Modified FOLFOX6 as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer with massive ascites or inadequate oral intake

The potential of retinoic acid receptors as prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in gastric cancer

Background

Gastric cancer is a heterogeneous collection of tumors characterized by low survival rates. All-trans retinoic acid (retinoic-acid) is a clinically useful therapeutic agent belonging to the chemical family of retinoids, which consists of both natural and synthetic derivatives of vitamin-A. Retinoids are essential components of the normal diet and they regulate different physiological processes. From a therapeutic point of view, retinoic-acid is the first example of clinically useful differentiating agent. Indeed, the differentiating properties of this compound have promoted the use of retinoic-acid as a standard of care in Acute-Promyelocytic-Leukemia, a rare form of acute myeloid leukemia. In this study, we determine the RNA expression of the six isoforms of Retinoic-Acid-Receptors (RARα/RARβ/RARγ/RXRα/RXRβ/RXRγ) in view of their potential use as gastric cancer progression markers and/or therapeutic targets. In addition, we evaluate associations between the expression of these receptors and a simplified molecular classification of stomach tumors as well as the clinical characteristics of the cohort of patients analyzed. Finally, we define the prognostic value of the various Retinoic-Acid-Receptors in gastric cancer.

Methods

In this single institution and retrospective RAR-GASTRIC study, we consider 55 consecutive gastric cancer patients. We extract total RNA from the pathological specimens and we perform a NanoString Assay using a customized panel of genes. This allows us to determine the expression levels of the RAR and RXR mRNAs as well as other transcripts of interest.

Results

Our data demonstrate ubiquitous expression of the RAR and RXR mRNAs in gastric cancers. High levels of RARα, RARβ, RXRα and RXRβ show a significant association with stage IV tumors, "de novo" metastatic disease, microsatellite-stable-status, epithelial-to-mesenchymal-transition, as well as PIK3CA and TP53 expression. Finally, we observe a worse overall-survival in gastric cancer patients characterized by high RARα/RARβ/RARγ/RXRβ mRNA levels.

Conclusions

In gastric cancer, high expression levels of RARα/RARβ/RARγ/RXRβ transcripts are associated with poor clinical and molecular characteristics as well as with reduced overall-survival. Our data are consistent with the idea that RARα, RARβ, RARγ and RXRβ represent potential prognostic markers and therapeutic targets of gastric cancer.

The Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Plus mFOLFOX6 in Gastric Cancer with Severe Peritoneal Metastasis

(1) Background: Nivolumab plus chemotherapy is established as a first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). While mFOLFOX6 is commonly used for AGC with severe peritoneal metastasis, the efficacy of nivolumab combined with it remains uncertain. We evaluated the outcomes of nivolumab plus mFOLFOX6 for AGC with severe peritoneal metastasis in clinical practice. (2) Methods: This multicenter retrospective study was conducted between December 2021 and June 2023. We investigated AGC patients with massive ascites or inadequate oral intake due to severe peritoneal metastasis and who received nivolumab plus mFOLFOX6. (3) Results: Among 106 patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy, 21 (19.8%) had severe peritoneal metastasis, with 14 receiving nivolumab plus mFOLFOX6. The median progression-free survival was 7.4 months (95%CI 1.9-10.1), and the median overall survival was 10.7 months (95%CI 5.3-NA), with four patients (28.5%) surviving more than 12 months. Improved ascites and oral intake were observed in 6/14 patients (42.8%) and 10/11 patients (90.9%), respectively. The major grade 3 or more adverse events included leukopenia (28.5%) and neutropenia (21.4%), with no severe immune-related adverse events reported. (4) Conclusions: The safety and moderate efficacy of nivolumab plus mFOLFOX6 were suggested even in AGC patients with severe peritoneal metastasis.

Intraperitoneal therapy for gastric cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis

INTRODUCTION

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) is one of the most aggressive malignancies worldwide and has a poor prognosis. Multidisciplinary therapies are used in its treatment, but the prognosis for GAC patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) remains poor and there is no effective established approach.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the results of recent clinical studies and recent advances in the management, including surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. In this review, keywords were searched in combination with 'peritoneal carcinomatosis' and 'gastric cancer' in PubMed, and then studies that evaluated peritoneal carcinomatosis associated with gastric cancer were identified through reading them. Several studies were quoted at second hand. Despite recent advances in therapeutic approaches such as systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, intraperitoneal chemotherapy, debulking surgery, thermal hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and best supportive therapy, further studies are necessary. This review also summarizes molecular biology of GAC patients with PM.

EXPERT OPINION

Each modality is advancing and some have shown therapeutic effects, but none have become standard treatments that exhibit remarkable effects. To improve the prognosis of GAC patients with PM, large-scale clinical trials and further basic research are required.

Clinical Impact of Oral Intake in Second-line or Third-line Chemotherapy for 589 Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Insufficient oral intake in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) limits the use of several drugs. We aimed to determine the oral intake status of patients with AGC during later-line chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated data of patients with AGC who experienced disease progression during first-line chemotherapy administered from January 2012 to December 2018 in a single institution. We defined "insufficient oral intake" as requiring daily intravenous fluids or hyperalimentation. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify oral intake-related factors.

RESULTS

Among 589 included patients, at disease progression during first-line, second-line, and third-line chemotherapy, 78.3% (461), 53.3% (314), and 30.4% (179) of patients, respectively, exhibited sufficient oral intake. Fourth-line chemotherapy was initiated for 22.2% (131) of patients, with 20.0% (118) exhibiting sufficient oral intake. During second-line and third-line chemotherapy, 11/67 (16%) and 2/39 (5%) patients, respectively, exhibited improvements in oral intake; 85/428 (19.9%) and 70/259 (27.0%), respectively, exhibited deteriorations in oral intake. Factors correlated to deterioration in oral intake during second-line chemotherapy were poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (odds ratio, 4.32; P<0.001), moderate or severe ascites (1.96; P=0.045), peritoneal metastasis (2.12; P=0.029), prior palliative surgery (3.41; P=0.003), and high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (3.09; P<0.001); those correlated to deterioration in oral intake during third-line chemotherapy were poorly differentiated pathology (2.52; P=0.025) and high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (2.65; P=0.006).

CONCLUSION

As later-line chemotherapy is ineffective in improving oral intake in patients with AGC, careful adaptation of regimens is required for patients at risk for impaired oral intake.

Current status of doublet combinations of platinum and fluoropyrimidines using oxaliplatin for advanced gastric cancer

The most common treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is systemic chemotherapy. The standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer differs worldwide. In Japan, two phase III clinical trials demonstrated the non-inferiority of S-1 compared with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and superiority of cisplatin plus S-1 (CS), compared with S-1, with respect to overall survival (SPIRITS trial). Oxaliplatin (L-OHP) has a favorable toxicity profile compared with cisplatin; hence, a phase III clinical trial (G-SOX trial) demonstrated the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in CS was 5.4 and 13.1 months and those in SOX was 5.5 and 14.1 months, respectively. Serious adverse events were more frequently seen in CS than in SOX. So, SOX is as effective as CS for advanced gastric cancer with favorable safety profile. After the publication of this G-SOX trial, the combination of oral or intravenous 5-FU and various doses of L-OHP have been reported. And FOLFOX6 regimen (FOLFOX: a combination of 1-LV and FU with L-OHP) was approved for the treatment of AGC in Japan in 2017. FOLFOX was promising for patients with severe peritoneal metastasis from AGC, because the FOLFOX regimen does not require hydration and does not include oral agents. This review summarizes the efficacy and safety of doublet combinations of platinum and fluoropyrimidines using L-OHP for advanced gastric cancer.

Marked improvement of oral intake with nivolumab monotherapy in a patient with microsatellite instability-high gastric cancer with insufficient oral intake

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors are commonly less effective for patients with a poor general condition, they can be effective and should be considered for poor general conditions in the case of MSI-H tumor.

WJOG10517G: a multicenter Phase II study of mFOLFOX6 in gastric cancer patients with severe peritoneal metastases

Gastric cancer patients with severe peritoneal metastases, defined as massive ascites and/or inadequate oral intake, have been excluded from clinical trials of new treatments due to poor prognosis and tumor-related complications, such as ileus. Based on the results of the JCOG1108/WJOG7312G study, their prognosis when treated with 5-fluorouracil/l-leucovorin or 5-fluorouracil/l-leucovorin plus paclitaxel remained extremely poor in this setting. Retrospective studies have shown the promising efficacy of the modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) regimen, with improved ascites and oral intake. Therefore, we planned a Phase II study of mFOLFOX6 in gastric cancer patients with severe peritoneal metastases (jRCTs041180007). The primary end point is overall survival, with an exploratory analysis comparing the findings with those of the JCOG1108/WJOG7312G study using Bayes' theorem. Trial registration Identifier: jRCTs041180007 (jRCTs: the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials).

Increased expression of miR-181d is associated with poor prognosis and tumor progression of gastric cancer

Aberrant expression of miR-181d has been noted in multiple human cancers, but its role in gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression, clinical significance and functional role of miR-181d in GC. We applied quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) to quantify the expression of miR-181d in 131 GC tissues, as well as in GC cell lines. The correlation of miR-181d expression with overall survival of GC patients was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier survival method. Cox regression analysis was conducted to further determine the prognostic value of miR-181d in GC. Cellular functional experiments were carried out to calculate the effect that miR-181d had on GC behaviors. MiR-181d expression was significantly up-regulated in both GC tissues and cells (all P< 0.001), and correlated with TNM stage and lymph node metastasis (all P< 0.05). GC patients in the high miR-181d expression group had shorter survival time than those in the low miR-181d expression group (log-rank P< 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that miR-181d expression and TNM stage were two independent prognostic markers for GC. Overexpression of miR-181d significantly promoted the NCI-N87 and MGC-803 cells proliferation, migration and invasion (all P< 0.05). MiR-181d serves a role as an oncogene in GC by promoting tumor progression. And miR-181d might be a novel predictive marker for the prognosis of GC patients.