Detection of Drug-Induced Thrombocytopenia Signals in Children Using Routine Electronic Medical Records

Background: Drug-induced thrombocytopenia (DITP) is a severe adverse reaction and a significantly under-recognized clinical problem in children. However, for post-marketing pharmacovigilance purposes, detection of DITP signals is crucial. This study aimed to develop a signal detection model for DITP using the pediatric electronic medical records (EMR) data.

Methods: This study used the electronic medical records collected at Beijing Children’s Hospital between 2009 and 2020. A two-stage modeling method was developed to detect the signal of DITP. In the first stage, we calculated the crude incidence by mining cases of thrombocytopenia to select the potential suspected drugs. In the second stage, we constructed propensity score–matched retrospective cohorts of specific screened drugs from the first stage and estimated the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using conditional logistic regression models. The novelty of the signal was assessed by current evidence.

Results: In the study, from a total of 839 drugs, 21 drugs were initially screened as potentially inducing thrombocytopenia. In total, we identified 18 positive DITP associations. Of these, potential DITP risk of nystatin (OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.37–2.22) and latamoxef sodium (OR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.38–1.88) were two new DITP signals in both children and adults. Six associations between thrombocytopenia and drugs including imipenem (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.16–2.45), teicoplanin (OR: 4.75, 95% CI: 3.33–6.78), fusidic acid (OR: 2.81, 95% CI: 2.06–3.86), ceftizoxime sodium (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.36–2.45), ceftazidime (OR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.58–2.95), and cefepime (OR: 5.06, 95% CI: 3.77–6.78) were considered as new signals in children.

Conclusion: This study developed a two-stage algorithm to detect safety signals of DITP and found eighteen positive signals of DITP, including six new signals in a pediatric population. This method is a promising tool for pharmacovigilance based on EMR data.

Validity of diagnostic codes and laboratory measurements to identify patients with idiopathic acute liver injury in a hospital database

PURPOSE

The development and validation of algorithms to identify cases of idiopathic acute liver injury (ALI) are essential to facilitate epidemiologic studies on drug-induced liver injury. The aim of this study is to determine the ability of diagnostic codes and laboratory measurements to identify idiopathic ALI cases.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional validation study, patients were selected from the hospital-based Utrecht Patient Oriented Database between 2008 and 2010. Patients were identified using (I) algorithms based on ICD-9-CM codes indicative of idiopathic ALI combined with sets of liver enzyme values (ALT > 2× upper limit of normal (ULN); AST > 1ULN + AP > 1ULN + bilirubin > 1ULN; ALT > 3ULN; ALT > 3ULN + bilirubin > 2ULN; ALT > 10ULN) and (II) algorithms based on solely liver enzyme values (ALT > 3ULN + bilirubin > 2ULN; ALT > 10ULN). Hospital medical records were reviewed to confirm final diagnosis. The positive predictive value (PPV) of each algorithm was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 707 cases of ALI were identified. After medical review 194 (27%) patients had confirmed idiopathic ALI. The PPV for (I) algorithms with an ICD-9-CM code as well as abnormal tests ranged from 32% (13/41) to 48% (43/90) with the highest PPV found with ALT > 2ULN. The PPV for (II) algorithms with liver test abnormalities was maximally 26% (150/571).

CONCLUSIONS

The algorithm based on ICD-9-CM codes indicative of ALI combined with abnormal liver-related laboratory tests is the most efficient algorithm for identifying idiopathic ALI cases. However, cases were missed using this algorithm, because not all ALI cases had been assigned the relevant diagnostic codes in daily practice.

Monovalent H1N1 influenza vaccine safety in pregnant women, risks for acute adverse events

OBJECTIVE

To assess risks for acute adverse events and pregnancy complications in pregnant women following monovalent 2009 H1N1 inactivated influenza (MIV) vaccination.

METHODS

Within the Vaccine Safety Datalink, we compared rates of pre-specified medically attended events (MAE) occurring within 42 days of MIV vaccination to those occurring in matched cohorts that at the same gestational age were either unvaccinated or received seasonal trivalent inactivated influenza (TIV) vaccine. Using generalized estimating equation method, with a Poisson distribution and log link, we calculated adjusted incident rate ratios (AIRR).

RESULTS

Among 9349 women receiving MIV in any trimester, only one MAE occurred 0-3 days following MIV, an allergic reaction. No cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome, Bell's palsy, or transverse myelitis occurred 1-42 days after MIV. Compared to women receiving TIV and to unvaccinated women, risks for acute MAEs were not increased following MIV for any outcome. Hyperemesis was the most common adverse event in the MIV, TIV, and unvaccinated groups, occurring at a rate of about 4% over a 42-day period in all groups. Over a 42-day window, among all groups, incident gestational diabetes occurred at a rate of 3% and thrombocytopenia occurred at a rate of approximately 0.3%. Among women receiving MIV during pregnancy, increased risks for these and other less common obstetric events were not detected.

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of pregnant women no acute safety signals were identified within 6 weeks of receipt of MIV.

Identifying drugs that cause acute thrombocytopenia: an analysis using 3 distinct methods

Drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia (DITP) is often suspected in patients with acute thrombocytopenia unexplained by other causes, but documenting that a drug is the cause of thrombocytopenia can be challenging. To provide a resource for diagnosis of DITP and for drug safety surveillance, we analyzed 3 distinct methods for identifying drugs that may cause thrombocytopenia. (1) Published case reports of DITP have described 253 drugs suspected of causing thrombocytopenia; using defined clinical criteria, 87 (34%) were identified with evidence that the drug caused thrombocytopenia. (2) Serum samples from patients with suspected DITP were tested for 202 drugs; drug-dependent, platelet-reactive antibodies were identified for 67 drugs (33%). (3) The Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System database was searched for drugs associated with thrombocytopenia by use of data mining algorithms; 1444 drugs had at least 1 report associated with thrombocytopenia, and 573 (40%) drugs demonstrated a statistically distinctive reporting association with thrombocytopenia. Among 1468 drugs suspected of causing thrombocytopenia, 102 were evaluated by all 3 methods, and 23 of these 102 drugs had evidence for an association with thrombocytopenia by all 3 methods. Multiple methods, each with a distinct perspective, can contribute to the identification of drugs that can cause thrombocytopenia.