The prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab combination therapy: a meta-analysis

The Role of Systemic Therapies in the Treatment of Grades 1-4 Gliomas

The primary treatment for gliomas typically involves tumor resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy, with increasing emphasis on chemotherapy and molecularly targeted drugs. This study aimed to review and summarize the literature on the systemic therapy of malignant gliomas. Chemotherapy may be considered in grades 2 and 3 gliomas, especially when mutations in 1p19q-codeletion are detected. The beneficial impact of adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy (PCV: procarbazine, lomustine, vincristine) has also been demonstrated. In grade 4 glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), wild-type isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) status showed the best treatment outcomes with temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. Prolonging adjuvant TMZ therapy improves treatment outcomes compared to the standard 6-cycle adjuvant therapy. Bevacizumab (BEV) monotherapy can improve progression-free survival and maintain the initial quality of life. Despite advancements in GBM treatment, outcomes remain unsatisfactory, with a median survival of 14-16 months. Further research is still needed regarding the systemic treatment of central nervous system gliomas.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Effectiveness of Radiotherapy and Temozolomide Treatment With or Without Bevacizumab in Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most frequent primary brain malignancy in adults. Despite improvements in imaging and therapy, the prognosis remains poor. To evaluate and compare the impact of combining bevacizumab with temozolomide and radiotherapy on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients diagnosed with GBM. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library, covering the period from their inception to December 2022. The collected data underwent analysis employing appropriate statistical methods. Six articles were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The addition of bevacizumab to the combination of temozolomide/radiotherapy did not increase the OS in GBM patients. The pooled odds ratio (OR) was 0.843 (95% CI: 0.615-1.156, P = 0.290). The addition of bevacizumab to radiotherapy/temozolomide did not increase the PFS in patients with GBM. The pooled OR was 0.829 (95% CI: 0.561-1.224, P = 0.346). The funnel plot demonstrated the absence of the alleged pleiotropic effects by showing no evidence of observable variability across the estimations. This study does not support the benefit of the addition of bevacizumab to temozolomide and radiotherapy in improving OS and PFS in GBM patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab for Treating Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Phase II and III Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

To fully investigate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab for glioblastoma.

METHODS

Databases were searched for phase II/III randomized controlled trials treated with bevacizumab.

RESULTS

Bevacizumab significantly improved the PFS in glioblastoma patients, but did not prolong OS. PFS was significantly prolonged in both first-line and second-line treatment. Bevacizumab plus temozolomide was correlated with improved PFS for patients with different MGMT methylation status. Bevacizumab could increase the risk of hypertension, proteinuria, thromboembolic, and infection. Hypertension should be well concerned.

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab-containing regimen can significantly improve PFS, but did not prolong OS.

Targeted therapies in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma-A systematic meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Glioblastoma (GB) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. The standard of care for newly diagnosed GB involves surgical resection followed by radiochemotherapy with temozolomide, with or without tumor-treating fields. In recent years, various efforts have been made to identify suitable molecularly targeted treatment options for malignant brain tumors. This meta-analysis provides an overview of recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with and without molecular stratification, analyzing targeted agents in patients with newly diagnosed GB. The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (Ovid), ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and Google Scholar were searched for RCTs on targeted therapies in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted and pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis. Twelve RCTs (n = 3941 patients) involving protein kinase inhibitors, proteasome and histone deacetylase inhibitors, anti-angiogenic approaches and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors were included in the meta-analysis. None of the targeted agents achieved a significant benefit with regard to OS (HR = 0.98 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-1.11, P = .7731]). By comparison, targeted therapy showed a benefit for PFS (HR = 0.83 [95% CI 0.74-0.94, P = .0037]), especially for patients with an unmethylated O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter (0.75 [95% CI 0.56-0.99, P = .0440]). Prolongation of PFS was largely driven by VEGF inhibition with bevacizumab (HR = 0.70 [95% CI 0.61-0.80, P = .0000]). VEGF inhibition with bevacizumab prolonged PFS in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma compared to standard care. However, no improvement in OS was observed with any of the targeted agents.

Metabolic Rewiring in Glioblastoma Cancer: EGFR, IDH and Beyond

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), a highly invasive and incurable tumor, is the humans’ foremost, commonest, and deadliest brain cancer. As in other cancers, distinct combinations of genetic alterations (GA) in GBM induce a diversity of metabolic phenotypes resulting in enhanced malignancy and altered sensitivity to current therapies. Furthermore, GA as a hallmark of cancer, dysregulated cell metabolism in GBM has been recently linked to the acquired GA. Indeed, Numerous point mutations and copy number variations have been shown to drive glioma cells’ metabolic state, affecting tumor growth and patient outcomes. Among the most common, IDH mutations, EGFR amplification, mutation, PTEN loss, and MGMT promoter mutation have emerged as key patterns associated with upregulated glycolysis and OXPHOS glutamine addiction and altered lipid metabolism in GBM. Therefore, current Advances in cancer genetic and metabolic profiling have yielded mechanistic insights into the metabolism rewiring of GBM and provided potential avenues for improved therapeutic modalities. Accordingly, actionable metabolic dependencies are currently used to design new treatments for patients with glioblastoma. Herein, we capture the current knowledge of genetic alterations in GBM, provide a detailed understanding of the alterations in metabolic pathways, and discuss their relevance in GBM therapy.

Emerging therapies for glioblastoma: current state and future directions

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common high-grade primary malignant brain tumor with an extremely poor prognosis. Given the poor survival with currently approved treatments for GBM, new therapeutic strategies are urgently needed. Advances in decades of investment in basic science of glioblastoma are rapidly translated into innovative clinical trials, utilizing improved genetic and epigenetic profiling of glioblastoma as well as the brain microenvironment and immune system interactions. Following these encouraging findings, immunotherapy including immune checkpoint blockade, chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell therapy, oncolytic virotherapy, and vaccine therapy have offered new hope for improving GBM outcomes; ongoing studies are using combinatorial therapies with the aim of minimizing adverse side-effects and augmenting antitumor immune responses. In addition, techniques to overcome the blood-brain barrier (BBB) for targeted delivery are being tested in clinical trials in patients with recurrent GBM. Here, we set forth the rationales for these promising therapies in treating GBM, review the potential novel agents, the current status of preclinical and clinical trials, and discuss the challenges and future perspectives in glioblastoma immuno-oncology.

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in the treatment of adult gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BEV) in patients with glioma.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults aged 18 years and above, whose histology was confirmed to be malignant glioma.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The main indicators included progression-free survival (PFS) rate and overall survival (OS) rate, and the secondary indicators were adverse reactions.

RESULTS

A total of 11 clinical centre trials were included in this study for meta-analysis, including 2392 patients. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the median PFS rate of the BEV group was significantly higher than that of the non-BEV group (p<0.00001). When comparing PFS between two groups, we found that the PFS in the BEV group was higher than that in the non-BEV group at 6 months (OR 3.31, 95% CI 2.74 to 4.00, p<0.00001), 12 months (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.70 to 2.49, p<0.00001) and 18 months (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.69, p=0.03). But at 24 months (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.37, p=0.47), there was no significant difference between the two groups. At 30 months (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.97, p=0.04), the PFS of the BEV group was lower than that of the non-BEV group. Moreover, The results showed that BEV had no significant effect on improving OS, but the adverse reaction in BEV group was significantly higher than that in non-BEV group.

CONCLUSION

The evidence suggests that BEV can significantly prolong the PFS of patients with glioma within 18 months and shorten the PFS of patients after 30 months. This limitation may be related to the subgroup of patients, the change of recurrence mode, the optimal dose of drug, the increase of hypoxia, the enhancement of invasiveness and so on. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out more samples and higher quality large-scale research in the future.

Targeting the RhoGEF βPIX/COOL-1 in Glioblastoma: Proof of Concept Studies

Simple Summary

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an incurable disease with a 14-month average life-expectancy following diagnosis, and clinical management has not improved in four decades. GBM mortality is due to rapid tumour growth and invasion into surrounding normal brain. Invasive cells make complete surgical removal of the tumour impossible, and result in disease relapse. Thus, it is imperative that any new treatment strategy takes these invading cells into consideration. Bevacizumab (Bev), which prevents the formation of new blood vessels, is an FDA approved therapy, but it has failed to increase overall survival in GBM and has even been shown to increase tumour invasion in some cases. Complementary anti-invasive therapies are therefore urgently required to enhance bevacizumab efficacy. We have identified βPIX/COOL-1, a RhoGEF protein which plays an important role in GBM cell invasion and angiogenesis and could be a useful target in this setting.

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM), a highly invasive and vascular malignancy is shown to rapidly develop resistance and evolve to a more invasive phenotype following bevacizumab (Bev) therapy. Rho Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor proteins (RhoGEFs) are mediators of key components in Bev resistance pathways, GBM and Bev-induced invasion. To identify GEFs with enhanced mRNA expression in the leading edge of GBM tumours, a cohort of GEFs was assessed using a clinical dataset. The GEF βPix/COOL-1 was identified, and the functional effect of gene depletion assessed using 3D-boyden chamber, proliferation, and colony formation assays in GBM cells. Anti-angiogenic effects were assessed in endothelial cells using tube formation and wound healing assays. In vivo effects of βPix/COOL-1-siRNA delivered via RGD-Nanoparticle in combination with Bev was studied in an invasive model of GBM. We found that siRNA-mediated knockdown of βPix/COOL-1 in vitro decreased cell invasion, proliferation and increased apoptosis in GBM cell lines. Moreover βPix/COOL-1 mediated endothelial cell migration in vitro. Mice treated with βPix/COOL-1 siRNA-loaded RGD-Nanoparticle and Bev demonstrated a trend towards improved median survival compared with Bev monotherapy. Our hypothesis generating study suggests that the RhoGEF βPix/COOL-1 may represent a target of vulnerability in GBM, in particular to improve Bev efficacy.

Comparative efficacy of antiangiogenic treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumor which has highly expressed vascular endothelial growth factor. To date, various antiangiogenic drugs have been investigated in clinical trials but with no overall conclusion, especially for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (nGBM). In this study, Bayesian network meta-analysis will be used to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the results of different clinical trials, and assess the efficacy of different antiangiogenic drugs on nGBM.

METHODS

In order to find more comprehensive information about the application of antiangiogenic drugs in nGBM patients, we searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant randomized controlled trials. We also reviewed their reference lists to avoid omissions. Cochrane risk of bias tool (V.1.4.3) and Stata (V.15.0) will be used to assess the methodological quality of this review.

RESULTS

This study will provide reliable evidence for different antiangiogenic therapies in nGBM patients.

CONCLUSION

We will evaluate the relative effectiveness of different antiangiogenic drugs and rank each intervention in nGBM patients through prognosis to provide decision-making reference on which method to choose for clinicians.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019146537.

Bevacizumab has bidirectional regulatory effects on the secretion of basic fibroblast growth factor in glioma cells

Previous studies suggest that upregulated basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) plays a key role in the resistance to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in glioma. This study reported that anti-VEGF treatment regulated bFGF secretion in a double-edged manner. That is, moderate VEGF neutralization reduced bFGF production, whereas VEGF overblocking enhanced bFGF secretion in glioma cells. Our data provide a new perspective on the treatment of glioma with anti-VEGF, and the underlying mechanism is worthy of further study.

The Role of Kinase Signaling in Resistance to Bevacizumab Therapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most malignant primary brain tumor and is characterized by vascular hyperplasia, necrosis, and high cell proliferation. Despite current standard therapies, including surgical resection and chemoradiotherapy, GBM patients survive for only about 15 months after diagnosis. Recently, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved an antiangiogenesis medication for recurrent GBM-bevacizumab-which has improved progression-free survival in GBM patients. Although bevacizumab has resulted in significant early clinical benefit, it inescapably predisposes tumor to relapse that can be represented as an infiltrative phenotype. Fundamentally, bevacizumab antagonizes the vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF_A), which is consistently released on both endothelial cells (ECs) and GBM cells. Actually, VEGF_A inhibition on the ECs leads to the suppression of vascular progression, permeability, and the vasogenic edema. However, the consequence of the VEGF_A pathway blockage on the GBM cells remains controversial. Nevertheless, a piece of evidence supports the relationship between bevacizumab application and compensatory activation of kinase signaling within GBM cells, leading to a tumor cell invasion known as the main mechanism of bevacizumab-induced tumor resistance. A complete understanding of kinase responses associated with tumor invasion in bevacizumab-resistant GBMs offers new therapeutic opportunities. Thus, this study aimed at presenting a brief overview of preclinical and clinical data of the tumor invasion and resistance induced by bevacizumab administration in GBMs, with a focus on the kinase responses during treatment. The novel therapeutic strategies to overcome this resistance by targeting protein kinases have also been summarized.

Co-Administered Polymeric Nano-Antidotes for Improved Photo-Triggered Response in Glioblastoma

Polymer-based nanoparticles (NPs) are useful vehicles in treating glioblastoma because of their favorable characteristics such as small size and ability to cross the blood–brain barrier, as well as reduced immunogenicity and side effects. The use of a photosensitizer drug such as Verteporfin (BPD), in combination with a pan-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), Cediranib (CED), encapsulated in NPs will provide the medical field with new research on the possible ways to treat glioblastoma. Concomitant administration of BPD and CED NPs have the potential to induce dual photocytotoxic and cytostatic effects in U87 MG cells by (1) remotely triggering BPD through photodynamic therapy by irradiating laser at 690 nm and subsequent production of reactive oxygen species and (2) inhibiting cell proliferation by VEGFR interference and growth factor signaling mechanisms which may allow for longer progression free survival in patients and fewer systemic side effects. The specific aims of this research were to synthesize, characterize and assess cell viability and drug interactions for polyethylene-glycolated (PEGylated) polymeric based CED and BPD NPs which were less than 100 nm in size for enhanced permeation and retention effects. Synergistic effects were found using the co-administered therapies compared to the individual drugs. The major goal of this research was to investigate a new combination of photodynamic-chemotherapy drugs in nano-formulation for increased efficacy in glioblastoma treatment at reduced concentrations of therapeutics for enhanced drug delivery in vitro.