Persistence to disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis in a Canadian cohort

Appointment non-attendance is associated with disease modifying therapy persistence the following year

BACKGROUND

It is recommended that healthcare providers and persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) have discussions prior to discontinuing a disease modifying therapy (DMT). However, if these appointments missed, either as a no show (NS) or short-notice cancellation (SNC), these discussions do not take place and may result in premature discontinuation. This study aimed to explore whether appointment non-attendance was predictive of DMT persistence the following year.

METHODS

Electronic health record data from Veterans with MS (n = 3,742) in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) MS Center of Excellence Data Repository were examined during two time frames: January 2013 - December 2013 (Year 1) and January 2014 - December 2014 (Year 2). DMT non-persistence was defined as discontinuing a DMT and not restarting another one within 90 days. The proportion of each type of missed appointment in Year 1 was calculated by dividing the number of NS and SNC by the total number of scheduled appointments during that time frame, respectively. Logistic regressions were run for each appointment non-attendance behavior, with Year 2 non-persistence as the outcome and age, sex, race, number of comorbidities, time since initial DMT, and Year 1 non-persistence as covariates.

RESULTS

Veterans who were non-persistent in Year 2 (n = 563) had a higher proportion of NS (6.5 % vs. 4.6 %, p < .001) and SNC (6.7 % vs 5.7 %, p = .002) in Year 1. After adjusting for demographics and DMT history, both the proportion of NS (aOR = 5.01, 95 % CI: 1.82, 13.29, p = .001) and SNC (aOR = 3.86, 95 % CI: 1.09, 12.90, p = .032) in Year 1 were significantly associated with non-persistence the following year.

CONCLUSIONS

Appointment non-attendance was associated with DMT non-persistence the following year, with both higher proportions of NS and SNC being significant contributors after controlling for demographics and DMT history. These findings highlight the potential effects of disruption to care for persons with MS.

Treatment patterns and persistence on disease modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis and its associated factors

BACKGROUND

Effective interventions for Multiple Sclerosis require timely treatment optimization which usually involves switching disease modifying therapies. The patterns of prescription and the reasons for changing treatment in people with MS, especially in low prevalence populations, are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the persistence, reasons of DMT switches and prescription patterns in a cohort of Colombian people with MS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study including patients with confirmed MS with at least one visit at our centre. We estimated the overall incidence rate of medication changes and assessed the persistence on medication with Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for individual medications and according to efficacy and mode of administration. The factors associated with changing medications were assessed using adjusted Cox proportional-hazards models. The reasons for switching medication changes were described, and the prescription patterns were assessed using network analysis, with measures of centrality.

RESULTS

Seven hundred one patients with MS were included. Mean age was 44.3 years, and 67.9% were female. Mean disease duration was 11.3 years and 84.5% had relapsing MS at onset, with median EDSS of 1.0. Treatment was started in 659 (94%) of the patients after a mean of 3 years after MS symptom onset. Among them, 39.5% maintained their initial DMT, 29.9% experienced a single DMT change, while 18.7% went through two, and 11.9% had three or more DMT changes until the final follow-up. The total number of treatment modifications reached 720, resulting in an incidence rate of 1.09 (95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.17) per patient per year The median time to change after the first DMT was 3.75 years, and was not different according to the mode of administration or efficacy classification. The main reasons for changing DMT were MS activity (relapses, 56.7%; MRI activity, 18.6%), followed by non-serious adverse events (15.3%) and disability (11.1%). Younger age at MS onset, care under our centre and insurer status were the main determinants of treatment change. Network analysis showed that interferons and fingolimod were the most influential DMTs.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of patients switch medications, mostly due to disease activity, and in association with age and insurer status.

Switching to second line MS disease-modifying therapies is associated with decreased relapse rate

Background and objectives

While randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for determining treatment efficacy, they do not capture the effectiveness of treatment during real-world use. We aimed to evaluate the association between demographics and multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapy (DMT) exposure, including treatment adherence and switches between different DMTs, on the risk of subsequent MS relapse.

Methods

All persons with relapsing-onset MS (pwRMS) living in Manitoba between 1999 and 2014 were identified from provincial healthcare databases using a validated case definition. Use of DMTs was abstracted from the provincial drug database covering all residents of Manitoba, including use of any DMT, stopping/starting any DMT, switches between different DMTs and adherence as defined by cumulative medication possession ratios (CUMMPRs) of 50, 70, 80 and 90%. Time to first-treated relapse was used as the outcome of interest in logistic regression and Cox-proportional hazards regression models adjusting for demographic covariates including age and year of diagnosis, sex, socioeconomic status and number of medical comorbidities.

Results

1780 pwRMS were identified, including 1,510 who were on DMT at some point in the study period. While total DMT exposure was not associated with the time to subsequent treated relapse, individuals who switched between more than 2 DMTs had higher post-switch rates of relapse. Switching to second-line DMTs was associated with a longer time to treated relapse in comparison to those who remained on a first-line DMT (HR 0.44; 95%CI: 0.32-0.62, p < 0.0001).

Discussion

Switching to high-efficacy DMTs reduces the rates of subsequent MS relapse at the population level.

Early versus delayed treatment with glatiramer acetate: Analysis of up to 27 years of continuous follow-up in a US open-label extension study

Background:

Glatiramer acetate (GA) is US-approved for relapsing multiple sclerosis.

Objectives:

To describe GA long-term clinical profile. To compare effectiveness of early start (ES) versus delayed start (DS; up to 3 years) with GA.

Methods:

Phase 3 trial participants entered a randomized placebo-controlled period then an open-label extension (OLE) with GA.

Results:

Overall, 208 out of 251 (82.9%) randomized participants entered the OLE; 24 out of 101 (23.8%, ES) and 28 out of 107 (26.2%, DS) participants completed the OLE. Median GA treatment was 9.8 (0.1–26.3) years. Annualized change in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was lower with ES versus DS (p = 0.0858: full study; p = 0.002; Year 5). Participants with improved/stable EDSS was consistently higher with ES versus DS: 40.3% versus 31.6% (p = 0.1590; full study); 70.8% versus 55.6% (p = 0.015; Year 5). ES prolonged time-to-6-month confirmed disease worsening (CDW) versus DS (9.8 vs 6.7 years), time-to-12-month CDW (18.9 vs 11.6 years), and significantly reduced time-to-second-6-month CDW (p = 0.0441). No new safety concerns arose.

Conclusion:

GA long-term treatment maintained clinical benefit with a similar safety profile to phase 3 results; a key limitation was that only 25% of participants completed the OLE. Early initiation of GA had sustained benefits versus delayed treatment.

A Prospective, Observational, Multicenter Study Assessing Adherence to Interferon Beta-1b Therapy and Patient Satisfaction Using the BETACONNECT Auto-Injector

Introduction

It is important to achieve good persistence and adherence to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) to achieve the best outcomes in chronic diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS). The BETACONNECT device is an electronic auto-injector for the DMT interferon beta-1b (Betaseron), designed to improve patients’ injection experience and to monitor adherence. This observational study aimed to assess patient adherence to and persistence with interferon beta-1b therapy as well as patient-reported satisfaction in a US population.

Methods

A prospective, observational, multicenter study was conducted in 146 adult patients with relapsing–remitting MS or clinically isolated syndrome, newly prescribed or currently established on interferon beta-1b therapy and naïve to the BETACONNECT device, and followed up during a 6-month observation period.

Results

Among the 91 patients who completed the study, the overall mean adherence rate was 82.5%, with 65.9% of patients adherent for at least 80% for the duration of the 6-month period. At 6 months, 98.9% of patients had less than a 60-day gap in therapy. Of the 115 patients who provided satisfaction data, 90.5% of patients were either very satisfied or satisfied with the BETACONNECT device.

Conclusion

This study shows that the BETACONNECT device was associated with high adherence to interferon beta-1b therapy in patients with MS. Patients also reported high degrees of satisfaction with the device. Therefore, this may be a viable delivery option to help with adherence and persistence, potentially leading to improved clinical outcomes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40120-022-00323-1.

Comorbidity and persistence of disease-modifying therapy use in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Comorbidity decreases the likelihood of initiating disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS). Our objective was to characterize the relationship between comorbidity and initial DMT persistence along with reasons for DMT discontinuation.

METHODS

We identified individuals with relapsing remitting MS or clinically isolated syndrome starting a platform DMT (interferon-β, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide) as initial therapy in the Canadian province of Nova Scotia from 2001 to 2016. Cases were identified using a clinic database for the only clinic providing specialty MS care in a province with universal publicly-funded health care. Comorbidity was determined by linkage of MS cases to provincial health administrative data using validated case definitions for mental health disorder, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, chronic lung disease, ischemic heart disease, epilepsy, and inflammatory bowel disease. Cox proportional hazards models explored the relationship between comorbidity, as a count or individual comorbidities, and time to discontinuation of initial DMT. Logistic regression models explored reasons for DMT discontinuation.

RESULTS

Among 1464 individuals starting platform therapy as initial DMT, the median duration on first DMT was 4 years (95% CI 4 - 4). Comorbidity count (0, 1, ≥2) was not associated with time to discontinuation of initial DMT. However, the presence of a mental health disorder was associated with an increased hazard of discontinuing DMT (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% CI 1.03-1.44). Comorbidity count was not associated with discontinuation for lack of efficacy or lack of tolerability after adjusting for covariates.

CONCLUSION

Individuals with mental health comorbidity may have unique challenges that affect persistence on DMT after treatment initiation.

Objective medication adherence and persistence in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression

BACKGROUND: Medication adherence is critical for the realization of pharmacotherapy benefits and reduced healthcare expenditure. Studies have shown up to 60% of people with Multiple sclerosis (MS) experience suboptimal medication adherence, which is associated with poorer health outcomes and subsequent discontinuation. The current systematic review reported on objectively measured adherence and discontinuation rates for self-administered oral and injectable disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). OBJECTIVES: To identify whether, in people with MS, the introduction of oral DMTs has improved medication adherence when compared with injectable DMTs. The secondary aim was to report synthesized objectively measured medication adherence and persistence rates for both oral and injectable DMTs in MS across varying study durations. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted through PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO. Inclusion criteria were limited to English, peer-reviewed, objective, self-administered DMT articles, published between July 1993 to December 2019. Publications reporting combined intravenous and self-administered DMT data, or that did not account for DMT switching in discontinuation rates, were excluded. Data were synthesized into observation lengths ranging from less than 8 months to greater than 36 months. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were undertaken on both oral and injectable 12-month adherence and discontinuation data. RESULTS: In total, 61 articles were included; 46 articles examined adherence and 26 examined discontinuation. Twelve-month adherence ranged between 53.0% to 89.2% for oral (N = 7) and 47.0% to 77.4% for injectable DMTs (N = 7). Results from the meta-analysis and meta-regression show significantly higher pooled mean medication possession ratio (MPR) adherence for oral DMTs (91.0%) when compared to injectable DMTs (77.0%) over 12 months (β = -0.146; 95% CI: -0.263 to -0.029). Results indicate major asymmetry across studies (LFK index: -5.18), proposing the presence of significant publication bias. Mean discontinuation over 12 months was between 10.5% to 33.3% for oral (N = 7) and 15.2% to 50.8% for injectable DMTs (N = 10), with meta-analysis results indicating the presence of significant heterogeneity (I2 Injectable: 99.5%; I2 Oral: 93.1%) between studies included in each subgroup. However, no appreciable difference in mean discontinuation rates across groups (Injectable: 27%; 95% Cl: 19.0%-34.0%; Oral: 24%; 95% CI: 17.0%-31.0%) was found. CONCLUSIONS: Medication adherence for oral DMTs suggests a significant improvement compared to adherence for injectable DMTs. No significant difference in discontinuation rates between oral and injectable DMTs was found. Oral DMT adherence and persistence studies are limited, given their relatively recent introduction. Suboptimal medication adherence and discontinuation issues remain present for both oral and injectable DMTs. Future studies would benefit from improved consistency in methodology, such as comparable adherence and persistence definitions. DISCLOSURES: The authors did not receive any funding for this study. Mardan and Hussain have nothing to disclose. Grech reports grants from Merck Pharmaceutical, outside the submitted work. Allan reports grants received from Merck Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Allan holds advisory board and consulting positions with Merck and advisory board positions for Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis, for which Monash Institute of Neurological Diseases receives consulting fees.

Medication adherence in multiple sclerosis as a potential model for other chronic diseases: a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether better medication adherence in multiple sclerosis (MS) might be due to specialised disease-modifying drug (DMD) support programmes by: (1) establishing higher adherence in MS than in other chronic diseases and (2) determining if higher adherence is associated with patient-specific or treatment-specific factors.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study with data from 1 January 1996 to 31 December 2015.

SETTING

Population-based health administrative data from three Canadian provinces.

PARTICIPANTS

Individual cohorts were created using validated case definitions for MS, epilepsy, Parkinson's disease (PD) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Subjects were included if they received ≥1 dispensation for a disease-related drug between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2014.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportion of subjects with optimal adherence (≥80%) measured by the medication possession ratio 1 year after the index date (first dispensation of disease-related drug).

RESULTS

126 478 subjects were included in the primary analysis (MS, n=6271; epilepsy, n=55 739; PD, n=21 304; RA, n=43 164). Subjects with epilepsy (adjusted OR, aOR 0.29; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.45), PD (aOR 0.42; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.63) or RA (aOR 0.26; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.35) were less likely to have optimal 1-year adherence compared with subjects with MS. Within the MS cohort, adherence was higher for DMD than for chronic-use non-MS medications, and no consistent patient-related predictors of adherence were observed across all four non-MS medication classes, including having optimal adherence to DMD.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects with MS were significantly more likely to have optimal 1-year adherence than subjects with epilepsy, RA and PD, and optimal adherence appears related to treatment-specific factors rather than patient-related factors. This supports the hypothesis that higher adherence to the MS DMDs could be due to the specialised support programmes; these programmes may serve as a model for use in other chronic conditions.

Age and sex as determinants of treatment decisions in patients with relapsing-remitting MS

BACKGROUND

. Most patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) are initially treated with moderate efficacy disease-modifying therapies (meDMTs), and only a smaller group of highly active patients are initiated on a high efficacy disease-modifying therapy (heDMT). Real-world data have shown that choosing a heDMT as the initial therapy in highly active RRMS patients is more effective than using a meDMT, and that in patients with breakthrough disease on a meDMT escalation of treatment to a heDMT is more effective than staying on the same or switching to another meDMT. The role of age and sex as determinants for selection of the initial treatment intensity, and for using escalation of treatment intensity in patients with relapse activity on treatment with meDMTs, is only partially known.

METHODS

. We included all Danish patients with RRMS registered in The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry who began a DMT since 2014 and stratified the cohort according to sex and age < 40 and ≥ 40 years at first DMT treatment. We studied determinants, with emphasis on age and sex, for the primary choice of therapy, for adherence to the initial therapy and for treatment escalation. Based on existing literature and clinical relevance, we included the following potential confounders in the analyses: DMT efficacy, pre-treatment relapse activity, disease duration, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, and, in a subgroup, MRI activity.

RESULTS

. With all covariates mutually adjusted, patient age was a strong decisive factor for choosing a heDMT with odds ratio 1.69 for starting a heDMT in patients < 40 years compared with patients ≥ 40 years. Men had odds ratio 1.53 for starting with a heDMT compared with women. The odds ratio of heDMT in patients with EDSS > 3 vs ≤ 3 was 3.49, and every additional relapse was associated with increased odds ratio 2.33 for heDMT. Patients were more adherent to the initial heDMTs than to the initial meDMTs. Patients above 40 years were more prone to stay on the initial treatment compared to patients below 40, regardless of whether the initial treatment was meDMT (p<0.001) or heDMT (p=0.008) (covariates mutually adjusted). Relapse activity resulted in escalation of therapy to a heDMT in 67% of patients aged < 40 years (N=273) and in 56% patients aged 40 years or above (N=159) (p=0.008), and younger patients had odds ratio 1.46 of escalating therapy compared to older patients. Male patients were more likely to have treatment escalation to heDMTs than female patients (odds ratio 2.03).

CONCLUSION

. Age and sex appear to be independent determinants for the choice of the initial DMT and for the decision of treatment escalation in patients with breakthrough disease on a meDMT. It is unfortunate, if older age is a factor that make choice of a heDMT more unlikely, as many DMTs seems to be less efficacious in older patients.

Changing therapeutic strategies and persistence to disease-modifying treatments in a population of multiple sclerosis patients from Veneto region, Italy

BACKGROUND

The availability of new disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) in the last years has changed the therapeutic strategies used in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). We aimed to describe trend in DMTs utilization and persistence to treatment in a large sample of patients attending 10 MS centres from four provinces of Veneto, Italy.

METHODS

Demographic, clinical and DMTs information of patients regularly followed from January 2011 to August 2018 were recorded and analysed. Persistence at 12, 24 months and at last follow-up was assessed by Kaplan Meier survival analysis. Multivariable Cox- proportional hazard model was used to identify predictors of persistence.

RESULTS

Of 3025 MS patients 65.7% were in treatment al last follow-up. Dimethylfumarate (DMF) was the most prescribed single drug among first-line and fingolimod among second-line DMTs. In the cohort of 1391 cases starting any DMT since 2011 12.9% stopped within 6 months, 24% within 12 and 40.3% within 24 months. Disease duration > 5 years at therapy start was predictive of greater risk of discontinuation, while age and sex were not. DMF use was predictive of higher persistence at 12 and 24 months, but not at last follow-up when azathioprine and glatiramer acetate showed the highest persistence compared to other DMTs. Side effects represented the main reason of discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

The use of the new oral DMTs greatly increased since their approval but persistence in the long-term is not better than with old drugs. The treatment choice is still a challenge both for patients and their doctors.

Monitoring, Switching, and Stopping Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews appropriate monitoring of the various multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapies, summarizes the reasons patients switch or stop treatment, and provides a framework for making these management decisions.

RECENT FINDINGS

With the increasing number of highly effective immunotherapies available for MS, the possibility of better control of the disease has increased, but with it, the potential for side effects has rendered treatment decisions more complicated. Starting treatment early with more effective and better-tolerated disease-modifying therapies reduces the likelihood of switching because of breakthrough disease or lack of compliance. Clinical and radiographic surveillance, and often blood and other paraclinical tests, should be performed periodically, depending on the disease-modifying therapy. Helping patients navigate the uncertainty around switching or stopping treatment, either temporarily or permanently, is one of the most important things we do as providers of MS care.

SUMMARY

Ongoing monitoring of drug therapy is a crucial component of long-term MS care. Switching treatments may be necessary for a variety of reasons. Permanent discontinuation of treatment may be appropriate for some patients with MS, although more study is needed in this area.

Persistence of use of prescribed cannabinoid medicines in Manitoba, Canada: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To estimate prevalence of continuous use (persistence) of prescribed cannabinoid medications for up to 1 year from initial prescription in Manitoba, Canada and predictors of duration of use.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A retrospective, population-based, cohort study using administrative data from the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository located at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

People without a record of a previous prescription who were prescribed a cannabinoid medication from 1 April 2004 to 1 April 2016 followed for 1 year from the date of first prescription.

MEASUREMENTS

Continuous prescribed cannabinoid medication use was defined as use without a gap exceeding 60 days between prescriptions. The primary outcome was prevalence of continuous prescribed cannabinoid medication use for up to 1 year. A secondary outcome was duration of continuous use. Predictors were socio-demographic characteristics, medical diagnoses and type of cannabinoid medication.

FINDINGS

Among 5452 new users, 18.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 17.08-19.12] were still using cannabinoids at 1 year. Median duration of use was 31 days [interquartile range (IQR) = 25-193]. This was highest for nabilone (33 days, IQR = 25-199) and lowest for nabiximols (20 days, IQR = 7-30). Use was longest among 19-45- and 46-64-year-old users and those with the highest socio-economic status. Fibromyalgia [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.84-0.95], osteoarthritis (HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.82-0.97) and substance use disorder (HR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.76-0.94) diagnoses were associated with longer use (HR for discontinuation-HR < 1 less discontinuation and longer use). A diagnosis of cancer was associated with shorter use (HR = 2.73, 95% CI = 2.02-3.67).

CONCLUSIONS

In Manitoba, Canada approximately 18% of people prescribed cannabinoid medication continue using for at least 1 year. Duration of use varies with type of cannabinoid medication, age, socio-economic status and dagnosis.

Discontinuation of disease-modifying therapy for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: Effect on clinical and MRI outcomes

BACKGROUND

Disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) have been shown to reduce relapses and new MRI lesions. However, few studies have assessed the impact of discontinuing DMT after a period of disease inactivity.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of DMT discontinuation on clinical and radiological outcomes in RRMS patients.

METHODS

69 RRMS patients who discontinued DMT after a period of disease inactivity were identified from the Comprehensive Longitudinal Investigation of MS study at the Brigham and Women's Hospital, based on the following inclusion criteria: age 18 or older; treated with DMT ≥2 years; no clinical and radiological relapse ≥2 years until the discontinuation; not restarting DMT for ≥6 months after discontinuation. Patients matched by age, gender, treatment, treatment duration, disease duration and Expanded Disability Status Scale score who remained on DMT were identified. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models with robust standard errors to account for the paired data were used to test the differences based on DMT discontinuation with the outcome measures: time to clinical relapse, MRI event, disability progression, and disease activity (either clinical relapse or MRI event).

RESULTS

Based on the 69 pairs of patients, discontinuation was not associated with time to clinical relapse (HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.44-1.72, p = 0.69), MRI event (HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.57 to 1.59, p = 0.84), disability progression (HR = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.61 to 2.53, p = 0.55) and disease activity (HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.56 to 1.42, p = 0.62). When we performed subgroup analysis to compare the impact of DMT discontinuation between older (age > 45) and younger (age ≤ 45) patients, we found a significant difference in the association between young and old for time to MRI event (p = 0.012) and time to new disease activity (p = 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that patients who discontinued treatment after a period of disease inactivity had a similar time to next event compared to subjects who remained on first-generation DMTs. In our cohort, we found that discontinuation after age 45 was associated with a stable disease course, while patients younger than age 45 who discontinued treatment were more likely to experience a new clinical relapse or MRI event.