Indications and postoperative treatment for Ex-PRESS(®) insertion in Japanese patients with glaucoma: comparison with standard trabeculectomy

Contributing factors for intraocular pressure control in patients with mostly normal-tension glaucoma after initial Ex-PRESS drainage device implantation

PURPOSE

To investigate the postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) control and identify the factors associated with failure of initial Ex-PRESS surgery in patients with open-angle glaucoma for 3 years.

METHODS

A total of 79 patients with medically uncontrolled open-angle glaucoma (55 normal-tension glaucoma and 24 primary open-angle glaucoma) were enrolled. All patients underwent Ex-PRESS implantation (including combined cataract surgery). The outcome measure was the survival rate using life table analysis, the failure was defined as IOP of > 18 mmHg (criterion A), > 15 mmHg (criterion B) or > 12 mmHg (criterion C) and/or IOP reduction of < 20% from baseline (each criterion) without any glaucoma medications. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify risk factors for IOP management defined as the above criterion.  RESULTS: The mean preoperative IOP was 19.3 ± 5.8 mmHg. At 36 months, the mean IOP was 11.8 ± 3.6 mmHg with a mean IOP change of 7.5 mmHg (reduction rate 39.0%). The cumulative probability of success was 58% (95%CI: 42-64%) (criterion A), 48% (95%CI: 37-59%) (criterion B) and 30% (95%CI: 20-40%) (criterion C). In multivariate analyses, factors that predicted poor IOP control included the intervention of bleb needling after 6 months after the surgery (HR: 2.43; 95%CI: 1.35-4.37; P = 0.032). Transient hypotony was observed in 4 patients.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of bleb needling after Ex-PRESS surgery in the late postoperative period was suggested to be the main risk factor for achieving lower IOP.

Comparison of tube shunt implantation and trabeculectomy for glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of tube shunt implantation with trabeculectomy in the treatment of patients with glaucoma.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed for studies comparing tube with trabeculectomy in patients with glaucoma (final search date: 27 February 2022). Comparisons between tube and trabeculectomy were grouped by the type of tube (Ahmed, Baerveldt, Ex-PRESS and XEN). The primary endpoints included intraocular pressure (IOP), IOP reduction (IOPR), IOPR percentage (IOPR%), complete success rate (CSR), qualified success rate (QSR) and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Forty-nine studies were included in this meta-analysis and presented data for 3795 eyes (Ahmed: 670, Baerveldt: 561, Ex-PRESS: 473, XEN: 199, trabeculectomy: 1892). Ahmed and Ex-PRESS were similar to trabeculectomy in terms of IOP outcomes and success rate (Ahmed vs trabeculectomy: IOPR%: mean difference (MD)=1.34 (-5.35, 8.02), p=0.69; Ex-PRESS vs trabeculectomy: IOPR%: MD=0.12 (-3.07, 3.31), p=0.94). The IOP outcomes for Baerveldt were worse than those for trabeculectomy (IOPR%: MD=-7.51 (-10.68, -4.35), p<0.00001), but the QSR was higher. No significant difference was shown for the CSR. XEN was worse than trabeculectomy in terms of IOP outcomes (IOPR%: MD=-7.87 (-13.55, -2.18), p=0.007), while the success rate was similar. Ahmed and Ex-PRESS had a lower incidence of AEs than trabeculectomy. Baerveldt had a lower incidence of bleb leakage/wound leakage, hyphaema and hypotonic maculopathy than trabeculectomy but a higher incidence of concurrent cataracts, diplopia/strabismus and tube erosion. The incidence of AEs was similar for the XEN and trabeculectomy procedures.

CONCLUSION

Compared with trabeculectomy, both Ahmed and Ex-PRESS appear to be associated with similar ocular hypotensive effects and lower incidences of AEs. However, Baerveldt and XEN cannot achieve sufficient reductions in IOP outcomes similar to those of trabeculectomy.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021257852.

Ex-PRESS® surgery versus trabeculectomy for primary open-angle glaucoma with low preoperative intraocular pressure

PURPOSE

To compare surgical outcomes between Ex-PRESS® surgery (EXP) and trabeculectomy (Trab) for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) with low preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective non-randomized study. We included POAG patients with preoperative IOP ≤ 16 mmHg who were taking tolerance glaucoma medications. We compared the surgical outcomes, postoperative IOP, number of glaucoma medications, reduction rate of corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), visual acuity, and postoperative complications between POAG patients who underwent EXP (34 eyes) or Trab (38 eyes) and could be followed up for > 2 years.

RESULTS

Both surgeries significantly decreased the IOP (p < 0.001): At 2 years, EXP provided decreases from 13.4 ± 2.3 to 10.2 ± 3.1 mmHg, and Trab provided decreases from 13.5 ± 2.0 to 8.9 ± 3.2 mmHg. No significant differences were observed in the postoperative IOP (p = 0.076), number of postoperative medications (p = 0.263), success rate (p = 0.900), reduction rate of ECD (p = 0.410), or difference in visual acuity (p = 0.174). The reduction rate of IOP was significantly high in the Trab group (p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Both surgeries significantly decreased IOP and were useful surgical methods for low-IOP glaucoma. Our results suggest that trabeculectomy can decrease IOP more than Ex-PRESS surgery but might have more complications.

Association of Deepening of the Upper Eyelid Sulcus with the Incidence of Blepharoptosis after Glaucoma Filtration Surgery

Purpose: To examine the clinical characteristics of patients who developed blepharoptosis after filtering surgery. Study Design: A retrospective, observational study. Methods: 96 eyes in 79 patients who underwent glaucoma filtration surgery were included in this study. These patients were followed up for more than one year after filtration surgery. The clinical characteristics were compared between two groups: a group that developed blepharoptosis during the follow-up, and a group that did not develop blepharoptosis. Results: Of the 96 eyes in 79 patients who underwent filtration surgery, 12 eyes (12.5%) developed blepharoptosis and underwent blepharoptosis surgery. There were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the following: age, sex, presence or absence of simultaneous cataract surgery, differences in surgical procedures (conventional trabeculectomy or trabeculectomy with an Ex-Press mini-glaucoma shunt device), number of needlings after filtration surgery, glaucoma type and number of anti-glaucomatous drugs before filtration surgery. Deepening of the upper eyelid sulcus (DUES) was found in 6 of the 12 eyes (50.0%) of the blepharoptosis group and 9 of the 84 eyes (10.7%) of the non-blepharoptosis group, and a significant difference was observed (p < .01). When blepharoptosis patients without DUES after filtration surgery were used as a reference, there was a significant difference in odds ratios between these patients and blepharoptosis patients with DUES (OR: 8.56; 95% CI: 2.30-32.21; p < .01). Conclusion: The development of blepharoptosis after filtration surgery is an important issue, and the presence of DUES may be a risk factor for postoperative blepharoptosis after glaucoma filtration surgery.

Efficacy and safety of Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery versus trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma: a retrospective comparative study

Background

The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the short-term efficacy and safety of Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery and trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma (NVG).

Methods

Patients with NVG who underwent Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery or trabeculectomy as a primary glaucoma surgery between March 2013 and October 2015 were included in the study, and their medical charts were retrospectively reviewed. The Ex-PRESS® and trabeculectomy groups included 14 eyes and 30 eyes, respectively. Surgical failure was defined by an intraocular pressure (IOP) of ≥21 mmHg (condition A) or ≥ 18 mmHg (condition B); Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model were used to assess efficacies.

Results

Kaplan–Meier survival analyses indicated that the probabilities of success at 1 year for the Ex-PRESS® group were 25.7 and 31.8% based on complete and qualified success under condition A, respectively. The corresponding values for the trabeculectomy group were 47.8 and 69.3%, and there was a significant difference in qualified success with condition A (Fig. 1; P = 0.018), while there were no significant differences in the other criteria. Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery and higher intraocular pressure were independent prognostic factors using Cox proportional hazards model analyses in qualified success as in condition A (P = 0.012 and 0.0495, respectively). The occurrences of postsurgical hyphema and bleb leaks were significantly higher in the trabeculectomy group (P = 0.005 and 0.008, respectively).

Conclusion

During a 1 year follow-up, Ex-PRESS® mini shunt surgery was a less effective, but safer treatment for NVG compared with trabeculectomy.

Conventional trabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy with the Ex-PRESS® mini-glaucoma shunt: differences in postoperative interventions

PURPOSE

To compare the postoperative interventions and outcomes between conventional trabeculectomy and trabeculectomy with the Ex-PRESS® mini-glaucoma shunt device (Ex-Press).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, comparative, single-facility study. We analyzed the cases of 108 glaucoma patients who underwent trabeculectomy and were followed for >1 year. Thirty-nine eyes underwent a conventional trabeculectomy (conventional group) and 69 eyes underwent a trabeculectomy with an Ex-Press (Ex-Press group). As evaluation items, we examined postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), the surgical success rate, postoperative complications, the number of days to laser suture lysis, and needling.

RESULTS

Trabeculectomy significantly decreased the patients' IOP values from 27.8±7.9 to 11.1±3.9 mmHg in the conventional group (p<0.001) and from 27.7±9.2 to 11.5±3.7 mmHg in the Ex-Press group (p<0.001) after 1 year. The success rate was not significantly different between the groups. The timing of the first laser suture lysis was significantly sooner in the Ex-Press group, and the Ex-Press group showed significantly less choroidal detachment due to low IOP.

CONCLUSION

Earlier laser suture lysis in patients whose trabeculectomy treatment includes an Ex-Press is required to obtain the outcomes comparable to those of conventional trabeculectomy.

Short-term outcomes after EX-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy alone in patients with neovascular glaucoma

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate postoperative clinical outcomes in patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG) who underwent trabeculectomy or EX-PRESS implantation and to identify predictors of successful EX-PRESS implantation.

Methods

The study designed as a retrospective observational analysis and was set in a single tertiary center. Eighty-nine patients (89 eyes) with NVG, were treated using trabeculectomy alone (Trab group; n=39) or EX-PRESS implantation (EX group; n=50). All patients with a history of glaucoma surgery were excluded. The main outcome measures were postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity (VA), number of medications, complications, additional therapy, and success rate.

Results

The mean follow-up duration was 4.6 months in the Trab group and 4.2 months in the EX group. There was no significant difference in IOP between the groups except at 1-month follow-up (P=0.045). The number of patients with early postoperative hypotony, a shallow anterior chamber, hyphema, or anterior chamber irrigation was significantly lower in the EX group than in the Trab group (P=0.016, 0.008, 0.019, and 0.014, respectively). The other outcomes, ie, VA, number of medications, and success rate, were similar between the two groups. In the EX group, the success rate was significantly lower in 15 patients with a history of vitrectomy compared to that in 35 patients without a history of vitrectomy (P=0.047).

Conclusion

Implantation of an EX-PRESS device may be more effective and safer than trabeculectomy alone in patients with NVG. However, a history of vitrectomy may affect the surgical success rate when using EX-PRESS.

Effect of glaucoma implant surgery on intraocular pressure reduction, flare count, anterior chamber depth, and corneal endothelium in primary open-angle glaucoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of filtering surgery using the EX-PRESS device on intraocular pressure (IOP), flare count, anterior chamber (AC) depth, and the corneal endothelium in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), including normal-tension glaucoma (NTG).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study comprised 63 consecutive patients with POAG or NTG. They underwent complete ophthalmologic examinations, including measurement of visual acuity (VA), IOP, flare count, AC depth, and cell density of the corneal endothelium (CE). Two outcomes were used for surgical success: outcome 1 was defined as a ≥20% reduction in the IOP from the preoperative value, with an IOP ≥ 5 mmHg but ≤18 mmHg, and outcome 2 was defined as a ≥20% reduction in the IOP, with an IOP ≥ 5 mmHg but ≤15 mmHg.

RESULTS

The IOP significantly decreased from 17.7 preoperatively to 12.4 mmHg postoperatively (P < 0.0001). The success rates for outcome 1 at 24 months were 81.3 and 46.7% for POAG and NTG, respectively (P = 0.0065); the corresponding success rates for outcome 2 were 79.4 and 46.7% (P = 0.0120). The flare count significantly increased on postoperative day 1 (P = 0.0002) but recovered to insignificant levels by day 3 (P = 0.0686). A transient decrease in AC depth was observed by 4 weeks after surgery (P = 0.0017). The CE changed from 2529 preoperatively to 2428/mm² at 24 months (P = 0.0089).

CONCLUSION

The advantage of filtering surgery using the EX-PRESS device includes reduced inflammation, and the disadvantages include loss of the CE and reduced effectiveness of NTG.