Therapeutic Targeting of FLT3 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Current Status and Novel Approaches

Broadening the horizon: potential applications of CAR-T cells beyond current indications

Engineering immune cells to treat hematological malignancies has been a major focus of research since the first resounding successes of CAR-T-cell therapies in B-ALL. Several diseases can now be treated in highly therapy-refractory or relapsed conditions. Currently, a number of CD19- or BCMA-specific CAR-T-cell therapies are approved for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), multiple myeloma (MM), and follicular lymphoma (FL). The implementation of these therapies has significantly improved patient outcome and survival even in cases with previously very poor prognosis. In this comprehensive review, we present the current state of research, recent innovations, and the applications of CAR-T-cell therapy in a selected group of hematologic malignancies. We focus on B- and T-cell malignancies, including the entities of cutaneous and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (T-ALL, PTCL, CTCL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), classical Hodgkin-Lymphoma (HL), Burkitt-Lymphoma (BL), hairy cell leukemia (HCL), and Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM). While these diseases are highly heterogenous, we highlight several similarly used approaches (combination with established therapeutics, target depletion on healthy cells), targets used in multiple diseases (CD30, CD38, TRBC1/2), and unique features that require individualized approaches. Furthermore, we focus on current limitations of CAR-T-cell therapy in individual diseases and entities such as immunocompromising tumor microenvironment (TME), risk of on-target-off-tumor effects, and differences in the occurrence of adverse events. Finally, we present an outlook into novel innovations in CAR-T-cell engineering like the use of artificial intelligence and the future role of CAR-T cells in therapy regimens in everyday clinical practice.

FLT3 inhibitors and novel therapeutic strategies to reverse AML resistance: An updated comprehensive review

FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutations occur in almost 30% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Despite the initial clinical efficacy of FLT3 inhibitors, many treated AML patients with mutated FLT3 eventually relapse. This review critically discusses the opportunities and challenges of FLT3-targeted therapies and sheds light on their drug interactions as well as potential biomarkers. Furthermore, we focus on the molecular mechanisms underlying the resistance of FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) AMLs to FLT3 inhibitors alongside novel therapeutic strategies to reverse resistance. Notably, dynamic heterogeneous patterns of clonal selection and evolution contribute to the resistance of FLT3-ITD AMLs to FLT3 inhibitors. Ongoing preclinical research and clinical trials are actively directed towards devising rational "personalized" or "patient-tailored" combinatorial therapeutic regimens to effectively treat patients with FLT3 mutated AML.

AML under the Scope: Current Strategies and Treatment Involving FLT3 Inhibitors and Venetoclax-Based Regimens

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a disease that mainly affects elderly patients who are more often unfit for intensive chemotherapy (median age of diagnosis is 68). The regimens, including venetoclax, a highly specific BCL-2 (B-cell lymphoma-2) inhibitor, are a common alternative because of their safer profile and fewer side effects. However, the resistance phenomenon of leukemic cells necessitates the search for drugs that would help to overcome the resistance and improve treatment outcomes. One of the resistance mechanisms takes place through the upregulation of MCL-1 and BCL-XL, preventing BAX/BAK-driven MOMP (mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization), thus stopping the apoptosis process. Possible partners for BCL-2 inhibitors may include inhibitors from the FLT3i (FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 inhibitor) group. They resensitize cancer cells through the downregulation of MCL-1 expression in the FLT3 mutated cells, resulting in the stronger efficacy of BCL-2 inhibitors. Also, they provide an additional pathway for targeting the clonal cell. Both preclinical and clinical data suggest that the combination might show a synergistic effect and improve patients' outcomes. The aim of this review is to determine whether the combination of venetoclax and FLT3 inhibitors can impact the therapeutic approaches and what other agents they can be combined with.

A Review of FLT3 Kinase Inhibitors in AML

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a highly aggressive illness distinguished by the accumulation of abnormal hematopoietic precursors in both the bone marrow and peripheral blood. The prevalence of FLT3 gene mutations is high and escalates the probability of relapse and mortality. The survival rates for AML patients, particularly those over 65, are low. FLT3 mutation screening at diagnosis is mandatory, and FLT3 inhibitors are crucial in treating AML patients with mutations. There are two categories of FLT3 mutations: FLT3-ITD located in the juxtamembrane domain and FLT3-TKD in the tyrosine kinase domain. FLT3-ITD is the most common type, affecting nearly a quarter of patients, whereas FLT3-TKD only affects 6-8% of patients. FLT3 inhibitors are now crucial in treating AML patients with FLT3 mutations. When dealing with FLT3-mutated AML, the recommended course of treatment typically involves chemotherapy and midostaurin, followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) to maximize the likelihood of success. Maintenance therapy can lower the risk of relapse, and gilteritinib is a better option than salvage chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory cases. Clinical trials for new or combined therapies are the most effective approach. This review discusses treatment options for patients with FLT3-mutated AML, including induction chemotherapy and options for relapsed or refractory disease. Additional treatment options may become available as more studies are conducted based on the patient's condition and susceptibility.

PLM-101 is a novel and potent FLT3/RET inhibitor with less adverse effects in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a prevalent form of leukemia in adults. As its survival rate is low, there is an urgent need for new therapeutic options. In AML, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutations are common and have negative outcomes. However, current FLT3-targeting agents, Midostaurin and Gilteritinib, face two significant issues, specifically the emergence of acquired resistance and drug-related adverse events leading to treatment failure. Rearranged during transfection (RET), meanwhile, is a proto-oncogene linked to various types of cancer, but its role in AML has been limited. A previous study showed that activation of RET kinase enhances FLT3 protein stability, leading to the promotion of AML cell proliferation. However, no drugs are currently available that target both FLT3 and RET. This study introduces PLM-101, a new therapeutic option derived from the traditional Chinese medicine indigo naturalis with potent in vitro and in vivo anti-leukemic activities. PLM-101 potently inhibits FLT3 kinase and induces its autophagic degradation via RET inhibition, providing a superior mechanism to that of FLT3 single-targeting agents. Single- and repeated-dose toxicity tests conducted in the present study showed no significant drug-related adverse effects. This study is the first to present a new FLT3/RET dual-targeting inhibitor, PLM-101, that shows potent anti-leukemic activity and fewer adverse effects. PLM-101, therefore, should be considered for use as a potential therapeutic agent for AML.

Application of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships in the Prediction of New Compounds with Anti-Leukemic Activity

Leukemia invades the bone marrow progressively and, through unknown mechanisms, outcompetes healthy hematopoiesis. Protein arginine methyltransferases 1 (PRMT1) are found in prokaryotes and eukaryotes cells. They are necessary for a number of biological processes and have been linked to several human diseases, including cancer. Small compounds that target PRMT1 have a significant impact on both functional research and clinical disease treatment. In fact, numerous PRMT1 inhibitors targeting the S-adenosyl-L-methionine binding region have been studied. Through topographical descriptors, quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) were developed in order to identify the most effective PRMT1 inhibitors among 17 compounds. The model built using linear discriminant analysis allows us to accurately classify over 90% of the investigated active substances. Antileukemic activity is predicted using a multilinear regression analysis, and it can account for more than 56% of the variation. Both analyses are validated using an internal "leave some out" test. The developed model could be utilized in future preclinical experiments with novel drugs.

Application of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships in the Prediction of New Compounds with Anti-Leukemic Activity

Leukemia invades the bone marrow progressively and, through unknown mechanisms, outcompetes healthy hematopoiesis. Protein arginine methyltransferases 1 (PRMT1) are found in prokaryotes and eukaryotes cells. They are necessary for a number of biological processes and have been linked to several human diseases, including cancer. Small compounds that target PRMT1 have a significant impact on both functional research and clinical disease treatment. In fact, numerous PRMT1 inhibitors targeting the S-adenosyl-L-methionine binding region have been studied. Through topographical descriptors, quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) were developed in order to identify the most effective PRMT1 inhibitors among 17 compounds. The model built using linear discriminant analysis allows us to accurately classify over 90% of the investigated active substances. Antileukemic activity is predicted using a multilinear regression analysis, and it can account for more than 56% of the variation. Both analyses are validated using an internal “leave some out” test. The developed model could be utilized in future preclinical experiments with novel drugs.

Combination Therapies with Kinase Inhibitors for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treatment

Targeting kinase activity is considered to be an attractive therapeutic strategy to overcome acute myeloid leukemia (AML) since aberrant activation of the kinase pathway plays a pivotal role in leukemogenesis through abnormal cell proliferation and differentiation block. Although clinical trials for kinase modulators as single agents remain scarce, combination therapies are an area of therapeutic interest. In this review, the author summarizes attractive kinase pathways for therapeutic targets and the combination strategies for these pathways. Specifically, the review focuses on combination therapies targeting the FLT3 pathways, as well as PI3K/AKT/mTOR, CDK and CHK1 pathways. From a literature review, combination therapies with the kinase inhibitors appear more promising than monotherapies with individual agents. Therefore, the development of efficient combination therapies with kinase inhibitors may result in effective therapeutic strategies for AML.

FMS-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: An Update on the Emerging Evidence and Safety Profile

FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) is one of the most frequently mutated genes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Approximately 30% of the adult cases harbor an internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) and 5-10% a tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) amino acid substitution (FLT3-TKD). The treatment paradigm of AML patients harboring FLT3 mutations (30%) has been modified by the discovery of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. First- and second-generation inhibitors classify FLT3 inhibitors according to FLT3 specificity: first-generation FLT3 inhibitors include sorafenib and midostaurin and second-generation inhibitors are represented by quizartinib, gilteritinib and crenolanib, among others. Activity of these inhibitors depends on their mechanism of receptor binding (active vs inactive conformation) and efficacy against the FLT3-ITD and -TKD mutations (type 1 inhibitors are active both on FLT3-ITD and TKD, whereas type 2 inhibitors are active only on FLT3-ITD). The FLT3 inhibitors sorafenib, midostaurin, quizartinib and gilteritinib have been tested in monotherapy in several settings including refractory or relapsed AML (R/R AML), post-transplant maintenance as well as in combination with intensive chemotherapy (ICT) or non-intensity regimens. The results of published randomized studies support the use of sorafenib in a post-transplant setting (SORMAIN trial), midostaurin in combination with ICT based (RATIFY trial) and gilteritinib for R/R AML (ADMIRAL trial). Gilteritinib in combination with hypomethylating agent as well as quizartinib are not supported by solid randomized trial results for their use in FLT3-mutated AML patients.