Clinical and prognostic significance of pathological and inflammatory markers in the surgical treatment of locally advanced colorectal cancer

Microenvironmental markers are correlated with lymph node metastasis in invasive submucosal colorectal cancer

Aims

Recent studies have shown that the microenvironment can include cancer cells and cancer‐associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and that both play important roles in the progression and metastasis of CRC. Here, we aimed to analyse the expression patterns of cancer cell‐ and CAF‐related proteins in submucosal invasive colorectal cancer (SiCRC) and whether such markers are correlated with lymph node metastasis (LNM).

Methods and results

Quantitative analysis was conducted for Ki‐67, p53, β‐catenin and matrix metalloproteinase‐7 (MMP7) to assess cancer cell markers. In addition, we examined CAF markers, including smooth muscle alpha‐actin (α‐SMA), CD10, podoplanin, fibroblast‐specific protein 1 (FSP‐1), platelet‐derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)‐α, PDGFR‐β, adipocyte enhancer‐binding protein 1 (AEBP1), fibroblast‐associated protein 1 (FAP‐1), zinc finger E‐box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) and TWIST‐related protein 1 (TWIST1). In both cases, we conducted digital pathology with Aperio software. We also examined the expression patterns of biomarkers using hierarchical cluster analysis. Two subgroups were established based on the expression patterns of cancer cell‐ and CAF‐ related markers, and the associations of these subgroups with clinicopathological variables. In multivariate analysis, subgroup 2, which was characterised by high expression of Ki‐67, p53, FAP‐1, platelet‐derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)‐α, PDGFR‐β and TWIST1, was correlated with LNM (P < 0.01). Next, we examined the associations of individual biomarkers with LNM. Multivariate analysis showed that high expression levels of Ki‐67 and FAP‐1 were significantly associated with LNM (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Our findings showed that expression patterns of cancer cell‐ and CAF‐related proteins may allow for stratification of patients into risk categories for LNM in SiCRC. In addition, Ki‐67‐ and FAP‐1‐expressing microenvironmental cells might be helpful for identification of correlations with LNM in SiCRC.

Soluble Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells-1 and Inflammatory Markers in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background:

Major abdominal surgery, including colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery, leads to systemic inflammatory response syndrome that can be detected and monitored with inflammatory markers testing. The aims of the study were to evaluate the usefulness of soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (sTREM-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in following the inflammatory response in CRC surgery and postoperative period, as well as to determine if duration of the surgery and the time that the colon has been opened during the surgery (open colon time [OCT]) reflect a larger surgical stress through inflammatory markers rise.

Methods:

The study included 20 patients who underwent CRC surgery and 19 healthy volunteers from June 2011 to September 2012. We determined inflammatory markers 1 day before surgery (T0), 24 h (T1), 48 h (T2), and 7 days after the surgery (T3). All statistical analyses were calculated using MedCalc Statistical Software version 14.8.1 (MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium).

Results:

Concentrations of CRP, PCT, and IL-6 in all measurement times were statistically different and sTREM-1 did not yield statistical significance. A weak positive correlation was found between IL-6 in T1 and T2 with the duration of the surgery (T1: r = 0.4060, P < 0.0001; T2: r = 0.3430, P < 0.0001) and OCT (T1: r = 0.3640, P < 0.0001, T2: r = 0.3430, P < 0.0001). A weak positive correlation between CRP in T2 and OCT (r = 0.4210, P < 0.0001) was also found. The interconnectivity of tested parameters showed a weak positive correlation between CRP and IL-6 in T1 (r = 0.3680; P < 0.0001), moderate positive correlation in T2 (r = 0.6770; P < 0.0001), and a strong positive correlation in T3 (r = 0.8651; P < 0.0001).

Conclusions:

CRP, IL-6, and PCT were shown to be reliable for postoperative monitoring. Simultaneous determination of CRP and IL-6 might not be useful as they follow similar kinetics. sTREM-1 might not be useful in CRC postoperative monitoring.

Trial Registration:

www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01244022;https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01244022?term=01244022&rank=1.

Clinical and Prognostic Significance of Pathological and Inflammatory Markers in Mucinous Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Curative Surgery

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and prognostic significance of pathological and inflammatory marker in mucinous rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery.

Material/Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the patient records of mucinous rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery at Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute from January 2006 to December 2013. The relationship between overall survival (OS) and clinicopathologic variables, pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), pretreatment platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), pretreatment lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and other biomarkers were analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing. Subsequently a Cox proportional hazard model was used to calculate hazard ratios for the risk of death.

Results

A total of 100 mucinous rectal cancer patients were included for analysis during the study period. The median age at presentation was 60.5 years (range, 26–81 years). The median overall survival (OS) for the whole group was 94 months. On univariate analysis, time interval from CCRT to operation (HR 0.37, p=0.03), lymphovascular invasion (HR 3.23, p=0.009), pretreatment NLR (HR 3.87, p=0.012), and LMR (HR 0.31, p=0.002) were significant prognostic factors for OS. In a multivariate analysis, pretreatment LMR was found to be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (HR, 0.43; 95%CI, 0.18 to 1.00, p=0.045).

Conclusions

Pretreatment lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio is a useful prognostic marker of OS in patients with mucinous rectal carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery.

Are Markers of Systemic Inflammation Good Prognostic Indicators in Colorectal Cancer?

Systemic inflammation has been proved to play a crucial role in promoting cancer progression and metastasis in many cancer types, including colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of the present review was to provide an overview of studies regarding the prognostic value of inflammation-based markers in patients with CRC. A literature search was performed for articles reporting the prognostic value of the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), modified GPS (mGPS), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in relation to CRC outcomes. In resectable early-stage CRC, high GPS scores seem significantly associated with cancer-specific survival. It has also been suggested that adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II CRC could improve cancer-specific survival in patients with high GPS scores. In patients with both resectable and unresectable metastatic CRC and a higher GPS score, all studies suggested poorer overall survival. In early-stage and resectable metastatic CRC, the NLR seemed related to overall survival; however, the data for disease-free survival were discordant. In metastatic disease, a possible correlation between a greater NLR and poorer response to bevacizumab has been suggested. Data concerning the prognostic and predictive role of the PLR and LMR in CRC are to date insufficient. In patients with unresectable metastatic disease, inflammation markers can be used to predict the chemotherapeutic outcome and monitor tumor progression. However, further prospective studies might lead to better risk stratification for patients eligible for curative surgery, thus, allowing the restriction of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy to patients with high-risk CRC.