Pre-Implantation Gender Selection: Family Balancing in Jordan

Ethical issues surrounding the use of assisted reproductive technologies in Ghana: An analysis of the experiences of clients and service providers

Since the advent of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) in Ghana about three decades ago, IVF and ICSI treatments have enabled infertile Ghanaian couples to fulfill their aspirations and dreams of having children. In this extremely pronatalist society, ART has provided relief to many childless couples by reducing, if not eliminating, the shame of childlessness that they would otherwise have to suffer. However, as the provision and utilization of ART continue to increase, so do worries regarding the ethical difficulties surrounding this field of medicine, which challenge cultural ideals and personal desires. The study explores client and service provider experiences with ART in urban Ghana. Observation and in-depth interviews were employed to collect data, and the ethical dimensions of people's experiences relative to Ghanaian cultural and ethical values were analyzed. The results show that the provision of ART services for heterosexual couples in marital unions, the availability of PGT for sickle cell clients, the preference for multiple births emerging from embryo transfers, the lower preference for cryopreservation, the high cost of ART treatment, and the need for regulation of the provision of ART services in Ghana were some of the ethical concerns expressed by both clients and service providers.

Perceptions towards sex selection among Jordanian population: A survey study

Sex selection is becoming a more common practice in the society and worldwide. The current study aimed to examine the perceptions about sex selection options and possible association with sociodemographic factors and relevant characteristics. The study was a cross-sectional survey of adults in Jordan in January and February 2020 using a self-administered questionnaire. Results showed that 40.1% of respondents preferred male gender when having a child, 22.4% of respondents preferred the male gender when having a child, even if they have had children of both genders, and 71.3% preferred having children from both genders. On the other hand, 58.8% of participants preferred a male gender when there is one chance to conceive via assisted reproduction technologies. Also, among participants, 66% thought that sex selection is religiously acceptable, yet 78.0% did not support of the sex selection idea. The above factors were significantly associated with several sociodemographic variables such as gender, marital status, education, career, and place of residence, but not income. In conclusion, the current study shed a light on preferences towards sex selection in a large cohort to better understand the perception and attitude of the population towards this practice.