Interactions between Antiepileptic and Antipsychotic Drugs

Optimizing co-prescription of clozapine and antiseizure medications: a systematic review and expert recommendations for clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

Antiseizure medication (ASM) add-on to clozapine may be efficient to target clozapine-resistant mood or psychotic symptoms or clozapine-related adverse drug reactions (ADR) such as seizures. We aimed to synthesize the information relevant for clinical practice on the risks and benefits of clozapine-ASM co-prescription.

AREAS COVERED

Articles were identified with MEDLINE, Web of Sciences and PsycINFO search from inception through October 2023. The review was restricted to ASM with mood-stabilizing properties or with potential efficacy for resistant psychotic symptoms (valproate (VPA), lamotrigine, topiramate, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine).

EXPERT OPINION

VPA add-on to clozapine is associated with a high risk of serious ADR (myocarditis, neutropenia, pneumonia) mostly explained by complex time-dependent drug-drug interactions. The initial inhibitory effects on clozapine metabolism require slow titration to avoid immuno-allergic reactions. After the titration period, VPA has mainly inductive effects on clozapine metabolism that are more marked in smokers requiring therapeutic drug monitoring. Lamotrigine and topiramate add-on may be recommended as the first-line treatment for clozapine-related seizures, but there is limited evidence regarding the efficacy of this strategy for clozapine-resistant psychotic symptoms. Carbamazepine should not be co-prescribed with clozapine because of its potential for agranulocytosis and for inducing clozapine metabolism.

Pharmacogenomics and non-genetic factors affecting drug response in autism spectrum disorder in Thai and other populations: current evidence and future implications

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may affect family and social life profoundly. Although there is no selective pharmacotherapy for ASD, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recommended risperidone/aripiprazole to treat the associated symptoms of ASD, such as agitation/irritability. Strong associations of some pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic gene variants, e.g., CYP2D6 and DRD2, with risperidone-induced hyperprolactinemia have been found in children with ASD, but such strong genetic associations have not been found directly for aripiprazole in ASD. In addition to pharmacogenomic (PGx) factors, drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and possibly cumulative effects of DDIs and PGx may affect the safety or effectiveness of risperidone/aripiprazole, which should be assessed in future clinical studies in children with ASD. Reimbursement, knowledge, and education of healthcare professionals are the key obstacles preventing the successful implementation of ASD pharmacogenomics into routine clinical practice. The preparation of national and international PGx-based dosing guidelines for risperidone/aripiprazole based on robust evidence may advance precision medicine for ASD.

Drug-drug interactions between antiseizure medications and antipsychotic medications: a narrative review and expert opinion

INTRODUCTION

Antiseizure medications (ASMs) and antipsychotic drugs are frequently coadministered with the potential for drug-drug interactions. Interactions may either be pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic, resulting in a decrease or increase in efficacy and/or an increase or decrease in adverse effects.

AREAS COVERED

The clinical evidence for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between ASMs and antipsychotics is reviewed based on the results of a literature search in MEDLINE conducted in April 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

There is now extensive published evidence for the clinical importance of interactions between ASMs and antipsychotics. Enzyme-inducing ASMs can decrease blood concentrations of many of the antipsychotics. There is also evidence that enzyme-inhibiting ASMs can increase antipsychotic blood concentrations. Similarly, there is limited evidence showing that antipsychotic drugs may affect the blood concentrations of ASMs through pharmacokinetic interactions. There is less available evidence for pharmacodynamic interactions, but these can also be important, as can displacement from protein binding. The lack of published evidence for an interaction should not be interpreted as meaning that the given interaction does not occur; the evidence is building continually. There is no substitute for careful patient monitoring and sound clinical judgment.

An individualized medication model of sodium valproate for patients with bipolar disorder based on machine learning and deep learning techniques

Valproic acid/sodium valproate (VPA) is a widely used anticonvulsant drug for maintenance treatment of bipolar disorders. In order to balance the efficacy and adverse events of VPA treatment, an individualized dose regimen is necessary. This study aimed to establish an individualized medication model of VPA for patients with bipolar disorder based on machine learning and deep learning techniques. The sequential forward selection (SFS) algorithm was applied for selecting a feature subset, and random forest was used for interpolating missing values. Then, we compared nine models using XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, random forest, GBDT, SVM, logistic regression, ANN, and TabNet, and CatBoost was chosen to establish the individualized medication model with the best performance (accuracy = 0.85, AUC = 0.91, sensitivity = 0.85, and specificity = 0.83). Three important variables that correlated with VPA daily dose included VPA TDM value, antipsychotics, and indirect bilirubin. SHapley Additive exPlanations was applied to visually interpret their impacts on VPA daily dose. Last, the confusion matrix presented that predicting a daily dose of 0.5 g VPA had a precision of 55.56% and recall rate of 83.33%, and predicting a daily dose of 1 g VPA had a precision of 95.83% and a recall rate of 85.19%. In conclusion, the individualized medication model of VPA for patients with bipolar disorder based on CatBoost had a good prediction ability, which provides guidance for clinicians to propose the optimal medication regimen.

Pharmacogenomics in clinical practice to prevent risperidone-induced hyperprolactinemia in autism spectrum disorder

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a global challenge that may disrupts family and social life significantly. There is robust evidence for the association of a pharmacokinetic gene variant (e.g., CYP2D6) with risperidone-induced hyperprolactinemia in ASD. Association of a pharmacodynamic gene variant (e.g., DRD2) with risperidone-induced hyperprolactinemia in ASD is also evident from multiple studies. In addition to genetic factors, dose, duration and drug-drug interactions of risperidone might also increase the serum prolactin level. There are several difficulties, such as reimbursement, knowledge and education of healthcare providers, in implementing risperidone pharmacogenomics into clinical practice. However, preparation of national and international pharmacogenomics-based dosing guidelines of risperidone may advance precision medicine of ASD.

Population pharmacokinetics of valproic acid in adult Chinese patients with bipolar disorder

PURPOSE

To develop and validate a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model of valproic acid (VPA) in adult Chinese patients with bipolar disorder, and provide guidance for individualized therapy in this population.

METHODS

A total of 1104 serum concentrations from 272 patients were collected in this study. The data analysis was performed using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach. Covariates included demographic parameters, biological characteristics, and concomitant medications. Bootstrap validation (1000 runs), normalized prediction distribution error (NPDE), and external validation of 50 patients were employed to evaluate the final model.

RESULTS

A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination was developed for VPA extended-release tablets. VPA clearance was significantly influenced by three variables: sex (12% higher in male patients), daily dose (increasing with the 0.13 exponent), and body weight (increasing with the 0.56 exponent). Typical values for the absorption rate constant (K_a), apparent clearance (CL/F), and apparent distribution volume (V/F) for a female patient weighing 70 kg administered VPA 1000 mg/day were 0.18 h^-1, 0.46 L/h, and 12.84 L, respectively. The results of model evaluation indicated a good stable and precise performance of the final model.

CONCLUSIONS

A qualified PPK model of VPA was developed in Chinese patients with bipolar disorder. This model could be used as a suitable tool for the personalization of VPA dosing for bipolar patients.

Antiepileptic drug use and mortality among community-dwelling persons with Alzheimer disease

Objective

To evaluate the risk of death in relation to incident antiepileptic drug (AED) use compared with nonuse in people with Alzheimer disease (AD) through the assessment in terms of duration of use, specific drugs, and main causes of death.

Methods

The MEDALZ (Medication Use and Alzheimer Disease) cohort study includes all Finnish persons who received a clinically verified AD diagnosis (n = 70,718) in 2005–2011. Incident AED users were identified with 1-year washout period. For each incident AED user (n = 5,638), 1 nonuser was matched according to sex, age, and time since AD diagnosis. Analyses were conducted with Cox proportional regression models and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

Results

Nearly 50% discontinued AEDs within 6 months. Compared with nonusers, AED users had an increased relative risk of death (IPTW hazard ratio [HR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12–1.36). This was mainly due to deaths from dementia (IPTW HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.42–1.86). There was no difference in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular deaths (IPTW HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.67–1.44). The overall mortality was highest during the first 90 days of AED use (IPTW HR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.91–3.03). Among users of older AEDs, relative risk of death was greater compared to users of newer AEDs (IPTW HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.52–2.16).

Conclusion

In older vulnerable patients with a cognitive disorder, careful consideration of AED initiation and close adverse events monitoring are needed.

Rhabdomyolysis and Hepatotoxicity From Valproic Acid: Case Reports

Valproic acid (VPA) has been widely used more frequently as its approved indications have been expanded. More and more case reports on rare toxicities have been published in the literature (ie, hepatotoxicities, hyperammonemic encephalopathy, coagulation disorders, pancreatitis, thrombocytopenia). In spite of the long history of VPA, there is a lack of awareness of VPA toxicities among clinicians. We present two cases of a 44-year-old African American female and a 60-year-old Hispanic male taking chronic VPA therapy for psychiatric disorders admitted to the hospital with a combination of hepatotoxicities and acute kidney injury-associated rhabdomyolysis. In both cases, home VPA therapy was continued during hospitalization. Consequently, the female patient deceased and the male patient survived and discharged with continuation of his chronic VPA therapy. In cases of surviving patients, resumption of maintenance VPA upon discharge should be held and alternative therapy should be considered.

Case report: Chlorpromazine and deep venous thrombosis

Purpose

Since the development of antipsychotic drugs in the 1950s, a variety of studies and case reports have been published that suggest an association between exposure to typical antipsychotics and venous thromboembolisms (VTE). Therefore, when starting treatment with antipsychotics, especially low-potency typical antipsychotics and clozapine, health-care providers must account for the patient's existing VTE risk factors.

Design/methodology/approach

In this case report, the authors describe the development of a pulmonary embolism associated with use of chlorpromazine in the treatment of an acute manic episode in a 51-year-old female patient with bipolar disorder type 1.

Findings

The patient was brought to the emergency room by the police on a legal hold for bizarre behaviors at a bus stop, which included incessantly yelling at bystanders. The patient was found to have disorganized thoughts, poor sleep, rapid speech, labile mood, distractibility, auditory hallucinations and grandiose delusions. During the course of her stay, the patient received extensive IM chlorpromazine for extreme agitation, in addition to chlorpromazine 200 mg IM Q8H, which was later decreased to chlorpromazine 100 mg chlorpromazine IM/PO Q8H. On day 4 of the treatment, the patient experienced difficulty breathing, hypoxia and tachycardia and was found to have bilateral expiratory wheezes. CT angiography showed sub-segmental pulmonary embolus and the patient was transferred to MICU service. The patient was then intubated and started on heparin by the medical team. Over the course of the next day, her respiratory distress resolved and the patient was extubated.

Originality/value

It is possible that chlorpromazine may indeed increase VTEs, and there are various physiological postulations regarding the mechanism of action. However, multiple confounding variables existed in the authors' report, including venous stasis and the use of restraints, tobacco and valproic acid. Each of these variables has been shown to increase VTE occurrence. Further controlled studies are necessary to identify the true relationship between antipsychotics and VTEs.

Comedication of Valproic Acid Is Associated With Increased Metabolism of Clozapine

OBJECTIVES

Valproic acid and clozapine are drugs commonly used in the treatment of schizophrenic and schizoaffective disorders. Pharmacokinetic interactions of valproic acid with several drugs are well known, yet results concerning the interaction with clozapine are inconsistent.

METHODS

Steady-state dose-corrected serum concentrations of clozapine and its main metabolite norclozapine were retrospectively analyzed in 45 patients receiving both clozapine and valproic acid. Controls were matched for sex, age, smoking, comedication, and inflammatory response.

RESULTS

The group receiving comedication with valproic acid showed significantly lower median dose-corrected serum concentrations of norclozapine (0.44 [0.27-0.58] (ng/mL)/(mg/d) vs 0.78 [0.60-1.07] (ng/mL)/(mg/d)) as well as metabolite to parent compound ratios (0.40 [0.36-0.47] vs 0.71 [0.58-0.84]) by approximately 44%. Dose-corrected serum concentrations of clozapine were not significantly lower. The effect of valproic acid was independent of sex and smoking.

CONCLUSIONS

Comedication with valproic acid accelerated metabolism of clozapine with predominant effects on the degradation of norclozapine. Therapeutic drug monitoring should be applied to guide individual patient responses upon initiation of comedication.

Prevalence and patterns of anti-epileptic medication prescribing in the treatment of epilepsy in older adults with intellectual disabilities

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of epilepsy is higher in people with intellectual disability (ID) and increases with the degree of ID. Although life expectancy for people with ID is increasing, people with ID coexisting with epilepsy have a higher mortality rate, particularly those who had recent seizures. There have been few observational studies of the prevalence and patterns of anti-epileptic prescribing among older people with ID and epilepsy. The aim of this study was to investigate prevalence and patterns of anti-epileptic prescribing in the treatment of epilepsy in a representative population of older people with ID and epilepsy.

METHODS

This was an observational cross-sectional study from wave 1 (2009/2010) of Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Aging, a nationally representative sample of 753 persons with ID aged between 41 and 90 years. Participants and/or proxies recorded medicines used on a regular basis and reported doctor's diagnosis of epilepsy; medication data were available for 736 (98%). Prescribing of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) for epilepsy in those with a doctor's diagnosis of epilepsy (N = 205) was the primary exposure of interest for this study. Participant exposure to these AEDs was then categorised into AED monotherapy and polytherapy. Participants/carers reported seizure frequency, when epilepsy was last reviewed and which practitioner reviewed epilepsy. In addition, medications that may lower the seizure threshold that were listed in the Maudsley prescribing guidelines in psychiatry were examined.

RESULTS

Of the 736 participants with reported medicines use, 38.9% (n = 287) were exposed to AEDs, and 30.6% (225) had a doctor's diagnosis of epilepsy. Of those with epilepsy (n = 225), 90.9% (n = 205) reported concurrent use of AEDs and epilepsy. Of these 205 participants, 50.3% (n = 103) were exposed to AED polytherapy, and 63 different polytherapy regimes were reported. The most frequently reported AEDs were valproic acid (n = 100, 48.7%), carbamazepine (n = 89, 46.3%) and lamotrigine (n = 57, 27.8%). In total, 13.7% had a concurrent psychotropic, which should be avoided in epilepsy, and 32.6% had a psychotropic where caution is required. Antipsychotics with potential epileptogenic potential accounted for 80% of these medications. Of those with AED polytherapy (n = 103), 29.5% (28) reported being seizure free for the previous 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of epilepsy was high among older people with ID, and half were exposed to two or more AEDs. Despite the use of AED therapy, over half had seizures in the previous 2 years. As the primary goals of optimal AED treatment are to achieve seizure freedom without unacceptable adverse effects, this was not achievable for many older patients with ID and epilepsy. Our findings indicated that people with ID and epilepsy were often exposed to psychotropic medications that may lower the seizure threshold. Regular review of epilepsy and medicines (including medicines that may interact with AEDs or lower the seizure threshold) by multidisciplinary teams working to agreed standards may improve quality of prescribing. Improved exchange of information and coordination of care between specialists and primary care practitioners in line with expert consensus recommendations could bring substantial benefit.

Computer-aided design of magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer nanoparticles for solid-phase extraction and determination of levetiracetam in human plasma

Analytical methods should be accurate and specific to measure plasma drug concentration. Nevertheless, current sample preparation techniques suffer from limitations, including matrix interference and intensive sample preparation. In this study, a novel technique was proposed for the synthesis of a molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) on magnetic Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles (NPs) with uniform core–shell structure. The Fe₃O₄@MIPs NPs were then applied to separate and enrich an antiepileptic drug, levetiracetam, from human plasma. A computational approach was developed to screen the functional monomers and polymerization solvents to provide a suitable design for the synthesized MIP. Different analysis techniques and re-binding experiments were performed to characterize the Fe₃O₄@MIP NPs, as well as to identify optimal conditions for the extraction process. Adsorption isotherms were best fitted to the Langmuir model and adsorption kinetics were modeled with pseudo-second-order kinetics. The Fe₃O₄@MIP NPs showed reasonable adsorption capacity and improved imprinting efficiency. A validated colorimetric assay was introduced as a comparable method to a validated HPLC assay for the quantitation of levetiracetam in plasma in the range of 10–80 μg mL⁻¹ after extraction. The results from the HPLC and colorimetric assays showed good precision (between 1.08% and 9.87%) and recoveries (between 94% and 106%) using the Fe₃O₄@MIP NPs. The limit of detection and limit of quantification were estimated to be 2.58 μg mL⁻¹ and 7.81 μg mL⁻¹, respectively for HPLC assay and 2.32 μg mL⁻¹ and 7.02 μg mL⁻¹, respectively for colorimetric assay. It is believed that synthesized Fe₃O₄@MIP NPs as a sample clean-up technique combined with the proposed assays can be used for determination of levetiracetam in plasma.

A novel molecularly imprinted polymer on Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles was applied to extract antiepileptic drug; levetiracetam from plasma for TDM purposes.

Exploring mechanochemistry to turn organic bio-relevant molecules into metal-organic frameworks: a short review

Mechanochemistry is a powerful and environmentally friendly synthetic technique successfully employed in different fields of synthetic chemistry. Application spans from organic to inorganic chemistry including the synthesis of coordination compounds. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a class of compounds with numerous applications, from which we highlight herein their application in the pharmaceutical field (BioMOFs), whose importance has been growing and is now assuming a relevant and promising domain. The need to find cleaner, greener and more energy and material-efficient synthetic procedures led to the use of mechanochemistry into the synthesis of BioMOFs.

CYP2D6 polymorphisms and their influence on risperidone treatment

Cytochrome P450 enzyme especially CYP2D6 plays a major role in biotransformation. The interindividual variations of treatment response and toxicity are influenced by the polymorphisms of this enzyme. This review emphasizes the effect of CYP2D6 polymorphisms in risperidone treatment in terms of basic knowledge, pharmacogenetics, effectiveness, adverse events, and clinical practice. Although the previous studies showed different results, the effective responses in risperidone treatment depend on the CYP2D6 polymorphisms. Several studies suggested that CYP2D6 polymorphisms were associated with plasma concentration of risperidone, 9-hydroxyrisperidone, and active moiety but did not impact on clinical outcomes. In addition, CYP2D6 poor metabolizer showed more serious adverse events such as weight gain and prolactin than other predicted phenotype groups. The knowledge of pharmacogenomics of CYP2D6 in risperidone treatment is increasing, and it can be used for the development of personalized medication in term of genetic-based dose recommendation. Moreover, the effects of many factors in risperidone treatment are still being investigated. Both the CYP2D6 genotyping and therapeutic drug monitoring are the important steps to complement the genetic-based risperidone treatment.

Valproate for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Many people with schizophrenia do not achieve a satisfactory treatment response with ordinary antipsychotic drug treatment. In these cases, various add-on medications are used, and valproate is one of these.

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether:1. valproate alone is an effective treatment for schizophrenia and schizoaffective psychoses; and2. valproate augmentation of antipsychotic medication is an effective treatment for the same illnesses.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials (July 2002; February 2007; July 2012; March 04, 2016). We also contacted pharmaceutical companies and authors of relevant studies in order to identify further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials comparing valproate to antipsychotics or to placebo (or no intervention), whether as the sole agent or as an adjunct to antipsychotic medication for the treatment of people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychoses.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We independently inspected citations and, where possible, abstracts, ordered papers, and re-inspected and quality-assessed these. At least two review authors independently extracted data. We analysed dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence intervals (CI). We analysed continuous data using mean differences (MD) and their 95% CI. We assessed risk of bias for included studies and used GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) to create a 'Summary of findings' table.

MAIN RESULTS

The 2012 update search identified 19 further relevant studies, most of which were from China. Thus the review currently includes 26 studies with a total of 2184 participants. All trials examined the effectiveness of valproate as an adjunct to antipsychotics. With the exception of two studies, the studies were small, the participants and personnel were not blinded (neither was outcome assessment), and most were short-term and incompletely reported.For this update we prespecified seven main outcomes of interest: clinical response (clinically significant response, aggression/agitation), leaving the study early (acceptability of treatment, overall tolerability), adverse events (sedation, weight gain) and quality of life.Adding valproate to antipsychotic treatment resulted in more clinically significant response than adding placebo to antipsychotic drugs (14 RCTs, n = 1049, RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.47, I2 = 12%, low-quality evidence). However, this effect was removed after excluding open RCTs in a sensitivity analysis. In terms of acceptability of treatment (measured by the number of participants leaving the study early due to any reason) valproate was just as acceptable as placebo (11 RCTs, n = 951, RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.24, I2 = 55%). Also overall tolerability (measured by the number of participants leaving the study early for adverse events) between valproate and placebo was similar (6 RCTs, n = 974, RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.97, I2 = 0).Participants in the valproate group were found to be less aggressive than the control group based on the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (3 RCTs, n = 186, MD -2.55, 95% CI -3.92 to -1.19, I2 = 82%, very low-quality evidence). Participants receiving valproate more frequently experienced sedation (8 RCTs, n = 770, RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.79, I2 = 0, low-quality evidence) but were no more likely to gain weight than those receiving placebo (4 RCTs, n = 427, RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.82, I2 = 0, low-quality evidence). No study reported on the important outcome of quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is limited evidence, based on a number of trials, that the augmentation of antipsychotics with valproate may be effective for overall clinical response, and also for specific symptoms, especially in terms of excitement and aggression. However, this evidence was entirely based on open RCTs. Moreover, valproate was associated with a number of adverse events among which sedation and dizziness appeared significantly more frequently than in the control groups. Further randomised studies which are blinded are necessary before any clear recommendation can be made. Ideally these would focus on people with schizophrenia and aggression, on those with treatment-resistant forms of the illness and on those with schizoaffective disorders.

Concomitant Use of Topiramate Inducing Neutropenia in a Schizophrenic Male Stabilized on Clozapine

This is a case of a 23-year-old African American male with a history of paranoid schizophrenia that developed neutropenia on a clozapine-topiramate therapy. Clozapine had well addressed the patient's psychotic symptoms, while topiramate was used as a weight-lowering agent. The patient had fairly stable leukocyte counts for eight months on clozapine 300 mg and topiramate 100 mg daily. Doubling the dosage of topiramate led to severe neutropenia after two months. Reviewing the patient's laboratory reports showed a gradual decline of neutrophils occurring at a lower dosage, followed by a rapid decline after an increased dosage. In this case, we report that not only did topiramate act as the neutropenic agent, but also it might have done so in a dose-dependent manner.

Understanding depot antipsychotics: an illustrated guide to kinetics

Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics can have considerable advantages over oral medications for the management of patients with schizophrenia. Despite the high prevalence of treatment nonadherence with oral pharmacotherapy, LAI antipsychotics are significantly underutilized in this patient population. The availability of newer LAI antipsychotic preparations combined with a resurgent interest in the use of typical antipsychotics has rekindled awareness of the value of LAI medications. This article is intended to provide a visual understanding of the various kinetic profiles of LAI antipsychotics to facilitate initiation and greater use of these agents.

Pharmacological treatment of psychiatric comorbidity in patients with refractory epilepsy

The purpose of the present study was to describe the use of psychopharmacological drugs for the treatment of a stated or presumed psychiatric comorbid condition in patients with refractory epilepsy and discuss the clinical implications of such treatment. The study was a retrospective descriptive study in patients admitted to the National Center for Epilepsy in Norway based on medication described in medical records. The mean age was 40 years (range: 9-90), and the gender ratio was 56/44% female/male. Psychotropic drugs (antidepressants and antipsychotics) were used to a lower extent than in the general population in Norway. Drugs for ADHD were predominantly used in children. The prevalence of patients treated with psychiatric comedication was 13% (143 of 1139 patients). The patients used two to eight concomitant CNS-active drugs, which calls for the close monitoring of potential pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions and should challenge clinicians to achieve a less complex pharmacotherapy. Psychiatric comorbidity is an important concern in patients with refractory epilepsy and may be undertreated.

Adverse drug reactions to gabapentin and pregabalin: a review of the French pharmacovigilance database

BACKGROUND

Gabapentin and pregabalin are widely used as antineuropathic pain drugs. Their use is also associated with the development of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), mainly neuropsychiatric.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to study 'serious' and/or 'unexpected' adverse reactions associated with pregabalin and gabapentin.

STUDY DESIGN

We studied ADRs reported to the French Pharmacovigilance System occurring between 1995 and 2009.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

For each ADR associated with gabapentin or pregabalin, we noted year, patient age and sex, type of adverse reaction, as well as the imputability score. Reporting rate of serious ADRs for gabapentin and pregabalin was estimated with regard to data of use (obtained from the French National Health Insurance Fund) using the defined daily dose. A global and descriptive analysis of the adverse reactions for each drug is presented. Secondly, details of deaths and ADRs with an imputability score of at least 'probable' or 'likely' were presented.

RESULTS

Overall, 1333 cases were recorded (725 related to gabapentin, 608 related to pregabalin), mainly neuropsychiatric ADRs. Among the 22 deaths recorded, 8 were related to gabapentin in obstetrical situations. Other less well-documented ADRs were identified, such as hepatitis associated with gabapentin and haematological ADRs associated with pregabalin.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed the prevalence of neuropsychiatric ADRs associated with gabapentin or pregabalin. A high rate of death occurred with gabapentin in an obstetrical context. New adverse reactions have been noted, such as haematological or hepatic adverse reactions associated with pregabalin and gabapentin, respectively.

Drug treatment patterns in bipolar disorder: analysis of long-term self-reported data

Background

The objective of this study is to investigate drug treatment patterns in bipolar disorder using daily data from patients who received treatment as usual.

Methods

Patients self-reported the drugs taken daily for about 6 months. Daily drug use and drug combinations were determined for each patient, both by the specific drugs and by medication class. The drug load was calculated for all drugs taken within a medication class.

Results and discussion

Four hundred fifty patients returned a total of 99,895 days of data (mean 222.0 days). The most frequently taken drugs were mood stabilizers. Of the 450 patients, 353 (78.4%) took a stable drug combination for ≥50% of days. The majority of patients were taking polypharmacy, including 75% of those with a stable combination. Only a small number of drugs were commonly taken within each medication class, but there were a large number of unique drug combinations: 52 by medication class and 231 by specific drugs. Eighty percent of patients with a stable combination were taking three or less drugs daily. Patients without a stable combination took drugs but made frequent changes. Taking more than one drug within a medication class greatly increased the drug load.

To summarize, (1) patients were more likely to take a mood stabilizer than any other drug; (2) although most patients were taking polypharmacy, there were no predominant drug regimens even among those taking a stable combination; and (3) most patients with a stable combination take a relatively small number of drugs daily. The wide variation in drug regimens and numerous possible drug combinations suggest that more evidence is needed to optimize treatment of bipolar disorder.

Interactions between antiepileptics and second-generation antipsychotics

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions (DIs) can occur between antiepileptics (AEDs) and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAPs). Some AED and SGAP pharmacodynamic mechanisms are poorly understood. AED-SGAP combinations are used for treating comorbid illnesses or increasing efficacy, particularly in bipolar disorder.

AREAS COVERED

This article provides a comprehensive review of the interactions between antiepileptics and second-generation antipsychotics. The authors cover pharmacokinetic AED-SGAP DI studies, the newest drug pharmacokinetics in addition to the limited pharmacodynamic DI studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Dosing correction factors and measuring SGAP levels can help to compensate for the inductive properties of carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital and primidone. Further studies are needed to establish the clinical relevance of combining: i) AED strong inducers with amisulpride, asenapine, iloperidone, lurasidone and paliperidone; ii) valproate with aripiprazole, asenapine, clozapine and olanzapine; iii) high doses of oxcarbazepine (≥ 1500 mg/day) or topiramate (≥ 400 mg/day) with aripiprazole, lurasidone, quetiapine, risperidone, asenapine and olanzapine. Two pharmacodynamic DIs are beneficial: i) valproate-SGAP combinations may have additive effects in bipolar disorder, ii) combining topiramate or zonisamide with SGAPs may decrease weight gain. Three pharmacodynamic DIs contributing to decreased safety are common: sedation, weight gain and swallowing disturbances. A few AED-SGAP combinations may increase risk for osteoporosis or nausea. Three potentially lethal but rare pharmacodynamic DIs include pancreatitis, agranulocytosis/leukopenia and heat stroke. The authors believe that collaboration is needed from drug agencies and pharmaceutical companies, the clinicians using these combinations, researchers with expertise in meta-analyses, grant agencies, pharmacoepidemiologists and DI pharmacologists for future progression in this field.

Antiepileptic drug interactions - principles and clinical implications

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are widely used as long-term adjunctive therapy or as monotherapy in epilepsy and other indications and consist of a group of drugs that are highly susceptible to drug interactions. The purpose of the present review is to focus upon clinically relevant interactions where AEDs are involved and especially on pharmacokinetic interactions. The older AEDs are susceptible to cause induction (carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone) or inhibition (valproic acid), resulting in a decrease or increase, respectively, in the serum concentration of other AEDs, as well as other drug classes (anticoagulants, oral contraceptives, antidepressants, antipsychotics, antimicrobal drugs, antineoplastic drugs, and immunosupressants). Conversely, the serum concentrations of AEDs may be increased by enzyme inhibitors among antidepressants and antipsychotics, antimicrobal drugs (as macrolides or isoniazid) and decreased by other mechanisms as induction, reduced absorption or excretion (as oral contraceptives, cimetidine, probenicid and antacides). Pharmacokinetic interactions involving newer AEDs include the enzyme inhibitors felbamate, rufinamide, and stiripentol and the inducers oxcarbazepine and topiramate. Lamotrigine is affected by these drugs, older AEDs and other drug classes as oral contraceptives. Individual AED interactions may be divided into three levels depending on the clinical consequences of alterations in serum concentrations. This approach may point to interactions of specific importance, although it should be implemented with caution, as it is not meant to oversimplify fact matters. Level 1 involves serious clinical consequences, and the combination should be avoided. Level 2 usually implies cautiousness and possible dosage adjustments, as the combination may not be possible to avoid. Level 3 refers to interactions where dosage adjustments are usually not necessary. Updated knowledge regarding drug interactions is important to predict the potential for harmful or lacking effects involving AEDs.

Mood stabilizers for patients with bipolar disorder: the state of the art

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a prevalent and disabling condition, often comorbid with other medical and psychiatric conditions and frequently misdiagnosed. International treatment guidelines for BD recommend the use of mood stabilizers - either in monotherapy or in association - as the gold standard in both acute and long-term therapy. Commonly used in the clinical practice of BD, mood stabilizers have represented an evolving field over the last few years. The concept of stabilization, in fact, has been stressed as the ultimate objective of the treatment of BD, given the chronic and recurrent nature of the illness, which accounts for its significant levels of impairment and disability. To date, different compounds are included within the broad class of mood stabilizers, with lithium, anticonvulsants and, more recently, atypical antipsychotics being the most representative agents. This article is aimed at providing an updated review of the available literature in relation to the role of mood stabilizers in BD, with particular emphasis on their mechanism of action, main clinical aspects and specific use in the different phases of BD treatment, according to the most recently published international treatment guidelines.

Characterisation of zuclopenthixol metabolism by in vitro and therapeutic drug monitoring studies

OBJECTIVE

Zuclopenthixol pharmacokinetics is incompletely characterised. We investigated potential interactions mediated through cytochrome P450 enzymes.

METHOD

In vitro, we examined the impact of CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 inhibitors on zuclopenthixol metabolism in microsomes from six human livers. Subsequently, we compared dose-corrected serum zuclopenthixol concentrations in 923 samples from a therapeutic drug monitoring database from patients prescribed oral (n = 490) or injected (n = 423) zuclopenthixol alone or with fluoxetine, paroxetine, levomepromazine or carbamazepine.

RESULTS

In vitro fluoxetine, paroxetine, ketoconazole and quinidine all significantly inhibited zuclopenthixol metabolism. Ketoconazole and quinidine together abolished zuclopenthixol disappearance. Clinically, dose-corrected oral zuclopenthixol serum concentrations increased significantly, after adjustment, by 93%, 78% and 46% during co-treatment with fluoxetine, paroxetine and levomepromazine and decreased 67% with carbamazepine. Carbamazepine caused dose-dependent reductions in the oral zuclopenthixol concentration-dose ratio (P < 0.001), fluoxetine (P < 0.001) and paroxetine (P = 0.011) dose-dependent increases and levomepromazine an increase related to its serum concentration (P < 0.001). Results for injected zuclopenthixol were similar but not all reached statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

The In vitro study suggests zuclopenthixol is metabolised primarily by CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. The clinical study supports this, demonstrating the impact of co-prescribed inhibitors or inducers. Guidelines should incorporate these interactions noting the potential for zuclopenthixol-related toxicity or treatment failure.

Augmentation with pregabalin in schizophrenia

Anxiety is a core symptom of schizophrenia that elicits significant subjective burden of disease and contributes to treatment resistance in schizophrenia. Anxious syndromes might be attributed to incompletely remitted delusions, the negative syndrome, depressive episodes, panic attacks, social phobia, avoidance after hospitalization, and down-tapering of benzodiazepine medication. Pregabalin, an antagonist at the alpha2delta subunit of voltage-gated Ca channels, modulates several neurotransmitter systems and was found to alleviate anxiety in different mental disorders. In schizophrenia, this treatment option has not been evaluated before.Here, we report a case series of 11 schizophrenic patients who had treatment-resistant anxiety and received augmentation with pregabalin. This observational analysis reveals that the strategy was able to significantly reduce scores on the Hamilton anxiety scale; furthermore, we observed improvements of psychotic positive and negative symptoms and mood as assessed by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, and Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia. After augmentation, both a complete discontinuation of concomitant benzodiazepine treatment as well as a dose reduction of antipsychotics could be achieved. We did not observe pharmacokinetic interactions or adverse events.These observations suggest that treating anxious syndromes in schizophrenia with pregabalin can be effective and tolerable. Further investigations should differentiate schizophrenic subsyndromes of anxiety and evaluate benefits and risks of pregabalin in comparison to placebo and active competitors.

Severe laryngeal dystonia in a patient receiving zuclopenthixol "Acuphase" and fluoxetine

OBJECTIVE

Prescribers are warned to be vigilant for potential cytochrome P450 mediated drug interactions; guidelines separately highlight risks of toxicity associated with zuclopenthixol acuphase. We previously examined potential cytochrome P450 interactions with zuclopenthixol and here describe dangerous side effects in a patient receiving zuclopenthixol acuphase and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine at high dose.

METHOD

We present the case of a patient established on fluoxetine 80 mg/day who subsequently received injected zuclopenthixol acuphase 100 mg.

RESULTS

Following zuclopenthixol acuphase administration, dangerous extra-pyramidal side effects were observed, including severe laryngeal dystonia necessitating emergency medical treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations of symptoms of zuclopenthixol toxicity are consistent with a cytochrome P450 2D6/3A4 interaction with fluoxetine. Previous evidence demonstrating this interaction included only patients taking fluoxetine up to 60 mg/day. This case extends the evidence base. In patients taking high dose fluoxetine, we advise marked reductions in the prescribed dose of zuclopenthixol acuphase.

Time to 'get real': preliminary insights into the long-term management of schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

A brief file and medication chart review was undertaken to examine the 'real world' treatment of schizophrenia, with a particular focus on long-term treatment strategies that extend beyond existing evidence-based guidelines.

METHOD

Treatment strategies were identified through an audit of patient files and their medication charts for patients admitted 2-5 years in a non-acute psychiatric hospital.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine file reviews and 20 medication chart audits were conducted. High levels of diagnostic heterogeneity were identified with the presence of psychosis and mood-related diagnoses (primarily schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder) and high rates of comorbidity (86%). Functional impairment, poor insight and high levels of risk were present in most patients. Treatments largely consisted of combination strategies with 75% of patients prescribed two or more antipsychotics and an average of 3.4 psychotropic medications in total. While clozapine was commonly prescribed (65%), this was often in combination with, on average, two other psychotropic agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Notwithstanding the limited sample, these findings provide a valuable glimpse into the management strategies employed in the long-term management of schizophrenia. Evidence-based guidelines are largely of limited value for this cohort that often has complex presentations and further research is urgently needed to provide guidance into management strategies that extend beyond 5 years, with particular emphasis on the utility of medication combinations.

Effect of valproate on olanzapine plasma concentrations in patients with bipolar or schizoaffective disorder

The effect of valproate on the steady-state plasma concentrations of olanzapine was investigated in 18 patients with bipolar or schizoaffective disorder. Additional valproate, at a dose ranging from 600 to 2000 mg/d, was administered for 4 weeks to patients stabilized on olanzapine (5-20 mg/d). During valproate coadministration, mean plasma olanzapine concentrations decreased significantly from 32.9 +/- 9.7 ng/mL at baseline to 27.4 +/- 9.8 ng/mL at week 2 (P = 0.02), and to 26.9 +/- 9.2 ng/mL at week 4 (P = 0.001). Smoking also decreased plasma olanzapine concentrations. Valproate coadministration with olanzapine was well tolerated and no patient showed a worsening of his or her psychopathological condition. These findings indicate that valproate, at doses of up to 2000 mg/d, is associated with a minimal, presumably not clinically significant, decrease in plasma olanzapine concentrations, possibly as a result of induction of olanzapine metabolism. New studies are needed to confirm that valproate could have mild inductive effects.

Augmentation of atypical antipsychotics with valproic acid. An open-label study for most difficult patients with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

Most difficult inpatients with schizophrenia are in serious needs but obviously underrepresented in clinical trials.

METHODS

Very challenging patients received open-label treatment with atypical antipsychotics concurrently augmented with valproic acid. The primary outcome was the newly developed Functional Assessment for Comprehensive Treatment of Schizophrenia (FACT-Sz). Patients improving more than 20 points were classified as responders.

RESULTS

Mean age and illness duration of 28 participants (22 male) were 42 y.o. and 20 years, respectively. They had spent a half of their life admitted after the onset. The average Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) were very severe at 79 and 6.1, respectively, with the baseline Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) of as low as 21. As a result of augmentation, there were nine responders, 12 partial responders, and seven non-responders including only two patients who got worse. The main antipsychotics were mostly either risperidone or olanzapine. Mean maximum oral dose and blood level of valproic acid were 1907 mg and 91.7 microg/ml, respectively. Overall significant improvements whilst to an inadequate degree were noted in clinical parameters. Valproate augmentation was generally well tolerated but serious adverse effects included thrombocytopenia, anaemia and sedation/falls.

CONCLUSIONS

While these preliminary results need to be tested against tenacious monotherapy or polypharmacy involving clozapine, augmenting atypical antipsychotics with valproic acid can be useful for very severe schizophrenia.

Antipsychotic prescribing practices following withdrawal of concomitant carbamazepine

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to examine provider prescribing habits following carbamazepine discontinuation and to assess for the presence of antipsychotic-related adverse drug reactions due to the loss of car-bamazepine-related induction of the cytochrome P450 enzyme (CYP) 3A4 and p-glycoprotein.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patient records from January 2006 through December 2007 at the Veterans Affairs (VA) San Diego Healthcare System was done, which focused on the co-prescription of carbamazepine and a second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic (aripiprazole, quetiapine, risperidone) that is significantly affected by CYP3A4/p-glycoprotein induction. The cases in which carbamazepine was discontinued while the antipsychotic was continued during the 2-year time frame were then analyzed further. Data were collected concerning documentation of antipsychotic-related adverse drug reactions that occurred after carbamazepine was discontinued and prescribers' responses to carbamazepine discontinuation.

RESULTS

Nine patients were identified who had concomitant prescriptions for carbamazepine and a second-generation antipsychotic and who then discontinued carbamazepine. In only one case did the provider initially decrease the dose of the antipsychotic when carbamazepine was discontinued. Two patients experienced akathisia 3 weeks after carbamazepine was discontinued.

CONCLUSIONS

Many providers are not adjusting the dose of second-generation antipsychotics after discontinuation of a CYP3A4/p-glycoprotein inducer, placing patients at risk for adverse drug reactions. In addition to provider education, mechanisms need to be integrated into the current prescription processing software to alert providers of kinetic changes related to medication discontinuation. In addition, when discontinuing carbamazepine in patients who are being concomitantly treated with a second-generation antipsychotic that is a CYP3A4/p-glycoprotein substrate, providers should arrange for patient follow-up 2-4 weeks after carbamazepine discontinuation to evaluate patients for antipsychotic-related adverse drug reactions.

Advantages and disadvantages of combination treatment with antipsychotics ECNP Consensus Meeting, March 2008, Nice

TERMINOLOGY AND PRINCIPLES OF COMBINING ANTIPSYCHOTICS WITH A SECOND MEDICATION: The term "combination" includes virtually all the ways in which one medication may be added to another. The other commonly used terms are "augmentation" which implies an additive effect from adding a second medicine to that obtained from prescribing a first, an "add on" which implies adding on to existing, possibly effective treatment which, for one reason or another, cannot or should not be stopped. The issues that arise in all potential indications are: a) how long it is reasonable to wait to prove insufficiency of response to monotherapy; b) by what criteria that response should be defined; c) how optimal is the dose of the first monotherapy and, therefore, how confident can one be that its lack of effect is due to a truly inadequate response? Before one considers combination treatment, one or more of the following criteria should be met; a) monotherapy has been only partially effective on core symptoms; b) monotherapy has been effective on some concurrent symptoms but not others, for which a further medicine is believed to be required; c) a particular combination might be indicated de novo in some indications; d) The combination could improve tolerability because two compounds may be employed below their individual dose thresholds for side effects. Regulators have been concerned primarily with a and, in principle at least, c above. In clinical practice, the use of combination treatment reflects the often unsatisfactory outcome of treatment with single agents. ANTIPSYCHOTICS IN MANIA: There is good evidence that most antipsychotics tested show efficacy in acute mania when added to lithium or valproate for patients showing no or a partial response to lithium or valproate alone. Conventional 2-armed trial designs could benefit from a third antipsychotic monotherapy arm. In the long term treatment of bipolar disorder, in patients responding acutely to the addition of quetiapine to lithium or valproate, this combination reduces the subsequent risk of relapse to depression, mania or mixed states compared to monotherapy with lithium or valproate. Comparable data is not available for combination with other antipsychotics. ANTIPSYCHOTICS IN MAJOR DEPRESSION: Some atypical antipsychotics have been shown to induce remission when added to an antidepressant (usually a SSRI or SNRI) in unipolar patients in a major depressive episode unresponsive to the antidepressant monotherapy. Refractoriness is defined as at least 6 weeks without meeting an adequate pre-defined treatment response. Long term data is not yet available to support continuing efficacy. SCHIZOPHRENIA: There is only limited evidence to support the combination of two or more antipsychotics in schizophrenia. Any monotherapy should be given at the maximal tolerated dose and at least two antipsychotics of different action/tolerability and clozapine should be given as a monotherapy before a combination is considered. The addition of a high potency D2/3 antagonist to a low potency antagonist like clozapine or quetiapine is the logical combination to treat positive symptoms, although further evidence from well conducted clinical trials is needed. Other mechanisms of action than D2/3 blockade, and hence other combinations might be more relevant for negative, cognitive or affective symptoms. OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER: SSRI monotherapy has moderate overall average benefit in OCD and can take as long as 3 months for benefit to be decided. Antipsychotic addition may be considered in OCD with tic disorder and in refractory OCD. For OCD with poor insight (OCD with "psychotic features"), treatment of choice should be medium to high dose of SSRI, and only in refractory cases, augmentation with antipsychotics might be considered. Augmentation with haloperidol and risperidone was found to be effective (symptom reduction of more than 35%) for patients with tics. For refractory OCD, there is data suggesting a specific role for haloperidol and risperidone as well, and some data with regard to potential therapeutic benefit with olanzapine and quetiapine. ANTIPSYCHOTICS AND ADVERSE EFFECTS IN SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS: Cardio-metabolic risk in patients with severe mental illness and especially when treated with antipsychotic agents are now much better recognized and efforts to ensure improved physical health screening and prevention are becoming established.

Value of therapeutic drug monitoring in epilepsy

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has made it possible to study the individual variations in drug utilization, to reveal noncompliance in patients and for quality assurance aspects. Even if there is a shortage of data from randomized controlled studies concerning the effectiveness of using TDM as an aid to dosage adjustment, experience from nonrandomized investigations and long-lasting clinical experience have shown that TDM of both older and newer AEDs may be of clinical benefit if used appropriately. The main situations for TDM include: after starting treatment to provide a baseline steady-state concentration for further evaluation of an individual therapeutic concentration; after change in drug dosage, in particular when nonlinear kinetics apply; at therapeutic failure to sort out a pharmacokinetic explanation for uncontrolled seizures or side effects; in case of drug interactions; and when pharmacokinetic changes due to physiological or pathological changes are foreseen (e.g., age-dependent conditions [children, elderly], pregnancy, hepatic disease, renal disease or gastrointestinal conditions potentially affecting drug absorption) and change in drug formulation (brand name/generic). Recently, new terminology and definitions have been suggested by the International League Against Epilepsy. The reference range is a range of drug concentrations quoted by laboratories and is not a therapeutic range. Emphasis should be placed on the concept of an individual therapeutic concentration.

Carbamazepine induces bioactivation of cyclophosphamide and thiotepa

PURPOSE

We report a patient with metastatic breast cancer who received three cycles of high-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide [1,000 mg/(m(2) day)], thiotepa (80 mg/(m(2) day) and carboplatin (dose calculated based on modified Calvert formula with 3.25 mg min/ml as daily target AUC) over 4 days, followed by peripheral blood progenitor cell support. During the first two cycles the patient concomitantly used carbamazepine for the treatment of epilepsy. Due to severe nausea and vomiting the patient was unable to ingest carbamazepine; therefore, this was discontinued after the second cycle.

METHODS

Blood samples were drawn on 2 days (day 1 and 2, 3 or 4) of each cycle and plasma levels of cyclophosphamide, its active metabolite 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, thiotepa, its main, active metabolite tepa and carboplatin were determined.

RESULTS

Exposure to 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide and tepa on day 1 was increased in the presence of carbamazepine (58 and 75%, respectively), while exposure to cyclophosphamide and thiotepa was reduced (40 and 43%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Since increased exposure to the active metabolites is associated with an increased risk of toxicity, it is important to be aware of this drug-drug interaction.

Interaction between valproic acid and carbapenem antibiotics

The serum concentration of valproic acid (VPA) in epilepsy patients decreased by the administration of carbapenem antibiotics, such as meropenem, panipenem or imipenem, to a sub-therapeutic level. This review summarized several case reports of this interaction between VPA (1-4 g dose) and carbapenem antibiotics to elucidate the possible mechanisms decreasing VPA concentration by carbapenem antibiotics. Studies to explain the decrease were carried out using rats by the following sites: absorption of VPA in the intestine, glucuronidation in the liver, disposition in blood and renal excretion. In the intestinal absorption site, there are two possible mechanisms: inhibition of the intestinal transporter for VPA absorption by carbapenem antibiotics, and the decrease of beta-glucuronidase supplied from enteric bacteria, which were killed by antibiotics. This is consistent with a view that the decrease of VPA originated from VPA-Glu, relating to entero-hepatic circulation. The second key site is in the liver, because of no decreased in VPA level by carbapenem antibiotics in hepatectomized rats. There are three possible mechanisms in the liver to explain the decreased phenomenon: first, decrease of the UDPGA level by carbapenem antibiotics. UDPGA is a co-factor for UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)-mediated glucuronidation of VPA. Second, the direct activation of UGT by carbapenem antibiotics. This activation was observed after pre-incubation of human liver microsomes with carbapenem antibiotics. Third, the inhibition of beta-glucuronidase in liver by carbapenem antibiotics and the decreased VPA amount liberated from VPA-Glu. The third site is the distribution of VPA in blood (erythrocytes and plasma). Plasma VPA distributed to erythrocytes by the inhibition of transporters (Mrp4), which efflux VPA from erythrocytes to plasma, by carbapenem antibiotics. The increase of renal excretion of VPA as VPA-Glu depends on the increase of VPA-Glu level by UGT. One or a combination of some factors in these mechanisms might relate to the carbapenem-mediated decrease of the plasma VPA level.

The effect of adjunctive mood stabilizers on antipsychotic utilization pattern and health resource utilization for Medicaid enrollees with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Prescribing adjunctive mood stabilizers to manage schizophrenia is prevalent, despite the lack of substantial evidence to support the long-term use of this treatment regimen.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of using adjunctive mood stabilizers on antipsychotic utilization, total health expenditures, inpatient hospitalizations, long-term care stays, and emergency room (ER) visits for patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

Georgia Medicaid claims from 1999 through 2001 were analyzed to identify recipients diagnosed with schizophrenia (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM]: 295. XX). The treatment groups consisted of subjects who received combination therapy of mood stabilizers and antipsychotics (including both atypical and typical medications), while the comparison group consisted of subjects who were on antipsychotic medications without exposure to the mood stabilizers under investigation. Four treatment groups (valproate, lithium, carbamazepine, and combination mood stabilizer therapy) were formed based on the mood stabilizers patient received. Differences in annual health care use and expenditures were estimated between propensity score matched treatment and comparison groups controlling for comorbidity, prior utilization, demographic, and health provider specialty.

RESULTS

During the 1-year observation period, subjects in treatment groups filled an average of 200-days supply of adjunctive mood stabilizers. These adjunctive mood stabilizer recipients had significantly longer antipsychotic treatment durations than the subjects who did not have exposure to mood stabilizers (valproate + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: 56.47 days, p < 0.0001; lithium + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: 90.25 days, p < 0.0001; carbamazepine + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: 41.27 days, p = 0.0439; multiple mood stabilizers + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: 83.14 days, p < 0.0001). The intensive pharmacotherapy associated with treatment groups resulted in $900-$1300 higher pharmacy costs than the comparison groups (valproate + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: $1218.43, p < 0.0001; lithium + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: $985.79, p = 0.0015; carbamazepine + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: $911.63, p = 0.0497; multiple mood stabilizers + antipsychotic vs. antipsychotic only, net difference: $1281.91, p < 0.0047). However, there were no statistically significant differences for total health expenditures, hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and nursing home admissions between propensity-matched treatment and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in health care costs or utilization of ER, long-term care, and inpatient services between schizophrenia patients who did and did not receive adjunctive mood stabilizer; however, longer antipsychotic treatment durations were observed in patients receiving adjunctive mood stabilizers. Interpretation of these results is limited by the unknown selection bias between the treatment and the comparison groups and the relatively small number of patients in some treatment groups. The development of a better-controlled study to further evaluate this treatment regimen is warranted.

Metabolic drug interactions with newer antipsychotics: a comparative review

Newer antipsychotics introduced in clinical practice in recent years include clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, sertindole, ziprasidone, aripiprazole and amisulpride. These agents are subject to drug-drug interactions with other psychotropic agents or with medications used in the treatment of concomitant physical illnesses. Most pharmacokinetic interactions with newer antipsychotics occur at the metabolic level and usually involve changes in the activity of the major drug-metabolizing enzymes involved in their biotransformation, i.e. the cytochrome P450 (CYP) monooxygenases and/or uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT). Clozapine is metabolized primarily by CYP1A2, with additional contribution by other CYP isoforms. Risperidone is metabolized primarily by CYP2D6 and, to a lesser extent, CYP3A4. Olanzapine undergoes both direct conjugation and CYP1A2-mediated oxidation. Quetiapine is metabolized by CYP3A4, while sertindole and aripiprazole are metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. Ziprasidone pathways include aldehyde oxidase-mediated reduction and CYP3A4-mediated oxidation. Amisulpride is primarily excreted in the urine and undergoes relatively little metabolism. While novel antipsychotics are unlikely to interfere with the elimination of other drugs, co-administration of inhibitors or inducers of the major enzymes responsible for their metabolism may modify their plasma concentrations, leading to potentially significant effects. Most documented metabolic interactions involve antidepressant and anti-epileptic drugs. Of a particular clinical significance is the interaction between fluvoxamine, a potent CYP1A2 inhibitor, and clozapine. Differences in the interaction potential among the novel antipsychotics currently available may be predicted based on their metabolic pathways. The clinical relevance of these interactions should be interpreted in relation to the relative width of their therapeutic index. Avoidance of unnecessary polypharmacy, knowledge of the interaction profiles of individual agents, and careful individualization of dosage based on close evaluation of clinical response and, possibly, plasma drug concentrations are essential to prevent and minimize potentially adverse drug interactions in patients receiving newer antipsychotics.

Effect of Topiramate on Plasma Concentrations of Clozapine, Olanzapine, Risperidone, and Quetiapine in Patients With Psychotic Disorders

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of topiramate on the steady-state plasma concentrations of the second-generation antipsychotics--clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and quetiapine--in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.

METHODS

Thirty-eight outpatients on long-term treatment with clozapine (250-500 mg/d, n = 10), olanzapine (10-20 mg/d, n = 12), risperidone (3-6 mg/d, n = 9), or quetiapine (200-600 mg/d, n = 7) received adjunctive topiramate, gradually titrated up to a final dosage of 200 mg/d for 6 weeks. Pharmacokinetic assessments were made at baseline and at the end of treatment weeks 4 and 8 at topiramate dosages of 100 and 200 mg/d, respectively.

RESULTS

Plasma concentrations of clozapine and its metabolite (norclozapine), olanzapine, risperidone and its metabolite (9-hydroxy-risperidone), and quetiapine were not significantly modified during concomitant administration of topiramate. Adjunctive topiramate therapy was well tolerated in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that topiramate, at the dosages recommended for use as a mood stabilizer, does not affect the plasma levels of the new antipsychotics-clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and quetiapine.

Therapeutic monitoring of valproate in psychiatry: how far have we progressed?

Valproate (VPA) is a well-established anticonvulsant drug that has found increasing use as a psychotherapeutic agent. The drug is currently used in the management of bipolar, depressive, anxiety, and psychotic disorders; alcohol withdrawal and dependence; agitation associated with dementia; and borderline personality disorder. Despite such widespread use, studies focusing on the concentration-response relationship of VPA in psychiatry are limited. This article examines the rationale for therapeutic monitoring of VPA in psychiatric disorders and reviews reports of VPA concentrations measured during efficacy studies of this drug in psychiatry. Most studies have been open-labeled and uncontrolled, and have not placed the determination of a target concentration range as a primary objective. Furthermore, most studies have used the therapeutic range (50-100 mg/L) for seizure disorders to guide dosage in the psychiatric disorders, although study outcomes have suggested the need to redefine a threshold concentration in the different psychiatric conditions. With the increasing popularity of VPA as a psychotropic agent, it is clear that further investigation of the plasma concentration range associated with efficacy in psychiatric conditions is warranted.

Effect of Adjunctive Lamotrigine Treatment on the Plasma Concentrations of Clozapine, Risperidone and Olanzapine in Patients With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder

The effect of lamotrigine on the steady-state plasma concentrations of the atypical antipsychotics clozapine, olanzapine, and risperidone was investigated in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder stabilized on chronic treatment with clozapine (200-500 mg/day; n = 11), risperidone (3-6 mg/day; n = 10) or olanzapine (10-20 mg/day; n = 14)). Lamotrigine was titrated up to a final dosage of 200 mg/day over 8 weeks, and pharmacokinetic assessments were made at baseline and during treatment weeks 6 and 10, at lamotrigine dosages of 100 and 200 mg/day respectively. The plasma concentrations of clozapine, norclozapine, risperidone, and 9-hydroxy-risperidone did not change significantly during treatment with lamotrigine. The mean plasma concentrations of olanzapine were 31 +/- 7 ng/mL at baseline, 32 +/- 7 ng/mL at week 6, and 36 +/- 9 ng/mL at week 10, the difference between week 10 and baseline being statistically significant (P < 0.05). Adjunctive lamotrigine therapy was well tolerated in all groups. These findings indicate that lamotrigine, at the dosages recommended for use as a mood stabilizer, does not affect the plasma levels of clozapine, risperidone, and their active metabolites. The modest elevation in plasma olanzapine concentration, possibly due to inhibition of UGT1A4-mediated olanzapine glucuronidation, is unlikely to be of clinical significance.