Construct validity of patient-reported outcome instruments in US adults with hemophilia: results from the Pain, Functional Impairment, and Quality of life (P-FiQ) study

The Hemophilia Joint Health Score version 2.1 Validation in Adult Patients Study: A multicenter international study

Background

The Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) was developed and validated to detect arthropathy in children. Additional evidence is required to show validity in adults. We studied the convergent and discriminant construct validity of the HJHS version 2.1(HJHSv2.1) in adults with hemophilia. A secondary aim was to define age‐related normative adult HJHSv2.1 reference values.

Methods

We studied 192 adults with hemophilia, and 120 healthy adults in four age‐matched groups—18 to 29, 30 to 40, 41 to 50, and >50 years—at nine centers. Trained physiotherapists scored the HJHS and World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) joint score. Health history, the Functional Independence Scale of Hemophilia (FISH), Hemophilia Activities List (HAL), and Short‐Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF‐MPQ) were also collected.

Results

The median age was 35.0 years. Of participants with hemophilia, 68% had severe, 14% moderate, and 18% mild disease. The HJHS correlated strongly with WFH score (Spearman’s rho [r_s] = .95, P < .001). Moderate correlations were seen between the FISH (r_s = .50, P < .001) and SF‐MPQ Present Pain Intensity (r_s = .50, P < .001), while a modest correlation was found with the HAL (r_s = −.37, P < .001). The HJHS significantly differentiated between age groups (Kruskal‐Wallis T = 35.02, P < .001) and disease severity in participants with hemophilia. The HJHS had high internal reliability (Cronbach’s α = .88). We identified duration of swelling as a redundant item in the HJHS.

Conclusions

The HJHS shows evidence of strong convergent and discriminant construct validity to detect arthropathy in adults with hemophilia and is well suited for use in this population.

Validation of PROMIS Profile-29 in adults with hemophilia in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Profile-29 questionnaire is widely used worldwide, but it has not yet been validated in the Netherlands, nor in persons with hemophilia.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the Dutch-Flemish version of the PROMIS-29 Profile v2.01 in adults with hemophilia.

METHODS

Dutch males with hemophilia (all severities) completed questionnaires that contained sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, the PROMIS-29, RAND-36, and the Hemophilia Activities List (HAL). Structural validity of each subscale was assessed with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Internal consistency was calculated for each subscale with sufficient model fit in CFA. Construct validity was assessed by testing hypotheses about (1) correlations of each PROMIS-29 subscale with corresponding scales of RAND-36 and domains of HAL, and (2) mean differences in T-scores between subgroups with different hemophilia severities, self-reported joint impairment, and HIV infection status. We considered ≥75% of data in accordance with the hypotheses evidence for construct validity.

RESULTS

In total, 770 persons with hemophilia participated in this cross-sectional study. CFA revealed sufficient structural validity for five subscales: Physical Function, Depression, Sleep Disturbance, Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities, and Pain Interference. Internal consistency was high and Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.79 for Sleep Disturbance to 0.96 for Pain Interference. Differences between clinical subgroups were in the expected direction. Construct validity was confirmed for Physical Function, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, and Pain Intensity.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed sufficient evidence for structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity for most PROMIS Profile-29 subscales among people with hemophilia in the Netherlands.

Understanding the Pain Management Landscape within the US Bleeding Disorder Community: A Multi-Center Survey

Objectives

Pain is a known complication in persons with hemophilia (PWH) as a result of muscle and joint bleeding. Little is known regarding national Hemophilia Treatment Center (HTC) practice patterns related to pain management. The aim of this study was to: 1) Describe pain management practice patterns of HTC providers, 2) Identify gaps and areas of alignment with the CDC pain guidelines, and 3) Address educational opportunities for pain management. This survey is the first extensive description of multidisciplinary practice patterns of pain management for PWH.

Methods

This descriptive study involved physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses, physical therapists, and social workers from federally funded Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTC) eligible to complete an online survey exploring pain management practice patterns within the CDC pain guidelines.

Results

Results of this survey shed light on areas of strength and cohesiveness between HTC providers, including the following: dedication to effective pain management, utilization of non-pharmacological pain options, trial of non-opioid medications first before opioids, maintaining follow-up with patients after opioid prescription initiation, recognizing and utilizing clinically important findings before prescribing opioids, and counseling their patients regarding potential risk factors.

Conclusions

There remain opportunities to incorporate into clinical practice consistent use of tools such as formal screening questionnaires, opioid use agreements, written measurable goals, ongoing prescription monitoring, and written plans for discontinuation of opioid therapy. These results provide opportunities for improvement in education of HTC team members thus optimizing pain management in persons with bleeding disorders.

Phase 4 Safety and Efficacy Study of Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) in Previously Treated Chinese Patients With Severe/Moderately Severe Hemophilia A

Antihemophilic factor (recombinant) (rAHF; ADVATE^®; Baxalta US Inc., a Takeda company, Lexington, MA, USA) is indicated for the treatment and prevention of bleeding in patients with hemophilia A. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of standard prophylaxis versus on-demand treatment with rAHF in previously treated Chinese patients with severe/moderately severe hemophilia A. This open-label, sequential, interventional, postapproval study (NCT02170402) conducted in China included patients of any age with hemophilia A with factor VIII (FVIII) level ≤2%. Patients received 6 months’ on-demand rAHF then 6 months’ rAHF prophylaxis (20-40 IU/kg every 48 ± 6 hours). The primary objective was percentage reduction in annualized bleeding rate (ABR) in the per-protocol analysis set (PPAS); secondary objectives included ABR by bleeding subtype, hemostatic efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety. Of 72 patients who received ≥1 rAHF dose, 61 were included in the PPAS. Total ABR was lower during prophylaxis (mean 2.5, 95% CI 1.5-3.7; median 0) versus on-demand treatment (mean 58.3, 95% CI 52.5-64.7; median 53.9), representing a 95.9% risk reduction. Similar findings in favor of prophylaxis were observed for all types of bleeding event by cause and location. rAHF hemostatic efficacy was rated as “excellent”/“good” in 96.1% of treated bleeding events. Transient FVIII inhibitors (0.6-1.7 BU) in 4 patients resolved before study end; no unexpected safety issues were observed. rAHF prophylaxis in this study of previously treated Chinese patients with severe/moderately severe hemophilia A resulted in a clear reduction in bleeding events versus rAHF on-demand treatment, with no change in safety profile.

Hemophilia without prophylaxis: Assessment of joint range of motion and factor activity

BACKGROUND

Recurrent joint bleeding in hemophilia results in arthropathy and functional impairment. The relationship of arthropathy development and factor activity (FA) has not been reported in patients with FA levels <15%-20%.

METHODS

During the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Universal Data Collection, joint range-of-motion (ROM) measurements were taken at each comprehensive visit. Data were extracted from male patients with hemophilia (PWH) age ≥2 years with baseline factor activity levels ≤40%, excluding those prescribed prophylaxis, and used to calculate a proportion of normal ROM (PN-ROM) measure. Data were analyzed using regression models.

RESULTS

There were 6703 eligible PWH with 30 102 visits. PN-ROM declined with increasing age, and was associated with hemophilia severity, race/ethnicity, obesity, and viral illnesses. PWH ≥30 years old with fFA ≤2% and those ≥50 years old with FA ≤5% had mean PN-ROM values >10% less than controls; those ≥40 years old with FA <1% had values >20% less than controls. In the multivariable analysis, subjects with <1% FA had a 0.43% greater decrease (-0.49 to -0.37, 95% confidence interval) in PN-ROM each year relative to those with 16%-40% factor activity. A less pronounced effect was seen with 1%-5% or 6%-9% FA.

CONCLUSION

The effect of FA on ROM loss is far greater than that of any of the other characteristics, especially with FA <10%. This emphasizes the need to maintain a high index of suspicion for arthropathy in individuals with moderate and low-mild hemophilia.

Correlations between patient-reported outcomes and self-reported characteristics in adults with hemophilia B and caregivers of children with hemophilia B: analysis of the B-HERO-S study

Purpose

Pain, anxiety, depression, and other aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important issues for people with hemophilia and caregivers of children with hemophilia. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments may be used to assess aspects of HRQoL; however, the use of PROs in clinical management of patients with hemophilia is limited and inconsistent. The Bridging Hemophilia B Experiences, Results and Opportunities Into Solutions (B-HERO-S) study evaluated the impact of hemophilia B on HRQoL and other psychosocial aspects in affected adults and caregivers of children with hemophilia B. This post hoc analysis assessed correlations between PRO scores and psychosocial questions commonly asked in comprehensive care settings among B-HERO-S respondents.

Patients and methods

B-HERO-S consisted of two online surveys, one administered to adults with hemophilia B (n=299) and one administered to caregivers of children with hemophilia B (n=150). The adult survey included EQ-5D-5L with visual analog scale, BPI, HAL, and PHQ-9. The caregiver survey included PHQ-9 and GAD-7. Questions related to demographics, hemophilia treatment, and psychosocial questions asked in comprehensive care visits were also included in the surveys. A post hoc analysis was performed to assess correlations between responses to selected psychosocial questions with PRO scores.

Results

For adults with hemophilia B, greater pain severity and pain interference scores were associated with work-related problems, functional limitations, and relationship, psychological, and treatment issues. Significant correlations were also noted between some of these psychosocial outcomes and depressive symptoms. For caregivers, greater depression and anxiety were associated with employment issues, their child’s functional, relationship, and psychological issues, having had difficulty or concerns with treatment/factor availability or affordability, and having less frequent HTC visits.

Conclusion

High correlations were observed between PRO scores measuring pain, depression, and anxiety and questions commonly used in the comprehensive care setting to assess the psychosocial impact of hemophilia.

Health-related quality of life and health status in persons with haemophilia A with inhibitors: A prospective, multicentre, non-interventional study (NIS)

INTRODUCTION

Real-world data (RWD) on health-related outcomes in persons with haemophilia A (PwHA) provide insights into patient needs and can guide clinical study design. A global, prospective, non-interventional study (NIS; NCT02476942) collected detailed RWD on bleeding outcomes, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and health status in PwHA treated per local routine clinical practice.

AIM

To report HRQoL and health status in the adult/adolescent PwHA with inhibitors cohort in the NIS.

METHODS

This cohort enrolled PwHA aged ≥12 years with high-titre factor VIII inhibitor history. Participants remained on their usual treatment (no protocol-specified interventions). Health-related outcomes: Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (Haem-A-QoL), Haemophilia-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire for Children Short Form (Haemo-QoL SF), EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels (EQ-5D-5L) index utility score (IUS) and visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS).

RESULTS

One hundred three participants were enrolled on episodic (n = 75) or prophylactic treatment (n = 28); median (range) age, 31 (12-75) years; median (range) observation time, 26 (4-70) weeks. Haem-A-QoL scores indicated impairments in HRQoL aspects; comparable between episodic/prophylactic regimens and relatively consistent over time. Haemo-QoL SF scores with both regimens varied over time, and appeared poorer with episodic than prophylactic treatment. IUS and EQ-VAS were comparable between regimens, stable over time and lower on bleeding days. Mean proportions of missed work and school days were 16% and 23%, respectively; mean (standard deviation) number of days hospitalized was 3.2 (8.8) (comparable between groups).

CONCLUSIONS

These RWD demonstrate that PwHA with inhibitors have impaired HRQoL, despite standard treatment, and that more effective treatment options are needed.

Reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome instruments in US adults with hemophilia B and caregivers in the B-HERO-S study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the reliability and validity of six patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for evaluating health-related quality of life in adults with mild-severe hemophilia B and caregivers of children with hemophilia B, including affected women/girls.

METHODS

Adults with hemophilia B and caregivers completed separate online surveys containing several PRO instruments, which were administered to adult participants only (EQ-5D-5L, Brief Pain Inventory v2 Short Form, Hemophilia Activities List, and International Physical Activities Questionnaire), both adults and caregivers (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]), or caregivers only (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item [GAD-7] scale). Construct validity and item-total correlation were assessed using Pearson product-moment correlation, internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and known-group validity was assessed by comparisons to self-reported characteristics based on the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

Patient-reported outcomes instruments generally showed satisfactory reliability for adults (n = 299) and caregivers (n = 150). In adults, PRO instruments generally showed high construct validity. Most PRO instruments showed expected significant differences among known groups for adults and caregivers. PHQ-9 and GAD-7 did not show significant differences among caregiver age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-reported outcomes instruments administered in B-HERO-S demonstrated reliability and validity in the broader population of adults with hemophilia B and caregivers when including all severities and genders.

[Efficacy of short-term full-dose prophylaxis in adult Chinese patients with severe hemophilia A]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of short-term full-dose prophylaxis in adult Chinese patients with severe hemophilia A.

METHODS

Thirteen adult Chinese patients with severe hemophilia A receiving on-demand or low-dose prophylaxis underwent ultrasound examination of the target joints and evaluation of Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS). The data of annual bleeding episodes in the period of on-demand or low-dose prophylaxis were collected retrospectively from the patients, and the changes in bleeding and joint condition (ultrasound findings of the target joints and HJHS) were observed during short-term full-dose prophylaxis. The activity intensity of the patients was assessed using the IPAQ questionnaire, and the 72 h FⅧ trough activity was measured during full-dose prophylaxis.

RESULTS

The median age of the 13 patients was 26.0 (20.5-29.0) years. For full-dose prophylaxis, the patients received a median therapeutic dose of 31.0 (29.1-33.0) IU/kg, administered for 3 times per week; the median 72 h FⅧ trough activity of patients was 1.7% (1.3-3.4%). During the follow-up period for 3 months, the annual bleeding rates (ABR) and annual joint bleeding rates (AJBR) decreased significantly in all the patients (P=0.001 and 0.001, respectively), but zero bleeding was achieved in only 4 patients (30.8%) and zero joint bleeding in 7 patients (53.8%); 9 patients (69.2%) still experienced breakthrough bleeding. The damage severity of target joints assessed by ultrasound and HJHS in 6 patients (46.2%)was worse than before and no obvious progression of target joints damage was found in 7 patients (53.8%). Compared with the patients without progression, the patients with worsened joint damage had poorer baseline joint condition, higher bleeding frequencies before and during the follow-up, a higher intensity of physical activity, and a lower baseline FⅧ activity.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, although short-term full-dose prophylaxis can significantly reduce the bleeding and partially prevent the progression of joint damage, it is not yet possible to achieve the goal of zero bleeding for all adult patients with severe hemophilia A in China, nor can it completely prevent further joint damage. For adult patients with different clinical bleeding phenotypes, joint conditions and physical activity intensity, individualized therapy involving additional evaluation methods should be implemented, and physiotherapy and surgical intervention can be considered when necessary.

Patient-reported outcomes and joint status across subgroups of US adults with hemophilia with varying characteristics: Results from the Pain, Functional Impairment, and Quality of Life (P-FiQ) study

INTRODUCTION

Pain and functional impairment associated with joint disease are major problems for people with hemophilia, and impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) may vary across groups defined by demographic and treatment-related characteristics.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate differences in overall HRQoL, pain, function, and joint status between P-FiQ study subgroups.

METHODS

Adult males with hemophilia and a history of joint pain/bleeding completed a pain history and the patient-reported outcome instruments EQ-5D-5L, Brief Pain Inventory v2 Short Form (BPI), International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), and Hemophilia Activities List (HAL); optionally, joint status was assessed (Hemophilia Joint Health Score v2.1 [HJHS]). Scores were analyzed between subgroups across sets of participant characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 381 adult males with hemophilia were enrolled, with median age of 34 years. Worse scores on EQ-5D-5L index, BPI pain severity/interference, HAL overall score, and HJHS were generally associated with being college educated, unemployment, self-reporting both acute and chronic pain, and self-reporting anxiety/depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Measures of joint status and HRQoL were consistently lower in participants who had higher educational levels, were unemployed, self-reported having both acute and chronic pain, and self-reported having anxiety/depression. A greater understanding of the association of these factors with disease outcomes may improve individualized patient management.

What can we learn from using formal patient-reported outcome instruments to assess pain, functional impairment, anxiety, and depression in US adults with hemophilia?

People with hemophilia frequently suffer from arthropathy that leads to pain and functional impairment, ultimately resulting in reduced quality of life. The impact of pain and functional impairment on the lives of people with hemophilia was explored in the Pain, Functional Impairment, and Quality of Life (P-FiQ) study. Various patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments were employed to assess the effect of pain and functional impairment on multiple aspects of health in people with hemophilia. The results presented in this supplement include detailed observations from PRO instruments regarding pain, functional impairment, anxiety, and depression, an analysis of the differences in health-related quality of life across subgroups of patients defined by demographic and treatment-related characteristics, and results of a modeling analysis to identify patient factors which influence perceptions of pain and functional impairment, independent of joint status. These data provide insights into how the results from PRO assessments may be used to evaluate outcomes for people with hemophilia in the clinical and research settings.

Internal consistency and item-total correlation of patient-reported outcome instruments and hemophilia joint health score v2.1 in US adult people with hemophilia: results from the Pain, Functional Impairment, and Quality of life (P-FiQ) study

BACKGROUND

The Pain, Functional Impairment, and Quality of Life study was an observational, cross-sectional assessment of the impact of pain on functional impairment and quality of life in adult people with hemophilia (PWH) of any severity in the USA who experience joint pain and/or bleeding.

OBJECTIVE

To assess internal consistency (IC) and item-total correlation (ITC) of assessment tools used in the Pain, Functional Impairment, and Quality of Life study.

METHODS

Participants completed 5 patient-reported outcome instruments (EQ-5D-5L with visual analog scale, Brief Pain Inventory v2 Short Form [BPI], International Physical Activity Questionnaire [IPAQ], Short Form 36 Health Survey v2 [SF-36v2], and Hemophilia Activities List [HAL]) and underwent an optional physiotherapist-administered musculoskeletal exam (Hemophilia Joint Health Score v2.1) during routine visits. Reliability assessment included IC and ITC of each instrument.

RESULTS

A total of 381 adult PWH (median age, 34 years) were enrolled. Participants were predominantly white/non-Hispanic (69.2%); 75% had congenital hemophilia A, and 70.5% had severe hemophilia. A total of 310 subjects reported bleeding within the past 6 months (mean [SD] number of bleeds, 7.1 [13.00]). IC was generally high across the instruments employed (Cronbach's alpha 0.79-0.98) with the exception of HAL use of transportation (0.58) and IPAQ total physical activity (0.51). ITC was high (Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient >0.20) for all items except the "vigorous intensity activities" item of IPAQ, which was applicable to less than one-third of participants. The ITCs were generally highest in domains/scores that measured the functional consequences of hemophilic arthropathy on mobility and pain.

CONCLUSION

The demonstrated reliability (IC/ITC) of the patient-reported outcome instruments and Hemophilia Joint Health Score v2.1 support a role for these instruments in evaluating adult PWH in US clinical and research settings.

Known-group validity of patient-reported outcome instruments and hemophilia joint health score v2.1 in US adults with hemophilia: results from the Pain, Functional Impairment, and Quality of life (P-FiQ) study

BACKGROUND

The Pain, Functional Impairment, and Quality of Life (P-FiQ) study was an observational, cross-sectional assessment of the impact of pain on functional impairment and quality of life in adults with hemophilia in the United States who experience joint pain or bleeding.

OBJECTIVE

To describe known-groups validity of assessment tools used in the P-FiQ study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Participants completed 5 patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments (5-level EuroQoL 5-dimensional questionnaire [EQ-5D-5L] with visual analog scale [VAS], Brief Pain Inventory v2 Short Form [BPI], International Physical Activity Questionnaire [IPAQ], Short-Form Health Survey [SF-36v2], and Hemophilia Activities List [HAL]) and underwent a musculoskeletal examination (Hemophilia Joint Health Score [HJHS]) during a routine clinical visit.

RESULTS

P-FiQ enrolled 381 adults with hemophilia (median age, 34 years). Participants were predominantly white/non-Hispanic (69.2%), 75% had congenital hemophilia A, and 70.5% had severe hemophilia. Most (n=310) reported bleeding within the past 6 months (mean [SD] number of bleeds, 7.1 [13.00]). All instruments discriminated between relevant known (site- or self-reported) participant groups. Domains related to pain on EQ-5D-5L, BPI, and SF-36v2 discriminated self-reported pain (acute/chronic/both; P<0.05), domains related to functional impairment on IPAQ, SF-36v2, and HAL discriminated self-reported functional impairment (restricted/unrestricted; P<0.05), and domains related to mental health on the EQ-5D-5L and SF-36v2 discriminated self-reported anxiety/depression (yes/no; P<0.01). HJHS ankle and global gait domains and global score discriminated self-reported arthritis/bone/joint problems, percentage of lifetime on prophylaxis, current treatment regimen, and hemophilia severity (P<0.01); knee and elbow domains discriminated all of these (P<0.01) except for current treatment regimen.

CONCLUSION

All assessment tools demonstrated known-group validity and may have practical applicability in evaluating adults with hemophilia in clinical and research settings in the United States.