Early Study of Tumor Abnormal Protein in Gastric Adenocarcinoma

Clinical application of serum tumor abnormal protein in prostate cancer patients

PURPOSE

To explore the clinical value of tumor abnormal protein (TAP) in the diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of prostate cancer.

METHODS

This study enrolled a total of 265 patients who underwent prostate biopsy procedures from December 2017. TAP levels were assayed in their blood samples using a validated TAP testing kit. Comprehensive pathological assessments, including Gleason scores, TNM staging, and AJCC prognosis stages, were conducted on prostate cancer patients. Further analysis was carried out to examine the correlation between TAP expression levels and various clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

A significantly elevated TAP concentration was discerned in prostate cancer patients relative to those with benign prostate hyperplasia. Moreover, a significantly elevated TAP expression was detected in prostate cancer patients with high Gleason score (≥ 8) and advanced stages (III and IV), as compared to those with Gleason scores of 6 and 7 and lower stages (I and II). When diagnosing prostate cancer in gray area of PSA, TAP demonstrated superior diagnostic capabilities over PSA alone, with higher diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy than fPSA/tPSA ratio. Additionally, post-surgical or hormonal treatment, there was a marked reduction in TAP expression level among prostate cancer patients.

CONCLUSION

The assessment of TAP presents itself as a promising tool for early diagnosis and holds potential for sensitivity in monitoring treatment reponse in prostate cancer patients.

Clinical significance of tumor abnormal protein in patients with type 2 diabetes complicated with lung adenocarcinoma in situ

BACKGROUND

To investigate the application value of tumor abnormal protein in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with lung adenocarcinoma in situ.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 140 patients having type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with lung adenocarcinoma in situ (Group A), 160 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (Group B), and 120 healthy controls (Group C) were enrolled in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from November 2021 to December 2022.

RESULTS

The total cholesterol level was higher in Group A than in Group B (p < 0.05) and Group C (p < 0.01), and it was higher in Group B than in Group C (p < 0.01). The comparison results of cholesterol level were similar to those of tumor abnormal protein, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and glycosylated hemoglobin among the three groups. The triglyceride level was higher in Group A than in Group B and Group C (both p < 0.01). Group A had a higher level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol than Group C (p < 0.01). The fasting plasma glucose level was higher in Group A than in Group B and Group C (both, p < 0.01). These findings indicated that tumor abnormal protein, glycosylated hemoglobin, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and fasting plasma glucose were independent factors for patients having type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with lung adenocarcinoma in situ.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, detecting tumor abnormal protein levels may help diagnose lung adenocarcinoma in situ in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Quantification of Tumor Abnormal Proteins in the Diagnosis and Postoperative Prognostic Evaluation of Gastric Cancer

Background:

Abnormal glycosylation of proteins has been identified in almost all types of cancers and is closely related to the cancer progression, metastasis, and survival of cancer patients. This study was to explore the values of serum tumor abnormal protein (TAP), an abnormal glycochain protein, in the diagnosis and prognosis of gastric cancer (GC).

Methods:

A total of 335 GC patients were included as the study group, and another 335 subjects served as the control group. Tumor abnormal protein expression was compared between the 2 groups. Correlation analysis was used to assess the correlations of TAP with clinicopathological factors. Gastric cancer patients were divided into training set and test set at a ratio of 2:1. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses in training set were used to evaluate the prognostic significance of TAP in GC patients and explore the independent risk factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) to establish a prognostic model, followed by testing of the model. According to the median of TAP, 335 GC patients were divided into 2 groups to plot the survival curves of OS and DFS.

Results:

Tumor abnormal protein expression in the study group was significantly higher than in the control group. Taking the best cut-off value of TAP (110.128 μm²) as the diagnostic criteria for GC, the sensitivity and specificity of TAP were 83.58% and 97.61%, respectively, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was 0.935, which was not inferior to computed tomography (CT). Tumor abnormal protein expression was an independent risk factor for OS and DFS. The prognostic predictive value of TAP was better than that of pathological stage in GC patients. The model with TAP was effective in predicting prognosis.

Conclusion:

Tumor abnormal protein is an effective indicator for early screening and prognostic evaluation of GC and can also assist the clinical diagnosis and treatment of GC.