Only first intravitreal bevacizumab injection achieves statistically significant visual improvement in naïve myopic choroidal neovascularization

Management of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: Focus on Anti-VEGF Therapy

Myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) is the second most common form of CNV after age-related macular degeneration (AMD). It is a sight-threatening complication of pathologic myopia (PM) and often affects patients in their working years causing significant impact on quality of life. Previous therapies such as photodynamic therapy with verteporfin have shown limited success. Due to the similarities in pathogenesis of mCNV and AMD CNV, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy (anti-VEGF), which has so far been the mainstay of treatment for AMD CNV, has been shown to be effective in the treatment of mCNV and has become the first-line treatment of choice. This article aims to examine briefly the epidemiology and pathophysiology of mCNV, as well as review the evidence for efficacy, safety, and clinical use of anti-VEGF treatment for mCNV.

Prognostic factors of eyes with naïve subfoveal myopic choroidal neovascularization after intravitreal bevacizumab

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy of 1 intravitreal bevacizumab injection followed by pro re nata (1 + PRN) injection in cases of subfoveal myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) and to identify CNV-recurrence-related prognostic factors.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational case series.

METHODS

In total, 103 eyes of 89 consecutive naive patients who had subfoveal myopic CNV and had been followed-up for at least 2 years were included. Of those eyes, 24 had recurrences. The remaining eyes were stable after the initial treatment.

RESULTS

The average patient age was 51.1 ± 15.2 years. The average follow-up duration was 44.1 ± 12.7 months. At baseline and at the 1-year, 2-year, and final visits, the average best corrected visual acuities (BCVAs) were 0.57 ± 0.45, 0.38 ± 0.51, 0.40 ± 0.52, and 0.41 ± 0.41 logMAR, respectively. The recurrence rate during follow-up was 23.3%. The BCVA improved by 0.2 logMAR after 2.7 injections in the eyes without recurrence but by only 0.08 logMAR after 6.9 injections in the eyes with recurrence. In univariate analysis, recurrence was associated with older age, more myopic refraction, thinner choroid, larger CNV lesions, and subfoveal hemorrhage at baseline. In multivariate analysis, only baseline CNV lesion size associated significantly with CNV recurrence (P = 0.002). Recurrence, baseline BCVA, choroidal thickness, and CNV size associated significantly with final BCVA (P = 0.026, <0.0001, 0.007, and 0.002, respectively). Baseline choroidal thickness, CNV size, age, and presence of lacquer cracks associated significantly with injection number (P < 0.0001, <0.0001, 0.026, and 0.035, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

1 + PRN intravitreal bevacizumab monotherapy effectively stabilized subfoveal myopic CNV. The CNV size, the baseline BCVA, and the choroidal thickness were the main prognostic factors of subfoveal myopic CNV after 1 + PRN injection of bevacizumab.

[Treatment of high myopic choroidal neovascularisation with intravitreal bevacizumab]

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) in the treatment of high myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of 16 eyes of 16 patients with high myopic choroidal neovascularization treated with first-line IVB (1.25mg/0.05mL) with a one-year follow-up. All patients underwent a complete baseline (M0) ophthalmologic examination, including the measurement of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), biomicroscopic and fundus examination, fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography, and optical coherence tomography. Patients were followed monthly. Additional IVB was administered when persistent or additional retinal exudation was observed. The main study parameters were visual acuity at 1, 6 and 12 months and the progression of exudation on OCT and angiography.

RESULTS

Mean age was 63±14 years and spherical equivalent was -15.4±7.4 diopters. Baseline BCVA was 0.75±0.5 logMAR. Mean follow-up was 15±2 months. The average number of IVB was 2.4±1.2 injections. Metamorphopsia decreased in all patients and completely disappeared in fourteen eyes. Mean BCVA was 0.5±0.3 logMAR at M1 and 0.6±0.5 logMAR at M6 and M12. No adverse events related to the intravitreal injections were observed.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that IVB (Avastin(®)) is effective in the treatment of high myopic CNV. Moreover, only a small number of intravitreal injections were required to treat this condition.