1
|
von der Warth R, Rudolph M, Bengel J, Glattacker M. The association of early response with the outcome of psychosomatic rehabilitation in patients with mental disorders and its link to treatment and illness beliefs-A prospective longitudinal cohort study. Psychother Res 2025; 35:379-394. [PMID: 38381978 DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2024.2316014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Early response is considered to be an important predictor for therapy outcomes; yet little is known about its relevance in psychosomatic rehabilitation. This paper aims to describe the association of early response in psychosomatic rehabilitation, as well as the associations of early response with pre-rehabilitative factors such as illness and treatment beliefs. A longitudinal study with three measurement points was applied. Early response was defined using the percent improvement method after two weeks of treatment. Its association with therapy outcome and with illness and treatment beliefs was analyzed using multiple regression analyses. A total of 264 participants took part. Early response was a significant predictor of psychosomatic rehabilitation outcome, explaining an incremental variance of 1-30% after controlling for initial symptom burden. Illness and treatment beliefs predicted 6-20% variance in early response. Important illness beliefs referred to perceived symptoms, consequences and comprehensibility of the illness. Important treatment beliefs referred to expectations about rehabilitation structure, processes and concerns. Early response is associated with the therapy outcome of psychosomatic rehabilitation, with illness and treatment beliefs found to be associated with early response. Further research on the predictors of early response in psychosomatic rehabilitation is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rieka von der Warth
- Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Rudolph
- Deutsche Rentenversicherung Rheinland-Pfalz (German Statutory Pension Insurance Rhineland Palatinate), Mittelrhein-Klinik (Clinic for Psychosomatic Rehabilitation), Boppard-Bad Salzig, Germany
| | - Jürgen Bengel
- Section of Rehabilitation Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Manuela Glattacker
- Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hobson TE, Metz AK, Bellendir TR, Froerer DL, Rosenthal RM, Hunter CDR, Featherall J, Maak TG, Aoki SK. Short-term Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery in Patients Participating in Formal Physical Therapy Versus a Home Exercise Program: A Prospectively Enrolled Cohort Analysis. Am J Sports Med 2024; 52:2021-2028. [PMID: 38857043 DOI: 10.1177/03635465241252981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physical therapy is frequently utilized in the postoperative care of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). There has been limited research into the efficacy of a structured home exercise program (HEP) compared with formal physical therapy (FPT) in this patient population. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS The purpose was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of patients utilizing FPT versus an HEP after hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS. It was hypothesized that both groups would show similar improvements regarding outcome scores, which would improve significantly compared with their preoperative scores. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS Patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS at a single center between October 2020 and October 2021 were prospectively enrolled. Patients were allowed to self-select FPT or an HEP and were administered a survey preoperatively and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. The survey included the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, visual analog scale for pain, 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, and patient satisfaction with physical therapy and overall care. Statistical analysis was conducted between the 2 groups and within groups to compare preoperative and postoperative scores. RESULTS The patients' mean age was 32.6 ± 10.4 years, with 47.2% being female and 57.4% choosing the HEP. At 12 months postoperatively, no significant differences were reported between the FPT and HEP groups regarding the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score (P = .795), visual analog scale for pain score (P > .05), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function T-score (P = .699), 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool score (P = .582), and patient satisfaction (P > .05). Outcome scores at 12 months postoperatively were significantly improved from the preoperative scores across all measures in both groups (P < .001). CONCLUSION There were no significant differences regarding patient outcomes between FPT and the HEP at 1-year follow-up after hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS when patients selected their own treatment, with both groups demonstrating significant improvements in their outcome scores from their preoperative values. These findings suggest that a structured HEP may be a viable alternative to FPT after hip arthroscopic surgery in patients who prefer a self-directed rehabilitation program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor E Hobson
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Allan K Metz
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Trina R Bellendir
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Devin L Froerer
- School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Reece M Rosenthal
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Collin D R Hunter
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Joseph Featherall
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Travis G Maak
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Stephen K Aoki
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kaier K, Knecht J, Nalbach L, Körner M. The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the effectiveness of psychosomatic rehabilitation in Germany. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:719. [PMID: 38862923 PMCID: PMC11165732 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11170-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the present study is to investigate the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the effectiveness of psychosomatic rehabilitation. METHODS Between April 2019 and March 2022, a total of 18,388 patients from 7 rehabilitation centres could be included in the study. For each patient, score values from the HEALTH-49 and ICF AT-50 Psych questionnaires were calculated at the beginning and at the end of rehabilitation and the effectiveness of the rehabilitation program was determined by comparing the scores at the beginning and at the end of the rehabilitation programme. Using risk adjusted linear mixed models, three time intervals were compared: a pre-pandemic episode (April 2019 to March 2020), the first year of the pandemic (April 2020 to March 2021) and the second year of the pandemic (April 2021 to March 2022). RESULTS Overall, it can be stated that the pandemic has substantially impaired the effectiveness of psychosomatic rehabilitation measures. This phenomenon can be observed across a wide range of psychosocial markers and even two years after the start of the pandemic there is no end to the limited effectiveness. With regard to 'psychological and somatoform disorders', for example, there was a relative decrease in the effectiveness of the rehabilitation measure by 11.29% in the first year of the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic episode, p < 0.001. In the second year of the pandemic, the effectiveness of the rehabilitation measure was still decreased by 8.8% compared to the pre-pandemic episode, p < 0.001. In addition, the evaluations show that a division of the pandemic effect into direct effects (on the individual) and indirect effects (via further complication of the occupational problem environment) can be made and that the pandemic-related complication of the occupational problem environment are still prevalent more than two years after the start of the pandemic. DISCUSSION The Covid-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the psychosomatic rehabilitation programs reducing the effectiveness of treatment not only for a short period of time but constantly until March 2022. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER DRKS00029669; Date of registration: 02/08/2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus Kaier
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 49, 79106, Germany, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Jakob Knecht
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 49, 79106, Germany, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lukas Nalbach
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Mirjam Körner
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Qian Y, Wang X, Huang X, Li J, Jin C, Chen J, Sha M. Bounded rationality in healthcare: unraveling the psychological factors behind patient satisfaction in China. Front Psychol 2024; 15:1296032. [PMID: 38605837 PMCID: PMC11008602 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1296032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Patient satisfaction is a crucial metric to gauge the quality of medical services, but the psychological factors influencing patient satisfaction remain insufficiently explored. Methods This study examines these psychological factors by applying the theory of bounded rationality to 1,442 inpatients in Hangzhou, China, whose data were collected using a questionnaire. One-way ANOVA, correlation analysis, and hierarchical regression were used to analyze patient satisfaction and its associated factors. Additionally, the path analysis of the structural equation model revealed the mechanisms behind the key psychological factors that influenced patient satisfaction. Results Medical risk perception, the social cognition of the medical environment, and social desirability bias had significant positive impacts on patient satisfaction. By contrast, negative emotions had a significant negative impact on patient satisfaction. Notably, patients' negative emotions had both a suppressive effect and a positive moderating effect on the relationship between medical risk perception and patient satisfaction. Similarly, social desirability bias had a suppressive effect on the correlation between the social cognition of the medical environment and patient satisfaction, albeit with a negative moderating effect. Discussion These results suggest that when evaluating and improving patient satisfaction, accounting only for the factors that directly influence medical service quality is insufficient, as the indirect and moderating effects of patients' negative emotions and the social cognition of the medical environment must also be considered. Medical service providers should thus address patients' negative emotions, establish good doctor-patient relationships, optimize service environments, provide managers with medical risk education and training on negative emotions, and prioritize patient-centered care. Additionally, the government and relevant health departments should optimize medical policies, enhance fairness and accessibility, and create a positive social cognitive environment through public education and awareness campaigns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Qian
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
- Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaohe Wang
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xianhong Huang
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jinwen Li
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chen Jin
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jie Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - MengYi Sha
- Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Riedl D, Kampling H, Kruse J, Nolte T, Labek K, Kirchhoff C, Grote V, Fischer MJ, Knipel A, Lampe A. Epistemic Trust Is a Critical Success Factor in Psychosomatic Rehabilitation-Results from a Naturalistic Multi-Center Observational Study. J Clin Med 2023; 13:177. [PMID: 38202184 PMCID: PMC10780285 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Knowledge about critical success factors underpinning beneficial treatment outcomes in psychosomatic inpatient rehabilitation is scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of patients' epistemic stance in relation to the improvement of psychological distress during rehabilitation. In this naturalistic longitudinal observational study, n = 771 patients completed routine assessments for psychological distress (BSI-18), health-related quality of life (HRQOL; WHODAS), and epistemic trust (ETMCQ) before (T1) and after (T2) psychosomatic rehabilitation. Patients were grouped as best, average, and worst responders based on their mean BSI-18 changes during treatment, and their mean change in epistemic trust, mistrust, and credulity was compared using repeated measures analyses of variance (rANOVAs). No associations of performance with sex (p = 0.09), age (p = 0.11), or relationship status (p = 0.58) were found. Best responders reported significantly improved epistemic trust (p = 0.001) and reduced epistemic mistrust (p < 0.001), whereas worst responders reported a significant increase in epistemic mistrust (p < 0.001) and credulity (p < 0.001). Average responders did not change for either epistemic trust (p = 0.11), mistrust (p > 0.99), or credulity (p = 0.96). Our results underscore the role of the epistemic stance in psychosomatic and psychotherapeutic treatments. These results help to better understand what might determine psychosomatic rehabilitation outcomes and indicate the role of epistemic trust as a critical success factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Riedl
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, 1100 Vienna, Austria
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Hanna Kampling
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany
| | - Johannes Kruse
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany
- Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Center of the Philipps University Marburg, 35037 Marburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Nolte
- Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London N1 9JH, UK
- Research Department for Clinical, Educational and Heath Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Karin Labek
- Institute of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Christina Kirchhoff
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Vincent Grote
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, 1100 Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael J. Fischer
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, 1100 Vienna, Austria
- VAMED Rehabilitation Center Kitzbuehel, 6370 Kitzbuehel, Austria
| | | | - Astrid Lampe
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, 1100 Vienna, Austria
- VAMED Rehabilitation Center Montafon, 6780 Schruns, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang Y, Liu C, Wang P. Patient satisfaction impact indicators from a psychosocial perspective. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1103819. [PMID: 36908420 PMCID: PMC9992178 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1103819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patient satisfaction plays an important role in improving patient behavior from care, reducing healthcare costs, and improving outcomes. However, since patient satisfaction is a multidimensional concept, it remains unclear which factors are the key indicators of patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to verify whether and how patients' psychosocial perceptions of physicians influenced patient satisfaction. Method In China, 2,256 patients were surveyed on stereotypes of physicians, institutional trust, humanized perception, and communication skills, as well as patient expectations and patient satisfaction. The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Results Stereotypes, institutional trust, and humanized perception have an indirect effect on patient satisfaction through communication, and patient expectations have a direct effect on patient satisfaction. Conclusions "Patient-centered" communication is the key to improving patient satisfaction, while positive stereotypes at the societal level, standardization of organizational institutions, expression of the doctor's view of humanity in the doctor-patient interaction, and reasonable guidance of patient expectations are important for improving patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Wang
- College of Education, Lanzhou City University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Chenchen Liu
- Department of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China
| | - Pei Wang
- School of Teacher Education, Honghe University, Mengzi, China.,Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|