recovery of visual acuity and patient satisfaction.

Liu H, Vaidyanathan U, N. Somani A, C. Hopping G, R. Barnes J, B. Heiland M, B. Rosen D, N. Motlagh M, C. Hoopes P. Diagnosis and Management of Pseudoguttata: A Literature Review

Corneal pseudoguttata (PG), also known as pseudoguttae or secondary guttata, is a transient, reversible endothelial edema commonly associated with anterior segment pathology. While considered rare, PG presents on slit-lamp examination more commonly than originally thought. We have clinically observed PG after refractive surgeries, in association with infectious keratitis, and following medication use. PG presents as dark lesions on slit-lamp exam with specular illumination, similar to primary corneal guttata. PG is distinct from guttata because PG resolves over time and does not involve Descemet's membrane. Other ocular findings that may be confused with guttata include endothelial blebs (EB) and endothelial denudation (ED). EB are possibly a type of PG that present after contact lens use or hypoxia. ED is a distinct entity that is characterized by loss of endothelial cells without involvement of Descemet's membrane. Confocal microscopy may be useful in differentiating these four endothelial lesions, with differences in border definition and the presence of hyperreflective areas two main distinctions. PG presents as a hyporeflective, elevated shape without clear borders on confocal microscopy. PG, EB, and ED can resolve with time without the need for surgical intervention, unlike corneal guttata. Treatment of the underlying condition will lead to resolution of both PG and EB.

Clinical Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Eyes With Previous Radial Keratotomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) performed in eyes with corneal endothelial decompensation and previous radial keratotomy (RK).

METHODS

Five consecutive eyes of 3 patients with previous RK underwent DMEK for endothelial decompensation; best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, maximum keratometry (Kmax), central corneal thickness, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were assessed.

RESULTS

By 6 months postoperative, all eyes had achieved a best spectacle-corrected visual acuity of ≥20/40 (≥0.5), 4/5 (80%) were ≥20/25 (≥0.8), and 2/5 (40%) were ≥20/20 (≥1.0). On average, central corneal thickness decreased by 122 μm, and Kmax decreased by 4.2 diopters. Successful rebubbling was performed on 1 eye at 3 weeks postoperatively; another eye experienced gaping of an old RK wound, that spontaneously resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

DMEK is technically feasible in eyes with previous RK and may provide excellent outcomes. A significant change in the anterior corneal contour and associated refractive power of the eye may be anticipated depending on the amount of preoperative corneal edema and the number of RK incisions.

Non-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for post radial keratotomy corneal edema

An elderly male with monocular status presented with complaints of gradual loss of vision in his left eye. Slit-lamp evaluation revealed postradial keratotomy (RK) corneal decompensation. He underwent non-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (nDSAEK) in his left eye. Postoperatively, his visual acuity improved from counting finger at 1 m to 20/200, J5. Graft adherence was good. A preexisting epiretinal membrane with macular edema was noted, but our patient refused any further surgical intervention for the same. In conclusion, nDSAEK may be considered as an effective treatment modality for the management of post-RK corneal decompensation.

Tailored lamellar keratoplasty: a new technique

We present a new method for treating complicated corneal gaps among patients who have previously undergone radial keratotomy (RK).After complete healing of a fungal keratitis in a patient who has undergone RK, we removed the oedematous corneal sector and put anterior tailored segment of a corneal button previously used for Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. The patient's best-corrected visual acuity reached to 20/20 6 months later. This technique will compensate for oedematous parts without putting a significant effect on other parts such as purse string sutures.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and refractive surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has become a first-line treatment in corneal endothelial diseases because of its exceptional clinical outcomes and low complication rates. Because of its improved refractive predictability, DMEK is now also considered for managing cases with endothelial decompensation following previous refractive procedures, or in combination with those. This article reviews the clinical outcomes in these cases and discusses the possibility of refractive interventions following DMEK.

RECENT FINDINGS

DMEK has been successfully performed in eyes after laser in-situ keratomileusis, eyes after anterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and aphakic eyes. Often, DMEK is combined with cataract surgery (triple-DMEK). Initial reports on reducing the refractive cylinder by toric IOL implantation are available. Although there are some reports on phacoemulsification and IOL implantation after phakic DMEK, reports on laser refractive procedures following DMEK are lacking.

SUMMARY

In contrast to earlier keratoplasty techniques, DMEK induces on average only mild refractive shifts owing to the 'natural' restoration of the cornea. As such, DMEK may be ideal in managing corneal decompensation in refractive patients. However, further studies are required to assess the safety and efficacy of DMEK after refractive treatment and of refractive procedures following DMEK.

Fuchs' dystrophy associated with radial keratotomy: Lamellar or perforating keratoplasty?

CASE REPORT

A 70 year-old male patient with a history of radial keratotomy suffering from Fuchs' dystrophy and a cataract. The patient received a two-step surgery: lens phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implant, followed by descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in both eyes, four months later. There were no complications apart from a recurrent cystoid macular oedema in both eyes. The best corrected visual acuity was 20/40 both eyes, and the patient was satisfied.

DISCUSSION

Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty may be considered as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty in the case of endothelial dysfunction and radial keratotomy in patients with no corneal ectasia or significant stromal opacity.