Concordance Between Persons with Multiple Sclerosis and Treating Physician on Medication Effects and Health Status

Comparison of time to clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life in neurological disorders in patients treated with natalizumab versus ocrelizumab

Aim: To assess time to improvement in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) domains for patients treated with natalizumab versus ocrelizumab. Methods: Patients enrolled in the MS PATHS network who initiated treatment with either natalizumab or ocrelizumab rated the Neuro-QoL domains of physical function, symptoms, emotional health, cognitive function and social ability. Results: Time to clinically meaningful improvement was significantly shorter with natalizumab versus ocrelizumab for cognitive function (event time ratio [95% CI]: 0.37 [0.24-0.57]; p < 0.001), sleep disturbance (0.45 [0.28-0.72]; p = 0.001), social role participation (0.37 [0.21-0.66]; p = 0.001) and social role satisfaction (0.5 [0.31-0.8]; p = 0.004). Conclusion: Natalizumab had shorter time to clinically meaningful improvement in cognitive, sleep, and social role Neuro-QoL domains versus ocrelizumab.

Large-scale cross-sectional online survey on patient-neurologist communication, burden of disease assessment and disease monitoring in people with multiple sclerosis

Background

Management of multiple sclerosis (MS) requires a high level of communication between health care professionals (HCPs) and people with MS (pwMS) including profound investigation and discussion of symptoms to identify therapeutic needs. For treatment decisions, monitoring of disease activity is important, in this respect self-monitoring devices and apps, as well as magnetic resonance imaging are important tools.

Methods

MS Perspectives is a cross-sectional online survey conducted in Germany which was designed to collect data, among others, on the communication between pwMS and HCPs regarding treatment goals, symptom assessment, usage of devices and apps to self-monitor health functions, as well as to identify patients' attitude toward the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Between December 2021 and February 2022, 4,555 pwMS completed the survey.

Results

In total, 63.7% of participants reported that treatment goals have been discussed with their HCPs. Symptoms worsening in the past 12 months independent of relapses was more often reported by pwMS than inquired by HCPs, according to patients' report. Devices or apps for health monitoring were used by less than half of participants. Frequency of MRI controls was much lower in participants with longer compared to shorter disease duration (47.5 vs. 86.3%). The proportion of patients with annual or semiannual scans was highest among pwMS receiving infusion therapy (93.5%), followed by oral medication (82.5%) and injectables (73.4%), and lowest for pwMS without immunotherapy (58.2%).

Conclusion

MS Perspectives identified a rather low patient involvement regarding treatment goals and symptom assessment in clinical practice. Regarding this and our findings for health self-monitoring and MRI usage, strategies for improving patient-HCP communication and disease monitoring may be considered.

Communication between persons with multiple sclerosis and their health care providers: A scoping review

OBJECTIVES

This study undertakes a scoping review of research about communication between persons with MS and their health care providers.

DESIGN

PubMed, PsycInfo, Communication Source, Socindex, Sociological Abstracts, Cinahl, and Proquest Dissertations and Theses were used to identify studies since each database's inception. Research team members engaged in study selection, coding for communication issues, and data extraction for descriptive information.

RESULTS

Of the 419 empirical articles identified, 175 were included. Codes represented all elements of ecological and pathway models, emphasizing emerging technologies for facilitating communication, uncertainty and anxiety for persons with MS, and communication issues surrounding diagnosis, information seeking, and decision making.

CONCLUSION

This review synthesizes and organizes influences on communication, communication processes, and health outcomes of communication for persons with MS and their providers. Findings extend the ecological model with illness context and the pathway model with communication breakdowns and provider outcomes.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Health care providers should consider the complexity of communication when interacting with persons with MS, including the larger context in which it occurs, communication processes and their purposes, and short-term and long-term consequences of interactions. Ecological and pathway models can be frameworks for developing educational materials, as they succinctly capture key communication issues and outcomes.